Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316441342
CITATIONS READS
0 109
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Nacera Bennabi on 06 May 2017.
小型船舶基于混合电力推进的能效改进
N. Bennabi 1,2, H. Menana3, J. F. Charpentier2, J. Y. Billard2, B. Nottelet1
摘要: 未来小型船舶建造的目标之一是减少船舶排放,以符合国际海事组织(IMO)关于温室气体和污染物排
放现行和将来的规定。本文介绍了与船舶对环境影响的相关文献和相关规章。提出了电力推进,特别是混合推进系
统(HPS)是减少小型船舶的环境影响的具有前进的解决方案。这些小型船舶常常在人口密集区域附近使用,这些
区域是减少污染和排放的非常关键的区域。本文提出了用于小型船舶的几种混合动力和电动推进系统,包括对未来
船舶建造挑战的综述,以及可在小型船舶中实施的 HPS 的可能拓扑结构的描述。本文还描述了 HPS 的关键特点,并
且介绍了小型电力混合船舶的实例。
关键词: 混合电力船舶;串并联混合;燃料电池;超级电容;二氧化碳排放;电力电能
Abstract -- One of the future goals of shipbuilding for small ships is to reduce the impact of ship emissions to respond to existent
and future regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on greenhouse gas and pollutants emissions.
This work presents a state of the art of the context and related regulations associated to ship environmental impact. It shows that,
electrification of propulsion and particularly Hybrid Propulsion Systems (HPS) are promising solutions to reduce the environmental
impact of small ships which are often used near agglomeration areas which are very critical area for pollution and emission. Several
hybrid and electric propulsion systems for small vessels are presented. The paper includes a general description of the future
challenges for shipbuilding and a description of the possible topologies of HPS which can be implemented in small ships. The key
features of the HPS components are also described and examples of small electric and hybrid ships are presented
Index Terms-- hybrid Electric ship; series hybrid; parallel hybrid, fuel cell; battery; supercapacitor; CO2 emissions; electrical
power.
In this context, minimization of fuel consumption and
I. NOMENCLATURE reduction of emissions is one of the main objectives for
IMO International Maritime Organization designing future generations of ships [3]. One of the main
MARPOL Marine Pollution challenges is to improve efficiency and optimally manage the
ECA Emission Controlled Areas Sulfur energy/propulsion chains in order to reduce fuel
consumption and environmental impact with an investment
II. INTRODUCTION as low as possible [4]. In this perspective, electrification and
was granted to electrification and hybridization of small hand these small ships (pleasure boat, tugs, naval buses, river
ships. shuttles…) are often used near or in agglomeration areas
which correspond to the highest restrictions in terms of
III. SHIPS IMPACTS AND REGULATORY ASPECTS pollution and emissions, and in the other hand, in such small
Diesel engines remain currently the most used for ships in boats, the volume and the number of components of the
conventional propulsion systems as shown in Fig .1 energy chains are strongly limited, reducing the possibilities
of implementing innovative energy/propulsion systems. This
is why the second part of the paper will focus on the
solutions to reduce the impacts of small ships and
particularly on the solutions based on electrification and
hybridization of the energy chain.
Table 1 : NOx Limitations – MARPOL VI (氮氧化物的排放限值) [2] 2) Electrification and Hybridization of ship propulsion
Tier Construction NOx Limit, g/kWh for small ships
date n= engine’s rated speed (rpm) New electric and hybrid propulsion architectures, allowed
n<130 130≤n≤2000 n≥2000
by innovative and high performance components (batteries,
fuel cells, supercapacitors) are a very promising track to
I 01 /01/2000 17 45. n-0.2 9.8
strongly reduce pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. If
II 01 /01/2011 14 44. n-0.23 7.7
some studies are conducted for the integration of such
III 01 /01/2016 3.4 9. n-0.2 2
architectures in large vessels, small ships benefit only
marginally today of this kind of systems. Actually, the
integration of these new propulsion architectures on small
IV. WAYS OF REDUCTION OF SMALL SHIP ships operating on shorts cycles is a real technical challenge.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Indeed, in such ships, the volumes devoted to energy storage
and energy/propulsion systems are strongly reduced.
