Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contextualization: 1 point
Describes a broader historical context
relevant to prompt by relating topic of
prompt to historical events,
developments, or processes that occur
before, during, or continue after the time
frame of the question. Not merely a
phrase or reference
Evidence: 1 point AND 1 point
Provides specific examples of evidence Supports an ARGUMENT in response to the prompt using
relevant to topic of prompt specific and relevant examples of evidence
Analysis and Reasoning : 1 point AND 1 point:
Uses historical reasoning (comparison, Demonstrates a complex understanding of the historical
causation, CCOT) to frame or structure development that is the focus of the prompt, using
an argument that addresses the evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify an argument
prompt that addresses the question; not merely a phrase or
● Must show historical reference.
reasoning/may be uneven or
imbalanced ● Explaining nuance of an issue by analyzing
multiple variables
● Explaining both similarity and difference, or
explaining both continuity and change, or
explaining multiple causes, or explaining both
cause and effect
● Explaining relevant AND insightful connections
within and across time periods
● Confirming the validity of an argument by
corroborating multiple perspectives across
themes
● Qualifying or modifying an argument by
considering diverse or alternative views or
evidence
LEQ Grading: Grading within each range will be determined by the style and sophistication with which the above tasks are accomplished.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0-50 (F) 50-60(F) 60 - 69(D) 70-79 (C) 80-89(B) 90-95(A) 95-100(A)
General Comments: