Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BACKGROUND:
On October 23th, 2017, staff presented the “Small Housing Revolution Project:
Laneway Housing” project to the Committee of the Whole. The project consisted of a
one-year partnership with Small Housing BC (SHBC). Founded in 2012, SHBC is a
registered society that conducts research, education and advocacy to promote the
development of small housing forms in British Columbia. SHBC approached the City of
Nelson to participate, along with two other BC municipalities, in a project that aims to
create a roadmap for municipalities to incorporate infill development into one or more of
their existing residential neighbourhoods by engaging industry and the public to better
understand local barriers and opportunities for small housing development.
The last remaining task is a design competition to select pre-reviewed designs that the
public may purchase. In December 2017, Small Housing BC prepared a 40-page report
for the City on best practices with respect to pre-approved designs and City-run design
competitions, based on case studies from five cities and interviews with the
professionals involved. Staff have conducted additional research and multiple reviews
over the past several months to prepare this competition, including:
Staff have tentatively assembled a Design Review Panel that includes some of the best
known laneway house design-build firms from Vancouver and Calgary, as well as Ross
Chapin, the architect who founded the “pocket neighbourhood” concept.
Staff anticipate that the most probable users of pre-reviewed designs are individuals
who would otherwise design their own laneway house or seek to purchase stock plans
online. Staff recommend that the designs be available to purchase at $1,000. The
objective is to provide easy access to high-quality designs and code-compliant plans
that strike the right balance between affordable construction and ecologically-sound
design and that have been designed specifically for Nelson. The contest evaluation
criteria also emphasise adaptability.
The key risk of this project is the possibility of a low number of quality submissions and,
once the competition is closed, poor uptake on the part of Nelson homeowners. The
contest rules therefore state that the City may extend the deadline for submissions and
that the Design Review Panel is not obliged to award all prizes. Conversely, if uptake of
the three designs is unexpectedly high, some in the community have suggested that
there would be too many of the same. One survey respondent wrote: diversity is what
makes our current housing interesting!” A couple responses warned of “cookie cutter”
laneway houses behind heritage houses. Pre-reviewed designs do not necessarily
mean that all builds would be identical. Individual homeowners are likely to opt for
different siding, colour, and site orientation. Staff also anticipate that many purchasers
would hire a professional to modify the plans anyway, to adapt either to their own wants
or needs, or to site-specific conditions.
The concern of site adaptation has been raised by some members of the public and
stakeholders. Accordingly, staff have designed evaluation criteria that reward designs
that could be used on both flat and sloped properties.
The Official Community Plan (OCP) encourages residential infill housing and
densification that fits neighbourhood context. Specifically, the OCP supports laneway
housing. The City’s Affordable Housing Strategy (2014) prioritises the adoption of infill
housing policies, encouraging alternative housing forms and construction techniques.
There are many precedents for municipally-run design competitions and prizes,
including for pre-reviewed plans.
COMMUNICATION:
The possibility of the City pursuing pre-reviewed or pre-approved designs has been
circulated for over a year and a half, including throughout public consultation on
laneway housing regulations in January and February 2018. In the public survey, the
City asked:
Most of the 270 survey respondents were in favour and a quarter of them were
interested in potentially purchasing a design. Most of the “other” responses were in
favour, on the condition that laneway house applicants aren’t required to choose a pre-
approved design.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Competition Plan and Rules
2. Draft Entry and Waiver Form
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That Council passes the following resolutions:
1. THAT Council approve a laneway house design competition as per the attached
documents, budget, and tentative timeline.
2. THAT Council approve refunding the $450 laneway house development permit
fee, when applicable, to applicants who use a pre-reviewed design and achieve
Step 3 or higher of the BC Step Code.
