Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rice Tariffication)
February 25, 2019 | 12:03 am
Commentary
By Caesar B. Cororaton, Krista Danielle S. Yu and Marites M. Tiongco
School of Economics, De La Salle University
AFTER 24 YEARS since the Philippines was granted approval in 1995 by the
World Trade Organization (WTO) to impose quantitative restriction (QR) on
rice importation into the country, the government finally eliminated the quota
system on rice importation through the passage of RA 11203. The law, which
was recently signed, will be implemented on March 5, 2019. One of the key
features of RA 11203 is the replacement of the rice importation quota system
with tariffs. In the new law, the following tariffs apply:
(ii) 40% if within the minimum access volume (MAV) of 350,000 metric tons for
imports coming from countries outside of ASEAN
The objective of this short note is to present our simulation results of the
potential economic impact of RA 11203 on rice farmers, rice imports,
consumer prices, Filipino consumers, government tariff revenue, and poverty.
The simulation was conducted using a Philippine economic model. We
considered two scenarios involving a complete elimination of QR: (i) without
tariff replacement on rice imports; and (ii) with rice tariffs in RA 11203. The
simulations were compared to the base case where the QR on rice
importation is retained.
3. In both cases, the elimination of the rice QR will result in lower domestic
prices of rice, which in turn leads to higher volume of rice consumption. The
value of rice consumption however will decline by P2.1 billion despite the
increase in the volume of rice consumption largely because of the decrease in
the domestic prices of rice as a result of the tariffication of rice QR.
4. In both cases, the tariffication of the QR will result in lower inflation. The
reduction in the overall price is larger in the case of no tariff replacement,
mainly because tariffs are additional taxes on consumption. Across decile
income groups, however, the decline in consumer prices is higher in lower
income groups largely because these groups have relatively higher
expenditure share on rice in their consumption basket. Cororaton and Yu
(2019) have noted that 20.2% of consumption of poor households is on rice as
compared to 10.9% of consumption of non-poor.
5. Both cases are poverty-reducing. The number of poor who will be lifted out
of poverty is considerably higher in the first case at 409,956 compared to
38,060 for the second case mainly because of the higher reduction in
consumer prices. However, the negative effects on palay farmers are
significantly higher in the first case with no tariff replacement compared to the
case with tariffs under RA 11203.
The rice QR system which lasted for 24 years generated sizable pure
economic rent that went directly to the pockets of select few. It is about time to
tariffy the rent and redistribute these to the rice farmers who will be negatively
affected by the influx of cheaper imported rice. The higher expected increase
in government tariff revenue generated through RA 11203 will be more than
enough to assist palay farmers and may be used by the government to
increase the assistance to palay farmers through direct income support or
through productivity assistance, e.g., the development of improved rice
varieties that can withstand and adapt to rapid changes in weather conditions,
in addition to the programmes specified under the Rice Competitiveness
Enhancement Fund.
All told, the implementation of RA 11203 was a right policy move by the
government to correct the distortion created by the rice QR that puts heavy
burden on poor.