Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Submitted To
THEOLOGY - I
by
Vivek Ray
ID No. M14J002
31 January, 2018
6. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 8
7. Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 8
2
1. Introduction
Sin is a difficult topic to discuss. Erikson observes, “Sin, like death not a pleasant and
enjoyable topic. It depresses us. We do not like to think of ourselves as bad or evil persons. Yet
the doctrine of sin teaches us that this is what we are by nature.”1 One cannot talk about Jesus
Christ as saviour without first giving a Biblical understanding of sin and our own fallen nature.
Before this, it is important that we try to understand other person’s perspective on the subject.
For this purpose I interviewed two friends (one Hindu and other Muslim), both zealous in their
faith to find their understanding of sin (transcript given as Appendix). Then in this writing there
perspective is contrasted with nature of sin as given in the Bible. Further, I have examined
Jesus’ attitude towards sin and sinners and made an attempt on how we may explain sin and
salvation to those of other faith.
Sin “is any want of conformity unto or transgression of the law of God” (1John 3:4; Rom_4:15),
in the inward state and habit of the soul, as well as in the outward conduct of the life, whether
by omission or commission (Rom 6:12-17; 7:5-24). It is “not a mere violation of the law of our
constitution, nor of the system of things, but an offense against a personal lawgiver and moral
governor who vindicates his law with penalties.”2
It is understood from this definition that sin can be properly defined only in relationship with
the nature and attributes of God. Hence a person’s understanding of sin will depend on his
understanding of God himself.
Bible teaches nature of sin being universal as well as the personal responsibility of every
individual towards his or her sins.
God created everything good (Genesis 1:31). Sin, though already present in the angelic world,3
entered human race with the disobedience of our first parent, when they ate of the fruit of tree
1
Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Publishing Group, 1990), 663
2
M. G. Easton, s.v. “Sin” in Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Public Domain, 1897). e-Sword 11.1.0
3
Wayne A. Grudem, Systematic Theology, An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Hyderabad: OM Books,
2018). 412-14
3
of knowledge of good and evil. (Genesis 3:1-19). This in many ways typical of sin generally.
Grudem observes that it stuck at the basis of knowledge, moral standards and identity as it gave
different answers to three important questions, 1. “What is true?” 2. “What is right?” and 3.
“Who am I?”4 This affected the entire mankind in two specific ways:
a. Inherited Guilt: Since Adam was the legal head and representative of the entire human
race, his sin was imputed on us. Paul says, “Therefore….sin came into the world
through one man and death through sin, so death spread to all men because all men
sinned.” (Rom 5:12) Though some theologians may disagree with the Paul’s literal
meaning, Erickson argues that “it is clear that he certainly is saying that death originated
in the human race because of Adam’s sin. He is also saying that death is universal and
the cause of this is the universal sin of mankind.”5
b. Inherited Depravity: All mankind have inherited the sinful nature from Adam. Paul
affirms that we have a natural disposition to sin before becoming a Christian, “we were
by nature children of wrath, like rest of mankind.” Grudem says, “Anyone who have
raise children have experiential testimony to the fact that we all are born with a
tendency to sin. Children discover by themselves to do wrong.”6
Bible says that in our nature we totally lack spiritual good before God (Rom7:18, Titus
1:15, Jer 17:9). In our actions we are totally unable to do spiritual good and are not
pleasing to God as they do not proceed from faith or love to him. In our view we may
do much good, but Isaiah affirms “all our righteous deeds are like polluted garments”
(Isa 64:6, cf Rom3:9-20).
Psalmist says, “They have all gone astray, they are all alike corrupt; there is none that is good,
no one (Ps 14:3). Paul says, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23).
James admits, “We all make many mistakes” (James 3:2). John writes, “If we say we have no
sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us” (1 John 1:8). The fact is that every human
being has sinned as an individual, knowingly or unknowingly transgressing God’s law. It is
4
Ibid, 492-93
5
Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Publishing Group, 1990), 636
6
Grudem, Systematic Theology, 496
4
true that because of inherited sin nature, every man finds himself unable to avoid sin. But our
responsibility is not limited by our ability. Grudem states:
“The true measure of our responsibility and guilt is not our own ability to obey God, but rather
the absolute perfection of God’s moral law and his holiness (which is reflected in that law).”
