Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
This paper underlines the importance attributed to computer programs and
computer graphics in the early experiments of Electronic Literature. Based on
the texts reviewed, the influence of the aesthetic theory of Max Bense and of
Concrete Poetry has to be reduced. The early anthologies of Concrete Poetry
contained a scarce number of texts which belonged to a sub-genre that could
be defined as “Computerised Concrete Poetry.” Both Franke (1971) and Bailey
(1973) have reported the greater presence of other textual models.
KEYWORDS
electronic literature; programming; computer graphics; concrete poetry; Max
Bense; Cybernetic Serendipity.
RESUMO
Este artigo destaca a importância atribuída aos programas de computador e à
computação gráfica nas primeiras experiências de Literatura Eletrónica. Com
base nos textos analisados, a influência da teoria estética de Max Bense e da
Poesia Concreta deve ser diminuída. As primeiras antologias da Poesia Concreta
continham um número escasso de textos pertencentes a um subgénero que se
poderia denominar “Poesia Concreta Computacional.” Quer Franke (1971), quer
Bailey (1973) relataram uma presença maior de outros modelos textuais.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE
literatura eletrónica; programação; computação gráfica; poesia concreta; Max
Bense; Cybernetic Serendipity.
I . P RE F IG U RA T I ON A N D P R E CU R S O R S : A N A R T À VEN IR
I I. TH E R OL E O F M AX BEN S E
I II . L UT Z, TH E S CH O OL AN D TH E S TU T T G AR T G R OU P
Theo Lutz, who is credited as the author of the first text classifiable as a
work of Electronic Literature [Cf. Fig. 1] (Lutz, 1959: 3-9), was one of Bense’s stu-
dents. After his ‘stochastic’ texts, Lutz produced few other works of literary rel-
evance (Funkhouser, 2012: 263 [note 9]). It is worth noting that the article in
which he explains the method used for his compositions (Lutz, 1960: 11) makes
no reference to previous avant-gardes. There is no evidence that he carried on
those experiments: almost certainly he preferred working as a mathematician
and programmer.
In terms of literary value, thematic ties with Franz Kafka’s works have been
identified in Lutz’s texts: “Lutz … has chosen passages from Franz Kafka’s The
Castle that put the machine processing for probabilistic techniques in parallel
with the routing systems of social control described in the novel” (Higgins and
Kahn eds., 2012: 9).
5 A few of his texts are in Gomringer ed., 1972: 19-25. Gomringer wrote for “Augenblick” already in
the 1950s.
6 See Walther, 1996: 365. The young Haroldo de Campos, one of the “Noigandres,” had been Jakob-
son’s student at Harvard University.
7 We owe to the “Noigandres” a partial translation of his treatise on aesthetics: Bense, 1971.
8 Bense and Walther eds., 1965.
9 A fundamental essay on these was written by Eco, 1962.
10 See e. g. his essay Moles, 1972: 131-152.
11 Text in Italian, Czech, Hungarian, and German.
THE EARLY COMPUTER POETRY AND CONCRETE POETRY 55
17 A few months earlier, Balestrini had put his concrete poems on exhibition at the “Ferro di cavallo”
art gallery in Rome. He defined them as “chronograms.”
18 The text was preceded by a foreword by the author and with reproductions of spreadsheets, flow
diagrams and part of the program.
THE EARLY COMPUTER POETRY AND CONCRETE POETRY 59
The problem posed was not about obtaining from the machine an imitation of pro-
cesses peculiar to humans. It was simply about exploiting the abilities of the elec-
tronic means to resolve, very fast, certain complex operations pertaining to poetic
technique. The usefulness of, and the legitimate resort to, the methods and means
made available by science and by the most advanced technologies, intended as an
integration of the literary and artistic creative work, become manifest insofar as we
belong to an industrial civilization. (145)
Bense himself knew about Balestrini’s experiments, but remarked that they
were of limited complexity, because programming techniques diminished the
heuristic value of the process, alien to the paradigms of the information theory:
19 Later in Bense, 1974: 474-475. A quick mention of Balestrini’s research also appears in Bense, 1969:
63.
60 MATTEO D’AMBROSIO
When, in the summer of 1968, the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London or-
ganized the exhibition Cybernetic Serendipity,21 we may infer from its catalogue
that Bense’s aspirations had not been followed. Up to that moment, there was
but one isolated experiment tried by the Scottish poet Edwin Morgan. Besides,
in the section on Computer poems and texts (Reichtardt ed., 1968: 53-62), haiku was
privileged as “perfect for computer reformulation” (Funkhouser, 2007: 35), be-
ing a textual model of only 3 verses and a total of 17 syllables, deriving from a
centuries-old Japanese tradition known and appreciated by many Western poets
(Masterman, 1971: 176).
