0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
1K просмотров13 страниц
The rather salacious details behind the actual complaint filed against former Seguin ISD Superintendent Stetson Roane are now coming to light. This document is part of a lawsuit filed by against Roane by the woman who claimed that he sexually harassed her. That sexual harassment complaint ultimately led to a separation agreement in which the district agreed to pay him nearly $100,000 in exchange for his resignation.
The rather salacious details behind the actual complaint filed against former Seguin ISD Superintendent Stetson Roane are now coming to light. This document is part of a lawsuit filed by against Roane by the woman who claimed that he sexually harassed her. That sexual harassment complaint ultimately led to a separation agreement in which the district agreed to pay him nearly $100,000 in exchange for his resignation.
The rather salacious details behind the actual complaint filed against former Seguin ISD Superintendent Stetson Roane are now coming to light. This document is part of a lawsuit filed by against Roane by the woman who claimed that he sexually harassed her. That sexual harassment complaint ultimately led to a separation agreement in which the district agreed to pay him nearly $100,000 in exchange for his resignation.
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-18-008721
HALCY MARTIN DEAN, § — INTHE98™ DISTRICT
Plaintiff, 8
§
§
Vv. § COURT OF
;
STETSON ROANE, IN HIS §
INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ONLY, §
Defendant § TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
HALCY MARTIN DEAN, Plait
iff, files this First Amended Original Petition,
complaining of STETSON ROANE, Defendant, in his individual capacity only, and would
respectfully show the Court and Jury as follows:
I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN AND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Ll Plaintiff intends to conduct discovery under Level 3 of Texas Rule of Civil
Procedure 190.4, and hereby requests thatthe Court enter a discovery control order under Rule
1904
12 Plaintiff seeks monetary relief in excess of $200,000 but less than $1,000,000,
including damages of any kind, penalties, court costs, expenses, prejudgment interest, and
attomey fees
IL. PARTIES
2.1 Plaintiff HALCY MARTIN DEAN is an individual residing at SUUMEMIINS, Seguin,
“Texas 78155. The last three digits of Plaintif's Texas driver's license number are WB
‘The last three digits of Plaintiff's Social Security number are WR
PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED ORIGMAL PETITION Page |22 Defendant STETSON ROANE is an individual domiciled in Willacy County, Texas,
who has been served with process and has already filed an answer herein, No further citation
or service of process is needed at this time
‘I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3.1 This Court has jurisdiction over this case, in that Plaintiff's damages exceed the
minimum jurisdictional limits of the Court. Venue is proper in Travis County, Texas,
because all or a substantial part of Plaintiff's cause of action accrued in Travis County, Texas.
IV. EACIS
41 Atall times material to this case, Plaintiff Halcy Martin Dean (“Plaintiff” or “Halcy")
has been continuously employed as the Director of Special Education for Seguin Independent
School District in Seguin, Texas. On or about January 17, 2017, Haley was attending a
professional conference in Austin, Texas, presented by the Texas Council of the
Administrators of Special Education (TCASE). This convention was for special education
staff,
42 At that time, Defendant Roane was the Superintendent of the Seguin Independent
School District in Seguin, Texas and also one of Haley’s bosses. Defendant Roane’s wife
was Haloy’s immediate supervisor, and Defendant Roane was Mrs. Roane’s immediate
supervisor.
43 For reasons unknown to Halcy initially, Defendant Roane had previously decided
that he wanted to attend the January 2017 TCASE convention in Austin, He had requested
that Haley get him a hotel room, He also indicated that he did not want to register for or
attend the conference itself, but simply that he wanted a hotel room in Austin, during the same
time Halcy was to be there. Haley was puzzled as to why Defendant Roane wished to attend
PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Page?the convention, but she felt she had been given a directive to book him a hotel room, so she
did. Prior to the convention and conference, Haley remarked to several others that she did
not know why Defendant Roane was attending the conference, and she booked Defendant
Roane’s hotel room at a separate hotel from her own. At the conference, however, she
certainly found out why.
44 Onthe night of January 17, 2017, Defendant Roane arrived at the conference after 5:00
pam, He did not attend any conference sessions. He arranged a business dinner for Haley and
several of her colleagues.
4.5 Afterdinner, Defendant Roane insisted on walking Haley to her cab oruber. Rather than
saying good night, however, and over Haley’s insistence that it was not necessary, Defendant
Roane insisted on “ensuring” Halcy got back to her own hotel “safely.” Halcy stated several
times that she was fine and did not need assistance getting back to her hotel, but Defendant Roane
insisted. Because Defendant Roane held a position of authority and power over Haley at the
Seguin Independent School District, Haley did not wish to offend Defendant Roane, and she did
not want to be rude to him, even though he was clearly (and boorishly) beginning to step outside
the scope of his duties as superintendent and outside the scope of their working relationship,
4.6 Upon arrival at Haley’s hotel, Defendant Roane next insisted on walking Haley to
het room. Roane then insisted on entering Haley's room, at which point he began to disrobe.
Defendant Roane discussed his “stress level,” and his need for “release.” He discussed how
attractive Haley was and how he needed someone like her to “work with him.” He talked
about how they could do great things together and “be powerful.”
4.7 Haley attempted to redirect Defendant Roane, by talking to him about how much
Halcy liked Mr. Roane’s wife, Denise. Plaintiff reminded Defendant Roane that Denise was
PLAINTIF#’S FinsT AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Pace3
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company, Incorporated, of Norton v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company, Incorporated, of Norton, 953 F.2d 638, 4th Cir. (1992)
United States v. Jerry Allen Lequire, Charles Allen Lequire, Gene Edward Lequire, James Thomas Lequire, William Michael Lequire, Bonnie Sue Anders and Michael Carl Jenkins, 931 F.2d 1539, 11th Cir. (1991)