Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
August 1970
Recommended Citation
Cavanagh, John R. (1970) "Psychosexual Maturity and Marriage," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 37 : No. 3 , Article 12.
Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol37/iss3/12
but fully hominized (by the defini- ground for discussion in ~ )lura listie
tions found in this volume) fetus, society and if secular soc y rejects
newborn, or infant and if so, how? this must we not continue ) develop .....·.
• , ·:·'
our own integral humanisn . \1 aritain)
I probably fall into Milhaven 's Clas- in this fundamental an • absolute
sicist, "Type A" epistemologic men- value?
tality, formed as I was by George- I am appropriately imp rc ~ d by the
town's Toohey, Foley and McFadden technological competence C my re- ~·
in the middle forties and by my own search colleagues who have lemically
continuing predeliction for the clas- analyzed and to some ext t synthe-
sical scholastic axis of Aristotle- sized the DNA molecul e do not
Thomas and Maritain. From this believe, however , that i1 ~o doing,
predominately rationalist mentality, I they have defined or elab1 ted "life" Psychosexual Matl,Jrity and Marriage
candidly admit that not only do I hold which is somehow differ t than a
the absolute inviolability of innocent biochemical construction , ·n though
human life but also the inviolability of it may have some of th e 1alities of John R. Cavanagh, M.D., Washington, D.C.
that living tissue, the gamete, which living tissue.
constitutes the vehicle for transmitting In any event, this volu of Theo-
this same life. Indeed, particularly as a logical Studies provoke s J siderable
physician, I hold a certain phenomeno-- thought and question an < 1 addition
logical reverence and respect for "life" to well written essa includes . ·'. . .
in any form as that utterly and un- numerous excellent re fe n es on the · -~ =
speakably mysterious gift of the subject under discu s . ,_ Father
.- .
t~"
ional maturity is not common. individuaL They renew themselves
creator with which I am given the Burghardt, S.J ., editor o f n eological from within during adolescence, when
llbo:sexual maturity is even less so.
privilege of cooperating. Cannot a Studies deserves a share , the credit the· individual is facing society for the
no statistics to prove this
respect for "life" be the irreducible for pulling this volume t of her. first time on his own, and in the early
one has only to deal with
*For a copy of this volume .($2.00 per single issue) or a subscription ($7.0 0 year) write daily life to recognize its years of marriage when he is adapting
Theological Studies, Business Office, 428 E. Preston Street, Baltimore, Marylati ' 1202. . Since criteria of psycho- to an intimate contact with another
.. . . ~· '
I• Chosexual maturity as one of its during this period. There can be little
IIP"''""'u,. Psychosexual maturity is, doubt that his milieu during early life : ...
., :• .
part of emotional maturity. will have a tremendous influence over
is psychosexually immature , he his adolescent and later emotional and
to that extent emotionally sexual development. His future mental
••lltu.re. His emotional immaturity health and mental adjustment will
not, however, be restricted to depend upon his acceptance of an
IIICtlosexual immaturity_ adjustment to reality.
early postulate for the study of
should be the recognition of
SEXUAL MATURITY:
that personality and maturity
EMOTIONAL MATURITY
IU W~oue,reJo.ni·n g concepts which, while
may achieve workable propor- To orient this discussion, one
relatively early in life, continue should first define sexual maturity and
• • anann during the lifetime of the then emotional maturity. The one
written for the Special Committee for Studies on Problems of
and Birth Control.