Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 551

Chapter 1

The Nature of Strategic Management

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 1 -1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
REMEMBER

If you are what you eat,


then definitely
you are what you plan for.

Ch 1 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Prime Task of
Strategic Management

Peter Drucker: -- think through the


overall mission of a business. Ask
the key question: “What is our
Business?”

Ch 1 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management:
Some Basic Assumptions
 Plan or be planned for.
 No planning is planning for failure.
 If you think planning process is expensive,
try ignorance (no planning).
 Sometimes planning is more important than
plans.
 Good old days are not sufficient to secure
future success (Vision and mission).
 If you don’t know where are you going, any
road will take there (strategic direction).

Ch 1 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Thinking & Strategists
 Strategic thinking is done by maintaining focus, thinking long term,
sorting out what “important” vs. what is “noise” and acting
accordingly.
 An organization can continuously regenerate itself by envisioning its
future, assessing what and where it is currently, and determining what
goals and activities are necessary to move the organization toward its
intended future.
 The key element that makes long-range planning “strategic“ is the
process of creating and evaluating alternatives possible outcomes
(scenarios) based on data collected from the many environments that
influence an organization (such as political, economic, social, and
technological environments).
 Strategic thinking involves making some assumptions about the future
environments of an organization.

Ch 1 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Thinking & Strategists
 The gathering of environmental information and adapting to
environmental change are the primary characteristics of planning that
make it strategic.
 Strategic planning works best when the guiding members of an
organization revisit what “business” they are in, who their customers
and stakeholders are, and what these constituents need and expect.
 Strategic thinking states how components of the whole organization
relate to each other within their internal and external environments
both now and in the future. Because of this, strategic thinking provides
direction for, and constraints on, long-range, intermediate, and short-
range planning.

Ch 1 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management – Defined

Art & science of formulating,


implementing, and evaluating,
cross-functional decisions that
enable an organization to achieve its
objectives.

Ch 1 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management – Defined

 Strategic Management is that set of managerial


decisions and actions that determines the long-run
performance of a corporation (Wheelen and
Hunger).
 It includes four stages:
 Environmental scanning.
 Strategy formulation.
 Strategy implementation.
 Strategy evaluation and control.

Ch 1 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management

In essence, the strategic plan is a


company’s game plan.

Ch 1 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management
achieves a firm’s success
through integration --

Management Marketing

Finance/Accounting Production/Operations

Research & Development MIS

Ch 1 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Formulation

Vision & Mission

External Opportunities & Threats

Internal Strengths & Weaknesses

Long-Term Objectives

Alternative Strategies

Strategy Selection

Ch 1 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Issues in Strategy
Formulation

New Business opportunities


Businesses to abandon
Allocation of resources
Expansion or diversification
International markets
Mergers or joint ventures
Avoidance of hostile takeover

Ch 1 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Implementation

Annual Objectives

Policies

Employee Motivation

Resource Allocation

Ch 1 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy
Implementation

Action Stage of Strategic


Management –

Most difficult stage


Mobilization of employees &
managers
Interpersonal skills critical
Consensus on goal pursuit

Ch 1 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation

Internal Review

External Review

Performance Metrics

Corrective Actions

Ch 1 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy
Evaluation
Final Stage of Strategic
Management

Subject to future
modification
Today’s success no
guarantee of future success
New & different problems
Complacency leads to
demise

Ch 1 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Intuition and
Analysis

The strategic management process


attempts to organize quantitative and
qualitative information under conditions
of uncertainty.

Ch 1 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Intuition and
Analysis

Intuition is based on:


 Past experiences
 Judgment
 Feelings

Intuition is Useful for decision making


 Conditions of great uncertainty
 Conditions with little precedent

Ch 1 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Intuition & Analysis

Intuition & Judgment

Involve Management at all levels

Influence all Analyses

Ch 1 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Intuition & Analysis

Analytical Thinking

Intuitive Thinking

Ch 1 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Adapting to Change

Organizations must monitor


events
 On-going process
 Internal and external events

 Timely changes

Ch 1 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management is
Gaining and Maintaining
Competitive Advantage

“Anything that a firm does especially


well compared to rival firms”

Ch 1 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Achieving Sustained
Competitive Advantage

1. Adapting to change in external trends,


internal capabilities and resources

2. Effectively formulating, implementing &


evaluating strategies

Ch 1 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Adapting to Change

Rate & magnitude of change


increasing dramatically

E-commerce

Demographics

Technology

Ch 1 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Adapting to Change

Effective Adaptation

Requires long-term focus

Ch 1 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Adapting to Change – Key
Strategic Management
Questions
 What kind of business should
we become?
 Are we in the right fields
 Are there new competitors
 What strategies should we
pursue?
 How are our customers
changing?

Ch 1 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Strategists – Firm’s success/failure

Various Job Titles:

•Chief Executive Officer (CEO)


•Chief Strategy Officer (CSO)
•President
•Owner
•Board Chair
•Executive Director

Ch 1 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Vision Statement –
What do we want to become?

Mission Statement –
What is our business?

Ch 1 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Opportunities and Threats (External)

 Largely beyond the control of a single


organization

Ch 1 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Opportunities & Threats (External)


Analysis of Trends:
• Economic
• Social
• Cultural
• Demographic/Environmental
• Political, Legal, Governmental
• Technological
• Competitors

Ch 1 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms
Opportunities & Threats

Environmental Scanning (Industry Analysis)

 Process of conducting research and


gathering and assimilating external
information

Ch 1 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms
Opportunities & Threats

Basic Tenet of Strategic Management

Take advantage of
External Opportunities

Strategy Formulation

Avoid/minimize impact of
External Threats

Ch 1 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Strengths & Weaknesses (Internal)

 Controllable activities performed


especially well or poorly

Ch 1 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Strengths & Weaknesses (Internal)

Typically located in functional areas of the firm


• Management
• Marketing
• Finance/Accounting
• Production/Operations
• Research & Development
• Computer Information Systems

Ch 1 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms
Strengths & Weaknesses
Assessing the Internal Environment

Financial Ratios

Performance Metrics
Internal Factors
Industry Averages

Survey Data

Ch 1 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Long-term Objectives

 Mission-driven pursuit of specified results


more than one year out

Ch 1 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Long-term Objectives

Essential for ensuring the firm’s success


• Provide direction
• Aid in evaluation
• Create synergy
• Focus coordination
• Basis for planning, motivating, and
controlling

Ch 1 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Strategies

 Means by which long-term objectives are


achieved

Ch 1 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Strategies
Some Examples
• Geographic expansion
• Diversification
• Acquisition
• Market penetration
• Retrenchment
• Liquidation
• Joint venture

Ch 1 -39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Annual Objectives

 Short-term milestones that firms must


achieve to attain long-term objectives

Ch 1 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Terms

Policies

 Means by which annual objectives will be


achieved

Ch 1 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Comprehensive strategic management model
External
Audit

Chapter 3

Long-Term Generate, Implement Implement Measure &


Vision
Objectives Evaluate, Strategies: Strategies: Evaluate
&
Select Mgmt Issues Marketing, Performance
Mission
Strategies Fin/Acct,
R&D, CIS
Chapter 2 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9

Internal
Audit

Chapter 4

Ch 1 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management Model

Strategic Management Process

 Dynamic & Continuous


 More formal in larger organizations

Ch 1 -43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management Model

1. Identify Existing --

• Vision
• Mission
• Objectives
• Strategies

Ch 1 -44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategic Management Model

2. Audit external environment


3. Audit internal environment
4. Establish long-term objectives
5. Generate, evaluate & select
strategies
6. Implement selected strategies
7. Measure & evaluate performance

Ch 1 -45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Benefits of Strategic
Management

• Proactive in shaping firm’s future

• Initiate and influence firm’s activities


• Formulate better strategies
•Systematic, logical, rational

Ch 1 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Benefits of Strategic
Management

Financial Benefits

• Improvement in sales
• Improvement in profitability
• Productivity improvement

Ch 1 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Benefits of Strategic
Management

Non-Financial Benefits

• Improved understanding of competitors strategies


• Enhanced awareness of threats
• Reduced resistance to change
• Enhanced problem-prevention capabilities

Ch 1 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Benefits of Strategic
Management (Greenley)

1. Identification of Opportunities
2. Objective view of management problems
3. Improved coordination & control
4. Minimizes adverse conditions & changes
5. Decisions that better support objectives

Ch 1 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Benefits of Strategic
Management (Greenley – cont’d)

6. Effective allocation of time & resources


7. Internal communication among personnel
8. Integration of individual behaviors
9. Clarify individual responsibilities
10. Encourage forward thinking

Ch 1 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Benefits of Strategic
Management (Greenley – cont’d )

11. Encourages favorable attitude toward


change
12. Provides
discipline and formality to the
management of the business

Ch 1 -51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Why Some Firms Do No
Strategic Planning

Poor reward structures


Fire-fighting
Waste of time
Too expensive
Laziness
Content with success

Ch 1 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Why Some Firms Do No
Strategic Planning

Fear of failure
Overconfidence
Prior bad experience
Self-interest
Fear of the unknown
Suspicion

Ch 1 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Business Ethics & Strategic
Management

Business Ethics defined --

 Principles of conduct within organizations


that guide decision making and behavior.

Ch 1 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Business Ethics & Strategic
Management

Good business ethics –

 Prerequisite for good strategic management

Ch 1 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Business Ethics & Strategic
Management

Code of business ethics –

 Provides basis on which policies can be


devised to guide daily behavior and
decisions in the workplace

Ch 1 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Business Ethics & Strategic
Management

Business practices always considered unethical –

 Misleading advertising
 Misleading labeling
 Harm to the environment
 Insider trading
 Dumping flawed products on foreign markets
 Poor product or service safety
 Padding expense accounts

Ch 1 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Natural Environment
Perspective

ISO used to gain strategic advantage

 ISO 9000 focuses on quality control


 > 1.5 million companies incorporate ISO

Ch 1 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Natural Environment
Perspective

ISO 14000 standards

 Voluntary standards
 ISO 14001 standard for Environmental
Management System
 Firms minimize harmful effects on
environment

Ch 1 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Nature of Global
Competition

International/multinational corporations

 Parent company
 Host country

Ch 1 -60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Nature of Global
Competition

Strategy implementation may be difficult

 Cultural differences
 Norms
 Values
 Work ethic

Ch 1 -61
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Advantages of International
Operations

Absorb excess capacity


Reduce unit costs
Spread risk over wider markets
Low-cost production facilities

Ch 1 -62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Advantages of International
Operations (cont’d)

Less intense competition


Lower taxes
Economies of scale

Ch 1 -63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of International
Operations

Difficult communications
Underestimate foreign competition
Cultural barriers to effective management
Complications arising from currency
differences

Ch 1 -64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 2
The Business Vision & Mission

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 2 -1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision

“The last thing IBM needs right now is a


vision.” (July 1993)

What IBM needs most right now is a


vision.” (March 1996)

-- Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., CEO, IBM Corporation

Ch 2 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision

Agreement on the basic vision for which the


firm strives to achieve in the long run is
critically important to the firm’s success.

Ch 2 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision

“What do we want to become?”

Ch 2 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision

Clear Business
Vision

Comprehensive
Mission Statement

Ch 2 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision & Mission

Shared Vision --
 Creates commonality of interests
 Reduce daily monotony

 Provides opportunity & challenge

Ch 2 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision Statement Examples

A national organization which represents its


members in all aspects of poultry and eggs
on both a national and international level.

-- U.S. Poultry & Egg Association

Ch 2 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision Statement Examples

The Vision of USGS is to be a world leader in


the natural sciences through our scientific
excellence and responsiveness to society’s
needs.

-- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)

Ch 2 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statements

-- 90% of all companies have used a


mission statement in the previous five
years.

Ch 2 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statement

“What is our business?”

