Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ryan Cao
Mrs. Dickerson
July 8, 2015
The van Holde-Weischet analysis (vHW) method provides an abstract yet brilliant
(depends on if you’re using Dr. Demeler’s enhanced vHW or not), and can be used to
find a suitable range of sedimentation values to perform a 2DSA on. Here’s how the
method works-given a standard set of concentration profiles for various radii (positions
relative to the cell itself), baseline and plateau regions are determined (by the user; ba-
sically flat areas on either side of the main curve), and the region between them is parti-
tioned into j “boundary fractions”. Since the graph is always plotted as concentration as
a function of the radius (again, distance within the cell relative to the cell itself), these
boundary fractions are spaced equally apart in terms of concentration (i.e. the difference
radii differences are not. Given these points, one can use a simplified version of the
Lamm equation to find the relationship between analogous r, c pairs on different scans
at the particular boundary fraction point, ti is the time of that scan relative to t0, the time
NISD Summer Internship Cao 2
of the “initial” scan, and w is the angular velocity. Once the s*i, j values have been de-
termined, they are plotted against (time)^-0.5, the inverse square root of time. The rea-
son for this is, because the vHW analysis is based on a mathematical simplification (and
must be fitted with a line across each analogous group, which is extrapolated to 0, or in-
finite time (because this is 1/sqrt(time)), to rid the coefficients of the influence of diffu-
to time itself and thus given infinite time, [think limits! Or big O notation!] the effects
caused by diffusion, a lower order contributor, are negligible.) Once these points and
lines are plotted, the graph is determined and conclusions may be drawn about the
There are some shortcomings to this method, however. Because it must extrapo-
late to infinite time, the method assumes as well an infinitely long cell, which of course is
a physical impossibility. Thus, scans were a baseline cannot be clearly determined (i.e.
the actual main curve has not cleared the meniscus yet) or where the plateau region is
significantly affected by back diffusion or pileup at the bottom of the cell cannot be used.
This is where the enhanced vHW plot comes in-to determine the plateau concentration
for scans where one cannot be determined accurately based on the current readings,
the plateau concentrations for scans where one is possible to be determined are done
so through another equation, and by fitting these concentrations and extrapolating to the
time of the scan with the unreadable plateau one can be estimated where none was
previously available.
NISD Summer Internship Cao 3
Also, with scans where the concentration gradient (main curve) does not fully
clear the meniscus, those boundary fractions that do not intersect the meniscus are
used as regular scan points and those that do are discarded. Now to determine back
diffusion (and thus scans that should be partially or even fully discarded), the estimated
s*i, j values are used to determine diffusion coefficients for spheres of the same sedi-
mentation coefficient, a conservative measure then used to find (generally) the largest
amount of back-diffusion that could possibly happen. With the user determining the
maximum amount of tolerable back diffusion, the program subtracts the current gradient
from that and when the limit is passed, stops and discards all points that would’ve been
Another issue is that the correct radial dilution (the cell is sector-shaped and thus
material dilutes slightly when settling to the outer edge), and thus the correct s*i, j val-
ues, is not properly accounted for in a heterogenous system due to the fact that the ef-
fects of the varying sedimentation rates on the graph is at different radius points and
thus different dilutions are being made. So, given an initial boundary fraction, an s*i, j
value is calculated for many points within that boundary and the baseline cutoff, to
where a good estimate of the general s*i, j values in that region (species) are. This new
estimation is combined with the earlier result, as well as the time, to ensure that all r, c
points in an area correspond to the same species and thus keep heterogenous mix-
Ultrascan. The enhanced vHW method was compared to a regular vHW algorithm in
NISD Summer Internship Cao 4
this study using pieces of DNA of various lengths, and results soon proved the en-
hanced version to be much more adept at determining number of species and clearly