____________________________ ____________________________
PLANNER CITY MANAGER
To create this inventory of options, a two‐round design competition is proposed. The first round will
consist of a call for prototypes. The second round will be an invite‐only competition of up to five
participants to produce design plans, selected from the top entries from the first round. Three designs
will be selected and cash prizes for the top three will be awarded. The designers of all three plans will
receive a royalty of $1,000 each time the plan is purchased by a homeowner. The winners will be
required to provide buildable plans. The winning designers will also benefit from publicity. The
unsuccessful candidates may also, if they choose, have their prototype design and names published by
the City; builders who prefer those designs over the winning ones can still contact the designer
independently.
The Design Review Panel will consist of five members, plus the competition organizer (Alex Thumm, City
Planner) as a non‐voting chairperson. Tentatively, the five members are:
1. Studio North is a Calgary‐based interdisciplinary design‐build architectural firm established by
Matthew Kennedy and Mark Erickson that specialises in laneway housing. The firm’s principals
have worked in several continents.
2. Ross Chapin is an architect and community planner based on Whidbey Island, Washington, and
author of Pocket Neighborhoods: Creating Small Scale Community in a Large Scale World. Since
1996, Ross has partnered in developing seven pocket neighbourhoods in the Puget Sound
region—small groupings of homes around a shared commons. Additionally, Chapin has designed
more than 40 neighbourhoods across the U.S., Canada and the U.K. for other developers.
Among current work are communities for multi‐generations, elders and mentally ill clients, and
whole neighbourhoods with connected pocket neighbourhood clusters. His built projects and
innovative ideas have received international media coverage, professional peer review and
national design awards, and are shifting the thinking of homebuyers, builders and policy makers.
3. Jake Fry started Smallworks in late 2005 and became a strong advocate for the introduction of
laneway housing. He established Smallworks Studios and Laneway Housing Inc., which has built
over 100 laneway houses, and worked with the City of Vancouver and other municipalities to
help develop zoning by‐laws based on his experience and interaction with hundreds of potential
small home clients. “My desire in starting Smallworks was to build simple, elegant modern
homes which, with basic maintenance, would look as good a generation after they were built as
when they were new.” In 2012, Jake was one of two founding directors of SmallHousing BC, a
non‐profit society. In 2014 Jake was named Ernst & Young’s (EY) Entrepreneur of the Year in
Manufacturing. Today, Jake focuses on finding new ways to broaden the range of housing types
in Vancouver to create affordable options for single‐family home ownership.
4. Ed Olthof of Pacific West Builders is a local builder, chair of the City of Nelson’s Advisory
Planning Commission, and past president of the Nelson & District Chamber of Commerce. His
role on the Design Review Panel is to bring the pragmatic perspective of a local builder who is
intimately familiar with the Building Code and local construction limitations and costs.
5. Pam Mierau has been the Director of Development Services and Approving Officer for the City
of Nelson for over four years. She previously worked in urban planning at the City of Calgary and
a Calgary‐based architectural firm. She holds a Masters of Environmental Design, an Urban
Design Certificate, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Communication. Her role on the Design Review
Panel is to bring a city planning perspective to the table, to speak to Nelson’s experience with
laneway house builds thus far, and to represent the City’s broader planning objectives.
