0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
17 просмотров1 страница
This document discusses the identification and characterization of third party projects for a cumulative effects assessment of the PERU LNG Project. The objective was to identify existing or planned projects in the study area that could interact with the LNG project through various impacts. Both private and government projects were considered. An initial list of around 2000 projects was identified through research and interviews, and only four were found to have potential for interaction requiring further examination. The assessment was conducted separately for the project area and upstream areas.
This document discusses the identification and characterization of third party projects for a cumulative effects assessment of the PERU LNG Project. The objective was to identify existing or planned projects in the study area that could interact with the LNG project through various impacts. Both private and government projects were considered. An initial list of around 2000 projects was identified through research and interviews, and only four were found to have potential for interaction requiring further examination. The assessment was conducted separately for the project area and upstream areas.
This document discusses the identification and characterization of third party projects for a cumulative effects assessment of the PERU LNG Project. The objective was to identify existing or planned projects in the study area that could interact with the LNG project through various impacts. Both private and government projects were considered. An initial list of around 2000 projects was identified through research and interviews, and only four were found to have potential for interaction requiring further examination. The assessment was conducted separately for the project area and upstream areas.
4.3 Identification and Characterization of Third Party Projects
4.3.1 Objectives and Scope
The objective of the Third Party Project assessment phase of the CEA was to first identify any existing or reasonably foreseeable projects (including expansions) occurring within the study area, and then determine whether they had the potential to interact with the PERU LNG Projects or Upstream Projects. Such interactions may take the form of air emissions, waste discharges, sedimentation of water courses, procurement and supply of goods and services (including employment), transportation, movement of people as a result of improved access, etc. Where possible the pathways that link these projects with the PERU LNG activities were to be identified. In addition, projects or activities occurring within the Study Area, and that have the potential to affect the abundance or distribution of natural or cultural resources, were sought (e.g., land use change, loss and fragmentation of natural habitat). These effects are less dependent on interactions per se, but are important in terms of assessing ‘nibbling’ effects as well as spatial and temporal crowding. Private sector ventures and government sponsored initiatives were considered. Section 4.3.2 details the Third Party Project assessment for the PERU LNG Projects study area. Section 4.3.3 details the Third Party Project assessment for the Upstream Projects study area.
4.3.2 Detailed Description of Approach – PERU LNG Projects Study Area
The task required consultation with government agencies and regional authorities located in the districts of Ayacucho, Huancavelica, Ica and Lima. The identification of Third Party Projects already present within PERU LNG Projects Study Area, as well as those proposed or regarded as reasonably foreseeable, was accomplished using a combination of desk-based research, interviews with national and local administrators, and field observation. This involved multiple steps, as depicted in Figure 4.15. Of an initial total of approximately 2000, only four projects were identified as having the potential to interact with the PERU LNG Projects. While the emphasis of the CEA was on Third Party Projects, two other ‘project types’ were considered, namely the existing TgP pipeline, and access roads and temporary facilities. Both categories of project were initially assessed in the original ESIAs, however, they have been re-assessed here to take advantage of information that has become available since the completion of those documents in 2005, and the benefits of an enhanced method of assessment.