Jesus said, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Matt 5:48). God’s
standard is perfection. The moral law of God explicitly given in the Bible hold us personally
responsible for our sinful attitude and actions.
Jesus welcomed sinners and offered them forgiveness and love, and gave them understanding
and care. He drew, sought and made friends with most despised member of society. When
criticized by the scribes and Pharisees he responded by the parable of lost sheep, lost coin and
prodigal son. He saw sinners as being diseased, desperately needing a cure. He said, “It is not
the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”
(Mark 2:17).
It does not imply that Jesus condoned sin or was soft about it. In Sermon of the Mount he raised
the standard of the law from mere outward observance to the attitude of the heart. He gave hard
truth that sometimes offended people (John 6:60-61, Mark 6:3), and held people personally
responsible for their sins (John5:14, John 8:11). At the same time He had compassion at their
hopeless condition (Matt 9:36), being slave to sin (John 8:34). The purpose of Jesus’ ministry
on earth was the save sinners from this condition.
According to the interview with Govind, my Hindu friend (Appendix A)7 sin is a wrong deed
that is against ‘dharma’8 that would accumulate as bad karma. Unlike Bible there is no original
sin. He believes that soul is pure, but a person sins because of the attachment of human body
7
Govind Baibhaw, "Understanding Sin According to Hindu Faith," telephone interview by author, January 13,
2019. (Transcript available as Appendix A on page 9)
8
Dharma for a Hindu means the eternal and inherent nature of reality, regarded in Hinduism as a cosmic law
underlying right behaviour and social order.
("Dharma | Definition of Dharma in English by Oxford Dictionaries," Oxford Dictionaries | English, , accessed
January 27, 2019, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/dharma.)
5
with the material world (samsara) which is evil. (This is similar to some gnostic teachings).
The suffering or blessings in the material world are because of one’s karma accumulated from
previous births. Therefore for a Hindu, salvation means breaking away from the everlasting
cycle of rebirth in the material birth and be united with the Supreme Spirit and attaining eternal
bliss by perfecting his karma. In absence of a personal and righteous God, sin is not against
God, and one is responsible only to himself. There is no final judgement for ‘adharma’ only
consequences such as inferior birth, demonic wombs (preta yoni), sickness and sufferings in
next birth. A person may become increasingly sinless by works of dharma such as austerities
(tapah), chanting mantras, sacrifices, charity etc.; gaining knowledge under an able guru, and
through devotion. The interviewee claims that several great and holy men of past attained a
sinless state by these means. Without any absolute standards of perfection a Hindu sees sin and
perfection only in relative terms. Salvation means to him means losing his identity and
becoming one for ever with “ultimate reality”. Biblical salvation is being with a personal God
all through eternity, enjoying Him forever.
According to the Muslim couple interviewed (Appendix B)9 sin is a deed that is done against
one’s own moral sense of right or wrong or violation of a prohibition by Allah. However,
contrary to Biblical understanding, sin according to their faith is an evil deed or mistake made
wilfully or out of ignorance but is not a transgression against God himself. Allah forgives the
person when he accepts his mistake. According to them Adam was also forgiven when he asked
after being thrown out of paradise for his disobedience. So there is no inherited sin or sin nature.
Man commits sin because he has his own desires and a free will to act. Moreover he may sin
being influenced by Iblis (devil) who is allowed by Allah to tempt and deceive people. Allah
may overlook many sins committed by common people due to ignorance, but punish smallest
mistake by otherwise pious person according to his sovereign will. On the one hand, Allah
saved his chosen ones from sin through divine interventions. On other hand there is no certainty
of forgiveness or eternal destiny. One must continue doing good deeds recommended in the
religion in hope of finding favour with Allah and entry into paradise. From opinion gathered
from this interview, it appears that Allah of Muslim is not like the God of Bible who is Holy,
Love and Himself is the standard of righteousness and justice.10 He is a controlling god who
9
Ahmed and Mehjabi, "Understanding of Sin According to Muslim Faith," interview by author, January 20,
2019, Kolkata. (Transcript available as Appendix B on page 11)
10
Grudem, Systematic Theology, 197-205
6
likes to keep his people guessing and does not seemed to be concerned about their moral
perfection, holiness or salvation.