1) Reduction of ships emissions by the use of
alternative fuels Furthermore they often operate in transient involving strong
Table 2 represents a summary of the different conversion power demand. The available times for charging energy
factors of CO2 emission for different types of fuel [9]. These systems are also often limited.
data underline in particular the interest of biofuels compared In the following, we describe the different hybrid
to fossil ones. In recent years, the LNG (Liquefied Natural energy/propulsion topologies and give some elements related
Gas) has been considered as an alternative fuel for ships to the adequacy of these topologies to meet the specific
[13]. Fig. 6 shows a comparison between several types of requirements of small ships.
fuel in terms of emissions. These results shows that LNG is a A. General Advantages of electric and hybrid propulsions
very interesting alternative to diesel allowing a reduction of
Hybrid Propulsion Systems (HPS) are interesting when there
about 85-90% of NOx emissions, almost 100% of SOx
is a large variation in power demand during operations. The
emissions and about 15-20% of CO2 emissions.
design rules of this type of systems can differ significantly
for different types of vessel, mainly due to the different types
of mission profiles and operation requirements. Hybrid
propulsion systems are very promising technologies to
design high efficiency and environmental friendly small
ships [14-15].
• HPS provide a better energy efficiency and significant
greenhouse gas and pollutants emissions reduction than
classical mechanical systems [15-16],
• Hybrid systems are modular, and offer a power
redundancy.
• The use of electrical propulsion systems (POD system and
thrusters) allow to improve maneuverability with important
reduction of noise and vibrations [15],
• Electrical propulsion systems offer more degree of freedom
for naval architecture and allows to free onboard available
space.
• HPS allows reducing of the level of vibration transmitted to
Fig.6. Emissions of different types of fuel for typical ships (典型船舶的排
放图) [13]
the structure of the ship.
第**卷 第*期 电 源 学 报 Vol.** No.*
201*年*月 Journal of Power Supply *. 201*
- The efficiency is - Good efficiency Cells (PAFC). These Fuel Cells are characterized by an
limited by the related to the reduced operating temperature from 50 to 250°C [18, 25, 27]. High
multiplication of numbers of series temperature fuel cells include the Solid Oxid Fuel Cells
systems in series components (SOFC) and the Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC). Their
(engine, generator, (particularly in operating temperatures are comprised between 650 and
Power and Efficiency
redundancy since
The system is because the propulsion
modular, and offers power can be provided
power sources independently by two
redundancy independent systems.
Fig.9: Comparison of the efficiency and electrical power installed for the
- Complex mechanical
combustion-based systems and fuel cell systems (内燃机系统及燃料电池
system which can be a
cause of failure. 系统的电力效能比较) [28]
In most cases one of the propulsion systems is devoted to The Fig.9 shows a comparison between the different
low speed operations (classically the electric system) and the elements of generation of energy, and shows that PEMFC
have an efficiency up to 45% (efficiency of PSCF is about
other one (classically the combustion engine) is used for high
40% and diesel engine efficiency is about 35%). It can
speeds. The first system can also be used as a boost system provide high efficiency power with zero emission.
to provide a supplementary power during transient (starting, It can be also noticed that PEMFC technology is
acceleration, etc.). This architecture reduces the number of characterized by relatively low operating temperature which
elements compared to the series hybridization and allows ensures an easy and quick start which could be interesting for
optimizing the sizing of each of the energy sources [21]. vessels with a variable duty cycle [20, 28]. Another
Table 3 gives a comparison between the series and parallel advantage is its significant lifetime compared to other fuel
hybridization architectures, in terms of coasts, redundancy cells types. All this points indicate that PEMFC can be a very
and efficiency. attractive element for HPS for low power small ship.
2) Nemo H2
This project is quite similar to “Alterwaser” boat. The ship
was launched in Amsterdam in 2009. Nemo H2 (shown in
Fig. 14) is 22 meters in length and can carry 86 passengers.
The propulsion is based on a series architecture where the
power is supplied by a PEMFC (60-70kW) [22, 32]. When
the ship is not at full power, batteries lead-acid (30-50kW)
are charged. These batteries can then provide extra power
when needed [32, 33].
第**卷 第*期 电 源 学 报 Vol.** No.*
201*年*月 Journal of Power Supply *. 201*