Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.pp.okstate.edu/arch
Why Not ‘Business as Usual’
‘Business as usual’ does not result in
p
optimized buildingg design
g and construction.
I
Integrated Design & Construction
dD i &C i
“Interaction
Interaction among all building disciplines,
disciplines
from earliest concept development
throughout the building life cycle,
cycle in order
to achieve integration of design efforts and
operation of the total building.
building ”
‐ ASHRAE Technical Committee 7.01 –Integrated Building Design
Integrated Building Design &
Construction Process
Construction Process
● Began 1993
● Initially, called the C2000 program, a small Canadian
Initially called the C2000 program a small Canadian
demonstration program for:
‐ High‐performance buildings and the technical
requirements of:
requirements of:
‐ Energy performance
‐ Environmental impacts
‐ Indoor environment
Indoor environment
‐ Functionality and a range of other related parameters
● The C‐2000 process is now called the Integrated Design
Process (IDP) as was further developed by Busby
Process (IDP), as was further developed by Busby
Perkins+Will for the BC Green Building Roundtable, and
published in 2007
● A&E has renamed IDP to be Integrated Building Design
has renamed IDP to be Integrated Building Design
& Construction to include all aspects of a building
project from conception to in‐life use (life cycle)
Integrated Building Design &
Construction Process
Construction Process
Cost effective buildings require that the
C t ff ti b ildi i th t th
project team is optimized by including the
entire building team in the design process,
ti b ildi t i th d i
optimizing their relationship to one
another and collaborating on what must
th d ll b ti h t t
be done to balance the needs of each team
member against all project goals
b i t ll j t l.
Integrated Building Design &
Construction Process
Construction Process
● Frank Lloyd Wright, in his 1939 book An
O
Organic Architecture, referred to this
i A hit t f d t thi
process as "organic design"—he used the
phrase to refer to the integral relationship in
good architecture between the parts and the
good architecture between the parts and the
whole—setting out the architect's obligation
to assure consistency throughout the project
and at every level of detail.
and at every level of detail.
● IDP extends Frank Loyd Wright’s concept to
include not only integration between the
parts and the whole of the building, itself,
parts and the whole of the building, itself,
but also integration of the various entities
that have a vested interest in the project,
from initial identification of need through
construction, and then into operation and
usage.
Integrated Building Design &
Construction Process
Construction Process
Traditional Process
Architect Board of Regents
Adjacencies
A&E Program Coordr
City
Risk Mgmt / Insurance
Space Plng Committee
Internal Auditing
Design
AHJ/SFMO
Consultants
A&E Services
Sustainable Design
Commissioning Agent
A&E Const Mgmt
Construction
C t ti A&E E i
A&E Engineers
Management Inspection Services
Stds/Guidelines
PP Director
Inspection
Contractor Services
Who is In Charge ‐ Traditional
My design, my Construction is my name, What a bunch of morons.
plans, my project! Construction is my game. Has anybody looked at the
I’m in charge! I’m in charge! plans, specs, and codes?
My money, If you didn’t want
the inside conditions Plans! I don’t
my program. need no stinking
I’m
I m the user.
the user. to be different than
outdoors, you plans!
plans! Just let
Just let
I’m in me build it!
charge! wouldn’t need a
building
Construction
Owner Architect Engineer Contractor Inspector
Manager
Organization‐ Traditional
(Been There, Done That)
Lanman
Library
CEAT
John T
Hudgins
EHS
McKee Academics
Business Weaver
McLafferty Parking
A&S
McConaghy
Robinson
Marketing
Telecom
Jensen
FACP
Casteel
SU
Burri John H
Jafek
McDonald
Byram
Boles
Armijo
Grimes
CASNR
Peters
VMTH
Brooks
Cyntergy
Reed
Cobb
Nero
F+S+B
McIntire
Wallace
Holmes
H&V
Evans
Oliver
Watson Polak
Organization‐ Capital Projects Manual
(Been There Done That)
(Been There, Done That)
OWNER
(College)
Lines of Reporting
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Lines of Indirect Contact
ARCHITECTURE SERVICES IS THE
PROGRAM MANAGER, THE OWNER’S
AGENT
ARCHITECTURAL AND A/E SEREVICES IS OSU ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING A&E PROGRAM
COORDINATOR & ENGINEERING SERVICES
SERVICES
(Owner’s Agent)
SPECIALTY COTRACTOR
ARCHITECT
CONSULTANTS & OR
ENGINEERS CM@RISK
Finish Pre‐
Carpentry Construction Cost General
Services Estimator Work
(CM@Risk)
OTHER OTHER
TRADE TRADE
Site and/or
/ Structural Mechanical Electrical Plumbingg
Foundation
Organization‐ Small Projects Manual
(Doing It But Could Be Better)
(Doing It But Could Be Better)
Integrated Project Process
● Is not as linear as a traditional
process Architectural, Engineering &
● It is a more iterative process Interior Design
that provides:
- Additional flexibility and
dynamism
- Engages all team members
- There is scope for ongoing
learning and the capacity to
address emergent features Project
and strategies Team
Conventional Project Process Integrated Project Process
Involves team members only when
Involves team members only when Inclusive from the outset
Inclusive from the outset
essential
More decisions made by fewer people Iterative process
Linear process Whole‐Systems thinking
Systems often considered in isolation Allows for full optimization
Diminishing opportunity for synergies Emphasis on up‐front costs
Emphasis on up‐front
Emphasis on up front costs
costs Life‐cycle
Life cycle costing
costing
Typically finished when construction is Process continues through post‐
completed occupancy
Integrated Team Organization
More Collaboration Is Required Using
Integrated Design & Construction
Integrated Design & Construction
More Collaboration with Consultants & Users
More Inter‐Office Collaboration
More Collaboration Meetings
More Collaboration Is Required
(W k Fl Di
(Work Flow Diagram)
)
More Front‐End Time = Better Design
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Overall Project Flow
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
LEED
Assessment
CORE PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
• Client and Facility/Student
y User Representative(s)
( )
• Facilities Manager/Building Operator (maintenance and operations)
• LEED-AP
• Design Team
• Architect
• Structural Engineer
• Mechanical Engineer with expertise in:
• Simulation: energy modeling, thermal comfort analysis, and/ or
CFD simulations.
