Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

TESOL Certificate Programs

Rubric for Written Assignments V4

Student Name: J. Zheng Date: 3/18/19 Instructor Name: _Rodriguez Class: Portfolio Assignment: _POT

Item No relevant evidence Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
(0 – 59%) (60% - 69 %) (70% - 79%) (80 – 89%) (90% - 100%)
Content & The assignment was not Ideas are not well developed Ideas are somewhat developed, and Ideas are developed, and Ideas are fully developed, and
Ideas submitted, or the or may fail to demonstrate an demonstrate some understanding of demonstrate an accurate demonstrate a significant and
submitted assignment understanding of the task. the task. Main point(s) and understanding of the task. Main accurate understanding of the task.
_67___/70 was not relevant to the Main ideas, or examples/details may be included but point(s) and supporting Main point(s) and examples/ details
task at hand. examples/details, may be not well integrated. examples/details are clear and easily are identifiable, clear, and engaging
obscure or missing. identifiable. for the reader.

Evidence & The assignment was not When required, outside When required, outside evidence may When required, relevant outside When required, compelling outside
APA Format submitted, or the evidence may be missing or be minimal or may not fully support evidence is included. It supports evidence is included; it is seamlessly
submitted assignment may fail to support claims. claims. Paper may not follow APA claims. Paper follows APA format integrated into the paper to support
lacked evidence from Paper may not meet basic format entirely or may have errors in with few errors in citation/style. claims. Paper follows APA format
__8__/ 10 outside sources and requirements for APA citation/style. with no errors in citation or style.
APA formatting. format.

Organization The assignment was not The organization is not The organization is somewhat The organization is effective for the The organization is highly effective
& Standards submitted, or the effective for the task, or effective for the task, although it may task. The organization is clear and for the task. Organization skillfully
submitted assignment there is a lack of be loose or unclear. There may be logical. Transitions and connectors and logically builds support for the
organized in an organization. Errors with some errors with transitions and are used appropriately. Paper meets thesis. Transitions and connectors
_10___/ 10 appropriate or effective transitions and connectors connectors. Paper may not meet all most requirements for title, word are used appropriately and
way given the task at interfere with requirements for title, word count, count, spacing, etc. seamlessly Paper meets
hand. comprehensibility. Paper spacing, etc. requirements for title, word count,
may not meet basic spacing, etc.
requirements for title, word
count, spacing, etc.
Usage & The assignment was not Linguistic features of the Linguistic features of the writing Linguistic features of the writing Linguistic features of the writing
Mechanics submitted, or the writing (syntax, usage, word (syntax, usage, word form, (syntax, usage, word form, (syntax, usage, word form,
submitted assignment form, tone/register, spelling, tone/register, spelling, capitalization, tone/register, spelling, tone/register, spelling,
was not relevant to the capitalization, punctuation, punctuation, etc.) are somewhat capitalization, punctuation, etc.) are capitalization, punctuation, etc.) are
__10__/ 10 task at hand. etc.) are not effective. Errors effective. The errors may be effective. There may be a few highly effective. There are no
are very distracting and/or distracting and/or interfere with the errors, but they do not interfere with apparent errors. The writing is very
interfere greatly with the comprehensibility of the message. the comprehensibility of the professional and academic.
comprehensibility of the The writing may not be professional message. The writing is generally
message. The writing is not or academic. professional/academic.
professional or academic.

Score: ______95______/100 Letter Grade: _______A___________

Comments: Great job. You clearly demonstrated how you will incorporate the theories into your daily instruction. You thesis statement could have been stronger.
There were a few APA errors.

Вам также может понравиться