Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HPAKΛEOYΣΣΩTHPOΣ
HPAKΛEOVΣ ΣΩTHPOΣΘAΣIΩN
ΘAΣIΩN
Съставители:
СОФИЯ
TIRNOVI
MMXII
2012
1
© Individual authors, 2012
© Evgeni Paunov and Svetoslava Filipova – editors, 2012
© Faber Publishers, 2012
ISBN 978-954-400-717-1
А. Нумизматика | Numismatics
Sotir Ivanov. Circulation of Bronze Coins of Thessalonica from the 2nd Century
BC to the 1st Century BC in the Territory of Southwest Bulgaria................. 431
Сотир Иванов. Циркулация на бронзовите монети на Тесалоника от II в. пр.
Хр. до края на I в. пр. Хр. на територията на Югозападна България.....441
Katerini Liampi. Grave Hoard of Late Roman Period from the Site Ellinika
at Kopani, Ioannina/2008.............................................................................599
Катерини Лиампи. Късноримска монетна находка от некропола
„Елиника“ при Копани, град Янина . ........................................................ 613
Diana Doncheva. The Northern “Journey” of Late Bronze Age Copper Ingots.....671
Диана Дончева. Северният „път“ на медните слитъци през късната
бронзова епоха ............................................................................................ 705
В. Личности | Personalia
Г. Показатели | Indices
Dubravka UJES-MORGAN
(Newark, Delaware)
Abstract
Apollonia and Dyrrhachium, the two most important Greek cities on the Illyrian coast, issued
drachms depicting a cow suckling her calf from the 3rd to the 1st century BC. Large quantities of
these drachms have been discovered, both in numerous hoards and as innumerable finds of single
coins, far from the cities that issued them, in the basin of the middle Danube, the homeland of
the Scordisci, and further afield in Dacia and Thrace. A remarkable concentration of both hoards
(more than 30) and single finds of these drachms discovered in the territory of the Scordisci rep-
resents an extraordinary monetary phenomenon deserving attention. The chronology of issuing
of these drachms long remained unclear, but recent research by Petrányi (1995, 1996 and 1997),
and Picard and Gjongecaj (1996, 1999, 2000 and 2000a), provided a clarification of the chronol-
ogy of the final phase of their issuance. It has been determined that the massive output started
only ca. 80/70 BC, reached its maximum ca. 60/50 BC and ceased ca. 50/40 BC. The use of this
new chronology in examining the drachms present in the hoards discovered in the territory of the
Scordisci requires a down-dating of their arrival in that region to the middle of the 1st century BC.
Consequently, the interpretation of the causes of the massive inflow of these coins deep into the
Balkan hinterland, into the lands of the Scordisci and beyond, needs reconsideration. Since it was
the period of large military operations throughout the Balkans – the Mithridatic wars and the Ro-
man civil wars – it is probable that various military payments, rather than trade, prompted a rapid
transfer of such large quantities of these drachms into these distant regions.
The Objective
I
n this paper I propose a new explanation of the puzzling occurrence of
unusually large numbers of drachms issued by Apollonia and Dyrrhachium
in the distant territory of the Scordisci in terms of Roman military operations in
the Balkans around the middle of the first century BC.1
The Drachms
Apollonia and Dyrrhachium (Epidamnus) were founded in the Archaic period
by Corcyra and her mother city Corinth on the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, in
1 I first presented the results of my research on this topic in a paper at the 13th INC held in Ma-
drid in 2003. An updated brief version was presented in my paper at the American Philological
Association Annual Meeting in 2009.
367
368 Dubravka Ujes-Morgan
the Illyrian lands to the north of Epirus.2 They became the most important Greek
cities in the whole area. When the Illyrian and Macedonian kingdoms threatened
their prosperity in the last third of the 3rd century BC, they turned to the Romans
for military support and subsequently assumed the privileged status of a Roman
protectorate.3 In the next two centuries these two wealthy cities played a promi-
nent role in complex political and military events involving the Roman conquest
of the whole Balkans and the Mediterranean.
