Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
LEGAL ETHICS ASSIGNMENT 3 – ASSIGNMENT 12 11. Camacho v. Pangulayan, A.C. No. 4807, March 22, 2000
Assignment No. 2 12. TekBeng v. David, A.C. No. 1261, December 29, 1983
Additional
1. Bar matter 1625 October 13, 2015 1. Young v. Batuegas, 403 SCRa 123
Lawyer’s duties to the legal profession 2. Chavez v. Viola A.C. No. 2152. April 19, 1991
2. Cantiller v. Potenciano 180 SCRA 246 2. Lazo v. Judge Tiong, A.M. No. MTJ-98-1173, December 15, 1998
3. Millare v. Montero 246 SCRA 1 3. Libarios v. Judge Dabalos, A.M. No. RTJ-89-266 July 11, 1991
4. Abragan v. Rodriguez 380 SCRA 93 4. Sabitsana v. Judge Villamor, A.M. No. 90-474 October 4, 1991
5. Aninon v. SAbitsana 669 SCRA76 5. Mayor Padilla v. Zantua, A.M. MTJ-93-888, October 24, 1994
4. Tobias v. Judge Limsiaco, A.M. 09-1734, January 19, 2011, 1. Tabora v. Judge Carbonell, RTJ-08-2145, June 18, 2010
January 19, 2011
2. RE: Inhibition of Judge Rojas, A.M. 98-6-185-RTC, October 30,
5. Fernandez v. Judge Hamoy, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1821, august 12, 1998
2004
2. Fecundo v. Judge Berjamen, G.R. No. 88105, December 18, 1989
6. Re: Suspension of Clerk of Court, Rogelio Jacobo, A.M. No. 93-
3. Hilado v. Judge Reyes, G.R. No. 163155, July 21, 2006
10-1296, August 12, 1998
4. Sps. Nazareno v. Judge Almario, A.M. No. RTJ-94-1195,
7. Chan v. Judge Madajucon, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1697, October 15,
February 26, 1997
2003
5. SPS.Marfil and ESpaniola v. Judge Cuachon, A.M. No. 2360-MJ,
8. Dawa v. Judge De Asa, A.M. No. MTJ-98-1144, July 22, 1998
August 31, 1981
9. Anonymous v. Judge Achas, AM. No. MTJ-11-1801, February 27,
6. OCA v. Judge IsmaelRTJ-07-2045, January 19, 2010
2013
7. Borromeo-Garcia v. Judge Pagayatan, AM No. 08-2127,
10. InRE: Report in the Judcial Audit conducted in the RTC,
September 25, 2008
Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, A.M. No. 08-4-253, Janujary 12, 2011
8. SY, V. DINOPOL, A.M. NO. RTJ-09-2189, JANUARY 18, 2011
4|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES
9. ANDRES V. JUDGE MADAJUCON, A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1762, 9. REYES V. JUDGE DUQUE, AM NO. RTJ-08-2136, SEPTEMBER 21,
DECEMBER 17, 2008 2010
10. CATBAGA V. BARTE, A.M. NO. MTJ 02-1452, APRIL 6, 2005 10. PERFECTO V. JUDGE DEALES-ESIDERA, AM. NO. RTJ-11-2270,
642 SCRA 1
11. ORTIZ V. JACULBE, AM NO. RTJ 04-1833, JUNE 28, 2005
11. KING V. JUDE HONTANOSAS, A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1802,
SEPTEMBER 21,2004
Assignment No. 11
12. CO V. JUDGE PLATA, A.M. NO. MTJ-03-1501, MARCH 14, 2005
CANON 4
3. BALAYON V. JUDGE OCAMPO, A.M. NO. MTJ 91-619, JANUARY 2. SPS. ANDRES V MADAJUCON, A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1762,
29, 1993 DECEMBER 17, 2008
4. HAW TAY V. JUDGE SINGAYAO, A.M. NO. R-592-RTJ, 3. SANTOS V. TANCIONGCO, A.M. NO. MTJ-06-1631, SEPTEMBER
SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 30, 2008
5. LIWANAG V. JUDGE LUSTRE, A.M. NO. MTJ-98-1168, APRIL 21, 4. RODRIGUEZ V. ONG, A.M. NO. 08-19-SB-J, AUGUST 24, 2010
1999
5. MATAGA V. ROSETE, A.M. NO. MTJ-03-1488, OCTOBER 13,
6. IN RE: JUDGE ACUNA, A.M. NO. RTJ-04-1891, JULY 28, 2005 2004
7. HEIRS OF THE LATE ASPIRAS V. JUDGE GANAY, A.M. NO. RTJ- 6. CONCERNED TRIAL LAWYERS OF MANILA V. VENERACIO, A.M.
07-25055, DECEMBER 17, 2009 NO. RTJ-05-12920, APRIL 26, 2006
8. BELEN V. JUDGE BELEN, 671 SCRA 477 6. JULIO V. VEGA, A.M. NO. RTJ-89-406, JULY 18, 1991
5|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES
Assignment No. 13
CANON 6
Legal Ethics Update Part 2: 13. Failure of Attorney to disclose pertinent fact to client
constitutes appearance of conflicting interest, 490 SCRA518
For individual report and reaction paper.
14. Attorney and Client 39 SCRA 136
1. Integration of the Philippine Bar 48 SCRA 593
15. The role of an attorney in a compromise agreement 52 SCRA
2. The use of Abusive language is not a ground for
232
disqualification from membership in the bar 94 SCRA 522
16. Privileged communication in judicial proceedings 1SCRA 81
3. Fundamentals of law practice in more than one jurisdiction 136
SCRA 352 17. The duty of practitioners in handling cases, 124 SCRA
4. Lawyers are not angels 83 SCRA 742 18. Criticism of courts-proper language to be used 70 SCRA 389
5. Attorney in Court Practice 53 SCRA 197 19. The lawyers must always uphold their oath and the legal
profession 125 SCRA 279
6. Memorandum of Authorities on the Constitutionality of Bar
Integration 48 SCRA 565 20. The concept of privileged communications 11 SCRA 667
7. Disbarment proceedings 141 SCRA 51 21. Compensation for legal services 94 SCRA 794
8. Decorum of a legal practitioner 93 SCRa 103 22. The rule on substitution or employment of additional counsel
51 SCRA 22
9. Direct Contempt; a means of Judicial Tyranny 474 SCRa 392
23. The ethical conduct of lawyer 241 SCRA 128
10. Judicial disposition of Tardiness in Court Hearings 120 SCRA
52 24. Clash of societal rights 137 SCRA 660
11. Legal Consequences of the Lawyer’s Professional Mistakes, 25. Misconduct and negligence of public officers 282 SCRA 592
carelessness and negligence, 51 SCRA 429
26. Lawyers are not expected to know all the law 98 SCRA 49
12. Attorney and client privileged communication, 262 SCRA 194
27. The lawyer and the judge 99 SCRA 127
7|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES