Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

TRANSPO NOTES (based on Atty.

Padilla’s Syllabus)

5.2 Tatad v Garcia, Jr

5.3 Registered Owner Rule


PART I - COMMON CARRIERS 5.3.1 Gelisan v Alday
5.3.2 Benedicto v IAC
5.3.3 Erezo v Jepte

CHAPTER I – DEFINITION AND CONCEPT OF COMMON CARRIER 5.4 “Kabit System”


5.4.1 Santos v Sibug
5.4.2 Lita Enterprises Inc v IAC
1. Article 1732, Civil Code; Broad Concept 5.4.3 Teja Marketing v IAC
1.1 De Guzman v CA 5.4.4 Lim v CA
1.2 Cruz v Sun Holidays Inc
1.3 First Phil Industrial Corp v CA 5.5 Boundary System
1.4 Calvo v UCPB General Insurance 5.5.1 Magboo v Bernardo
1.5 Asia Lighterage and Shipping, Inc. v CA 5.5.2 Sps. Hernandez v Sps. Dolor
1.6 Asian Termininals Inc. v Daehan Fire and Marine Insurance Co
6. Governing Law on Common Carriers
1.7 Sps Perena v Sps Zarate 6.1 Applicable Laws
6.2 Conflicts Rule (Art 1753, NCC)
2. Characteristics; Test 6.3 Eastern Shipping Lines v IAC
2.1 Fisher v Yangco Steamship 6.4 Nat’l Dev’t Co v CA
2.2 US v Quinajon
2.3 Loadstar Shipping Co v CA 7. Obligations of Common Carrier, in General
2.4 Nat’l Steel Crop v CA
2.5 Certificate of Public Convenience (De Guzman v CA) 7.1 Commencement
2.6 Ownership of Vehicle Used as Carrier
2.6.1 Registered Owner Rule (see 5) 7.2 Duty to Serve; Exceptions
2.6.2 Cebu Salvage Corp v Ph Home Assurance Corp 7.2.1 Int’l Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code
2.6.3 Nonvessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC) 7.2.2 MARINA Circular No. 1 Series 2008 (Carriage of Dangerous Goods in Domestic Trade)

3. Distinguished from Private Carrier 7.3 Duty to Deliver


3.1 Planters Products Inc v CA 7.3.1 Actual Delivery v Constructive Delivery
3.2 San Pablo v Pantranco 7.3.2 Code of Commerce provisions
3.3 Limited Clientele 7.3.3 Where and to Whom Delivered
3.3.1 Ph American General Insurance Co v PKS 7.3.3.1 Place
3.3.2 FGU Insurance Corp v GP Sarmiento Trucking Corp 7.3.3.2 Consignee
3.4 Line Service v Tramp Service
7.4 Duty to Exercise Extraordinary Diligence
4. Contract of Carriage Distinguished from other Transactions
4.1 Towage (Baer Senior & Co v La Compania Maritima) 8. Perfection of Contract of Common Carriage
4.2 Stevedoring (Mindanao Terminal and Brokerage Service Inc v Phoenix Assurance Company) 8.1 Aspects of Contract of Carriage
4.3 Arraste/Terminal Operator (Asian Terminals Inc v Daehan Fire and Marine Insurance Co; 8.1.1 British Airways Inc. v CA
Asian Terminal Inc v First Lepanto-Taisho Insurance Corp) 8.2 Carriage of Goods
4.4 Freight Forwarding (Unsworth Transport International Phils Inc v CA) 8.3 Carriage of Passengers
4.5 Travel Agency (Crisostomo v CA) 8.3.1 Manay, Jr. v Cebu Air, Inc
4.6 Transportation Network Companies (TNC) v Transporttation Network Vehicle Service (TNVS) 8.3.2 Ramos v China Southern Airlines Co
(LTFRB Memo Circular 2015-015)

5. Government Regulation of Common Carrier’s Business; Public Policies


5.1 Public Interest Doctrine (KMU Labor Center v Garcia)
1

Вам также может понравиться