Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2. Increase Employment:
Another objective of the plans is better utilization of man power
resource and increasing employment opportunities. Measures have
been taken to provide employment to millions of people during
plans. It is estimated that by the end of Tenth Plan (2007) 39 crore
people will be employed.
3. Self-Sufficient:
It has been the objective of the plans that the country becomes self-
sufficient regarding food grains and industrial raw material like iron
and steel etc. Also, growth is to be self sustained for which rates of
saving and investment are to be raised. With the completion of
Third Plan, Indian economy has reached the take off stage of
development. The main objective of the Tenth Plan is to get rid of
dependence on foreign aid by increasing export trade and
developing internal resources.
4. Economic Stability:
Stability is as important as growth. It implies absence of frequent
end excessive occurrence of inflation and deflation. If the price level
rises very high or falls very low, many types of structural imbalances
are created in the economy.
Economic stability has been one of the objectives of every Five year
plan in India. Some rise in prices is inevitable as a result of
economic development, but it should not be out of proportions.
However, since the beginning of second plan, the prices have been
rising rather considerably.
6. Regional Development:
Different regions of India are not economically equally developed.
Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Andhra
Pradesh etc. are relatively more developed. But U.P., Bihar, Orissa,
Nagaland, Meghalaya and H.P. are economically backward. Rapid
economic development of backward regions is one of the priorities
of five year plans to achieve regional equality.
Causes
Cause # 1. Stagnant Economy:
When India was freed, it has deep marks of stagnation. During the
phase of fifty years of economic planning, its growth rate is zero or
near.
Similar trend has been noticed after the adaptation of plans. This
fact is also reflected from the national income by industrial origin.
Cause # 2. Poverty:
These five year plans have miserably failed to make a dent on
poverty as 40 per cent of population is in tight grip of poverty. The
poverty is greatly responsible for poor diets, low health and poor
standard of living. A large proportion of the population has to go
even without the most essential needs of daily life.
The per capita income which was 254.7 at current prices in 1950-51
increased to Rs. 1741.3 in 1980-81 to Rs. 5365.3 in 1990-91 and
further to Rs. 16563.5 in 2000- 01. It is expected to be Rs. 20860.0
during 2003-04.
Total backlog which was 5.3 million at the end of first plan gradually
rose to 106 million by the end of Ninth Plan. This backlog on
employment front is likely to further increase during the Tenth Plan
Period.
Achievement # 7. Power:
Total installed capacity (including non-utility), which was only
2,301 MW in 1950, increased to 97,899 MW (including non-utility
of 12,079 MW) by the end of March, 2000. The cumulative capacity
in the public utilities as on March, 2000 in the country has reached
97,837 MW (provisional) comprising 23,816 MW as hydro, 70,186
MW as thermal, 2,680 MW as nuclear and 1,155 MW as wind
energy.
These services are significant from the point of view of the poor and
economically backward whose low level of living could be raised
with the help of these services. The outlay during the Ninth Plan on
social and economic services was Rs. 1,82,005 crores, i.e. 21.2% of
the total outlay. The outlay from second plan to Ninth plan moved
between 15% to 21% on social services.
Achievement # 12. Social Justice:
The planning in India has an objective of sustained growth with
social justice. It has also been emphasising the achievement of this
objective. As a result, these plans have been ensuring the
improvement of living standards of the people, removal of poverty,
creation of additional jobs, and reduction in inequalities of income
and wealth.
In our Introduction we have recalled the various stages in the preparation of the Plan
which we now submit to the Government. Its preparation has been a task undertaken
in partnership with the Central Government and the States and leaders of opinion in
all branches of national life whose counsel we have freely sought. In many directions
the Plan calls for a new and much larger effort than ever before. We feel confident
that the people of India will meet the challenge of the Second Five Year Plan.
In a Plan of such wide scope there is always room for differences in emphasis which
must be appreciated. Shri K. C. Neogy has specially stressed th^t in view of the
magnitude of the Plan it will be difficult to implement it in a period of five years and
that deficit financing on an excessive scale may prove dangerous to the economy
and may cause hardship to certain sections of the population. He has also drawn
particular attention to the need for balanced development of transport and production
generally. We agree that these considerations are important and should be
constantly kept in view in carrying out the Plan- These aspects have also been
considered fully in appropriate sections of the Plan.