Morgan’s three “simulated computer poems” (Reichtardt ed., 1968: 57), that
in any case establish a connection between Computer Poetry and Concrete Po-
etry,22 had been developed with “the scope to simulate computer poetry without
recourse to the machine” (Bailey, 1973: 40) and are basically limited to perform-
ing the serial completion of permutational phenomena [Cf. Fig. 5, 6, and 7]. In
other words, we can recognise in those works the principles of Moles’ permuta-
tional art, but we can also read them as an expression of the wish for a more
complex operational feasibility that was not available then. The other contribu-
tions, “a fragment of the complete programme” of The house of Dust [Cf. Fig. 8 and
9], a work by Alison Knowles and James Tenney (Vostell and Higgins, 1969), and
the “automatic sentence generation” experiment by Jean A. Baudot, dating back
20 Louis T. M[ilic], “Computer Poetry.” The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, 1993,
230.
21 See Reichtardt ed., 1968. Cf. the review by Radoslav Putar (1969: 84-100): “Cybernetic serendipity
an exhibition in the institute of contemporary arts in London August 2-October 20 1968.” BIT in-
ternational 1.1 [issue entirely dedicated to “The theory of information and the new aesthetics”].
22 Many critics doubt that Concrete Poetry should be considered as one of the forebears of Computer
Poetry. Cf. for instance, Newell, 1983: 159.
THE EARLY COMPUTER POETRY AND CONCRETE POETRY 61
to 1964 (Reichtardt ed., 1968: 58), 23 appear to be more interested in the im-
portance of program development, which in the latter case was based on a math-
ematical model.
23 The explanation and the two pages reproduced are taken from Baudot’s La machine à écrire (1964).
62 MATTEO D’AMBROSIO
V . H AI KU
The Japanese haiku gathered more success, at least in terms of quantity. Mar-
garet Masterman and Robin McKinnon Wood’s haiku were the output of a TRAC
(Text Reckoning and Compiling) generator (Reichtardt ed., 1968: 54).
Charles O. Hartman explained the use of haiku by John Morris from the
Michigan State University (Morris, 1967: 17-20) in 1967 with these words:
Haiku were especially common. The reasons are clear from the history of modern
Imagist poetry. As both poets and programmers have realized, for different reasons,
the reader’s mind works most actively on sparse materials. We draw the clearest con-
stellations from the fewest stars. So the nonsense factor is low for a tiny collocation
of words that can be imbued with imagistic significance. It’s hard to put together two
words that don’t make some kind of sense to the willing reader. (Hartman, 1996: 31)
THE EARLY COMPUTER POETRY AND CONCRETE POETRY 65
While listing the Computer Poetry works that used haiku — that appear to
have not decreased to this date — understandable comparisons led Masterman
to acknowledge that the results achieved by Computer Poetry appeared to be
inferior compared to the results obtained by graphics, music, and cinema. Still,
she underlined the decisive importance of the author’s selection in the last stage
of development: “He himself programs the algorithms at the beginning, and he
himself chooses between the vast number of mechanical poems which have been
generated, at the end” (Masterman, 1971: 183).
V I. C ON C RE TE P OE T R Y AN TH OL O G IE S
In the Sixties, Concrete Poetry gradually spread to many countries in the world,
as is shown by the many publications of creative texts and exhibitions (D’Am-
brosio, 1979: 249-261). In those years, Concrete Poetry benefited from a wide
network of international relations. A global community guaranteed exhibitions,
publications and reviews, which in the best cases were tied to studies on semi-
otics. The poets tried to remedy to the lack of critiques by promoting public and
publishing initiatives.
Between 1967 and 1971, the main anthologies — i.e. those edited by Stephen
Bann (1967: 174), Emmett Williams (1967: [216]), Mary Ellen Solt (1968: 210) and
John J. Sharkey (1971: 69) — contain merely a reproduction of “Computer’s first
Christmas card” by Morgan. Certain personal choices of the editors are worth
noting: Williams even ignores his own experiments — Musica (1965), 24 IBM
(1966)25 — and prefers proposing a page from a short story by Ekbom, an uni-
dentified author. On her part, Solt presents the program (but not the text) of a
Computer Poem by Carl Fernbach-Flarsheim (Solt, 1968: 246).
Those early anthologies show that a new sub-genre was slowly being born,
a scarcely significant variant of the corpus that could be defined as “Computer-
ized Concrete Poetry.” The existence of a new form of art characterised by the
use of the computer as a tool was noted maybe for the first time — not without
indicating plausible examples — in Computer for the Arts, a book by Dick Higgins
that defined an artificial language, Fortran, as useful for the “solution of creative
problems” (Higgins, 1970: 1).
