Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
Calculation of return of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
1752.00
755.00
462.00
603.00
521.54
2
CALCULATION OF RETURN OF AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
Year Beginning Ending Dividend(Rs)
price(Rs) price(Rs)
898.00
1534
3
CALCULATION OF RETURN OF AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
Year Beginning Ending Dividend(Rs)
price(Rs) price(Rs)
598..45
1309
363
391.00
4
Calculation of return of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
Year Beginning Ending Dividend(Rs)
price(Rs) price(Rs)
1345.05
5
Calculation of standard deviation of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
_ _ _
Year Return (R) R R-R ( R-R )2
2013-2014 -55.6 -9.482 -46.14 2146.86992
2014-2015 -37.96 -9.482 -28.48 810.996484
2015-2016 32.23 -9.482 41.714 1739.89094
2016-2017 -13.5 -9.482 -2.018 4.072324
2017-2018 25.42 -9.482 34.902 1418.1696
-47.41 5899.97928
_
Average (R) = R = -47.41 = -9.48
N 5
_
Variance = 1/n-1 (R-R)2
= 1 (5899.97)
4
= 70.24
6
Calculation of standard deviation of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
_ _ _
Year Return R R-R ( R-R )2
(R)
2013-2014 54.23 -7.744 61.974 3840
2014-2015 -75.95 -7.744 -68.206 4652
2015-2016 41.09 -7.744 48.834 2384
2016-2017 -43.44 -7.744 -35.696 1474
2017-2018 -16.65 -7.744 -6.906 47.692
-38.72 14197.692
_
Average (R) = R = -38.72 = -7.744
N 5
_
Variance = 1/n-1 (R-R)2
= 1 (14197.692)
4
=55.22
7
Calculation of standard deviation of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
_ _ _
Year Return (R) R R-R ( R-R )2
2013-2014 85.52 10.18 75.34 5676
2014-2015 16.35 10.18 4.17 17.39
2015-2016 -70.24 10.18 -80.42 6467
2016-2017 10.27 10.18 0.09 0.0081
2017-2018 10.99 10.18 0.81 0.6561
50.89 14181
_
Average (R) = R = 50.89 = 10.18
N 5
Variance = 1 (R-R) 2
n-1
= 1 (14181)
4
= 55.15
8
Calculation of standard deviation of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
_ _ _
Year Return R R-R ( R-R )2
(R)
2013-2014 149.16 48.175 80.965 6555.3
2014-2015 2.77 48.175 -45.405 2061.6
2015-2016 76.34 48.175 28.185 793.3
2016-2017 31.9 48.175 -18.275 264.9
2017-2018 0.726 48.175 -47.449 2251.4
240.876 13926.5
__
Average R = R
N
= 240.876 = 48.175
5
__
Variance = 1 (R-R) 2
N-1
= 1 (13926.5)
4
= 54.6
9
Correlation between AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
DEVIATION 0F DEVIATION OF COMBINED
Year AVILA LIFE RB-RB DEVIATION
INSURENCE
___
RA-RA
2013-2014 61.974 75.34 4669.14
2014-2015 -68.206 4.17 -284.42
2015-2016 48.834 -80.42 -3927.23
2016-2017 -35.696 0.09 -3.215
2017-2018 -6.906 0.81 -5.59
448.667
n
Co-variance(COVAB )=1/n (RA-RA) (RB-RB)
t=1
Co-variance(COVAB )=1/5 448.667
= 89.7334
Correlation – Coefficient (PAB) = COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
(55.22)(55.15)
=0.0295
10
Correlation between AVILA LIFE INSURENCE&AVILA LIFE
INSURENCE
= 0.354
11
Correlation between AVILA LIFE
INSURENCE&BAJAJ
DEVIATION OF DEVIATION COMBINED
AVILA LIFE DEVIATION
Year
INSURENCE ___ ___
___ (RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
RA-RA
2013-2014 61.974 80.965 5017.72
2014-2015 -68.206 -45.405 3096.90
2015-2016 48.834 28.185 1575.41
2016-2017 -35.696 -18.275 580.95
2017-2018 -6.906 -47.449 327.68
10398.70
n
Co-variance(COVAB )=1/n (RA-RA) (RB-RB)
t=1
Co-variance(COVAB )=1/5 (10398.70)
=2079.74
(Std. A) (Std. B)
= 2079.74
(55.22)(54.60)
= 0.690
12
STANDARD DEVIATION
COMPANY STANDARED DEVIATION
BAJAJ 54.60
AVILA LIFE 55.15
INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 70.24
INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 55.22
INSURENCE
AVERAGE
COMPANY AVERAGE
BAJAJ 48.175
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE 10.18
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE -9.45
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE -7.744
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
COMPANY R
BAJAJAUTO&AVILA LIFE 0.605
INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 0.0295
INSURENCE&AVILA LIFE
INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 0.354
INSURENCE&AVILA LIFE
INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 0.690
INSURENCE&BAJAJ
13
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
Formula:
Xa = 0.4905
Xb = 0.5095
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE&AVILA LIFE INSURENCE:
Formula:
pab = 0.0295
X b = 0.50084
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
pab = 0.605
Xa = 1.6206
X b = -0.6206
15
Two Portfolios Correlat COMPAN COMPAN PORTFOL POR
ion Y Xa Y Xb IO TFO
Coeffici RETURN LO
ent Rp RISK
σp
ICICI&HDFC 0.5206 0.8199 ..0.1801 136.24 31.16
ITC&COLGATE 0.5008 0.0563 0.9497 26.835 22.77
AVILA LIFE 0.605 0.49918 0.50084 1.2335 49.43
INSURENCE&RA
NBAXI
M&M &BAJAJ 0.0295 1.6206 -0.620 142.61 171.2
2
__ __
PORTFOLIO RETURN ( Rp)=(Ra)(Xa) + (Rb) (Xb)
PORTFOLIO RISK= ___________________________________
σp=√ X1^2σ1^2+X2^2σ2^2+2(X1)(X2)(X14)σ1σ2
Portfolio return Rp
ICICI&HDFC 136.24
ITC&COLGATE 26.835