From the 3rd to the 1st century BC both cities issued the same type of smaller
silver coins, with the representation of a cow suckling her calf and the name of one
magistrate in the nominative case on the obverse, and a double stellate or floral
pattern in a double square and the name of another magistrate in the genitive case
on the reverse (Fig. 1).4 These coins are conventionally called drachms, although
their ancient name is not known.5 Their weight, of 3.4 grams, equals three scru-
ples, which later became the weight of the Roman victoriatus.6
Fig. 1.
While smaller coins typically were not carried far from a city’s territory7, large
quantities of these drachms of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium have been discovered
hundreds of miles inland in the basin of the middle Danube, in the Pannonian
2 The literature on these Greek foundations is abundant. See Wilkes, Fischer-Hansen 2004, 328–
331, for a recent collection of sources and selected literature on the foundation of these cities.
3 Polybius 2.12.2, Appian, Ill. 7–8.
4 Ceka 1972, lists 136 combinations of pairs of magistrates’ names for Apollonia, and 461 for Dyr-
rhachium.
5 Its weight indicates that it probably was a trite, as concluded in Picard, Gjongecaj 1996, 192,
note no. 25.
6 Before it was proved that the issuing of victoriati started only in 213 BC or later, this denomina-
tion was often given that same name, being of the same weight. Mørkholm 1991, 153, argued
that the introduction of a new weight system in Apollonia and Dyrrhachium was independent
of any influence from Rome and occurred considerably earlier than in Rome. The needs of pay-
ment in the trade between Corcyra with her two colonies and the towns in Southern Italy are
supposed to be the crucial reason for this change of weight system. However, the evidence of
coin finds does not indicate such a direction of diffusion of the drachmas.
7 See Grierson 1965, xiii, on the area of circulation and diffusion of small denominations.
1st Century BC Drachms of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium... 369
Plain, in the southern Carpathians, and as far as the western coast of the Black Sea,
both in numerous hoards and as innumerable finds of single coins.8
The chronology of issuing of these drachms has long remained uncertain,
principally due to their unvarying obverse and reverse types. Nevertheless, the
large number of the names of monetary magistrates indicates that they were is-
sued over a long period of time. Consequently, their occurrence so far from the
centers of their issuing has often been explained as a consequence of intensive
commerce, which would have brought large quantities of coins into the barbar-
ian lands during the 2nd and 1st centuries BC.9 However, only a limited number of
issues, bearing specific combinations of the magistrates’ names, were abundant
and reached the distant regions in large quantities. Thus the determination of the
chronology of their issuance has a key-role in the interpretation of the presence
of these drachms in the territory of the Scordisci, and elsewhere in the remote
barbarian lands.
8 The IGCH, CH and other works provide an illustration of the multitude of such hoards.
9 Mitrea 1945, 79–99 and 146–147, Glodariu 1976, 46–50, 87–90, Poenaru-Bordea 1983, through-
out, Preda 1993, 133–137.
10 I remain grateful to Dr. Gyula Petrányi, Dr. Niculae Conovici and Professor O. Picard for their
kindness to discuss with me the results of their research and provide their advice and explana-
tions on certain important details.
11 Picard, Gjongecaj 2000, 137–138, based on the reasons explained in Gjongecaj 1998, 81, 100–101.
The beginning of this coin type formerly was usually dated ca. 229 B.C., after the alliance be-
tween these two cities and Rome was established: Head 1911, 314. Giovannini 1978, 113, dated it
ca. 250–240 B.C., which was accepted in Mørkholm 1991, 152–153.