Budget
Prizes 1st prize: $5,000
2nd prize: $3,000
3rd prize: $2,000
Non‐monetary prizes (awarded to
those who received a 1st/2nd/3rd prize):
o People’s Choice
o Affordable Choice
o Eco‐Choice
Design Review Panel $500 x 4 (City staff will not receive
honoraria honoraria)
Communications $5,000
Tentative Project Timeline and Actions
Dec. 2018 – April Create plan and contest criteria/rules
2019 and have plan reviewed by others
(incl. the Architectural Institute of BC)
Present to Council
Select Design Review Panel and have
them review and agree to documents
April ‐ May 2019 Prepare marketing materials/website
No later than June Launch competition Promote to:
19th Local architects and designers and
other stakeholders, media, AIBC and
other province‐wide forums,
architectural schools, other laneway
house designers in the province
July 31st Deadline to submit questions
September 2nd Deadline for first‐round submissions If a satisfactory number of submissions
hasn’t been achieved, staff reserves the
right to re‐open and extend 1st round
September Design Review Panel evaluates and
narrows down to top 5 for second
round
st
Approx. October 1 Invite successful candidates to second
round and submit feedback to them
Oct 1st – Nov 30th Second round
December Design Review Panel evaluates
Announce winners
January 2020 Publicise results Advertise “people’s choice” vote
Then, public has two weeks to vote for
“People’s Choice”
Await full building plans from winners,
followed by plan review by building
officials
February 2020‐on Implement
Why Participate: Laneway and backyard infill housing is increasingly popular across Canada and the
American West Coast, both amongst homeowners, renters, and municipalities. This type of structure is
essentially a mini single‐family house, but given the size constraints that they are subject to as accessory
buildings, designing them requires innovative thinking, both in order to make them liveable, but also to
help reduce neighbourhood opposition to this type of infill housing. In the City of Vancouver, 45% of
new homes are being built with an accompanying laneway house. Other challenges are present, too,
such as achieving project costs that are affordable to enough homeowners and adapting designs to
individual backyards and lot coverage restrictions, as well as achieving energy efficiency for a smaller
building. Architects and home designers would do well to hone their skills in laneway house design and
broaden their portfolio in this market.
Over the course of 2018, the City of Nelson undertook public engagement and best‐practice research
and ultimately adopted significant amendments to its policies on laneway housing, allowing for more
flexibility and larger laneway homes and above‐garage suites. In the past year, the City of Nelson has
received as many laneway house applications as it had in the previous five years in total. Seven laneway
houses have been built in Nelson since 2017, with others having been approved. In Fall 2018, the City
published a reader‐friendly “How‐To” guide on laneway house development. Many Nelson residents
have expressed interest and regularly contact the City inquiring about pre‐approved designs. Nelson is a
dense, growing city with a high percentage of renters, with a vacancy rate well below 1%. City Council
has supported laneway housing as a key initiative to gently densify the city and create new housing in
existing neighbourhoods.
Winning designs will be awarded prize money along with a $1,000 royalty each time the design and
plans are purchased. Winning contest participants may benefit from additional paid work (at their own
set rate) resulting from clients’ desire for modifications. Furthermore, they will benefit from free,
ongoing publicity by the City of Nelson of their winning design through traditional media, social media,
the City’s website, laneway house application documents, and other events. The City intends to use the
contest as an educational initiative, showcasing the creative, high‐quality architecture generated
through this contest as a means to promote laneway housing. Non‐winning designs from the first and
second rounds may also be marketed by the City, with full credit given to the designers (once the results
have been announced and anonymity lifted) and the original designers retaining full copyright of their
designs, to be sold at their own discretion.
Monetary Prizes
1st prize: $5,000
2nd prize: $3,000
3rd prize: $2,000
Non‐monetary prizes (awarded to 1st/2nd/3rd prize winners)
People’s Choice: after the above prizes have been
announced, Nelson residents will have two weeks to vote.
Affordable Choice: the design review panel will award this
designation to the design that it feels will be the most
economical to build.
Eco‐Choice: the design review panel will award this
designation to the design that it feels achieves the highest
ecological standards.
Stages: The competition consists of two rounds. The first round is prototypical: we are looking for the
concept, costs, performance, and design interest of your design. Exterior drawings only are required. At
this stage, you must submit all the documents required in the “Submission Requirements and Rules”
section below.
Up to five of the top entrants from the first round will be invited to continue on to the second round. If
you are invited to this stage, you will be asked to provide interior floor plans, specs, and a more refined
affordability and eco‐sustainability report, and be able to show your design’s adaptability. Second‐round
participants will be asked whether they are interested in having their contact information shared with
other second‐round participants and/or unsuccessful first‐round participants for possible collaboration.
Only the contest winners will be required to submit complete, buildable plans.