Ch 2 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statements

•Enduring statement of purpose


•Distinguishes one firm from another
•Declares the firm’s reason for being

Ch 2 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statements

Also referred to as:

•Creed statement
•Statement of purpose
•Statement of philosophy
•Statement of business principles

Ch 2 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statements

Reveal what an organization wants to be


and whom it wants to serve

Ch 2 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statements

Essential for effectively establishing


objectives and formulating strategies.

Ch 2 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Specific questions that help
form startegic vision/mission

 What business we are in now?


 What business do we want to be in?
 What will our customers want in future?
 What are expectations of our stakeholders?
 Who will be our future competitors? Suppliers?
Partners?
 What should our competitive scope be?
 How will technology impact our industry?
 What environmental scenarios are possible?

Ch 2 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Products
Services Markets
Customers

Technology
Mission
Employees
Elements

Survival
Growth
Profit
Public
Image
Self-Concept Philosophy

Ch 2 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
CIA Vision

 We will provide knowledge


and take action to ensure the
national security of the
United States and the
prevention of American life
and ideals.

Ch 2 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
CIA Mission

 We are the eyes and ears of the nation and


at times its hidden hand. We accomplish this
mission by:
 Collecting intelligence that matters.
 Providing relevant, timely, and objective all-source
analysis.
 Conducting covert action at the direction of the
president to preempt threats or achieve United
states policy objectives.

Ch 2 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
CIA Values

 In pursuit of our country’s interests, we put Nation Before


Agency, Agency before unit, and all before self. What we do
matters.
 Our success depends on our ability to act with total discretion and
an ability to protect sources and methods.
 We provide objective, unbiased information and analysis.
 Our mission requires complete personal integrity and personal
courage, physical and intellectual.
 We accomplish things other than cannot, often at great risk.
When the stakes are highest and dangers greatest, we are there
and there first.
 We stand by one another and behind one another. Service,
sacrifice, flexibility, teamwork, and quiet patriotism (loyalty) are
our hallmarks.

Ch 2 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statement Examples

It is the California Energy Commission’s


mission to assess, advocate, and act to
through public/private partnerships to improve
energy systems that promote a strong
economy and healthy environment

-- California Energy Commission

Ch 2 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statement Examples

John Deere has grown and prospered through


a long-standing partnership with the world’s
most productive farmers. Today, John Deere
is a global company with several equipment
operations and complementary service
businesses. These businesses are closely
interrelated, providing the company with
significant growth opportunities and other
synergistic benefits.

-- John Deere, Inc.


Ch 2 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements
Avis Rent A Car
 “Our mission is renting cars. Our mission is
total customer satisfaction.”

McCormick & Company


 “The primary mission is to expand our
worldwide leadership position in the spice,
seasoning, and flavoring market.

Ch 2 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements
Saturn Division of GM
 “To market vehicles developed and manufactured in the U.S.
that are world leaders in quality, cost, and customer satisfaction
through the integration of people, technology, and business
systems and to transfer knowledge, technology, and experience
through out GM.”
Eastman Kodak
 “To be the best chemicals and electronic imaging.”

Ch 2 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements
Public Service Company of New Mexico
 “Our mission is to work for the success of people we serve
providing our customers reliable electric service, energy
information, and energy options that best satisfy their
needs.”
American Red Cross
 “The mission is to improve the quality of human life; to
enhance self-reliance and concern for others; and to help
people avoid, prepare for, and cope with emergencies.”

Ch 2 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements

Otis Elevator
 Key Market: To provide any customers.
 Contribution: a means of moving people
and things up, down and
sideways over short
distances.
 Distinction: with higher reliability than
any similar enterprise in the
world.

Ch 2 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements
McDonald’s
 Key Market: To offer the fast food
customer.
 Contribution: food prepared in the same
high- quality manner world-
wide, tasty, and reasonably
priced.
 Distinction: delivered in a consistent, low-
key décor and friendly
atmosphere.

Ch 2 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements

Wall-Mart
 Key Market: To offer all of the fine
customers in our territories.
 Contribution: all of their household needs.
 Distinction: in a manner in which they
continue to think of us fondly.

Ch 2 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Our Mission ….. Impossible

Ch 2 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Examples: Mission / vision statements
Our Mission
 Key Market:
.
 Contribution:
.
 Distinction:

Ch 2 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision & Mission

Many organizations develop both


vision & mission statements.

Ch 2 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision & Mission

Profit & vision are necessary to effectively


motivate a workforce

Ch 2 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision & Mission

Shared vision creates a community of


interests

Ch 2 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Developing Vision & Mission

Clear mission is needed before alternative


strategies can be formulated and
implemented

Ch 2 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Developing Vision & Mission

Participation from diverse managers is


important in developing the mission.

Ch 2 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Importance of Mission

Benefits from a strong mission

Unanimity of Purpose

Resource Allocation
Mission
Organizational Climate

Focal point for work


structure

Ch 2 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Effective Missions

Broad in scope

Generate strategic
alternatives

Not overly specific

Reconciles interests among


diverse stakeholders

Finely balanced between


specificity & generality

Ch 2 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Effective Missions

Arouse positive feelings &


emotions

Motivate readers to action

Generate favorable
impression of the firm

Ch 2 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Effective Missions

Reflect future growth

Provide criteria for strategy


selection

Basis for generating &


evaluating strategic options

Are dynamic in nature

Ch 2 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission & Customer
Orientation – Vern McGinnis

 Define what the organization is


 Define what it aspires to be
 Limited to exclude some ventures
 Broad enough to allow for growth
 Distinguishes firm from all others
 Stated clearly – understood by all

Ch 2 -39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission & Customer
Orientation

An Effective Mission Statement --

 Anticipates customer needs


 Identifies customer needs
 Provides product/service to satisfy needs

Ch 2 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social Policy & Mission

Managerial philosophy shapes social policy --

 Affects development of vision & mission

 Responsibilities to –
 Consumers
 Environmentalists
 Minorities
 Communities

Ch 2 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social Policy & Mission

Social policy should be integrated in all


strategic-management activities.

Mission should convey the social


responsibility of the firm

Ch 2 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vision & Mission

Research results are mixed, however,


firms with formal mission statements --

 2x average return on shareholder’s equity


 Positive relationship to company performance
 30% high return on certain financial measures

Ch 2 -43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
PepsiCo Mission
PepsiCo’s mission is to increase the value of our
shareholders’ investment. We do this through sales
growth, cost controls, and wise investment
resources. We believe our commercial success
depends upon offering quality and value to our
consumers and customers; providing products that
are safe, wholesome, economically efficient and
environmentally sound; and providing a fair return to
our investors while adhering to the highest
standards of integrity.

Ch 2 -44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Ben & Jerry’s Mission
Ben & Jerry’s mission is to make, distribute and sell
the finest quality all-natural ice cream and related
products in a wide variety of innovative flavors made
from Vermont dairy products. To operate the
Company on a sound financial basis of profitable
growth, increasing value for our shareholders, and
creating career opportunities and financial rewards
for our employees. To operate the Company in a
way that actively recognizes the central role that
business plays in the structure of society by initiating
innovative ways to improve the quality of life of a
broad community—local, national and international.

Ch 2 -45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statement Evaluation Matrix
COMPONENTS

Concern for
Survival,
Products Growth,
Organization Customers Services Markets Profitability Technology

PepsiCo Yes No No Yes No

Ben & Jerry's No Yes Yes Yes No

Ch 2 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Mission Statement Evaluation Matrix

COMPONENTS

Self- Concern for Concern for


Organization Philosophy Concept Public Image Employees

PepsiCo Yes No No No

Ben & Jerry's No Yes Yes Yes

Ch 2 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 3
The External Assessment

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 3 -1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
External Assessment

It is not the strongest of the species that


survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one
most responsive to change. –
Charles Darwin

Nothing focuses the mind better than the


constant sight of a competitor who wants to
wipe you off the map. –
Wayne Calloway, Former CEO, PepsiCo
Ch 3 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Environmental Uncertainty:
Complexity and Change

Complex
H. D. Uncertainty

Complexity

L. D. uncertainty
Simple

Stable Unstable
Change Ch 3 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Environmental Scanning

 Environmental scanning: is
the monitoring, evaluating, and
disseminating of information
from external and internal
environments to key people
within the organization.
 Task Environment: includes
those elements or groups that
directly affect the corporation
and, in turn, are affected by it.

Ch 3 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
External Strategic
Management Audit

-- Environmental Scanning

-- Industry Analysis

Ch 3 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
External Strategic
Management Audit

Identify & Evaluate factors beyond the


control of a single firm
 Increased foreign competition
 Population shifts
 Information technology

Ch 3 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
External Strategic
Management Audit

Purpose of External Audit


 Identify
 Opportunities
 Threats

Ch 3 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key External Forces

•Economic forces
•Social, cultural, demographic &
environmental forces
•Political, governmental & legal forces
•Technological forces
•Competitive forces

Ch 3 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key External Forces & the Organization

Competitors
Suppliers
Distributors
Creditors
Key Customers Opportunities
External Employees &
Forces
Communities Threats
Managers
Stockholders
Labor Unions
Special Interest Groups
Products
Services

Ch 3 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
External Audit

Gather competitive
intelligence –

 Social
 Cultural
 Demographic
 Environmental
 Economic
 Political, legal governmental
 Technological

Ch 3 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
External Audit – Sources of
Information

•Internet
•Libraries
•Suppliers
•Distributors
•Customers
•Competition

Ch 3 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Performing External Audit --
Variables

•Market share
•Breadth of competing products
•World economies
•Foreign affiliates
•Proprietary account advantages

Ch 3 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Performing External Audit --
Variables

•Price competitiveness
•Technological advancements
•Interest rates
•Pollution abatement

Ch 3 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Performing External Audit

Long-term orientation

Measurable
External
Factors Applicable to
competing firms

Hierarchical

Ch 3 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Industrial Organization (I/O)
View

-- Industry factors more important than


internal factors

 Performance determined by industry forces

Ch 3 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
I/O Perspective Firm Performance

Industry Properties

Economies of Scale

Barriers to market entry

Product differentiation

Level of competitiveness

Ch 3 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Economic Forces

•Availability of credit
•Level of disposable income
•Interest rates
•Inflation rates

Ch 3 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Economic Forces

•Money market rates


•Fed Gov’t deficits
•GDP trend
•Consumption patterns

Ch 3 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Economic Variables

Unemployment trends

Worker productivity levels

Value of the dollar in world markets

Stock market trends

Foreign economic conditions

Ch 3 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Economic Variables

Import/Export factors

Demand shifts for goods/services

Income differences by region/customer

Price fluctuations

Exportation of labor and capital

Ch 3 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Economic Variables

Monetary policies

Fiscal policies

Tax rates

OPEC policies

ECC policies

Ch 3 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic
& Environmental Forces

Major Impact –
•Products
•Services
•Markets
•Customers

Ch 3 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Social, Cultural, Demographic &
Environmental Variables

Childbearing rates

Number of special interest groups

Number of marriages & divorces

Number of births & deaths

Immigration & emigration rates

Ch 3 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic &
Environmental Forces

Actuarial rates

Monitor Key Per capita income

Variables Attitudes toward business

Avg. disposable income

Ch 3 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic &
Environmental Forces

Consumer behavior

Monitor Key Ethical concerns

Variables Attitudes toward saving

Racial equality

Ch 3 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic &
Environmental Forces

Avg. educational level

Monitor Key Governmental regulation

Variables Attitudes toward customer service

Attitudes toward quality

Ch 3 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic &
Environmental Forces

Energy conservation

Monitor Key Social responsibility

Variables Leisure time values

Recycling

Ch 3 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic &
Environmental Forces

Waste management

Monitor Key Air & water pollution

Variables Ozone depletion

Endangered species

Ch 3 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Political, Government & Legal
Forces

Government Regulation

Key opportunities & threats


 Antitrust legislation
 Tax rates

 Lobbying efforts

 Patent laws

Ch 3 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Political, Government & Legal
Forces

Increasing Global Interdependence

Political variables impact –


 Formulation of strategies
 Implementation of strategies

Ch 3 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Political, Government & Legal
Forces

Increasing Global Interdependence

Strategists in a global economy --


 Forecast political climates
 Legalistic skills
 Diverse world cultures

Ch 3 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Political, Government & Legal
Forces

Globalization of Industry
 Worldwide trend toward similar
consumption patterns
 Global buyers and sellers
 E-commerce
 Technology for instant currency transfers

Ch 3 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Political, Governmental, & Legal Variables

Regulation/deregulation

Tax law changes

Special tariffs

PAC’s

Voter participation rates

Ch 3 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Political, Governmental, & Legal Variables
(cont’d)

Number of patents

Changes in patent laws

Environmental protection laws

Equal employment legislation

Government subsidies

Ch 3 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Political, Governmental, & Legal Variables
(cont’d)

Anti-trust enforcement

Global relationships

Import/export regulations

Political conditions

Location and severity of terrorist activity

Ch 3 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Technological Forces

Major Impact –
•Internet
•Communications
•Semiconductors

Ch 3 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Technological Forces

Significance of IT
•Chief Information Officer (CIO)
•Chief Technology Officer (CTO)

Ch 3 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Technological Forces

Technology-based issues

Essential for nearly every strategic decision

Ch 3 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces

Collection & evaluation of data on


competitors is essential for successful
strategy formulation

Ch 3 -39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces

Competition on virtually all industries can be


described as intense.