To a Hindu sin is a serious matter as he believes that he needs to take several births before the
debt of sin (negative karma) is paid back. Resigning to karma is fatalistic and often frustrating
as one is not sure the number of rebirths one has to take before salvation (moksha) can be
attained. It can be explained to a Hindu that God of the Bible takes sin of mankind much more
seriously and is greatly pained by the human conditions stuck in self effort without help. God
in Jesus fulfilled all requirement of dharma (righteousness) by his perfect living (Matt 3:15,
17-20) and His perfect work on the cross. Christ is treasure of all knowledge and wisdom (Col
2:3) hence the perfect guru who can take sins away and open ways to true devotion (John 4:23-
24). So, now salvation is a free gift that can be obtained in this birth by repentance and faith
in His atoning and substitutory work.
A Muslim believes that man is born sinless and does not have sin nature from which he needs
to be save. His sinless state gets corrupted either by external influence or by mistakes made out
of ignorance or wilful disobedience. However they can be cleaned up by asking for forgiveness
and works and efforts that would please Allah. Hence, there is no need of a saviour. Muslim
believe they can ask for forgiveness from sins, but Allah may or may not forgive them. Hence,
there is no assurance of salvation for a Muslim.
A Muslim believe that one must be sorry for sins and repent, but the idea that payment of sin
is required by a holy God is not a part of Islam. Since, Muslim takes holiness and perfection of
God seriously, one may begin with emphasising the holiness of God from passages in Bible
such as Exodus 15:11; 1 Samuel 2:2; Joshua 24:19; Psalm 93:5 and hatred for sin in
Deuteronomy 25:16; Proverbs 6:16-19. This could be followed by a rhetorical question that
how a holy God who hates sin simply forgive without a penalty. Examples from human justice
system such as “Can a just judge let go a criminal without punishment?” may drive home need
for a Saviour.
7
As long as the Muslim believes he can atone for sin himself, the message of the gospel will be
foolishness to him. If he comes to understand that “no one will be declared righteous in his
sight by observing the law” (Romans 3:20), the door is open for the light of the gospel.11
It is important to bear in mind that we can only contextualize and explain by words about sin
and salvation to those of other faiths. It is ultimately the work of Holy Spirit to convict them
of their sins (John 16:8) and open their eyes to the truth of the Gospel.
6. Conclusion
The interviewees chosen for this writing were zealous and knowledgeable about their religion,
so they reflected understanding of sin according to their respective faiths. In reality we come
across people whose worldviews are not only influenced by their religion but also their
environment, secular education, popular culture and personal philosophies. So, each individual
will have his own unique perspective towards sin and salvation. The learning point through this
assignment, therefore is the importance of asking questions and listening to ones belief without
judging them. The objective of listening to a person of other faith should be twofold. First is to
find the commonalities of the person’s beliefs with Biblical understanding that would serve as
the starting point. Second is understanding the areas of frustrating gaps and struggles he faces
in his beliefs and bringing in the truth of the Bible to fill the gap. This is the model Paul used
while preaching in Athens in Acts 17:16-34.
At the same time one must remain sensitive to the Holy Spirit for understanding and guidance.
It is essential to pray that our message of truth and good news do not come with words alone
but in love with the power, with Holy Spirit and deep conviction. (1 Thes 1:5)
7. Bibliography
Anita, Josephine. Theology -I Study Guide. Southern Asia Bible College, Bangalore: Distance Learning
Department, 2009.
Baibhaw, Govind. "Understanding Sin According to Hindu Faith." Telephone interview by author.
January 13, 2019.