simulations
• Energy analysis: an energy engineer and/or bioclimatic
engineer may be required in order to cover the necessary areas
of expertise, such as: passive solar design, renewable energy
t h l i
technologies, and
d hybrid–tech
h b id t h strategies.
t t i
• Electrical Engineer
• Civil Engineer with expertise in: stormwater, groundwater,
rainwater, and/or wastewater systems
• Landscape Architect
• A&E Construction Manager
• A&E Inspection Services
• Commissioning g Agent
g (building
( g systems
y & envelope)
p )
• Cost Consultant (with experience in life-cycle costing)
• CMAR Construction
• Administrative Assistants
Process Activities & Deliverables
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Process Activities & Deliverables Aids
Integrated Design & Construction
Integrated Design & Construction
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Purpose: The Memorandum of Understanding’s purpose is to provide guidance,
define responsibilities, and establish procedures regarding design and construction
management for a specific project.
project Delineating the responsibilities of each agency /
organization will enable a system to be provided that meets the needs of the user
on time and within budget.
•The List of Rolls and Responsibilities may be attached to the MOU to further clarify
the responsibilities of each agency/organization. The generic list of Roles and
Responsibilities will be modified to be project specific.
•The Client/Owner, if an A&M College, will attach a copy of their Purchase Order
(PO) for the services described in the MOU. OSU System colleges are required to
list a valid Account Number within the initiating Project Request form.
•Changes in scope, construction amount, schedule, and fees made after the MOU
has
as been
bee executed
e ecuted shall
s a be eenumerated
u e ated a
and
deexecuted
ecuted via
a tthe
e OSU Architectural
c tectu a &
Engineering Services’ Project Change Request form, which follows on the next
page of this Manual.
Project Request Form Memorandum of Integrated Design Process Whole Building Design
Capital Projects Manual Understanding Roadmap Guide
<$2 000 000 const.
<$2,000,000 t costt Capital Projects Manual http://www.greenbuildingsbc.com/ http://www wbdg org/ Capital
http://www.wbdg.org/
>$2,000,000 const. cost Portals/0/docs/IDP-FINAL.pdf
Process Activities & Deliverables Aids
Integrated Design & Construction
Integrated Design & Construction
Additional Aids:
● Inspection Services Requirements: Building Code & Standards
Program – G:/ Misc/ Building Inspector/Building Codes Stds Program
Updated 7 30 09.doc
● A&E Sustainability Website:
Sustainability Presentation – Overview
Sustainability for Small Projects Presentation
LEED-NC Checklist
LEED-NC Rating Booklet
Green Globes vs LEED Comparison
Building Energy & Environment Standard 18115
Sustainability for Small Projects Standard 18130
Building System Commissioning Presentation
Building Envelope Commissioning Presentation
Labs 21
Team Roles by Phase
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Team Roles by Phase
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Team Roles by Phase (Cont)
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Team Roles by Phase (Cont)
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Team Roles by Phase (Cont)
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Team Roles by Phase (Cont)
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Using Integrated Design & Construction
Integrated Building Design & Construction
How Do We Begin?
How Do We Begin?
● Pre-Design Visioning Meeting - Determine
basic g
goals and needs, discuss p prior
involvement by students and staff, academic
needs, student needs, analyze space
requirement issues, the constraints and
opportunities of the proposed site, funding and
cost restraints vs. desires.
● Programming Charrette - An open public
meeting to solicit the values, vision, and needs
of the stakeholders, focused on producing a
feasible plan with minimal rework .
- A multidisciplinary charrette team, consists off
the sponsor staff, design and construction
team, key design consultants, and
stakeholders – those being anyone who can
approve, promote or block the project as well
as anyone directly affected by the outcomes
Integrated Building Design & Construction Process
is a BETTER Process
is a BETTER
Questions &
Discussion
Integrated Building Design & Construction Process
is a BETTER Process
is a BETTER
THANK YOU
THANK YOU