Ch 3 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces
Identifying Rival Firms

Strengths
•Weaknesses
•Capabilities
•Opportunities
•Threats
•Objectives
•Strategies

Ch 3 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Questions Concerning Competitors

Their strengths

Their weaknesses

Their objectives and strategies

Their responses to external variables

Their vulnerability to our alternative strategies

Ch 3 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Questions Concerning Competitors (cont’d)

Our vulnerability to strategic counterattack

Our product/service positioning

Entry and exit of firms in the industry

Key factors for our current position in industry

Sales/profit rankings of competitors over time

Ch 3 -43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Questions Concerning Competitors (cont’d)

Nature of supplier & distributor relationships

The threat of substitute products/services

Should we keep our strategies secret from


employees and stakeholders?

Ch 3 -44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces
7 Characteristics of most
Competitive U.S. Firms:

1. Market share matters


2. Understand what business you are in
3. Broke or not, fix it
4. Innovate or evaporate

Ch 3 -45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces
7 Characteristics of most
Competitive U.S. Firms:

5. Acquisition is essential to growth


6. People make a difference
7. No substitute for quality

Ch 3 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model of Competition

Potential development
of substitute products

Bargaining power Rivalry among Bargaining power


of suppliers competing firms of Buyers

Potential entry of new


competitors

Ch 3 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model

Rivalry Among Competing Firms

 Most powerful of the five forces


 Focus on competitive advantage of
strategies

Ch 3 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
(1) Rivalry among existing firms

• Number of competitors.
• Rate of industry growth.
• Product or service characteristics.
• Amount of fixed costs.
• Capacity.

• Height of exit barriers.


• Diversity of rivals.

Ch 3 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
(2) Threats of new entrants

 New entrants bring to the industry new capacity, a desire to


gain market share, and substantial resources.
 An entry barriers is an obstruction that makes it difficult for a
company to enter an industry.
 Some possible barriers to entry are:
 Economies of scale.

 Product differentiation.

 Capital requirements.

 Switching costs.

 Access to distribution channels.

 Disadvantages independent of size.

 Government policy.

Ch 3 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model

Potential Entry of New Competitors

 Barriers to entry are important


 Quality, pricing, and marketing can
overcome barriers

Ch 3 -51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
(3) Threats of substitute products or services

 Substitute products are those products that appear to be different but


can satisfy the same need as another products
 Examples:
 Regular mail vs. e.mail.
 Medical glasses vs. contact lenses.
 Airplane, trans, buses.
 Pepsi vs. Asser Asab.

Ch 3 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model

Potential Development of Substitute


Products

 Pressures increase when consumer’s


switching costs decrease
 Firm’s plans for increased capacity &
market penetration

Ch 3 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
(4) Bargaining power of Buyers
A Buyer or a group of buyers is powerful if some of the following factors hold
true:
1. A buyer purchase a large proportion of the seller’s product or
service.
2. A buyer has the potential to integrate backward by producing the
product itself.
3. Alternative suppliers are plentiful because the product is standard or
undifferentiated.
4. Changing suppliers costs very little.
5. The purchase product represents a high percentage of a buyer’s
costs, thus providing incentive to shop around for a lower price.
6. A buyer earns low profits and is thus very sensitive to costs and
service differentiation.
7. The purchased product is unimportant to the final quality or price of a
buyer’s products or service.

Ch 3 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model

Bargaining Power of Buyers

 Customers concentrated or buy in volume


affects intensity of competition
 Consumer power is higher where products
are standard or undifferentiated

Ch 3 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
(5) Bargaining power of Suppliers
A Buyer or a group of buyers is powerful if some of
the following factors apply:
1. The supplier industry is dominated by few
companies.
2. Its product or service is unique and /or it has built
up, but it sells to many.
3. Substitutes are not readily available.
4. Suppliers are able to integrate forward and compete
directly with their present customers.
5. A purchasing industry buys only a small portion of
the supplier group’s goods and services and is thus
unimportant to the supplier.

Ch 3 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

 Large number of suppliers & few


substitutes affects intensity of competition
 Backward integration can gain control or
ownership of suppliers

Ch 3 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Industry Analysis: The External Factor
Evaluation (EFE) Matrix

Summarize & Evaluate

Economic Demographic Governmental

Social Environmental Technological

Cultural Political Competitive

Ch 3 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
EFE – Gateway Computers (2003)
Wtd
Key External Factors Weight Rating
Score

Opportunities
1. Global PC market expected to grow 20%
0.10 3 0.30
in 2004
2. Cost of PC component parts expected to
0.10 3 0.30
decrease 10% - 2004
3. Internet use growing rapidly 0.05 2 0.10
4. China entered WTO; lowered taxes for
0.10 1 0.10
importing PC’s
5. The average income for PC worker has
0.05 3 0.15
declined from $40K/yr to $30k/yr
Ch 3 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
EFE – Gateway Computers (2003) (cont’d)
Wtd
Key External Factors Weight Rating
Score

Opportunities (cont’d)
6. Modernization of business firms and
0.05 2 0.10
government agencies
7. U.S. (& world) economies recovering 0.05 3 0.15
8. 30% of Chinese population can afford a
0.05 1 0.05
PC; only 10% of homes have a PC

Threats 0.10 1 0.10

1. Intense rivalry in industry 0.10 1 0.05

Ch 3 -60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
EFE – Gateway Computers (2003) (cont’d)
Wtd
Key External Factors Weight Rating
Score

Threats (cont’d)
2. Severe price cutting in PC industry 0.10 2 0.20
3. Different countries have different reg’s
0.05 1 0.05
and infrastructure for PC’s
4. Palm & PDA becoming substitutes 0.05 3 0.15
5. Demand exceeds supply of experienced
0.05 4 0.20
PC workers
6. Birth rate in U.S. declining annually 0.05 3 0.15

Ch 3 -61
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
EFE – Gateway Computers (2003) (cont’d)
Wtd
Key External Factors Weight Rating
Score

Threats (cont’d)
7. U.s. consumers and businesses delaying
0.05 2 0.10
purchase of PC’s
8. PC firms diversifying into consumer
0.05 3 0.15
electronics

Total 1.00 2.40

Ch 3 -62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Industry Analysis EFE

Total weighted score of 4.0


 Organization response is outstanding to threats
and weaknesses

Total weighted score of 1.0


 Firm’s strategies not capitalizing on opportunities
or avoiding threats

Ch 3 -63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Industry Analysis EFE

Important --

Understanding the factors used in the EFE


Matrix is more important than the actual
weights and ratings assigned.

Ch 3 -64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Industry Analysis: Competitive Profile
Matrix (CPM)

Identifies firm’s major competitors and


their strengths & weaknesses in
relation to a sample firm’s strategic
positions

Ch 3 -65
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Gateway Apple Dell
Wt Rating Wt’d Rating Wt’d Rating Wt’d
CSF’s Score Score Score

Market share 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.30 4 0.60


Inventory sys 0.08 2 0.16 2 0.16 4 0.32
Fin position 0.10 2 0.20 3 0.30 3 0.30
Prod. Quality 0.08 3 0.24 4 0.32 3 0.24
Cons. Loyalty 0.02 3 0.06 3 0.06 4 0.08
Sales Distr 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 3 0.30
Global Exp. 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.30 4 0.60
Org. Structure 0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 3 0.15

Ch 3 -66
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Gateway Apple Dell
CSF’s (cont’d) Wt Rating Wt’d Rating Wt’d Rating Wt’d
Score Score Score

Prod. Capacity 0.04 3 0.12 3 0.12 3 0.12


E-commerce 0.10 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30
Customer Serv 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 4 0.40
Price
0.02 4 0.08 1 0.02 3 0.06
competitive
Mgt. experience 0.01 2 0.02 4 0.04 2 0.02

Total 1.00 2.83 2.47 3.49

Ch 3 -67
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Industry Analysis CPM

Important --

Just because one firm receives a 3.2 rating


and another receives a 2.8 rating, it does not
follow that the first firm is 20 percent better
than the second.

Ch 3 -68
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 4
The Internal Assessment

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 4 -1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Internal Assessment

The biggest levers you’ve got to change a


company are strategy, structure, and culture.
If I could pick two, I’d pick strategy and
culture. –
Wayne Leonard, CEO, Entergy

Weak leadership can wreck the soundest


strategy. –
Sun Zi

Ch 4 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Nature of an Internal
Audit

Functional Areas of Business

-- Strengths

-- Weaknesses

Ch 4 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of an Internal Audit

Basis for Objectives & Strategies

 Internal strengths/weaknesses
 External opportunities/threats
 Clear statement of mission

Ch 4 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Internal Forces

Functional Business Areas:

Vary by organization
Divisions have differing strengths &
weaknesses

Ch 4 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Internal Forces

Distinctive Competencies:

Firm’s strengths that cannot be easily


matched or imitated by competitors

Ch 4 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Internal Forces

Distinctive Competencies:

Building competitive advantage involves


taking advantage of distinctive
competencies

Ch 4 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Key Internal Forces

Distinctive Competencies:

Strategies designed to improve on a


firm’s weaknesses and turn to strengths

Ch 4 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Internal Audit

Parallels process of external audit

•Information from:
•Management
•Marketing
•Finance/accounting
•Production/operations
•Research & Development
•Management information Systems

Ch 4 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Internal Audit

Involvement in performing an internal


strategic-management audit provides
vehicle for understanding nature and
effect of decisions in other functional
business areas of the firm

Ch 4 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Internal Audit

Key to Organizational Success

Coordination & understanding among


managers from all functional areas

Ch 4 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Internal Audit

Functional Relationships

Number and complexity increases


relative to organization size

Ch 4 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Internal Audit

Financial Ratio Analysis

Exemplifies complexity of relationships


among functional areas of the business

Ch 4 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Resource Based View (RBV)

Approach to Competitive Advantage

Internal resources are more important


than external factors

Ch 4 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Resource Based View (RBV)

3 All Encompassing Categories

1. Physical resources
2. Human resources
3. Organizational resources

Ch 4 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Resource Based View (RBV)

Empirical Indicators

 Rare
 Hard to imitate
 Not easily substitutable

Ch 4 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Strategy & Culture

Organizational Culture

Pattern of behavior developed by an


organization as it learns to cope with its
problem of external adaptation and
internal integration . . . is considered valid
and taught to new members as the correct
way to perceive, think and feel.