Review Process: Submissions will be evaluated through a blind jury process. The Design Review Panel
will be composed of five jurors (see top of document), plus the competition organiser as a non‐voting
chairperson. In the event of a panel member being unable to continue to act through illness or any other
cause, the Competition Organiser reserves the right to appoint an alternative panel member. The
competition organiser may submit an analysis of the submissions’ compliance with City bylaws to the
panel. The panel will select the competition winners, if possible, by consensus. If no consensus can be
achieved, awards will be determined by majority vote.
All submissions will be judged anonymously. Only the contest organiser will know participants’ identity.
It is therefore imperative not to include any identifying material in your submission.
If there are at least three competitive entries from designers based in the West or East Kootenay, the
Design Review Panel will be expected to designate at least one of the top three prizes to a “local”
submission. Submissions will nonetheless remain anonymous.
City of Nelson residents will also be invited to vote for their favourite designs (a “people’s choice”
award). This vote will not be anonymous, as it will occur after the first, second, and third prizes have
been announced.
Timeline
* may, under extraordinary circumstances, change without notice
June 19th, 2019 Launch competition
July 31st Deadline to submit questions. (Answers will be provided by August 8th.)
September 2nd Deadline for first‐round submissions
If a satisfactory number of submissions hasn’t been achieved, the
competition organiser reserves the right to re‐open and extend 1st round.
September Design Review Panel evaluates and narrows down to top 5 for second
round
Approx. Invite successful candidates to second round and submit feedback to
October 1st them; the Design Review Panel may direct questions to entrants
continuing on to the second round
Oct 1st – Dec. Second round
31st
January 2020 Design Review Panel evaluates second round submissions and announces
winners
February 2020 City of Nelson publicises the winning designs.
Then, public has two weeks to vote for “People’s Choice”.
City awaits full building plans from winners, followed by plan review by
building officials. Prize money is rewarded once received and approved
by the Building Official.
March 2020‐on Plans made available to the public.
Design Parameters: What You’re Designing and Where
1. A “Laneway House” in the R1 zone of the City of Nelson, British Columbia, a small but dense city
characterised by its heritage architecture. Laneway houses are essentially backyard houses and
they may not be subdivided off. They are an accessory use to a single‐family home. Think of
them as a detached secondary/basement suite. They are often used as rentals or housing for
young or aging family members. In Nelson, they are not permitted to be used as short‐term
rentals (i.e. Airbnb).
2. Most, but not all properties in Nelson back on to a laneway/alley, but lane access is not required
to build a laneway house. Residents may choose to design their laneway house so that their
primary, everyday access is via the lane, but for emergency access purposes there must be a 1m‐
wide foot access from the primary street.
3. We recommend reading the City’s “Laneway House How‐To Guide”: www.nelson.ca/lwh_guide
4. The competition organiser generally expects the construction costs of a 950‐sq. ft. laneway
house in Nelson to average $220 per square foot.
5. Compliance is required with City bylaws as they pertain to “Laneway Houses” in the R1 zone, the
City’s Development Permit Guidelines for Laneway Houses, and the BC Building Code 2018 (note:
Nelson is located in Climate Zone 5).
a. The zoning bylaw can be access at www.nelson.ca/zoning
b. The Development Permit Guidelines: www.nelson.ca/lwh_guidelines
6. In some areas of the City there is a Wildfire Development Permit restricting wood siding, open
soffits, shingles, or shakes are not permitted as roofing or siding. Refer to Development Permit
Area #3 in the Official Community Plan.
7. Site characteristics and variations:
a. Most lots in Nelson are steeply sloped, although many are flat, too. Lots that we expect
to be interested in a laneway house are 500 to 650 square metres in size and 15‐18
metres wide.
b. In most cases (R1 zoning), the required side and rear setbacks are 1.5 metres.
c. You may wish to consider designs that can easily be modified to be a single‐storey (4.5
metres in height or less) and designs that include, for example, a single‐car garage that
could easily be modified to be additional living space if the client so chooses (note that
the maximum height drops from 6.1 metres to 5.8 metres if no garage or carport is
included).