12 The Apolloniate coinage has been studied more thoroughly than the Dyrrhachian, and it
provides the base for the proposed chronological ordering: Petrányi 1995, 59–63; Picard and
Gjongecaj 1996, 187–198, also 2000, 137–160, and 2000a, 80–85. The beginning of the new, Ro-
man phase in the Apolloniate coinage is established in 38–36 B.C. although the issuing of dena-
rii might have started from ca. 44 BC: Picard, Gjongecaj 1999, 627, see also Ceka 1972, 103–107.
370 Dubravka Ujes-Morgan
• The third, i.e. the last phase, from around the 80 or 70s to the 40s BC. This
phase is characterized by a very large mint output, the maximum of which
occurred from the late 60s, 50s to the early 40s BC, in the period of the Ro-
man civil wars.
Table 1. The last nine Apolloniate issues, “Fin de la série” in the sequence
of Picard and Gjongecaj, dated between 80/70 and 48 BC.14
Obverse name, Reverse name, Associés No. in Ceka 1972 No. in the
Monétaire sequence
ΑΡΙΣΤΗΝ/ ΑΙΝΕΑΣ, ΑΡΧΙΒΙΟΣ, 21–22, 24–29 66
ΑΡΙΣΤΩΝ ΕΠΙΚΑΔΟΣ, ΛΥΣΗΝ,
ΜΝΑΣΙΑΣ, ΦΙΛΟΔΑΜΟΣ,
ΨΥΛΛΟΣ
ΤΙΜΗΝ ΔΑΜΟΦΩΝ 115 67
13 The sequences of issues have been established on the basis of systematic and exhaustive analy-
ses of a large number of hoards from all the regions into which these drachms spread. It would
not be effective to mention all the relevant bibliography on these hoards, mostly catalogued
in the IGCH, CH and elsewhere, but it is necessary to mention with due respect the analytical
work by Conovici, 1985, 59–72, also 1986, 69–88, 1989, 17–30, and 1991, ������������������������
67–75�������������������
, who first system-
atically arranged and analyzed the immense body of data. Data pertaining to the Pannonian
Plain and Carpathian Basin were gathered in Torbágyi 1988 and presented in Torbágyi 1993,
120–122. For the additional information on some hoards from the Serbian part of the Danube
valley see Popović 1976, 14–16, also 1977, 177–178, and 1990, 14–16. The finds from the Thracian
territories have recently been analyzed in Grigorova – Prokopov, 2002, 651–679, and the mixed
hoards with the Roman Republican denarii in Paunov – Prokopov 2002, 62–77 and 88.
14 Picard and Gjongecaj 2000, 156–157. This sequence is based on the contents of the hoards
Tirana 1 and 2, Gjonmë (IGCH 665, 666 and 667), and Shkodra 1997 (published in that same
article, p.145–147). The burial date of the Gjonmë hoard – 48 BC – proposed by Ceka, is taken
as the end of issuing in Apollonia.
1st Century BC Drachms of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium... 371
ΑΣΚΛΑΠΙΑ- ΦΙΛΙΣΤΙΩΝ 31 68
ΔΑΣ
ΑΓΙΑΣ ΑΙΝΕΑΣ, ΕΠΙΚΑΔΟΣ�����
, ΑΥ-
��� 1–3 69
ΤΟΒΟΥΛΟΣ
ΝΙΚΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΑΝΔΡΙΣΚΟΣ, ΑΡΙΣΤΩΝ 83 70
ΞΕΝΟΚΛΗΣ ΧΑΙΡΗΝ 91 71
ΣΙΜΙΑΣ ΑΥΤΟΒΟΥΛΟΣ 98 72
ΝΙΚΗΝ ΑΥΤΟΒΟΥΛΟΣ 88 73
ΣΩΣΙΚΡΑΤΗΣ ΝΙΚΩΝ, ΑΥΤΟΒΟΥΛΟΣ 103–104 74
No. in the
Obverse name Reverse name No. in Ceka 1972
sequence
ΜΑΑΡΚΟΣ ΛΥΣΑΝΙΑ 75 –10
ΝΙΚΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΑΝΔΡΙΣΚΟΥ 83 –9
ΑΡΙΣΤΩΝ ΛΥΣΗΝΟΣ 27 –8
ΞΕΝΟΚΛΗΣ ΧΑΙΡΗΝΟΣ 91 –7
ΑΓΙΑΣ ΕΠΙΚΑΔΟΥ 3 –6
ΝΙΚΗΝ ΑΥΤΟΒΟΥΛΟΥ 88 –5
ΤΙΜΗΝ ΔΑΜΟΦΩΝΤΟΣ 115 –4
ΑΡΙΣΤΩΝ ΑΙΝΕΑ 24 –3
ΣΩΣΙΚΡΑΤΗΣ ΝΙΚΩΝΟΣ 104 –2
ΑΡΙΣΤΗΝ ΜΝΑΣΙΑ 21 –1
15 Petrányi 1997, 6–7, and 9–11 for the next list, pertaining to the Dyrrhachian issues. See also
Petrányi 1996, 71–74. The arrangement in Petrányi 1997 is based on analysis of 37 hoards for
Apollonia drachms and 36 hoards for Dyrrhachium. Particular attention was paid to the met-
rological data and the details of iconography.