Ch 4 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Strategy & Culture

Organizational Culture

 Resistant to change
 May represent
 Strength
 Weakness

Ch 4 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Strategy & Culture

Values

Legends Beliefs

Cultural
Heroes Rites
Products

Symbols Rituals
Myths

Ch 4 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Integrating Strategy & Culture

Organizational Culture Can Inhibit


Strategic Management

 Miss external changes due to strongly


held beliefs
 Natural tendency to “hold the course”
even during times of strategic change

Ch 4 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Value Chain Analysis (VCA)
refers to the process whereby a firm determines the costs
Organizational Culture Can Inhibit
associated with organizational activities from purchasing
Strategic Management
raw materials to manufacturing product(s) to marketing
those products. VCA aims to identify where low-cost
advantages or disadvantages exist anywhere along the
value chain from raw material to customer service
activities.
VCA can enable a firm to better identify its own strengths
and weaknesses, especially as compared to competitors’
value chain analyses and their own data examined over
time
Ch 4 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Functions of Management

1. Planning
2. Organizing
3. Motivating
4. Staffing
5. Controlling

Ch 4 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management
Stage When Most
Function Important
Planning Strategy Formulation

Organizing Strategy Implementation

Motivating Strategy Implementation

Staffing Strategy Implementation

Controlling Strategy Evaluation

Ch 4 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Planning

 Beginning of management process


 Bridge between present & future
 Improves likelihood of attaining
desired results

Ch 4 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Forecasting

Establishing objectives

Planning Devising strategies

Developing policies

Setting goals

Ch 4 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Organizing

 Achieves coordinated effort


 Defines task & authority relationships
 Departmentalization
 Delegation of authority

Ch 4 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Organizational design
Job specialization
Job descriptions
Job specifications
Organizing Span of control
Unity of command
Coordination
Job design
Job analysis

Ch 4 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Motivating

 Influencing to accomplish specific


objectives
 Communication – major component

Ch 4 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Leadership
Communication
Work groups
Job enrichment
Motivating
Job satisfaction
Needs fulfillment
Organizational change
Morale

Ch 4 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Staffing

 Personnel management
 Human resources management

Ch 4 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Wage & salary admin.


Employee benefits
Interviewing
Hiring
Discharging
Staffing
Training
Management development
Affirmative Action
EEO
Labor relations

Ch 4 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Controlling

 Establishing performance standards


 Ensure actual operations conform to
planned operations
 Taking corrective actions

Ch 4 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management

Quality
Financial
Sales
Inventory
Controlling
Expense
Analysis of variance
Rewards
Sanctions

Ch 4 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Audit Checklist

•Does the firm use strategic management


concepts?
•Are objectives/goals measurable? Well
communicated?
•Do managers at all levels plan
effectively?

Ch 4 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Audit Checklist

•Do managers delegate well?


•Is the organization’s structure
appropriate?
•Are job descriptions clear?
•Are job specifications clear?
•Is employee morale high?

Ch 4 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Audit Checklist

•Is employee absenteeism low?


•Is employee turnover low?
•Are the reward mechanisms effective?
•Are the organization’s control
mechanisms effective?

Ch 4 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Customer Needs/Wants for Products/Services

1. Defining
2. Anticipating
3. Creating
4. Fulfilling

Ch 4 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing
Marketing Functions

1. Customer analysis
2. Selling products/services
3. Product & service planning
4. Pricing
5. Distribution
6. Marketing research
7. Opportunity analysis

Ch 4 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Customer surveys

Consumer information

Market positioning
Customer
strategies
Analysis
Customer profiles

Market segmentation
strategies

Ch 4 -39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Advertising
Sales
Promotion
Selling
Products/Services Publicity
Sales force management
Customer relations
Dealer relations

Ch 4 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Test marketing
Brand positioning
Devising warrantees
Planning
Product/Service Packaging
Product features/options
Product style
Quality

Ch 4 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Forward integration
Discounts
Credit terms
Pricing
Condition of sale
Markups
Costs
Unit pricing

Ch 4 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Warehousing
Channels
Coverage
Distribution Retail site locations
Sales territories
Inventory levels
Transportation

Ch 4 -43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Data collection
Marketing Research Data input
Data analysis
Support business functions

Ch 4 -44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing

Assessing costs

Assessing benefits
Opportunity
Analysis
Assessing risks

Cost/benefit/risk analysis

Ch 4 -45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing
Opportunity Analysis

1. Are markets segmented effectively?


2. Is the organization positioned well among
competitors?
3. Has the firm’s market share been
increasing?
4. Are the distribution channels reliable &
cost effective?
5. Is the sales force effective?

Ch 4 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing
Opportunity Analysis

6. Does the firm conduct market research?


7. Are product quality & customer service
good?
8. Are the firm’s products/services priced
appropriately?
9. Does the firm have effective promotion,
advertising, & publicity strategies?

Ch 4 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing
Opportunity Analysis

10. Are the marketing planning & budgeting


effective?
11. Do the firm’s marketing managers have
adequate experience and training?

Ch 4 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting

 Determining financial strengths &


weaknesses key to strategy
formation

Ch 4 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting
Finance/Accounting Functions

1. Investment decision (Capital budgeting)


2. Financing decision
3. Dividend decision

Ch 4 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Basic Financial Ratios

Firm’s ability to meet its


short-term obligations

Liquidity Ratios
Ratios

Current ratio
Quick (or acid test) ratio

Ch 4 -51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Basic Financial Ratios

Extent of debt financing

Ratios
Leverage Ratios
Debt-to-total assets
Debt-to-equity
Long-term debt-to-equity
Times-interest earned

Ch 4 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Basic Financial Ratios

Effective use of firm’s


resources

Activity Ratios Ratios

Inventory-turnover
Fixed assets turnover
Total assets turnover
Accounts receivable turnover
Average collection period

Ch 4 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Basic Financial Ratios

Effectiveness shown by
returns on sales &
investment
Profitability Ratios
Ratios

Gross profit margin


Operating profit margin
Net profit margin
Return on total assets (ROA)

Ch 4 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Basic Financial Ratios

Effectiveness shown by
returns on sales &
investment
Profitability Ratios
(cont’d) Ratios

Return on stockholders equity


(ROE)
Earnings per share
Price-earnings ratio

Ch 4 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Basic Financial Ratios

Firm’s ability to maintain


economic position

Growth Ratios Ratios

Sales
Net income
Earnings per share
Dividends per share

Ch 4 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Audit

•Where is the firm strong/weak indicated


by financial ratio analysis?
•Can the firm raise short-term capital as
needed?
•Can the firm raise long-term capital as
needed through debt and/or equity?

Ch 4 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Audit

•Does the firm have sufficient working


capital?
•Are capital budgeting procedures
effective?
•Are dividend payout policies reasonable?
•Are the firm’s financial managers
experienced & well trained?

Ch 4 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations

Production/Operations Functions

 Process
 Capacity
 Inventory
 Workforce
 Quality

Ch 4 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations

Facility design
Technology selection
Facility layout
Process Process flow analysis
Facility location
Line balancing
Process control

Ch 4 -60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations

Forecasting
Facilities planning
Capacity Aggregate planning
Scheduling
Capacity planning
Queuing analysis

Ch 4 -61
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations

Raw materials
Inventory Work in process
Finished goods
Materials handling

Ch 4 -62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations

Job design
Work measurement
Workforce Job enrichment
Work standards
Motivation techniques

Ch 4 -63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations

Quality control
Sampling
Quality Testing
Quality assurance
Cost Control

Ch 4 -64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations Audit

•Are suppliers of materials, parts, etc.


reliable and reasonable?
•Are facilities, equipment & machinery in
good condition?
•Are inventory-control policies and
procedures effective?

Ch 4 -65
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Production/Operations Audit

•Are quality-control policies & procedures


effective?
•Are facilities, resources, and markets
strategically located?
•Does the firm have technological
competencies?

Ch 4 -66
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Research & Development

Research & Development Functions

 Development of new products before


competitors
 Improving product quality
 Improving manufacturing processes to
reduce costs

Ch 4 -67
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Research & Development

Financing as many
projects as possible

use percent-of-sales
method
R&D Budgets
Budgeting relative to
competitors

How many successful


new products are
needed

Ch 4 -68
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Research & Development Audit

•Are the R&D facilities adequate?


•If R&D is outsourced, is it cost effective?
•Are the R&D personnel well qualified?
•Are R&D resources allocated effectively?

Ch 4 -69
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Information
Systems

Purpose

 Improve performance of an enterprise by


improving the quality of managerial
decisions.

Ch 4 -70
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Information
Systems

 Information Systems
 CIO/CTO
 Security
 User-friendly
 E-commerce

Ch 4 -71
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Information
Systems Audit

•Do managers use the information system


to make decisions?
•Is there a CIO or Director of information
systems position in the firm?
•Is data updated regularly?

Ch 4 -72
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Information
Systems Audit

•Do managers from all functional areas


contribute input to the information system?
•Are there effective passwords for entry
into the firm’s information system?
•Are strategists of the firm familiar with the
information systems of rival firms?

Ch 4 -73
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Information
Systems Audit

•Is the information system user-friendly?


•Do all users understand the competitive
advantages that information can provide?
•Are computer training workshops provided
for users?
•Is the firm’s system being improved?

Ch 4 -74
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IFE– Gateway Computers (2003)
Wtd
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating
Score

Strengths
1. Several new senior executive with world-
0.05 4 0.40
class skills and leadership experience
2. Continuous decline in operating costs
0.05 3 0.15
and cost of goods sold
3. Well-known brand name 0.05 3 0.15
4. Consumer Reports (Sept 2002)
0.10 4 0.40
recommended Gateway 500X as #1
5. As a direct seller, Gateway holds high
0.05 3 0.15
brand recognition

Ch 4 -75
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IFE– Gateway Computers (2003)
Wtd
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating
Score

Strengths (cont’d)
6. Gateway is diversifying into non-PC
0.10 3 0.30
products
7. Good relationship with its suppliers. 0.05 4 0.20
8. Economies of scale, the 6th largest PC
0.05 4 0.20
maker I the world
9. Gateway retails stores excellent 0.05 3 0.15

Ch 4 -76
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IFE– Gateway Computers (2003)
Wtd
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating
Score

Weaknesses
1. High operating expense (22% of revenue
0.05 3 0.15
vs. 10% for Dell)
2. Almost no budget for R&D vs. Dell’s 18%
0.10 1 0.05
of revenue
3. Low return on assets ratio 0.025 1 0.10

4. No niche market 0.025 2 0.05

Ch 4 -77
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IFE– Gateway Computers (2003)
Wtd
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating
Score

Weaknesses (cont’d)
5. Shortage of cash due to successive
0.10 2 0.20
losses
6. Limited number Gateway stores 0.05 2 0.10

7. Weak performance in overseas market 0.10 2 0.20

TOTAL 1.00 2.85

Ch 4 -78
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 5
Strategies in Action

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 5 -1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

Long-Term Objectives

Types of Strategies

Integration Strategies

Ch 5 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Intensive Strategies

Diversification Strategies

Defensive Strategies

Ch 5 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies

Means for Achieving Strategies

First Mover Advantages

Ch 5 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Outsourcing

Strategic Management in Nonprofit &


Governmental Organizations

Strategic Management in Small Firms

Ch 5 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategies in Action

Strategies for taking the hill won’t


necessarily hold it. –
Amar Bhide

The early bird may get the worm, but the


second mouse gets the cheese. –
Unknown

Ch 5 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategies in Action

Companies Embrace Strategic Planning

-- Quest for higher revenues

-- Quest for higher profits

Ch 5 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Long-Term Objectives

 Results expected from pursuing certain


strategies.
 Strategies represent actions to accomplish
long-term objectives.

