prot
SUSTAINED BY SCIENCE
‘The LEED green-building ratings
are based on political agenda, not
sound science, argue timber and
plastics advocates. by Pavck Moore,
| wth mason Knowles and Mike Levy
There is growing interest in "green build-
ings’ among governments, corporations,
‘and architects, and this is positive.
Unfortunately, the standard being adopted
‘by many reflects political bias and “agenda.
teased” policies rather than good science.
The Washington, D.C.-based U.S. Green
Building Council, which created the
Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) rating system, is influenced
by a number of environmental groups, in
particular the Natural Resources Defense
Council (NRDC), as well as by many profes-
sionals in bulding and architecture,
‘The LEED standard is basically a system
Cf points awarded in such categories as
siting, materials, water and eneray use,
indoorair quality, accommodating alterna.
tive transportation, and
Unfortunately, LEED does not incorporate @
life-cycle analysis of the environmental
impact of materials used in construction, For
‘example, a material is considered "green’
simply because it has recycled content,
regardless of the energy required to recycle
it oF the pollution caused in the process. A
material also gets points itis manufactured
within 500 miles of the construction sit,
regardless of the environmental impacts
involved in the manufacturing process,
HYDRO A NO.GO
Many of the standards specific weaknesses
reflect politcal bias among the environmen:
tal groupe that influence LEED. For exam:
ple, large-scale hycroelectric power is not