AVILA LIFE 1.234
INSURENCE&RANBAXI
M&M &BAJAJ 142.61
Portfolio risk
AVILA LIFE 31.16
INSURENCE&AVILA
LIFE INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 22.77
INSURENCE&AVILA
16
LIFE INSURENCE
AVILA LIFE 49.43
INSURENCE&RANBA
XI
AVILA LIFE 171.22
INSURENCE &BAJAJ
17
CHAPTER-VI
FINDINGS
SUGGESSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
18
FINDINGS
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
The combination of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE and gives the proportion of investment
is 0.0478 and 0.4025 for and, based on the standard deviations The standard deviation
for is 70.47 and for AVILA LIFE INSURENCE is 22.2.
Hence the investor should invest their funds more in AVILA LIFE
INSURENCEwhen compared to AVILA LIFE INSURENCE as the risk involved in
AVILA LIFE INSURENCEis less than AVILA LIFE INSURENCE as the standard
deviation of AVILA LIFE INSURENCEis less than that of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE.
The combination of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE and AVILA LIFE INSURENCE gives
the proportion of investment is 1.6206 and 0.6206 for AVILA LIFE INSURENCE and
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE, based on the standard deviations The standard deviation for
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE is 104. 186 and for AVILA LIFE INSURENCE is 54.6.
Hence the investor should invest their funds more in AVILA LIFE INSURENCE
when compared to AVILA LIFE INSURENCE as the risk involved in AVILA LIFE
INSURENCE is less than AVILA LIFE INSURENCE as the standard deviation of
AVILA LIFE INSURENCE is less than that of AVILA LIFE INSURENCE.
19
CONCLUSIONS
In case of perfectly correlated securities or stocks, the risk can be reduced to a minimum
point.
In case of negatively correlative securities the risk can be reduced to a
zero.(which is company’s risk) but the market risk prevails the same for the security or
stock in the portfolio.
Making a sound business case for having a strong risk management program has long
been an elusive challenge for many organizations. The question still remains
unanswered, “How much value should be placed on preventing loss from a disaster that
might never happen?” However it is generally agreed that the consequences of risk
management failure can be dire. There is a clear imperative for many companies to
develop a strong, consistent, enterprise wide risk management programme, as most
prevalent business risks will either remain at current levels or increase.
In pursuing this goal, companies, now more than ever, would do well to begin by
identifying their top drivers, then pinpointing the top threats to those revenue drivers,
and distinguishing between those that are predominantly downside risks and those that
are predominantly variable risks.
While both categories of risk deserve attention, companies may discover the
effectiveness of their risk management programs are most effective if they devote more
of their attention to controlling risk rather than transferring it to insurance companies.
And the risks that can be most directly controlled are downside risks, the very risks that
are most likely to threaten company’s top revenue drivers. When downside risks are
dealt with first through prevention and control, it enables senior management to deal
more aggressively with variable risks. In short they become more proactive and strategic
with their risk management approach.
20
Because companies indicate that they expect having trouble finding the time, budget and
people necessary to implement or maintain a strong risk management program, senior
management must demonstrate leadership in championing and funding this initiative.
The number one consequence of poor risk management is loss of competitiveness.
21
SUGGESTIONS:
1. Investor would be able to achieve when the returns of shares and debentures
2. Resultant portfolio would be known as diversified portfolio. Thus portfolio
construction would address itself to three major via. Selectivity, timing and
diversification
3. In case of portfolio management, negatively correlated assets are most profitable.
4. Correlation between the AVILA LIFE INSURANCE are negatively correlated
which means both the combinations of portfolios are at good position to gain in
future.
5. Investors may invest their money for long run, as both the combinations are most
suitable portfolios. A rational investor would constantly examine his chosen
portfolio both for average return and risk
22
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1. DONALDE, FISHER & RONALD J.JODON
SECURITIES ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT,6TH EDITION
2. V.K.BHALLA
INVESTMENTS MANAGEMENT S. CHAND PUBLICATION.
3. V.A.AVADHANI.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Website
4. WWW. Investopedia.com
5. www.nseindia.com
6. www.bseindia.com.
7. www.icici.com
Newspapers& magazine
ECONOMIC TIME, FINANCIAL EXPRES.ETC
23