Ch 5 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Long-Term Objectives

Objectives --

Quantifiable
Measurable
Realistic
Understandable
Challenging

Ch 5 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Long-Term Objectives

Objectives --

Hierarchical
Obtainable
Congruent
Time-line

Ch 5 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Long-Term Objectives

Objectives Necessary --

Corporate Level
Divisional Level
Functional Level

Ch 5 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Long-Term Objectives

Strategists Should Avoid --

Managing by Extrapolation
Managing by Crisis
Managing by Subjectives
Managing by Hope

Ch 5 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Long-Term Objectives

Varying Performance Measures


by Organizational Level
Organizational
Basis for Annual Bonus/Merit Pay
Level
75% on long-term objectives
Corporate
25% on annual objectives
50% on long-term objectives
Division
50% on annual objectives
25% on long-term objectives
Function
75% on annual objectives

Ch 5 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Financial vs. Strategic
Objectives
Financial Objectives
Growth in revenues
Growth in earnings
Higher dividends
Higher profit margins
Higher Earnings per share
Improved cash flow

Ch 5 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Financial vs. Strategic
Objectives
Strategic Objectives
Larger market share
Quicker on-time delivery than rivals
Quicker design-to-market times than rivals
Lower costs than rivals
Higher product quality than rivals
Wider geographic coverage than rivals

Ch 5 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Financial vs. Strategic
Objectives
Trade-Off
Maximize short-term financial objectives – harm
long-term strategic objectives
Pursue increased market share at the expense
of short-term profitability
Tradeoffs related to risk of actions; concern for
business ethics; need to preserve natural
environment; social responsibility issues

Ch 5 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Types of Strategies
Corp
A Large Company Level

Division Level

Functional Level

Operational Level

Ch 5 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Types of Strategies

A Small Company Company


Level

Functional Level

Operational Level

Ch 5 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Balanced Scorecard

Robert Kaplan & David Norton --

Strategy evaluation & control technique


Balance financial measures with non-financial
measures
Balance shareholder objectives with customer
& operational objectives

Ch 5 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Types of Strategies

Forward
Integration

Vertical Backward
Integration Integration
Strategies

Horizontal
Integration

Ch 5 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Vertical Integration Strategies

Gain Control Over --

Distributors
Suppliers
Competitors

Ch 5 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Forward Integration Strategies

Gain Control Over --

Distributors
Retailers

Ch 5 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Forward Integration Strategies

Guidelines --
Current distributors – expensive or unreliable
Availability of quality distributors – limited
Firm competes in industry expected to grow
markedly
Firm has both capital & HR to manage new
business of distribution
Current distributors have high profit margins

Ch 5 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Backward Integration
Strategies

Ownership or Control --

Firm’s suppliers

Ch 5 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Backward Integration
Strategies
Guidelines --
Current suppliers – expensive or unreliable
# of suppliers is small; # competitors is large
High growth in industry sector
Firm has both capital & HR to manage new
business
Stable prices are important
Current suppliers have high profit margins

Ch 5 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Horizontal Integration
Strategies

Ownership or Control --

Firm’s competitors

Ch 5 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Horizontal Integration
Strategies
Guidelines --
Gain monopolistic characteristics w/o federal
government challenge
Competes in growing industry
Increased economies of scale – major competitive
advantages
Faltering due to lack of managerial expertise or
need for particular resource

Ch 5 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Types of Strategies

Market
Penetration

Intensive Market
Strategies Development

Product
Development

Ch 5 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Intensive Strategies

Intensive Efforts --

Improve competitive position with


existing products

Ch 5 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Market Penetration Strategies

Increased Market Share --

Present products/services
Present markets
Greater marketing efforts

Ch 5 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Market Penetration Strategies

Guidelines --
Current markets not saturated
Usage rate of present customers can be increased
significantly
Shares of competitors declining; industry sales
increasing
Increased economies of scale provide major
competitive advantage

Ch 5 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Market Development
Strategies

New Markets --

Present products/services to new


geographic areas

Ch 5 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Market Development
Strategies
Guidelines --
New channels of distribution – reliable, inexpensive,
good quality
Firm is successful at what it does
Untapped/unsaturated markets
Excess production capacity
Basic industry rapidly becoming global

Ch 5 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Product Development
Strategies

Increased Sales --

Improving present products/services


Developing new products/services

Ch 5 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Product Development
Strategies
Guidelines --
Products in maturity stage of life cycle
Industry characterized by rapid technological
development
Competitors offer better-quality products @
comparable prices
Compete in high-growth industry
Strong R&D capabilities

Ch 5 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Types of Strategies

Concentric
Diversification

Diversification
Strategies

Conglomerate
Diversification

Ch 5 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Diversification Strategies

Less Popular --

More difficult to manage diverse


business activities

Ch 5 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Concentric Diversification
Strategies

Addition --

New & related products/services

Ch 5 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Concentric Diversification
Strategies
Guidelines --
Compete in no/slow growth industry
New & related products increases sales of current
products
New & related products offered at competitive
prices
Current products—decline stage of product life
cycle
Strong management team
Ch 5 -39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Conglomerate Diversification
Strategies

Addition --

New & unrelated products/services

Ch 5 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Conglomerate Diversification
Strategies

Guidelines --
Declining annual sales & profits
Capital & managerial ability to compete in new
industry
Financial synergy between acquired and acquiring
firms
Current markets for present products - saturated

Ch 5 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Types of Strategies

Retrenchment

Defensive Divestiture
Strategies

Liquidation

Ch 5 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Retrenchment Strategies

Regrouping --

Cost & asset reduction to reverse


declining sales & profit

Ch 5 -43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Retrenchment Strategies
Guidelines --
Failed to meet objectives & goals consistency; has
distinctive competencies
Firm is one of weaker competitors
Inefficiency, low profitability, poor employee morale,
pressure for stockholders
Strategic managers have failed
Rapid growth in size; major internal reorganization
necessary

Ch 5 -44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Divestiture Strategies

Selling a division or part of an


organization.

Ch 5 -45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Divestiture Strategies
Guidelines --
Retrenchment failed to attain improvements
Division needs more resources than are available
Division responsible for firm’s overall poor
performance
Division is a mis-fit with organization
Large amount of cash is needed and cannot be
raised through other sources

Ch 5 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
2003 Examples

Doll maker & mail order firm,


Forward
Pleasant Co., opened a retail store
Integration in Manhattan

Backward McDonalds recently acquired a


Integration paper cup producer

Horizontal Callaway Golf recently acquired


Integration Top-Flite Golf Company

Ch 5 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
2003 Examples

SABMiller Plc spent $500 million in


Market
2003 on marketing its Miller
Penetration brands of beer

Market JetBlue is adding dozens of new


Development routes

GM developing hydrogen powered


Product
automobiles or Pfizer developing a
Development new antismoking pill

Ch 5 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
2003 Examples

Microsoft launched its first


Concentric
personal computers that double as
Diversification entertainment centers

The video-rental firm Blockbuster


Conglomerate
may acquire the DVD and music
Diversification
direct-marketing firm Columbia
House

Horizontal Viacom acquired Comedy Central,


Diversification from AOL

Ch 5 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
2003 Examples

America West Airlines closing its


Retrenchment hub at Columbus, Ohio and laying
off 390 employees

ConocoPhillips recently sold its


Divestiture Circle K convenience store chain
to Alimentation Couche-Tard, a
Canadian firm

Sprint liquidated its Web-hosting


Liquidation
division

Ch 5 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Liquidation Strategies

Selling

Company’s assets, in parts, for


their tangible worth

Ch 5 -51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Liquidation Strategies

Guidelines --

Retrenchment & divestiture failed


Only alternative is bankruptcy
Minimize stockholder loss by selling firm’s assets

Ch 5 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies

Cost Leadership Strategies

Differentiation Strategies

Focus Strategies

Ch 5 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies

Cost Leadership
In conjunction with differentiation
Economies or diseconomies of
scale
Capacity utilization achieved
Linkages w/ suppliers & distributors

Ch 5 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies

Low Cost Producer Advantage

Many price-sensitive buyers


Few ways of achieving differentiation
Buyers not sensitive to brand
differences
Large # of buyers w/bargaining power

Ch 5 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies
Differentiation

Greater product flexibility


Greater compatibility
Lower costs
Improved service
Greater convenience
More features
Ch 5 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies

Focus

Industry segment of sufficient size


Good growth potential
Not crucial to success of major competitors

Ch 5 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Joint Venture/Partnering -

 Two or more companies form a temporary


partnership or consortium for purpose of
capitalizing on some opportunity.

Ch 5 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Cooperative Arrangements -

 R&D partnerships
 Cross-distribution agreements
 Cross-licensing agreements
 Cross-manufacturing agreements
 Joint-bidding consortia

Ch 5 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Why Joint Ventures Fail -

 Managers who must collaborate daily; not


involved in developing the venture
 Benefits the company not the customers
 Not supported equally by both partners
 May begin to compete with one of the
partners

Ch 5 -60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Joint Ventures
Guidelines --
Synergies between private and publicly held
Domestic with foreign firm, local management can
reduce risk
Complementary distinctive competencies
Resources & risks where project is highly profitable
(e.g. Alaska Pipeline)
Two or more smaller firms competing w/larger firm
Need to introduce new technology quickly

Ch 5 -61
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Mergers & Acquisitions
 Provide improved capacity utilization
 Better use of existing sales force
 Reduce managerial staff
 Gain economies of scale
 Smooth out seasonal trends in sales
 Gain new technology
 Access to new suppliers, distributors, customers,
products, creditors

Ch 5 -62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Recent Mergers

Acquiring Firm Acquired Firm


IBM Rational Software Corp
Yahoo Inktomi Corp
U.S. Steel National Steel Corp
Pfizer Pharmacia
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Montana Mills
Oracle People Soft
Palm Handspring
Nike Converse

Ch 5 -63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
First Mover Advantages

 Benefits a firm may achieve by entering a


new market or developing a new product or
service prior to rival firms.

Ch 5 -64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
First Mover Advantages
Potential Advantages

 Securing access to rare resources


 Gaining new knowledge of key factors &
issues
 Carving out market share
 Easy to defend position & costly for rival
firms to overtake

Ch 5 -65
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Outsourcing
Business-process outsourcing
(BPO)

 Companies taking over the functional


operations of other firms

Ch 5 -66
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Outsourcing

Benefits

 Less expensive
 Allows firm to focus on core business
 Enables firm to provide better services

Ch 5 -67
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 5)

Key Terms & Concepts

Concentric
Acquisition
Diversification

Backward Conglomerate
Integration Diversification

Cooperative
Bankruptcy
Arrangements

Combination
Cost Leadership
Strategy

Ch 5 -68
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 5)

Key Terms & Concepts

Differentiation Focus

Diversification
Forward Integration
Strategies

Divestiture Franchising

First Mover
Generic Strategies
Advantages

Ch 5 -69
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 5)

Key Terms & Concepts

Horizontal
Intensive Strategies
Diversification

Horizontal
Joint Venture
Integration

Hostile Takeover Leveraged Buyout

Integration
Liquidation
Strategies

Ch 5 -70
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 5)

Key Terms & Concepts

Long-Term
Outsourcing
Objectives

Market Development Product Development

Market Penetration Retrenchment

Merger Vertical Integration

Ch 5 -71
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 6
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 6 -1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

The Nature of Strategy & Choice

A Comprehensive
Strategy-Formulation Framework

The Input Stage

Ch 6 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

The Matching Stage

The Decision Stage

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice

Ch 6 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

The Politics of Strategy Choice

Governance Issues

Ch 6 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

To acquire or not to acquire, that is the


question –
Robert J. Terry

Life is full of lousy options --


General P.X. Kelley

Ch 6 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Nature of Strategy Analysis & Choice

-- Establishing long-term objectives


-- Generating alternative strategies
-- Selecting strategies to pursue
-- Best alternative - achieve mission & objectives

Ch 6 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Alternative Strategies Derive From --

 Vision
 Mission
 Objectives
 External audit
 Internal audit
 Past successful strategies

