Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Assignment (60%)
Introduction
This Guide explains the basis on which you will be assessed in this course during the semester. It
contains details of the facilitator-marked assignment.
One element in the assessment strategy of the course is that all students should have the same
information as facilitators about the Assignment. Please read through the whole guide at the
beginning of the course.
Academic Writing
Plagiarism
i) What is Plagiarism?
Any written assignment (essays, project, take-home exams, etc) submitted by a student
must not be deceptive regarding the abilities, knowledge, or amount of work contributed by
the student. There are many ways that this rule can be violated. Among them are:
o Paraphrases: The student paraphrases a closely reasoned argument of an author
without acknowledging that he or she has done so. (Clearly, all our knowledge is
derived from somewhere, but detailed arguments from clearly identifiable sources
must be acknowledged.)
o Outright plagiarism: Large sections of the paper are simply copied from other
sources, and are not acknowledged as quotations.
o Other sources: often include essays written by other students or sold by
unscrupulous organizations. Quoting from such papers is perfectly legitimate if
quotation marks are used and the source is cited.
o Works by others: Taking credit deliberately or not deliberately for works produced
by another without giving proper acknowledgement. Works includes photographs,
charts, graphs, drawings, statistics, video-clips, audio-clips, verbal exchanges such
as interviews or lectures, performances on television and texts printed on the web.
o The student submits the same essay to two or more courses.
Indirect
According to Wurman (1988), the new disease of the 21st century will
be information anxiety, which has been defined as the ever-widening
gap between what one understands and what one thinks one should
understand.
Referencing
All sources that you cite in your paper should be listed in the Reference section
at the end of your paper. Here’s how you should do your Reference.
From a Journal
DuFour, R. (2002). The learning-centred principal: Educational Leadership,
59(8). 12-15.
From a Webpage
National Park Service. (2003, February 11). Abraham Lincoln
Birthplace National Historic Site. Retrieved February 13, 2003,
from http://www.nps.gov/abli/
From a Book
Naisbitt, J. and Aburdence, M. (1989). Megatrends 2000. London:
Pan Books.
Question 1: [4 marks]
Group X
Group Y
A English test was administered to two groups of secondary school students. Explain the
distribution of the scores and the standard deviation shown in the two graphs above.
Question 3: [4 marks]
The table below is a summary of a study that examining the relationship between writing and
reading scores. Interpret the results, i.e. predicting writing from reading.
Question 4: [4 marks]
A mathematics test was administered to students in Group A and Group B. Explain the
results shown in the graphs below.
Group A Group B
Question 5: [5 marks]
A study was conducted to test the effectiveness of mind maps in learning history. A pretest was
administered before the experiment and the same test was administered after students were
taught using mind maps. Students were divided into four groups based on their performance in
history; i.e. Band 4 – excellent students and Band 1 = weak students.
The mean and standard deviation for the four bands is shown in the table below. Explain the
results obtained.
4
Question 6: [6 marks]
b) State the appropriate statistical tests to test the three research questions suggested.
Question 7: [6 marks]
Table 1:
Gender Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Spatial Male 0.879 34 0.012 0.971 78 0.016
Test Female 0.185 39 0.001 0.079 96 0.008
Scores
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of YouTube Video Clips in teaching
statistics to graduate students. Equal number of graduate students were assigned to three
different treatments: Lecture with video clips, Lecture without video clips and Small group teaching
without video clips. The results are shown in the tables below:
Scores in Statistics
.115 2 57 .802
ANOVA
Statistics Score
Tukey HSD
Mean Difference
(I) Treatment (J) Treatment (I-J) Std. Error Sig.
Lecture with video clips Lecture only 3.600 1.431 .046
Small group 3.800 1.431 .034
Lecture only Lecture with video
-3.600 1.431 .046
clips
Small Group .2000 1.431 .989
Small group Lecture with video
-3.800 1.431 .034
clips
Lecture only -.2000 1.431s .989
Question 9: [8 marks]
A researcher was interested in finding out whether Moral Reasoning could be enhanced if students
were taught using Moral Dilemmas. Subjects were given a Moral Reasoning Test before the
treatment (using moral dilemmas) and after the treatment and the results are shown in Table 1
below.
Question 10 [6 marks]
A researcher conducted a study to find out how undergraduates felt about the death sentence. A
sample 200 female and 165 male students were asked the question ‘Should criminals found guilty
for distributing illegal drugs be sentenced to death?” and the results are shown below:
Requirements:
ASSIGNMENT
JANUARY 2019 SEMESTER
LEVEL : MASTER
STUDENT’S NAME :
MATRIC NO. :
PROGRAMME :
ACADEMIC :
FACILITATOR
LEARNING CENTRE :