Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
thority and consists of all authority expressly given by the versely to the principal, unless the principal knows and ap-
principal to his/her agent. Answer (b) includes the authority
that can be reasonably implied from the express authority
and the conduct of the principal. Answer (d) is not chosen
because even though a party was never authorized by a prin-
cipal to be an agent, if the principal leads a third party to
believe thatthe party did have authority, this is apparent
agency.
11. (b) An agency agreement normally does not need to
be in writing. Exceptions to this general rule include agency
contracts that cannot be completed within one year and
agreements whereby the agent is to buy specific real estate
for the principal. This question incorporates the latter.
Typical agency agreements need not be in writing; these
would include purchasing office supplies, retaining an inde-
pendent contractor to do renovation work, or hiring an attor-
ney to collect a business debt.
B.S. Ratification
13. (d) Since Ames had no express, implied, or actual
authority, Trimon cannot enforce the contract. Answer (a) is
not chosen because ratifications under agency law require
that the contract be ratified in its entirety or not at all. An-
swer (b) is not chosen because until Clar ratifies the contract
in its entirety, Trimon may withdraw from the contract since
Ames had no authority to make the contract. Answer (c) is
not chosen because ratification can be accomplished by ac-
tions as well as words.
14. (b) When the third party is aware that there is a prin-
cipal, that principal, fully disclosed or partially disclosed,
may generally ratify the contract when he orshe is aware of
all material facts and if ratification of the entire contract
takes place.
C. Authority
15. (a) Since Beele authorized McDonald to be his
agent, the secret limitation has no effect on York. York may
enforce the contract for the full $140,000. Answer (b) is
incorrect because Beele authorized McDonald to be his
agent. Even though his agent was instructed to pay at most
$125,000 in the contract, this was a secret limitation that did
not limit York who was unaware of it. Answer (c) is incor-
rect because McDonald was given authority to purchase real
estate on Bee1e's behalf. The limitation on the dollar
amount was not known by York and therefore does not limit
her. Answer (d) is incorrect because although York can
enforce the contract against Beele, it is because Beele gave
authority to McDonald rather than how much the real estate
is worth.
2
4., (c) An agency relationship is terminated,
by opera-
tion of law if the subject of the agreement
becomes illegal or
impossible, the principal or the agent dies
or becomes in-
sane, or the principal becomes bankrupt.
Answers (a), (b),
and (d) are incorrect because they will
cause the termination
of an agency relationship by operation of
law. Answer Cc),
agent's renunciation of the agency, will not
cause the termi-
nation of an agency relationship. -
2
5. (c) When the agency relationship is
terminated by
an act of the principal and/or agent, third
parties are entitled
to notice of the termination from the
principal. Failure of
the principal to give the required notice
gives the agent ap-
parent authority to act on behalf of the
principal. Specifi-
cally, the principal must give actual notice
to all parties who
had prior dealings with the agent or
principal. Constructive
or public notice must be given to parties
who knew of the
existence of the agency relationship, but did
not actually
have business dealings with the agent or
principal. Since
Bolt Corp. did not give proper constructive
notice to Young
Corp., Ace had apparent authority to bind
the principal and:
therefore, Young Corp. will win.
Accordingly, answer (a) is
incorrect. Answer (b) is incorrect because
although Ace
lacked express authority, apparent authority
was present due
to the inadequacy of Bolt's notice. Answer
(d) is incorrect
because a principal is not an absolute
insurer of his agent's
acts. A principal is liable for his agent's
torts only if the
,
principal expressly authorizes the
conduct or the tort is
committed within the scope of the
agent's employment.