Ch 6 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Generating Alternatives --

Participation in generating alternative


strategies should be as broad as
possible

Ch 6 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Comprehensive Strategy-Formulation
Framework

Stage 1:
The Input Stage

Stage 2: Stage 3:
The Matching Stage The Decision Stage

Ch 6 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
Internal Factor Evaluation
Matrix (IFE)

Stage 1: External Factor Evaluation


The Input Stage Matrix (EFE)

Competitive Profile Matrix


(CPM)

Ch 6 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 1: The Input Stage

Basic input information for the matching &


decision stage matrices
Requires strategists to quantify subjectivity
early in the process
Good intuitive judgment always needed

Ch 6 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage

Match between organization’s internal


resources & skills and the opportunities & risks
created by its external factors

Ch 6 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage

SWOT Matrix

Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats

Ch 6 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix

Four Types of Strategies

Strengths-Opportunities (SO)
Weaknesses-Opportunities (WO)
Strengths-Threats (ST)
Weaknesses-Threats (WT)

Ch 6 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SO Strategies

Strengths
Weaknesses Use a firm’s
internal strengths
Opportunities
to take advantage
Threats SO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT

Ch 6 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
WO Strategies

Strengths
Weaknesses Improving internal
weaknesses by
Opportunities
taking advantage
Threats WO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT

Ch 6 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
ST Strategies

Strengths Use a firm’s


Weaknesses strengths
Opportunities to avoid or
Threats reduce the impact
ST of external
Strategies threats
SWOT

Ch 6 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
WT Strategies

Defensive tactics
Strengths aimed at reducing
Weaknesses internal
Opportunities weaknesses &
Threats avoiding
WT environmental
Strategies threats
SWOT

Ch 6 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix

Developing the SWOT

List firm’s key internal Strengths


List firm’s key internal Weaknesses
List firm’s key external Opportunities
List firm’s key external Threats

Ch 6 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Strengths – S Weaknesses – W
Leave Blank
List Strengths List Weaknesses

Opportunities – O SO Strategies WO Strategies

Use strengths to take Overcoming weaknesses


List Opportunities advantage of by taking advantage of
opportunities opportunities

Threats – T ST Strategies WT Strategies

Use strengths to avoid Minimize weaknesses and


List Threats threats avoid threats

Ch 6 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Matching Key Factors to Formulate Alternative Strategies
Key Internal Factor Key External Factor Resultant Strategy

20% annual growth in


Excess working capacity
+ the cell phone industry = Acquire Cellfone, Inc.
(strength)
(opportunity)

Exit of two major foreign Pursue horizontal integration


Insufficient capacity
+ competitors form the = by buying competitor's
(weakness)
industry (opportunity) facilities

Decreasing numbers of Develop new products for


Strong R&D (strength) + =
young adults (threat) older adults

Develop a new
Poor employee morale Strong union
+ = employee benefits
(weakness) activity (threat) package

Ch 6 -22
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
Steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

1. Select a set of variables to define the financial


strength (FS), competitive advantage (CA),
environmental stability (ES), and industry strength
(IS).
2. Assign a numerical value ranging from +1 (worst) to
+6 (best) to each of the variables that make up the
FS and IS dimensions. Assign a numerical value
ranging from -1 (best) to -6 (worst) to each of the
variables that make up the ES and CA dimensions.
On the FS and CA axes, make comparisons to
competitors. On the IS and ES axes, make
comparisons
Copyright 2005 Prentice to
Hallother industries. Ch 6 -24
SPACE Matrix
Steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

3. Compute an average score for FS, CA, IS and ES by


summing the values given to variables of each
dimension and then by dividing by the number of
variables included in the perspective dimensions.
4. Plot the average scores for FS, IS, ES, and CA on
the appropriate axis in the SPACE Matrix.
5. Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot the
resultant point on X. Add the two scores on the y-axis
and plot the resultant point on y.

Ch 6 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
Steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

6. Draw a directional vector form the origin of the space


Matrix through the new intersection point. The vector
reveals the type of strategies recommended for the
organization:
a) Aggressive,
b) competitive.
c) Defensive, and
d) Conservative.

Ch 6 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position

Financial Strength (FS) Environmental Stability (ES)

Technological changes
Return on investment
Rate of inflation
Leverage
Demand variability
Liquidity
Price range of competing products
Working capital
Barriers to entry
Cash flow
Competitive pressure
Price elasticity of demand
Ease of exit from market
Risk involved in business

Ch 6 -27
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position

Competitive Advantage CA Industry Strength (IS)

Market share Growth potential


Product quality Profit potential
Product life cycle Financial stability
Customer loyalty Technological know-how
Competition’s capacity utilization Resource utilization
Technological know-how Ease of entry into market
Control over suppliers & distributors Productivity, capacity utilization

Ch 6 -28
SPACE Matrix
FS
Conservative Aggressive
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1

CA IS
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6

-2
-3

-4
-5
Defensive Competitive
-6
ES Ch 6 -29
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Boston Consulting Group Matrix


Enhances multi-divisional firm in formulating
strategies
Autonomous divisions = business portfolio
Divisions may compete in different industries
Focus on market-share position & industry
growth rate

Ch 6 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Relative Market Share Position

Ratio of a division’s own market share in an


industry to the market share held by the largest
rival firm in that industry.

Ch 6 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High Medium Low
1.0 .50 0.0

High
+20
Industry Sales Growth Rate

Stars Question Marks


II I
Medium
0

Cash Cows Dogs


III IV
Low
-20
Ch 6 -33
BCG Matrix

Question Marks
Low relative market share – compete in high-
growth industry
Cash needs are high
Case generation is low

Decision to strengthen (intensive strategies) or


divest

Ch 6 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Stars
High relative market share and high growth rate
Best long-run opportunities for growth & profitability

Substantial investment to maintain or


strengthen dominant position
Integration strategies, intensive strategies, joint
ventures

Ch 6 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Cash Cows
High relative market share, competes in low-
growth industry
Generate cash in excess of their needs
Milked for other purposes

Maintain strong position as long as possible


Product development, concentric diversification
If weakens—retrenchment or divestiture

Ch 6 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Dogs

Low relative market share & compete in slow or


no market growth
Weak internal & external position

Liquidation, divestiture, retrenchment

Ch 6 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Tool for formulating alternative strategies


Based on two dimensions
Competitive position
Market growth

Ch 6 -39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
RAPID MARKET GROWTH
Quadrant II Quadrant I
1. Market development 1. Market development
2. Market penetration 2. Market penetration
3. Product development 3. Product development
4. Horizontal integration 4. Forward integration
5. Divestiture 5. Backward integration
6. Liquidation 6. Horizontal integration
WEAK 7. Concentric diversification
STRONG
COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE
POSITION Quadrant III Quadrant IV
POSITION
1. Retrenchment 1. Concentric diversification
2. Concentric diversification 2. Horizontal diversification
3. Horizontal diversification 3. Conglomerate
4. Conglomerate diversification
diversification 4. Joint ventures
5. Liquidation
SLOW MARKET GROWTH
Ch 6 -40
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant I

Excellent strategic position


Concentration on current markets/products
Take risks aggressively when necessary

Ch 6 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant II

Evaluate present approach


How to improve competitiveness
Rapid market growth requires intensive
strategy

Ch 6 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant III

Compete in slow-growth industries


Weak competitive position
Drastic changes quickly
Cost & asset reduction (retrenchment)

Ch 6 -43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant IV

Strong competitive position


Slow-growth industry
Diversification to more promising growth areas

Ch 6 -44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework

Quantitative Strategic
Stage 3:
Planning Matrix
The Decision Stage
(QSPM)

Ch 6 -45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix

Technique designed to determine the relative


attractiveness of feasible alternative actions

Ch 6 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM Strategic Alternatives
Key External Factors Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Economy
Political/Legal/Governmental
Social/Cultural/Demographic/
Environmental
Technological
Competitive
Key Internal Factors
Management
Marketing
Finance/Accounting
Production/Operations
Research and Development
Computer Information
Systems

Ch 6 -47
QSPM

Limitations

Requires intuitive judgments & educated


assumptions
Only as good as the prerequisite inputs

Ch 6 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Advantages

Sets of strategies considered simultaneously or


sequentially
Integration of pertinent external & internal
factors in the decision making process

Ch 6 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Cultural Aspects of Strategy
Choice

Organization Culture

Successful strategies depend on the degree of


consistency with the firm’s culture

Ch 6 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice

Politics in Organizations

Management hierarchy
Career aspirations
Allocation of scarce resources

Ch 6 -51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice

Political tactics for strategists

Equifinality
Satisfying
Generalization
Higher-order issues
Political access on important issues

Ch 6 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Governance Issues

Board of Directors Roles & Responsibilities

Control & oversight over management


Adherence to legal prescriptions
Consideration of stakeholder interests
 Advancement of stockholder rights

Ch 6 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Corporate Governance Issues

Business Week’s “principles of good governance”

1. No more than 2 directors current or former company executives


2. No directors do business with the company
3. Audit, compensation, and nominating committees made up
of outside directors
4. Each director attends at lest 75% of all meetings
5. Audit committee meets at least four times a year
6. CEO is not also the Chairperson of the Board
7. Shareholders have considerable power and information to
choose & replace directors
8. Stock options are considered a corporate expense
9. No interlocking directorships

Ch 6 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Aggressive Quadrant Business Portfolio

Attractiveness Scores
Cash Cows
(AS)

Competitive Advantage
Boards of Directors
(CA)

Boston Consulting
Competitive Quadrant
Group (BCG) Matrix

Ch 6 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Conservative Quadrant Dogs

Environmental Stability
Culture
(ES)

Financial Strength
Defensive Quadrant
(FS)

Directional Vector Governance

Ch 6 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Internal-External (IE)
Grand Strategy Matrix
Matrix

Halo Error Matching

Industry Strength
Matching Stage
(IS)

Quantitative Strategic
Input Stage
Planning Matrix (QSPM)

Ch 6 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Question Marks Stars

Relative Market Share Strategic Position & Action


Position Evaluation (SPACE)

Sum Total Attractiveness


SO Strategies
Score (STAS)

ST Strategies Sustainability

Ch 6 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Strengths, Weaknesses
WO Strategies
Opportunities, Threats SWOT

Total Attractiveness
WT Strategies
Scores (TAS)

Ch 6 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 7
Implementing Strategies: Management &
Operations Issues

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 7-1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

The Nature of Strategy Implementation

Annual Objectives

Policies

Ch 7-2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Resource Allocation

Managing Conflict

Matching Structure with Strategy

Ch 7-3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Restructuring, Reengineering & E-Engineering

Linking Performance & Pay to Strategies

Managing Resistance to Change

Ch 7-4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Managing the Natural Environment

Creating a Strategy-Supportive Culture

Production/Operations Concerns When


Implementing Strategies

Ch 7-5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Human Resource Concerns When


Implementing Strategies

Ch 7-6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Implementing Strategies

Pretend that every single person you meet


has a sign around his or her neck that says,
“Make me feel important” –
Mary Kay Ash, CEO of Mary Kay, Inc.