8. Building restrictions (for terms in quotation marks, refer to their definition in the City’s Zoning
Bylaw for calculation rules):
a. “Height”: 5.8 metres, but 6.1 metres if the “building footprint” includes a carport or
garage
b. “Building Footprint”: 65 square metres (note: the zoning bylaw allows for an 80 sq. m.
footprint for laneway houses 4.5 metres in height or under). In most cases, maximum lot
coverage is 35% (in others, this can go as high as 45%). Due to the lot coverage of
existing houses, designers may wish to balance the observation that not every property
may accommodate a 65 sq. m. footprint, and that in many cases 55 sq. m. may be
required, with the general desire to maximise living area.
c. “Gross Floor Area”: between 26 and 89 square metres
Submission Requirements and Rules
1. Deadline to submit for the first round: September 2nd, 2019 at 11:59pm, PST.
2. Building specifications are to be in metric. Drawings should normally be shown at a scale of 1:50
to 1:200.
3. Submissions shall be in PDF format and sent by email. Files should not exceed 20mb. If your files
are too large to email, please contact the competition organiser. All file submissions will be
acknowledged by the Organiser within 48 business hours (Monday to Friday). If you do not
receive an acknowledgment of receipt, your submission may have been caught in a spam filter
and you should contact the organiser.
4. Submission contents shall not name the entrant(s) or their firm, in order to keep the contest
anonymous. Entrants and their affiliation will be identified in the contest entrance form and
waiver.
5. Initial (first‐round) submissions are to include:
a. A design board [sent as a PDF only], legible if printed in A3 (or 11” x 17”), including high‐
level specifications indicating materials used, compliance with zoning, the City’s laneway
house design guidelines, the BC Building Code, and other relevant information (e.g. floor
area)
b. At least one exterior perspective of the building and/or proposal in context of a sample
site; renderings or quality drawings
c. In addition to inclusion in a design board, any images shall be submitted separately
in .jpeg or similar format; one version high‐resolution and another low‐resolution
version that is easier to email.
d. A written description (between 200 and 1,000 words) indicating how the evaluation
criteria (see below) are met. Entrants may include information on additional
opportunities for affordability, if applicable.
e. Complete and sign the attached entrance and declaration of authorship and rights form.
Submission of the form acknowledges authorship of the design ideas, and by signing it,
Competitors accept all conditions pertaining to the competition and agree to abide by
the decisions of the Design Review Panel and the City of Nelson.
6. Second‐round submissions (invite‐only) are to include:
a. Updated first‐round contents, if necessary
b. Interior floor plans and, preferably, interior renderings
c. Exterior: elevation drawings (including height calculation) and renderings
d. (For the above, you may include plans and drawings/renderings for various
configurations, e.g. flat‐lot and hillside; 1‐storey and 2‐storey, as desired by the designer)
e. Specifications/stats indicating compliance with zoning, the City’s laneway house design
guidelines, the BC Building Code, and other relevant information (e.g. floor area)
f. May include sample site plan, if desired
g. A written “pitch” (up to 400 words) to interested homeowners. The text’s target
audience are potential purchasers of the plans. Why should they pick your design?
Name the design.
7. Submissions should avoid structure‐specific or site‐specific engineering.
8. By entering this competition, entrants declare that the designs in their submission have been
developed solely for the purposes of this competition and represent no infringement on any
existing copyright or patent.
9. Entrants must be based in Canada and be of the age of majority.
10. Design teams may be modified at the second‐round stage with written notice to the
competition organiser, so long as the primary entrant remains the same.
11. Group submissions are encouraged, as well as student submissions. Student submissions must
be supported by at least one professional, such as a professor or practitioner.
12. Members of the Design Review Panel and their immediate family, employees, employers, or
associates are ineligible to participate. Current employees of the City are also ineligible.
13. No member of the Design Review Panel may assist an entrant or act in any other capacity to
advise or aid an entrant in the development or presentation of their submission. Entrants shall
not communicate in any manner with any member of the Design Review Panel regarding this
competition prior to the public announcement of the results.