11
GotQuestions.org, "Witnessing to Muslims - What Is the Key?" GotQuestions.org, January 09, 2019, ,
accessed January 27, 2019, https://www.gotquestions.org/witnessing-Muslims.html.
8
Easton, M. G. Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Public Domain, 1897.
Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Publishing Group, 1990.
GotQuestions.org. "Witnessing to Muslims - What Is the Key?" GotQuestions.org. January 09, 2019.
Accessed January 27, 2019. https://www.gotquestions.org/witnessing-Muslims.html.
Ahmed, and Mehjabi. "Understanding of Sin According to Muslim Faith." Interview by author. January
20, 2019.
V, Jayaram. "The Concept of Sin in Hinduism." Symbolism of Sagara Manthan or the Churning of the
Ocean. Accessed January 27, 2019. https://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/h_sin.asp.
9
Appendix A: Transcript of Interview with A Hindu
Govind is a Master in Hotel Administration and Assistant Professor with a Hotel Management
college in Siliguri. He always had been zealous of his faith. He loves to read Vivekananda, and
books by various Hindu swamis and scholars. The interview was conducted telephonically and
recorded.
10
Q: Is it possible to live a sinless life?
Govind: Yes it is possible. One can renounce the world and do ‘tapah’ (austerities) under an
able guru, who can take away the sins and thus he can move towards divine.
11
Appendix B: Transcript of Interview with Muslim Couple
Ahmed and Mehjabi are a young Muslim Couple. Ahmed is working for a bank and Mehjabi is
a housewife who is done her masters in Urdu. Both have been brought up in a strong Islamic
families and had been taught about their faith since childhood and are devout Muslims. During
the interview Mehjabi was more vocal, but an introvert Ahemd agreed with all what she said,
pitching in only when needed. The interview was in Hindi and is translated in English in this
transcript.
Q: But where did this moral sense of right and wrong comes from?
Mehjabi: (Chuckles) there is surely someone who is up there who made us and put this into
us.
12
fruit that was forbidden by Allah. She convinced Adam to eat it too. This is where man started
disobeying.
However, there is one good thing in human. If he makes mistakes he accepts it sooner or later,
either out of fear, guilt or shame. When Adam disobeyed he was thrown out of paradise and
separated from Eve. At that time he felt scared and ashamed and asked God for forgiveness,
and Allah forgave him. So whenever man feels sorry for his mistakes and asks for forgiveness
he is forgiven.
Q: You mean the free will of man is the reason for sin? Or is there are other things as
well?
Mehjabi: Yes there is. When Iblis or Satan was thrown out of paradise he felt agitated. Since
he has served and worshipped Allah for long he wanted some rewards from him. So, he was
rewarded with life till the Qayamat (doom’s day) and power to deceive human beings. He uses
this power especially with people whose souls are weak and give into temptation.
Mehjabi: If you see all the prophets that Allah has sent did not commit sin. Allah protected
them from sin. For example, our prophet when he was a child wanted to see a program the
content of which is forbidden in our religion. So, Allah put him in deep sleep and he continued
sleeping for three days till the program was over. So this how Allah himself protected him from
sinning.
Q: Earlier you said that if anyone asks for forgiveness God would forgive him just like
that? What about the demands of his righteousness?
Ahmed: God sees the heart of the person. He knows that man can make mistake. So if anyone
commits a mistake and then really feel sorry, God will forgive him. He won’t only be forgiven
13
but he would be as he was earlier, as if had never sinned. Allah loves those who comes back to
him.
Q: Does it mean if I continue sinning and remain ignorant God would overlook my sin?
Mehjabi: All are encouraged to gain knowledge that will take us to realize of our mistakes.
Moreover, even if a person is doing wrong he is also doing a lot of right. Robin Hood for
example was a dacoit. That was wrong, but he did lot of good by helping those in need. God
rewards us for our good works. However, we cannot say who will come under Allah’s wrath
or who will find favour is according to his sovereign will. Allah may forgive the vilest of sinner
and then punish a pious person for smallest of mistake.
14