372 Dubravka Ujes-Morgan
16 The Celtic invasion and settling of the Scordisci are described by Pausanias (1.4 and 10.19–23),
Diodorus (22.3–5 and 9) and Justin (24.4–8 and 32.3.6–8).
17 The territory of the Scordisci is identified on the basis of information by Strabo 7.5.12 and also
7.2.2, and by a fragment of Posidonius quoted by Athenaeus 6.25, p. 234 B (FrGrHist. 87, F 48)
and Justin 32.3.8. See the discussion by Papazoglu 1978, 360–363, and 345–389 for the Scordis-
can territory from their invasion until the Roman conquest. My delineation of the Scordiscan
territory in the map (Fig. 2) is based on Papazoglu’s work, and also on the archaeological evi-
dence as discussed by Todorović 1968, 19–36 and 83–108 and 1974, 158–160, and also Jovanović
1987, 847–850.
18 Strabo, 7.3.11, for the time of Burebista.
19 Strabo 7.5.12.
20 Ammianus Marcellinus 27.4.4, Festus 9.1, Orosius 5.23.17–19, Iordanes, Rom. 219, Florus 1.39
(the Scordisci mentioned as Thracians); for the commentary on these sources see Papazoglu
1978, 294–303
21 App. Ill. 3 and 5.
1st Century BC Drachms of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium... 373
drachms of Apollonia are present in 24 hoards and those of Dyrrhachium in all the
thirty hoards. Three regional groups of hoards may be distinguished:
• The central group is the largest regional group; it is situated in the core-land
of the Scordisci, the region of Syrmia (Srem), where the Roman city of Sirmium
later was a center.
• The second group extends to the east of the first region along the Danube, to
the area of the straits on the Danube called the “Iron Gates”.
• The third group is situated to the north-west of the Scordiscan core land.
It is noticeable that almost all the find spots lie to the North of the Danube,
except for the four, which are however located on the Danube’s southern (right)
bank. The locations of these groups correspond to the areas of clustering of the
Scordiscan settlements.22
In Table 4 these hoards are listed in four groups according to their contents:
• Group I: hoards containing only drachms.
• Group II: hoards containing drachms and barbarian coins, Scordiscan or other.
• Group III: besides drachms and barbarian coins, hoards containing also Ro-
man Republican denarii.
• Group IV: hoards containing drachms and Republican denarii.
The denarii have a precise chronology, and indicate the termini post quem for
the deposition of the hoards that contain them.
Analyses of the contents of the hoards for which the details are available have
shown that the majority of drachms pertain to the last phase of issuing, datable
from the 60’s to the 40’s B.C – this concerns the hoards known to Petrányi and
Picard, such as Vukovar III (no. 4), Pećinci (no. 10), Titel (no. 17), Zaklopača (no.