Ch 7-7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Nature of Strategy
Implementation

-- Successful strategy formulation does not


guarantee successful strategy implementation

Ch 7-8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Formulation vs. Implementation

 Formulation positions forces before the action

 Implementation manages forces during the


action

Ch 7-9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Formulation vs. Implementation

 Formulation focuses on effectiveness

 Implementation focuses on efficiency

Ch 7-10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Formulation vs. Implementation

 Formulation primarily an intellectual process

 Implementation primarily an operational


process

Ch 7-11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Formulation vs. Implementation

 Formulation requires good intuitive & analytical


skills

 Implementation requires special motivational &


leadership skills

Ch 7-12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Formulation vs. Implementation

 Formulation requires coordination among a


few individuals

 Implementation requires coordination among


many individuals

Ch 7-13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Strategy Implementation

 Varies among different types & sizes of


organizations

Ch 7-14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Implementation Activities
 Altering sales territories
 Adding new departments
 Closing facilities
 Hiring new employees
 Cost-control procedures
 Modifying advertising strategies
 Building new facilities

Ch 7-15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Management Perspectives
 Shift in responsibility

Division or
Strategists Functional
Managers

Ch 7-16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives

Policies

Resources
Management
Issues Organizational structure

Restructuring

Rewards/Incentives

Ch 7-17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues (cont’d)

Resistance to Change

Natural Environment

Supportive Culture
Management
Issues Production/Operations

Human Resources

Ch 7-18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives --

-- Decentralized activity
-- Directly involve all managers in the
organization

Ch 7-19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues
Purpose of Annual Objectives --

Basis for resource allocation


Mechanism for management evaluation
Metric for gauging progress on long-term
objectives
Establish priorities (organizational, division,
& departmental)

Ch 7-20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues
Consistency of Annual Objectives --

Across hierarchical levels


Horizontally consistent
Vertically consistent

Ch 7-21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues
Requirements of Annual Objectives

Measurable
Consistent
Reasonable
Challenging
Clear
Understood
Timely
Ch 7-22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives Should State

Quantity
Quality
Cost
Time
Be Verifiable

Ch 7-23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives

Policies

Resources
Management
Issues Organizational structure

Restructuring

Rewards/Incentives

Ch 7-24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Policies --

-- Facilitate the solving or recurring


problems & guide implementation of
strategy

Ch 7-25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Policies Establish --

Boundaries
Constraints
Limits

Ch 7-26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives

Policies

Resources
Management
Issues Organizational structure

Restructuring

Rewards/Incentives

Ch 7-27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Resource Allocation

-- Central management activity that


allows for the execution of strategy

Ch 7-28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

4 Types of Resources

1. Financial resources
2. Physical resources
3. Human resources
4. Technological resources

Ch 7-29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Managing Conflict

-- Disagreement between two more


parties on one or more issues

Ch 7-30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Managing Conflict
 Conflict not always “bad”
 No conflict may signal apathy
 Can energize opposing groups to
action
 May help managers identify problems

Ch 7-31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Conflict Management & Resolution

 Avoidance
 Diffusion
 Confrontation

Ch 7-32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives

Policies

Resources
Management
Issues Organizational structure

Restructuring

Rewards/Incentives

Ch 7-33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Matching Structure w/ Strategy

-- Changes in strategy = Changes in


structure

Ch 7-34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Structure & Strategy

 Structure dictates how objectives &


policies will be established
 Structure dictates how resources will
be allocated

Ch 7-35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chandler’s Strategy-Structure
Relationship

Organizational
New strategy New administrative
performance
Is formulated problems emerge
declines

Organizational
New organizational
performance
structure is established
improves

Ch 7-36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Basic Forms of Structure

 Functional Structure
 Divisional Structure
 Strategic Business Unit Structure (SBU)
 Matrix Structure

Ch 7-37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives

Policies

Resources
Management
Issues Organizational structure

Restructuring

Rewards/Incentives

Ch 7-38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Restructuring

-- Reducing the size of the firm – # of


employees, divisions, and/or units, # of
hierarchical levels

Ch 7-39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Restructuring

Downsizing
Rightsizing
Delayering

Ch 7-40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Reengineering

-- Reconfiguring or redesigning work,


jobs, & processes to improve cost,
quality, service, & speed.

Ch 7-41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Reengineering

Process management
Process innovation
Process redesign

Ch 7-42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Annual Objectives

Policies

Resources
Management
Issues Organizational structure

Restructuring

Rewards/Incentives

Ch 7-43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Linking Pay/Performance to Strategies

-- Pay for performance systems

Ch 7-44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Linking Pay/Performance to Strategies

Dual bonus systems


Profit sharing systems
Gain Sharing systems

Ch 7-45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Tests for Performance-Pay Plans
Does the plan capture attention?

Do employees understand the plan?

Is the plan improving communication?

Does the plan pay out when it should?

Is the company or unit performing better?

Ch 7-46
Management Issues (cont’d)

Resistance to Change

Natural Environment

Supportive Culture
Management
Issues Production/Operations

Human Resources

Ch 7-47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Resistance to Change

-- Single greatest threat to successful


strategy implementation

Ch 7-48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Resistance to Change

-- Raises anxiety; fear concerning


Economic loss
Inconvenience
Uncertainty
Break in status-quo

Ch 7-49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Change Strategies

Force Change Strategy


Educative Change Strategy
Rational or Self-Interest Change
Strategy

Ch 7-50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues (cont’d)

Resistance to Change

Natural Environment

Supportive Culture
Management
Issues Production/Operations

Human Resources

Ch 7-51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Natural Environment

-- Wide appreciation for firms that


“mend” rather than “harm” the
environment

Ch 7-52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Natural Environment – Environmental


Strategies

Develop/acquire “green” businesses


Divesting environmental-damaging
business
Low-cost producer through waste
minimization & energy conservation

Ch 7-53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues (cont’d)

Resistance to Change

Natural Environment

Supportive Culture
Management
Issues Production/Operations

Human Resources

Ch 7-54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Strategy-Supportive Culture

-- Preserve, emphasize, & build upon


aspects of existing culture that support
new strategies

Ch 7-55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues
Elements linking culture to strategy:

• Formal statements of philosophy, charters, etc. used


for recruitment and selection, and socialization
• Designing of physical spaces, facades, buildings
• Deliberate role modeling, teaching and coaching
• Explicit reward and status system, promotion criteria
• Stories, legends, myths about key people and events

Ch 7-56
Management Issues
Elements linking culture to strategy:

• What leaders pay attention to, measure and control


• Leader reactions to critical incidents and crises
• How the organization is designed and structured
• Organizational systems and procedures
• Criteria used for recruitment, selection, promotion,
retirement

Ch 7-57
Management Issues (cont’d)

Resistance to Change

Natural Environment

Supportive Culture
Management
Issues Production/Operations

Human Resources

Ch 7-58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Production/Operations Concerns

-- Production processes typically


constitute more than 70% of firm’s total
assets

Ch 7-59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Production/Operations Decisions

Plant size
Inventory/Inventory control
Quality control
Cost control
Technological innovation
Ch 7-60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues (cont’d)

Resistance to Change

Natural Environment

Supportive Culture
Management
Issues Production/Operations

Human Resources

Ch 7-61
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues

Human Resource Concerns

-- HR manager position has strategic


responsibility & has changed
dramatically as companies continue to
reorganize, outsource, etc.

Ch 7-62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Issues
Human Resource Strategic Responsibilities

Assessing staffing needs/costs


Developing performance incentives
ESOP’s
Child-care policies
Work-life balance issues
Ch 7-63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Diversity Issues
Women CEO’s in U.S. 2004 (examples)

Carly Fiorina Hewlett-Packard 49 yrs old


Meg Whitman eBay 47 yrs old
Andrea Jung Avon Products 45 yrs old
Anne Mulcahy Xerox 50 yrs old
Marjorie Magner Citigroup 54 yrs old
Betsy Holden Kraft Foods 47 yrs old
Mary Sammons Rite Aid 57 yrs old

Ch 7-64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 7)

Key Terms & Concepts

Annual Objectives Conflict

Avoidance Confrontation

Benchmarking Culture

Bonus System Defusion

Ch 7-65
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 7)

Key Terms & Concepts

Educative Change
Delayering
Strategy

Employee Stock Ownership


De-centralized Structure
Plans (ESOP’s)

Establishing Annual
Divisional Structure
Objectives

Downsizing Force Change Strategy

Ch 7-66
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 7)

Key Terms & Concepts

Functional Structure Just in Time (JIT)

Gain Sharing Matrix Structure

Glass Ceiling Policy

Horizontal Consistency
Profit Sharing
of Objectives

Ch 7-67
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 7)

Key Terms & Concepts

Rational Change
Restructuring
Strategy

Reengineering Rightsizing

Self-Interest Change
Resistance to Change
Strategy

Strategic Business Unit


Resource Allocation
(SBU)

Ch 7-68
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 7)

Key Terms & Concepts

Vertical Consistency
Triangulation
of Objectives

Ch 7-69
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 8
Implementing Strategies: Marketing,
Finance/Accounting, R&D, & MIS Issues

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 8-1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

The Nature of Strategy Implementation

Marketing Issues

Finance/Accounting Issues

Ch 8-2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Research & Development (R&D) Issues

Management Information Systems (MIS)


Issues

Ch 8-3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Implementing Strategies

The greatest strategy is doomed if it’s


implemented badly. --
Bernard Reimann

Ch 8-4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Nature of Strategy
Implementation

-- Strategy implementation means change.

Ch 8-5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
The Nature of Strategy
Implementation

-- Less than 10% of strategies formulated are


successfully implemented!

Ch 8-6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Low Success Rate – Strategy Implementation

 Failing to segment markets appropriately


 Paying too much for a new acquisition
 Falling behind competition in R&D
 Not recognizing benefit of computers in
managing information

Ch 8-7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Nature of Strategy
Implementation
Successful Strategy Implementation

 Market goods & services well


 Raise needed working capital
 Produce technologically sound goods
 Sound information systems

Ch 8-8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

-- Marketing variables affect


success/failure of strategy implementation

Ch 8-9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Marketing Decisions requiring policies

 Exclusive dealerships – multiple channels of


distribution
 Heavy, light, or no TV advertising
 Price leader or price follower
 Advertise online or not
 Offer complete or limited warrantee

Ch 8-10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Centrally important to Implementation

1. Market segmentation

2. Product positioning

Ch 8-11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Market Segmentation

 Subdividing of a market into distinct subsets


of customers according to needs and buying
habits.

Ch 8-12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Market Segmentation

 Key to matching supply & demand


 Market development, product-development,
market penetration & diversification strategies
 Allows operating with limited resources
 Enables small firms to compete successfully

Ch 8-13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Market Segmentation

 Directly affect marketing mix variables:


 Product
 Place
 Promotion
 Price

Ch 8-14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Mix – Component Factors
Product Place Promotion Price

Distribution
Quality Advertising Level
channels
Distribution Discounts &
Features Personal selling
coverage allowances

Style Outlet location Sales promotion Payment terms

Brand name Sales territories Publicity

Inventory
Packaging
levels/locations
Transportation
Product line
carriers

Warranty

Service level

Ch 8-15
Marketing Issues

Geographic

Demographic

Market Segment
Basis Psychographic

Behavioral

Ch 8-16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Geographic

 Region
 County size
 City or SMSA size
 Density
 Climate

Ch 8-17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Geographic

Demographic

Market Segment
Basis Psychographic

Behavioral

Ch 8-18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Demographic
 Age
 Family Size
 Family Life Cycle
 Income/Occupation
 Education
 Religion
 Race/Nationality

Ch 8-19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Geographic

Demographic

Market Segment
Basis Psychographic

Behavioral

Ch 8-20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Psychographic

 Social Class
 Lifestyle
 Personality

Ch 8-21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Geographic

Demographic

Market Segment
Basis Psychographic

Behavioral

Ch 8-22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Behavioral
 Use occasion
 Benefits sought
 User status
 Usage rate
 Loyalty status
 Readiness stage
 Attitude toward product

Ch 8-23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Product Positioning

-- Schematic representations that reflect how


products/services compare to competitors’ on
dimensions most important to success in the
industry

Ch 8-24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues

Customer Wants

Product
Positioning

Customer Needs

Ch 8-25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Product Positioning Steps

1. Select Key Criteria

2. Diagram Map

Product 3. Plot competitors’


Positioning products
Steps
4. Look for niches

5. Develop Marketing
Plan
Ch 8-26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Product Positioning Map
High
Convenience Rental Car Market

Firm 1
Firm 2

High Low
Customer Customer
Loyalty Loyalty


Firm 3
Low
Convenience
Ch 8-27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Marketing Issues
Product Positioning as Strategy Implementation
Tool

 Look for vacant niche


 Avoid sub optimization
 Don’s serve 2 segments w/ same strategy
 Don’t position in the middle of the map

Ch 8-28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

-- Central to strategy implementation.

