Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SP17-BPH-042
Abstract
Since the dawn of humanity, the question of the existence of God has perplexed philosophers,
theologians, and common person. Philosophers from ancient civilization e.g. Greeks, Romans,
and Babylonians have tried to answer this question in different forms and criticized the different
aspects of it. The arguments formulated to prove the existence of God is of four types:
Ontological, Casual, Designer Argument, Moral Argument. Philosophers and theologians used
these frameworks to provide a description of the existence of God. The arguments related to
essence are discussed under the banner of ontology, epistemology, and metaphysics. On the other
The inquiry of the existence of God is the philosophical heritage of humanity. Plato,
Aristotle, Xenophanes, Thomas Aquinas, St. Anselm, Averroes, and Avicenna spent their whole
lives in answering the questions related to the God, His nature and pragmatic influence on the
category of human civilization. There are different methodologies to prove the existence of God
used by these philosophers. These methodologies are followed by logical propositions which
1- Ontological Arguments
2- Casual Arguments
3- Designer Arguments
4- Moral Arguments
Ontological Arguments
Ontology is the study of the reality of being and existence. As the question of existence is
directly related to the existence of God, this branch of philosophy has wide discussions about the
existence of God. Why God exists? What is His nature? Is God infinite? Such type of questions
is fundamentally studied under ontology. In the pursuit of answering those questions, ontological
arguments for the existence of God were developed. The philosophers who put forward their
ontological models to prove the existence of God were Plato, St. Anselm and Thomas Aquinas.
These arguments are derived from deductive reasoning and suggest that God is logically
Plato was a Greek philosopher who lived between the fifth century BC. Plato discussed
various aspects of life, knowledge, and God in his philosophical journey. In particular, he
emphasized on the ontology and discovered his proof for the existence of God in one of his
1- Think about something which is naturally beautiful. One can think about beautiful
2- This beautiful scenery of forest has some features and shapes. These could be
3- Every physical object has some common geometrical shapes. These shapes merge to
make something beautiful. So, these common aspects are the essence of beauty.
4- Now, one can consider that there is some “Form” which is in principle is present in
5- Like this ultimate form of beauty, there are other forms as well. Like the form of
6- There is an ultimate form of Goodness. One can never think the greater form of God
This is the way how ontological arguments form. They start from simple premises and
after series of proposition prove the conclusion in the form of the necessity of the
existence of God.
Various Proofs for the Existence of God 5
St. Anselm is the theologian of the 11th century. Like Plato, he made his own kind of
logical understanding of the existence of God. He tried to postulate his theoretical model in the
following way:
1- There exists a being such that no greater being exists than him.
a. For universality, such being should exist both in mind and reality.
b. If it exists only in mind, then that being is not the greatest being individual
3- Ultimately, there is being such that no greater being can exists than him both
Saint Anselm with his beautiful insight made this remarkable argument about the necessity of a
being which we call as a God. He used the somewhat same form of argument which Plato used
Thomas Aquinas was philosopher and theologian of the 13th century. His philosophical
interrogation is so remarkable that he is still relevant in the realm of philosophy of religion and
ontology. Thomas Aquinas used five ways to prove the existence of argument but in this section
St. Aquinas put forward his theory which is also known as “Gradation of objects” with
1- There is a hierarchy of objects from top to bottom: some better some worse.
greatest in that quality and attribute. (Something is hotter than something hot)
4- There must also exist then a being which is the cause of all the attributes in the
This is not the only one formulation as proof of the existence of God given by Thomas
Aquinas. There are some other arguments as well. One of such argument is Possibility and
Necessity argument:
1- We observe that in the physical world around us, there are things which
come into being and go out of it. We call them as contingent things.
4- Ultimately, there was a time when nothing existed because all beings are
5- At that time, when nothing existed, who put contingent beings to come
into existence?
6- There must be a being which is not contingent and that being is necessary
by itself. This being made every contingent being and put it into motion.
These arguments provide the ontological foundation in proving the existence of God.
Some recent theologians, philosophers of religion, Muslim thinkers have redefined the logical
Casual Arguments
Casual arguments are implications of our physical reality. We experience that there is
always some cause of any effect, that is how we experience things and perceive time, and that
cause can be described through some physical laws and philosophy. This casual determinism is
used to explain the existence of God. One of the two most famous casual arguments were given
Thomas Aquinas, after conceiving the casual determinism in the natural process,
explained the existence of God as a prime mover of the universe. Evolution of his argument is
given below:
3- Those objects are also in motion and they don’t give motion to themselves.
5- There must be some first prime mover who makes everything in motion and
change.
Thomas Aquinas even used the nature of causes to prove the existence of God. This type of
argument is known as the argument from efficient causes. The description of the argument is
given below:
4- If some prior cause doesn’t exist, it’s effect also cease to exist.
6- There must be some first cause, which is necessary for its essence.
Designer Argument
In our universe, we observe that there are tremendous harmony and order between two
events, the motion of different celestial objects, the differential changes in weather, the existence
of an atmosphere on earth, the dynamics of cells, bizarre nature of the atomic world, the presence
of amazing patterns in flowers, and evolution of species. These things as contingent in their
essence are not able to give the order to themselves and create themselves out of nothing. There
must be a designer who made all these things and put them in order for thousands of years. This
absolute artistic eloquence of our natural phenomena demands some intelligent designer to do
design all these things around us. This argument is known as the designer argument.
Thomas Aquinas like all other arguments also worked out on his own designer argument.
being. Like as some arrow which is unintelligent reaches its goal by direction
Same as Aquinas, Ghazali and Kindi developed cosmological designer argument in the
realm of designer arguments. This argument is recently revived by theologian Willian Lane
Craig and called it “Kalam Cosmological Argument.” This is the strongest argument for the
existence of God. The statements and result of this argument are given below:
5- God exists.
Moral Arguments
The last phase of our arguments is the moral argument which describes the pragmatism of
the existence of God. Human beings tend to have a basic nature and instinct. We have basic
ethical standards such as nobody should kill anybody, everyone should speak the truth and so on.
This basic human nature describes that someone has printed some absolute moral obligations in
4- God exists.
Human society survives in the presence of innate moral obligations. All the religious books and
prophets emphasized on dynamical integrity and practicality of the existence of God in the
construction of human civilization. If we discard the presence of God, there would be an abyss of
meaning and therefore nihilism. It will give people the freedom to do what they desire and
deconstruct the social order. Therefore, the existence of God provides solid ground for morality.
Conclusion
By four different types of logical models, the depiction of the logical necessity of the
existence of God can easily be understood. Ontological arguments provide the essential rational
proof for the existence of God while Casual and Designer arguments use empirical evidence to
formulate it. The amalgamation of all this evidence is logically sufficient to explain the nature
and existence of God. While the pragmatic explanation is provided through the moral necessity
Bibliography
Bagget, D., & Walls, J. (2006). Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. Oxford:
References
Adams, R. (1971). The Logical Structure of Anselm's Argument. Philosophical Review, 80, 28-
54.
Alston, W. (1960). The Ontological Argument Revisited. Philosophical Review, 69, 452-74.
Layman, C. S. (2002). God and the Moral Order. Faith and Philosophy, 19, 304-316.
Rescher, N. (1959). The Ontological Proof Revisited. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 37,
138-148.