19), Kostolac (no. 20), Ram (no. 21), Coronini/Pescari II (no. 26), and those hoards
that have more recently been recorded, such as Srpski Miletić (no. 1), Ruma (no.
8), Vrdnik (no. 9), Indjija (no. 11) and Stara Pazova II (no. 14).23 Also, almost all the
isolated finds of drachms for which the magistrates’ names are recorded pertain
to the same last phase. Accordingly, the finds of drachms in the territory of the
Scordisci seem to have resulted from the pool of coinage which arrived en masse
during a relatively short period. Because in the territory of the Scordisci that pool
contained the very last issues, it probably occurred in the late 50’s and in the 40’s
BC. Hence the deposition of these hoards should be dated after that period or
slightly later. Consequently, the dates of deposition should be reassessed in practi-
cally all the instances of the previously published hoards – see Table 4.
24 See Crawford 1977, 119–121, on the slave-trade as the reason for massive penetration of Roman
republican denarii into Dacia.
25 App. Ill. 3–5.
26 Cassius Dio 54.20.3.
27 Strabo 7.5.2.
28 Cassius Dio 54.31.3.
29 Papazoglu 1978, 343–344.
1st Century BC Drachms of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium... 375
Perhaps they and their neighbors, the Bastarnae, should be recognized in the
mention of 500 Gallic and German cavalry whom the proconsul Aulus Gabinius
had left in Alexandria in the 50’s BC and whom Pompey’s son Gnaeus conveyed
with the Egyptian fleet to Epirus in 49 BC.30 In the winter of 49–48 BC Pompey
stationed his forces in Dyrrhachium, Apollonia, and other towns on the Adriatic
coast, to prevent Caesar from crossing the sea, as recorded by Caesar, in his Bel-
lum Civile.31
There could certainly have been other occasions, not recorded by the literary
sources, in which the Scordisci were paid in drachms for military services they
provided for Roman armies.
Hence the abundant inflow of drachms of Dyrrhachium and Apollonia, issued
during a relatively brief period of time, into the territory of the Scordisci, seems
best explained in terms of payments to mercenary soldiers during the Roman
Civil War. In fact, hardly any other reason for inflow of the drachms to this tribe
is obvious.
30 Caesar, Belum Civile 3.4.4: ‘D ex Gabinianis Alexandia, Gallos Germanosque, quos ibi A. Gabin-
ius praesidii causa apud regem Ptolemaeum reliquerat, Pompeius filius cum classe adduxerat’.
31 Caesar, Bell.Civ. 3.5.2: ‘Hiemare Dyrrhachii, Apolloniae omnibusque oppidis maritimis con-
stituerat, ut mare transire Caesarem prohiberet, eiusque rei causa omni ora maritima classem
disposuerat, praeerat Aegyptiis navibus Pompeius filius, …’.
376
Fig. 2.
378 Dubravka Ujes-Morgan
3. Vukovar I, 1961.
Krasnov 1962, 51; Mirnik 1981, no. 97; Popović 1987, 154; Mirnik 1996, 527–528.
22. Vračevgaj (also as Vracsevgáj), village near Bela Crkva, pot hoard, 1889.
Milleker 1897, 190, Berkeszi 1907, 47–48, Mitrea 1945, 86, no. 25, Mirnik 1981,
no. 92, Popović 1987, 154 (map), no. 104, Medeleţ 1995, no. 157-B, Ujes and Bakić
1996, 25, 27.
29. Turnu Severin (mentioned also as Drobeta, which is the name of Roman
fortresse on the Danube), 1970.
Mitrea 1972, 137, no. 14.
30. Ostrovul Şimian (island in the Danube, down-stream Turnu Severin), 1970.
Mitrea 1972, 364, no. 20, Preda and Davidescu 1974, 77–102; Popović 1987, 46,
Torbágyi 1993, 122.
Дубравка УЙЕС-МОРГАН