V II . F RAN KE ’S IN TE R P RE TA T I ON
first significant writer on computer art: (…) he stated that only members of the
scientific community had the language, awareness, and skill to approach the
new form” (Franke, 1971: 7).
Apart from marginality, Franke recognises in Computer Poetry a stylistic
reminiscence of Concrete Poetry, even though the configuration criteria refer
especially to the research in Computer Graphics:
26 A text belonging to that same series was reproduced in the catalogue of the event Impulse Com-
puterkunst. Grafik – Plastik – Musik – Film (see Franke, 1970).
27 The author, already a member of Group Zero, produced a number of markedly experimental films
in those years.
28 Text no. 3142 is taken from Event One, 1969.
THE EARLY COMPUTER POETRY AND CONCRETE POETRY 67
68 MATTEO D’AMBROSIO
Figures 10, 11, 12 and 13. Marc Adrian, “Semantic infra- and meta- structure,” 1970.
THE EARLY COMPUTER POETRY AND CONCRETE POETRY 69
V II I . C ON CL U S I ON S
to counterbalance its limited diffusion. The Computer Poetry that was then de-
veloping, as is shown in the texts quoted by Franke, tried to assimilate certain
textual strategies that reminded of Concrete Poetry. However, in the works of
Adrian and Sutcliffe, the addition of the hyper-coding of verbal signs was in-
spired by contemporary computer graphics strategies.
The early experiments (like those of Lutz or Balestrini) have their ‘literari-
ness’ guaranteed by a prevailing feature that allows us to define them as ‘deriv-
ative’ works. However, the research focused mostly on programming and pro-
cessing languages, where verbal linguistic system and creative variant are only
a component. Apart from a combinatory approach (that has been implemented
for centuries), the few texts produced appear to prefer the permutation referred
to by Moles in his treatise on aesthetics. Both in Gysin’s I am that I am and in the
works of Morgan included in the catalogue of Cybernetic Serendipity, there is the
simulation of a further possible computer processing. In other words, by retrac-
ing the history of early times we understand the disappointment of a minority
of the literary community, focused on the advanced research in innovative
forms of post-verbal writing and in new connections between art and new tech-
nologies.
REFERENCES
–––––––––– (2018a). “Di come Carlo Belloli, partendo dal “Poema preciso” marinettiano, divenne il
precursore della Poesia concreta,” De l’avant-garde, des avant-gardes: frontières, mouvements. Ed.
Jean-Paul Aubert, Serge Milan, and Jean-François Trubert, eds. Forthcoming.
–––––––––– (2018b). “A ‘Poetry of Numbers’? Khlebnikov, Jakobson, Marinetti, Schwitters, Kostelanetz.”
Chercher le texte. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press. EBook. Forthcoming.
DONGUY, Jacques (1997). “Poésie et ordinateur.”
http://www.sitec.fr/users/akenatondocks/theory_f/DONGUY. htm.
ECO, Umberto (1965). Opera aperta. Milano: Bompiani.
ECO, Umberto, ed. (1972). Estetica e teoria dell’informazione. Milano: Bompiani.
EDELINE, Francis (1969). “Une syntaxe topologique.” Le Journal des poètes 39.2: 12-15.
Event One. London: Computer Arts Society, 1969.
FERRAN, Bronac (2017). The Smell of Ink and Soil: The Story of (Edition) Hansjörg Mayer. Köln: Walther König.
FRANKE, Herbert W. (1970). Impulse Computerkunst. Grafik – Plastik – Musik – Film. München: Kunstverein.
–––––––––– (1971). Computer Graphics / Computer Art. London: Phaidon.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2007). Prehistoric Digital Poetry: An Archaeology of Forms, 1959-1995. Tusca-
loosa: University of Alabama Press.
–––––––––– (2012b). “First-Generation Poetry Generators”. Mainframe Experimentalism: Early Computing
and the Foundations of the Digital Arts. Ed. Hannah B. Higgins and Douglas Kahn. Berkeley: University
of California Press. 243-265.
GARNIER, Pierre (1968). Spatialisme et poésie concrete. Paris: Gallimard.
GARVIN, Harry R., and James M. Heath eds. (1983). Science and Literature. London-Toronto: Bucknell Uni-
versity Press.
GOMRINGER, Eugen, ed. (1972). Konkrete poesie: Deutschprache autoren. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.
GROUPE μ. (1977). Rhétorique de la poésie: Lecture linéaire lecture tabulaire. Bruxelles: Edition Complexe.
HARTMAN, Charles O. (1996). Virtual Muse: Experiments in Computer Poetry. Hannover-London: Wesleyan
University Press.
HIGGINS, Dick (1970). Computers for the Arts. Somerville, MA: ABYSS Publications.
HIGGINS, Hannah B., and Douglas Kahn (2012a). “Introduction”. Mainframe Experimentalism: Early Com-
puting and the Foundations of the Digital Arts, Berkeley: University of California Press. 1-14.