Ch 8-29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Essential for implementation

 Acquiring needed capital


 Developing projected financial statements
 Preparing financial budgets
 Evaluating worth of a business

Ch 8-30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Decisions based on Finance/Accounting

 Raise capital – short-term, long-term, preferred,


or common stock
 Lease or by fixed assets
 Determine appropriate dividend payout ratio

Ch 8-31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Decisions based on Finance/Accounting

 LIFO, FIFO, or market-value accounting


approach
 Extend time of AR
 Establish % discount on accounts for terms
 Determine the amount of cash kept on hand

Ch 8-32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Capital acquisition to implement strategies

 Debt

 Equity

Ch 8-33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Debt vs. Equity Decisions

 EPS/EBIT analysis
 Earnings per share/Earnings before interest and
taxes

Ch 8-34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
EPS-EBIT Analysis
(in $millions)
Heinz Company – Year End 2001
 $Amount Needed: $500
 Stock Price $40
 EBIT Range $1000 to $2000
 Tax Rate 175/673 = .26 = 26%
 Interest Rate 5%
 # Shares Outstanding 350

Ch 8-35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
EPS-EBIT Analysis (in $millions) – Heinz
Company
Stock Financing Financing Financing

High Low High Low High Low

EBIT ($982.4 in 2001) $2000 $1000 $2000 $1000 $2000 $1000

Interest (5%) 0 0 25 25 10 10

EBT 2000 1000 1975 975 1990 990

Taxes 26% 520 260 514 254 517 257

EAT 1480 740 1461 721 1473 733

# Shares outstanding 362.5 362.5 350 350 357.5 357.5

EPS 4.08 2.04 4.17 2.06 4.12 2.05

Ch 8-36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

EPS-EBIT Analysis Heinz

 Conclusion:

 Heinz should use debt to raise the $500 million

Ch 8-37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Projected Financial Statements

 Allow an organization to examine the expected


results of various actions and approaches

Ch 8-38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Steps in Preparing Projected Financial


Statements
1. Prepare income statement before balance
sheet (forecast sales)

2. Use percentage of sales method to project


CoGS & expenses

3. Calculate projected net income

Ch 8-39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues
Steps in Preparing Projected Financial
Statements (cont’d)

4. Subtract dividends to be paid from Net Income


and add remaining to Retained Earnings

5. Project balance sheet times beginning with


retained earnings

6. List comments (remarks) on projected


statements

Ch 8-40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Projected Income Statement for Litten Company (in millions)

Projected Year
Prior Year 2004 2005 Remarks

Projected Income Statement


Sales 100 150.00 50% increase
Cost of Goods Sold 70 105.00 70% of sales
Gross Margin 30 45.00
Selling Expense 10 15.00 10% of sales
Administrative Expense 5 7.50 5% of sales
EBIT 15 22.50
Interest 3 3.00
EBT 12 19.50
Taxes 6 9.75 50% rate
Net Income 6 9.75
Dividends 2 5.00
Retained Earnings 4 4.75

Ch 8-41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Financial Budget

-- Details how funds will be obtained and spent for


a specified period of time.

Ch 8-42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Types of Budgets

 Cash budgets
 Operating budgets
 Sales budgets
 Profit budgets
 Factory Budgets
 Expense Budgets

Ch 8-43
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Types of Budgets

 Divisional budgets
 Variable budgets
 Flexible budgets
 Fixed budgets

Ch 8-44
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Evaluating Worth of a Business

 Central to strategy implementation – integrative,


intensive, & diversification strategies often
implemented through acquisitions of other firms

Ch 8-45
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Finance/Accounting Issues

Evaluating Worth of a Business:


3 Basic Approaches

1. What a firm owns


2. What a firm earns
3. What a firm will bring in the market

Ch 8-46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Research & Development
Issues

-- New products and improvement of


existing products that allow for effective
strategy implementation

Ch 8-47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Research & Development
Issues

Constraints

 Level of support constrained by resource


availability
 Technological improvements shorten product
life cycles

Ch 8-48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Research & Development
Issues

3 Major R&D approaches to implementing


strategies

1. 1st firm to market new technological products


2. Innovative imitator of successful products
3. Low-cost producer of similar but less
expensive products

Ch 8-49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Management Information
Systems (MIS) Issues

-- Information is basis for understanding


the firm. One of the most important
factors differentiating successful from
unsuccessful firms

Ch 8-50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
MIS Issues

Functions of MIS

 Information collection, retrieval, & storage


 Keeping managers informed
 Coordination of activities among divisions
 Allow firm to reduce costs

Ch 8-51
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 8)

Key Terms & Concepts

Cash Budget Marketing Mix Variables

Outstanding Shares
EPS/EBIT Analysis
Method

Management Information Price-Earnings Ratio


Systems (MIS) Method

Market Segmentation Product Positioning

Ch 8-52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 8)

Key Terms & Concepts

Projected Financial
Statement Analysis

Research & Development


(R&D)

Vacant Niche

Ch 8-53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 9
Strategy Review, Evaluation, & Control

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 9-1
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

The Nature of Strategy Evaluation

A Strategy-Evaluation Framework

The Balanced Scorecard

Ch 9-2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline
Published Sources of Strategy
Evaluation Information

Characteristics of an Effective
Evaluation System

Contingency Planning

Ch 9-3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Auditing

21st Century Challenges in


Strategic Management

Ch 9-4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Review

Organizations are most vulnerable when


they are at the peak of their success --
R.T. Lenz

Ch 9-5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation &
Control

-- Strategies become obsolete


-- Internal environments are dynamic
-- External environments are dynamic

Ch 9-6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review,
& Control
Strategy Evaluation

 Vital to the organization’s well-being


 Alert management to potential/actual problems
in a timely fashion
 Erroneous strategic decisions can have severe
negative impact on organizations

Ch 9-7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
3 Basic Activities

1. Examine the underlying bases of a firm’s


strategy
2. Compare expected to actual results
3. Identify corrective actions to ensure that
performance conforms to plans

Ch 9-8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Strategy Evaluation

 Complex & sensitive undertaking

 Overemphasis can be costly &


counterproductive

Ch 9-9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Appraisal of Strategic Performance

 Have assets increased


 Increase in profitability
 Increase in sales
 Increase in productivity
 Profit margins, ROI, & EPS ratios increased

Ch 9-10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Consistency

Rummelt’s Consonance
4 Criteria
Feasibility

Advantage

Ch 9-11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Consistency

 Strategy should not present inconsistent


goals & policies

Ch 9-12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Consistency

Rummelt’s Consonance
4 Criteria
Feasibility

Advantage

Ch 9-13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Consonance

 Need for strategies to examine sets of trends

Ch 9-14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Consistency

Rummelt’s Consonance
4 Criteria
Feasibility

Advantage

Ch 9-15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Feasibility

 Neither overtax resources or create


unsolvable sub-problems

Ch 9-16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Consistency

Rummelt’s Consonance
4 Criteria
Feasibility

Advantage

Ch 9-17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Advantage

 Creation or maintenance of competitive


advantage

Ch 9-18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Difficulties in Strategy Evaluation

1. Increase in environment’s complexity


2. Difficulty predicting future with accuracy
3. Increasing number of variables

Ch 9-19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Difficulties in Strategy Evaluation

4. Rate of obsolescence of plans


5. Domestic and global events
6. Decreasing time span for planning certainty

Ch 9-20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Strategy Evaluation Should --

 Initiate managerial questioning


 Trigger review of objectives & values
 Stimulate creativity in generating
alternatives

Ch 9-21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Review of underlying bases of strategy --

 Develop revised EFE Matrix

 Develop revised IFE Matrix

Ch 9-22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Review effectiveness of strategy --

1. Competitors’ reaction to strategy


2. Competitors’ change in strategy
3. Competitors’ changes in strengths &
weaknesses
4. Reasons for competitors’ strategic change

Ch 9-23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Review effectiveness of strategy --

5. Reasons for competitors’ successful


strategies
6. Competitors’ present market positions &
profitability
7. Potential for competitor retaliation
8. Potential for cooperation with competitors

Ch 9-24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Monitor Strengths & Weaknesses;
Opportunities & Threats

 Are strengths still strengths?


 Have we added additional strengths?
 Are weaknesses still weaknesses?
 Have we developed other weaknesses?

Ch 9-25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Monitor Strengths & Weaknesses;
Opportunities & Threats

 Are opportunities still opportunities?


 Other opportunities develop?
 Are threats still threats
 Other threats emerged?
 Are we vulnerable to hostile takeover?

Ch 9-26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Evaluation Framework
I. Review Underlying Bases

Differences? Yes

NO
III.
Take
II. Measure Firm Performance Corrective
Actions
Differences? Yes

NO

Continue present course Ch 9-27


Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Measuring Organizational Performance

 Compare expected to actual results


 Investigate deviations from plan
 Evaluate individual performance
 Progress toward stated objectives

Ch 9-28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Quantitative Criteria for Strategy Evaluation

 Financial Ratios
 Compare performance over different periods
 Compare performance to competitors
 Compare performance to industry averages

Ch 9-29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Key Financial Ratios

 Return on investment (ROI)


 Return on equity (ROE)
 Profit margin
 Market Share

Ch 9-30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Key Financial Ratios

 Debt to equity
 Earnings per share (EPS)
 Sales growth
 Asset growth

Ch 9-31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Qualitative Evaluation of Strategy

 Internal consistency of strategy


 Consistency with environment
 Appropriateness in view of resources

Ch 9-32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Qualitative Evaluation of Strategy

 Acceptable degree of risk


 Appropriate time frame
 Workability of the strategy

Ch 9-33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Balanced Scorecard

-- Evaluate strategies from 4 perspectives:


1. Financial performance
2. Customer knowledge
3. Internal business processes
4. Learning & growth

Ch 9-34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Balanced Scorecard
Area of Objectives Measure or Target Time Expectation Primary Responsibility

Customers
1
2
Managers/Employees
1
2
Operations/Processes
1
2

Community/Social Responsibility
1
2

Business Ethics/Natural Environment


1
2
Financial
1
2

Ch 9-35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Characteristics of strategy evaluation

 Economical
 Meaningful
 Generates useful information
 Timely information
 Provides accurate picture of events

Ch 9-36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Evaluation Assessment Matrix

Have major Have major


changes changes Has the firm
occurred in the occurred in the progressed
firm’s internal firm’s external satisfactorily toward
strategic strategic achieving its stated
position? position? objectives? Result
No No No Corrective actions
Yes Yes Yes Corrective actions
Yes Yes No Corrective actions
Yes No Yes Corrective actions
Yes No No Corrective actions
No Yes Yes Corrective actions
No Yes No Corrective actions
No No Yes Continue course
Ch 9-37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Contingency Planning

Alternative plans that can be put into effect if


certain key events do not occur as expected

Ch 9-38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review &
Control
Auditing

 Financial audits determine correspondence


between assertions based on strategic plan
& established criteria

 Environmental audits insure sound and safe


practices

Ch 9-39
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control

21st Century Challenges in


Strategic Management

 Process is more an “art” than “science”


 Should strategies be visible or hidden from
stakeholders
 Should process be more top-down or bottom
up

Ch 9-40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 9)

Key Terms & Concepts

Advantage Consonance

Auditing Contingency Plans

Balanced Score Card Corporate Agility

Consistency Feasibility

Ch 9-41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 9)

Key Terms & Concepts

Future Shock Revised EFE Matrix

Management by Wandering Revised IFE Matrix


Around

Measuring
Taking Corrective Action
Organizational Performance

Reviewing Underlying
Bases of Strategy
Ch 9-42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall

Вам также может понравиться