escheat them in favor showing that the subject lands had been
of Pasay City conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
notwithstanding an Solano, the same still remained, at least before allegation that they the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent had been previously and the lower court was right not to assume donated. We recall otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot that a motion for perfunctorily presuppose that the subject intervention was properties were no longer part of the decedent’s earlier denied by the estate at the time the lower court handed down escheat court for its decision on the strength of a belated failure to show "valid allegation that the same had previously been claim or right to the disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts properties in decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece question." 9 Where a of evidence and analyze each case with person comes into an deliberate precision and unadulterated escheat proceeding thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by as a claimant, the speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated burden is on such assertions. intervenor to escheat them in favor of Pasay City establish his title to notwithstanding an allegation that they had been the property and his previously donated. We recall that a motion for right to intervene. A intervention was earlier denied by the escheat fortiori, the court for failure to show "valid claim or right to certificates of title the properties in question." 9 Where a person covering the subject comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, properties were in the burden is on such intervenor to establish his the name of the title to the property and his right to intervene. A decedent indicating fortiori, the certificates of title covering the that no transfer of subject properties were in the name of the ownership involving decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership the disputed involving the disputed properties was ever made properties was ever by the deceased during her lifetime. In the made by the absence therefore of any clear and convincing deceased during her proof showing that the subject lands had been lifetime. In the conveyed by Hankins to private respondent absence therefore of Solano, the same still remained, at least before any clear and the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent convincing proof and the lower court was right not to assume otherwise. The Court intervention was earlier denied by the escheat of Appeals therefore court for failure to show "valid claim or right to cannot perfunctorily the properties in question." 9 Where a person presuppose that the comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, subject properties the burden is on such intervenor to establish his were no longer part title to the property and his right to intervene. A of the decedent’s fortiori, the certificates of title covering the estate at the time the subject properties were in the name of the lower court handed decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership down its decision on involving the disputed properties was ever made the strength of a by the deceased during her lifetime. In the belated allegation absence therefore of any clear and convincing that the same had proof showing that the subject lands had been previously been conveyed by Hankins to private respondent disposed of by the Solano, the same still remained, at least before owner. It is settled the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent that courts decide and the lower court was right not to assume only after a close otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot scrutiny of every perfunctorily presuppose that the subject piece of evidence and properties were no longer part of the decedent’s analyze each case estate at the time the lower court handed down with deliberate its decision on the strength of a belated precision and allegation that the same had previously been unadulterated disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts thoroughness, the decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece judgment not being of evidence and analyze each case with diluted by deliberate precision and unadulterated speculations, thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by conjectures and speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated unsubstantiated assertions. assertions. escheat them in favor of Pasay City escheat them in favor notwithstanding an allegation that they had been of Pasay City previously donated. We recall that a motion for notwithstanding an intervention was earlier denied by the escheat allegation that they court for failure to show "valid claim or right to had been previously the properties in question." 9 Where a person donated. We recall comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, that a motion for the burden is on such intervenor to establish his title to the property lower court handed down its decision on the and his right to strength of a belated allegation that the same intervene. A fortiori, had previously been disposed of by the owner. It the certificates of is settled that courts decide only after a close title covering the scrutiny of every piece of evidence and analyze subject properties each case with deliberate precision and were in the name of unadulterated thoroughness, the judgment not the decedent being diluted by speculations, conjectures and indicating that no unsubstantiated assertions. transfer of ownership escheat them in favor of Pasay City involving the notwithstanding an allegation that they had been disputed properties previously donated. We recall that a motion for was ever made by intervention was earlier denied by the escheat the deceased during court for failure to show "valid claim or right to her lifetime. In the the properties in question." 9 Where a person absence therefore of comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, any clear and the burden is on such intervenor to establish his convincing proof title to the property and his right to intervene. A showing that the fortiori, the certificates of title covering the subject lands had subject properties were in the name of the been conveyed by decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership Hankins to private involving the disputed properties was ever made respondent Solano, by the deceased during her lifetime. In the the same still absence therefore of any clear and convincing remained, at least proof showing that the subject lands had been before the escheat, conveyed by Hankins to private respondent part of the estate of Solano, the same still remained, at least before the decedent and the the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent lower court was right and the lower court was right not to assume not to assume otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot otherwise. The Court perfunctorily presuppose that the subject of Appeals therefore properties were no longer part of the decedent’s cannot perfunctorily estate at the time the lower court handed down presuppose that the its decision on the strength of a belated subject properties allegation that the same had previously been were no longer part disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts of the decedent’s decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece estate at the time the of evidence and analyze each case with deliberate precision ownership involving the disputed properties was and unadulterated ever made by the deceased during her lifetime. thoroughness, the In the absence therefore of any clear and judgment not being convincing proof showing that the subject lands diluted by had been conveyed by Hankins to private speculations, respondent Solano, the same still remained, at conjectures and least before the escheat, part of the estate of the unsubstantiated decedent and the lower court was right not to assertions. assume otherwise. The Court of Appeals escheat them in favor therefore cannot perfunctorily presuppose that of Pasay City the subject properties were no longer part of the notwithstanding an decedent’s estate at the time the lower court allegation that they handed down its decision on the strength of a had been previously belated allegation that the same had previously donated. We recall been disposed of by the owner. It is settled that that a motion for courts decide only after a close scrutiny of every intervention was piece of evidence and analyze each case with earlier denied by the deliberate precision and unadulterated escheat court for thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by failure to show "valid speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated claim or right to the assertions. properties in escheat them in favor of Pasay City question." 9 Where a notwithstanding an allegation that they had been person comes into an previously donated. We recall that a motion for escheat proceeding intervention was earlier denied by the escheat as a claimant, the court for failure to show "valid claim or right to burden is on such the properties in question." 9 Where a person intervenor to comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, establish his title to the burden is on such intervenor to establish his the property and his title to the property and his right to intervene. A right to intervene. A fortiori, the certificates of title covering the fortiori, the subject properties were in the name of the certificates of title decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership covering the subject involving the disputed properties was ever made properties were in by the deceased during her lifetime. In the the name of the absence therefore of any clear and convincing decedent indicating proof showing that the subject lands had been that no transfer of conveyed by Hankins to private respondent Solano, the same still escheat them in favor of Pasay City remained, at least notwithstanding an allegation that they had been before the escheat, previously donated. We recall that a motion for part of the estate of intervention was earlier denied by the escheat the decedent and the court for failure to show "valid claim or right to lower court was right the properties in question." 9 Where a person not to assume comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, otherwise. The Court the burden is on such intervenor to establish his of Appeals therefore title to the property and his right to intervene. A cannot perfunctorily fortiori, the certificates of title covering the presuppose that the subject properties were in the name of the subject properties decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership were no longer part involving the disputed properties was ever made of the decedent’s by the deceased during her lifetime. In the estate at the time the absence therefore of any clear and convincing lower court handed proof showing that the subject lands had been down its decision on conveyed by Hankins to private respondent the strength of a Solano, the same still remained, at least before belated allegation the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent that the same had and the lower court was right not to assume previously been otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot disposed of by the perfunctorily presuppose that the subject owner. It is settled properties were no longer part of the decedent’s that courts decide estate at the time the lower court handed down only after a close its decision on the strength of a belated scrutiny of every allegation that the same had previously been piece of evidence and disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts analyze each case decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece with deliberate of evidence and analyze each case with precision and deliberate precision and unadulterated unadulterated thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by thoroughness, the speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated judgment not being assertions. diluted by escheat them in favor of Pasay City speculations, notwithstanding an allegation that they had been conjectures and previously donated. We recall that a motion for unsubstantiated intervention was earlier denied by the escheat assertions. court for failure to show "valid claim or right to the properties in otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot question." 9 Where a perfunctorily presuppose that the subject person comes into an properties were no longer part of the decedent’s escheat proceeding estate at the time the lower court handed down as a claimant, the its decision on the strength of a belated burden is on such allegation that the same had previously been intervenor to disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts establish his title to decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece the property and his of evidence and analyze each case with right to intervene. A deliberate precision and unadulterated fortiori, the thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by certificates of title speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated covering the subject assertions. properties were in escheat them in favor of Pasay City the name of the notwithstanding an allegation that they had been decedent indicating previously donated. We recall that a motion for that no transfer of intervention was earlier denied by the escheat ownership involving court for failure to show "valid claim or right to the disputed the properties in question." 9 Where a person properties was ever comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, made by the the burden is on such intervenor to establish his deceased during her title to the property and his right to intervene. A lifetime. In the fortiori, the certificates of title covering the absence therefore of subject properties were in the name of the any clear and decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership convincing proof involving the disputed properties was ever made showing that the by the deceased during her lifetime. In the subject lands had absence therefore of any clear and convincing been conveyed by proof showing that the subject lands had been Hankins to private conveyed by Hankins to private respondent respondent Solano, Solano, the same still remained, at least before the same still the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent remained, at least and the lower court was right not to assume before the escheat, otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot part of the estate of perfunctorily presuppose that the subject the decedent and the properties were no longer part of the decedent’s lower court was right estate at the time the lower court handed down not to assume its decision on the strength of a belated allegation that the establish his title to the property and his right to same had previously intervene. A fortiori, the certificates of title been disposed of by covering the subject properties were in the name the owner. It is of the decedent indicating that no transfer of settled that courts ownership involving the disputed properties was decide only after a ever made by the deceased during her lifetime. close scrutiny of In the absence therefore of any clear and every piece of convincing proof showing that the subject lands evidence and analyze had been conveyed by Hankins to private each case with respondent Solano, the same still remained, at deliberate precision least before the escheat, part of the estate of the and unadulterated decedent and the lower court was right not to thoroughness, the assume otherwise. The Court of Appeals judgment not being therefore cannot perfunctorily presuppose that diluted by the subject properties were no longer part of the speculations, decedent’s estate at the time the lower court conjectures and handed down its decision on the strength of a unsubstantiated belated allegation that the same had previously assertions. been disposed of by the owner. It is settled that escheat them in favor courts decide only after a close scrutiny of every of Pasay City piece of evidence and analyze each case with notwithstanding an deliberate precision and unadulterated allegation that they thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by had been previously speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated donated. We recall assertions. that a motion for intervention was earlier denied by the escheat court for failure to show "valid claim or right to the properties in question." 9 Where a person comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant, the burden is on such intervenor to