HIGGINS, Hannah B., and Douglas Kahn, eds. (2012b). Mainframe Experimentalism: Early Computing and the
Foundations of the Digital Arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
KLÜTSCH, Christoph (2012). “Information Aesthetics and the Stuttgart School.” Mainframe Experimen-
talism: Early Computing and the Foundations of the Digital Arts. Ed. Hannah B. Higgins and Douglas
Kahn. Berkeley: University of California Press. 65-89.
KOSTELANETZ, Richard, ed. (1980). Text-Sound Texts. New York: William Morrow and Company.
KRAUSE, Manfred, und Götz F. Schaudt eds. (1967). Computer-Lyrik. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag.
JACKSON, K. David, Eric Vos, and Johanna Drucker, eds. (1996). Experimental – Visual – Concrete. Avant-
Garde Poetry since the 1960s. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
JAKOBSON, Roman (1983). Letter to V. Khlebnikov [February 1914]. Italian trans. Remo Faccani. Il Verri
28.31/32: 71.
Longman Dictionary and Handbook of Poetry (1985). New York.
LUTZ, Theo (1959). “Stochastische Texte.” Augenblick 4.1: 3-9. English translation: http://www.stuttgar-
ter-schule.de/lutz_schule_en.htm.
–––––––––– (1960). “Über ein Programm zur Synthese stochastisch-logischer Texte.”
Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Geisteswissen-schaft 1.1: 11.
MARCUS, Adrian (1974). “An Introduction to the Visual Syntax of Concrete Poetry.” Visible Language 8.4:
333-360.
MARINETTI, Filippo Tommaso (1912). I poeti futuristi, con un proclama di F. T. Marinetti e uno studio sul Verso
libero di P. Buzzi. Milano: Edizioni futuriste di “Poesia”.
MASTERMAN, Margaret (1971). “Computerized haiku.” Cybernetics, Art and Ideas: 175-183.
MINGUET, Philippe (1969). “La poésie comme art de l’espace.” Le Journal des poètes 39.2: 2-5.
MOLES, Abraham [1962]. “Erstes manifest der permutationellen kunst.” Rot 3.8.
–––––––––– (1972). “Analisi delle strutture del messaggio poetico a differenti livelli della sensibilità.
L’aspetto informazionale dei problemi di una poetica.” Estetica e teoria dell’informazione: 131-152.
MORRIS, John (1967). “How to Write Poems with a Computer.” Michigan Quarterly Review 6.1: 17-20.
72 MATTEO D’AMBROSIO
PREMINGER, Alex, Terry Brogan, and Frank Warnke, eds. (1993). The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry
and Poetics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
NEWELL, Kenneth B. (1983). “Pattern, Concrete, and Computer Poetry: The Poem as Object in Itself.”
Science and Literature. Ed. Harry Raphael Garvin, Harry Garvin, and James M. Heath. Lewisburg:
Bucknell University Press.159-173.
PUTAR, Radoslav (1969). “Cybernetic serendipity an exhibition in the institute of contemporary arts in
London, August 2-October 20 1968.” BIT international 1.1: 84-100.
QUENEAU, Raymond (1950). Batons, chiffres et lettres. Paris: Gallimard.
REICHARDT, Jasia, ed. (1968). Cybernetic Serendipity. The Computer and the arts. A Studio International special
issue. Ed. London: W. & J. Mackay.
–––––––––– (1971). Cybernetics, Art and Ideas. Greenwich, CT.: New York Graphic Society.
SHARKEY, John, ed. (1971). Mindplay. An Anthology of British Concrete Poetry. London: Lorrimer Publishing.
SOLT, Mary Ellen, ed. (1968). “A World Look at Concrete Poetry.” Artes Hispanicas / Hispanic Arts 1:3/4.
TZARA, Tristan (1918). “Manifeste Dada 1918.” Dada 2.3: 2-4.
VOSTELL, Wolf, and Dick Higgins (1969). Fantastic Architecture. New York: Something Else Press.
WALTHER, Elisabeth (1996). “The Relations of Haroldo de Campos to German Concretist Poets, in Par-
ticular to Max Bense.” Experimental – Visual – Concrete. Avant-Garde Poetry since the 1960s. Eds. K.
David Jackson, Eric Vos, and Johanna Drucker. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 353-366.
WILLIAMS, Emmett (1973). A Valentine for Noël. Four Variations on a Scheme. Barton-Brownington-Berlin:
Something Else Press.
WILLIAMS, Emmett, ed. (1967). Anthology of Concrete Poetry. New York: Something Else Press.
WORTHY, R. M. (1962). “A New American Poet Speaks: The Works of A. B.” Horizon 4.3: 96-99.