BETWEEN
AND
4. I upon the advice of the Plaintiff’s Solicitor and pursuant to Order 18 Rule
19 (1)(a) of the Rule of Court 2012, discovers that the Defendants’
Statement of Defence have discloses no reasonable defence.
A copy of the Defendants’ Statement of Defence, dated 2th February 2018 are
now produced, shown to me and collectively marked as Exhibit “SAA-3”.
Parties
6. The Plaintiff, SYARIKAT AZEL AZZAN SDN BHD (Company No.: 335678-T)
is a private limited company incorporated under the laws of Malaysia with
its registered address at No1, Jalan Sg 1/9, Taman Sri Gombak, 68100
Batu Caves, Selangor.
A copy of the company search on Syarikat Azel Azzan Sdn Bhd conducted
with Companies Commission of Malaysia is now produced, shown to me
and collectively marked as Exhibit “SAA-4”.
8. The Defendant SING HOCK ELECTRIC (KL) SDN BHD (Company No.:
221145-W) is a private limited company incorporated under the laws of
Malaysia with its registered address at 42B-44B, Jalan Pandan 3/2, Pandan
Jaya, Cheras, 55100 Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur.
A copy of the company search on Sing Hock Electric (KL) Sdn Bhd conducted
with Companies Commission of Malaysia is now produced, shown to me and
collectively marked as Exhibit “SAA-5”.
a. Based on paragraph 3 (b), the Defendant contended that there are no issue
of misrepresentation to the consumers as no complaints were received prior
to 28th February 2017.
b. The Defendant in paragraph 3 (c), submitted that the Plaintiff has no goodwill
and reputation for products that are manufactured by the defendant.
b. The Plaintiff has goodwill and reputation on the usage of the trademark “azel”
which were also use by the Defendant.
A copy of Comparison of the trade mark features and Article from the Asia
Economic Monitor now produced, shown to me and collectively marked as
Exhibit “SAA-7” and “SAA-8”.
c. Plaintiff incurred losses after receiving complaints from its customer regarding
faulty goods that belongs to the Defendant in 2017.
12. I am further advised by the Plaintiffs’ Solicitors, for the reasons stated above, the
Statement of Defence file by the Defendants discloses no reasonable defence as
the case may be, that the Defences is unsustainable in law and should be struck
out.
13. The Plaintiffs therefore humbly pray that the Plaintiffs’ Notice of Application filed
herein be allowed with costs and costs to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff
immediately.
(NRIC. NO 610609–14-4557), )
Before me,
……………………..………..