14. Any submission that is received after the submission deadline, is incomplete, or violates any
provisions of the Competition rules or Terms and Conditions, will be disqualified. Upon evidence
of any infraction of the competition conditions, the entrant(s) shall be informed, in writing, of
disqualification.
If design entries do not meet appropriate standards, the Design Review Panel reserves the right to not
award one or more prizes. If a satisfactory number of submissions have not been received, the
competition organiser reserves the right to extend the contest. Winners will be announced as soon as
possible.
Feedback will only be sent to the winners. Competitors will be expected to maintain confidentiality and
must not release their designs for publication, or identify the name of the successful or unsuccessful
designers to any third parties until after an official announcement has been made and/or anonymity
lifted. The Competition Organisers reserve the right to publicise the Competition, any design submission,
and the result in any way or medium they consider fit. Illustrations of any design ‐ either separately, or
together with other designs, with or without explanatory text written by the Organisers or by the
entrant ‐ may be used without cost. Once anonymity has been lifted, authors will be credited and
recognised in all associated media and publicity.
Copyright rests with the author of the submitted design, until and unless a prize has been awarded. It is
a condition of entry that winners will transfer ownership of the design and plans to the City of Nelson.
Prior to the prize money being issued, the plans must be approved by the City’s Building Official for
Building Code compliance. If the winning design ultimately does not meet regulatory requirements to
the satisfaction of the City’s Building Official, the prize will not be awarded to that entrant and the
Design Review Panel may award the prize to another design.
The Architectural Institute of British Columbia (AIBC) has, in writing, reviewed this competition and
approves it for participation by its members, as well as designers.
The deadline for questions is July 31st, 2019. Questions shall be submitted by email and answers will be
posted online on the project page at www.nelson.ca/designcompetition. The competition organiser is:
Alex Thumm
Planner, City of Nelson
Suite 101 ‐ 310 Ward Street
Nelson, British Columbia V1L 5S4
P: 250.352.8253 | E: athumm@nelson.ca
Post‐Competition
The City of Nelson owns the rights to the designs and plans and sells them for $1,000 per project within
the City of Nelson. 100% of this fee goes to designer as a royalty. The designer may sell the design/plans
(this includes designs/plans that are substantially similar to the winning design) outside of City limits at
the price of their choosing; however, they may not allow the plans/design to be used for more than 15
individual builds outside of City limits. In the case of a team submission, payment will be made to the
primary entrant or their firm, as desired.
If the City chooses to retire the designs from this program, the rights return to the original designer.
If pre‐reviewed designs are used, the applicant will benefit from an expedited review process.
Furthermore, the $450 development permit fee (if applicable) will be refunded to the applicant if Step 3
of the BC Step Code is met. If a plan purchaser wishes to modify the plans, the original winning designer
will be recommended to the applicant by the City. However, the applicant is free to choose another
designer to modify the plans for their building permit. The City may also indicate to the applicant which
builder(s), if any, have built their chosen design previously.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Design: successful designs will be high‐quality, attractive, and practical. Contestants would
therefore benefit from knowledge of the real estate preferences of locals. Designs will fit as
wide of a range of contexts and neighbourhoods as possible (i.e. fitting with contemporary and
heritage primary homes alike), giving consideration to Nelson’s context and architecture.
2. Good home, good neighbour: successful designs will be appreciated by both neighbours and
occupants of the laneway house. They will have street appeal (attractive design that will be
attractive to most) and afford privacy to both occupants and adjacent neighbours. Limit bulk.
Occupants will benefit from a high‐quality interior that will be as house‐like as possible (e.g. high
ceilings, ‘quiet walls’ to reduce noise within the home).
3. Affordability: in their use of materials, successful designs will strike a balance between
affordability and sustainability that will be attractive to Nelson property owners. The ongoing
costs of maintenance must also be taken into consideration.
4. Flexibility and longevity: the winning designs will be those that are the most elastic, meaning
adaptable to and replicable across a variety of lots, neighbourhoods, lot configurations, and
topographies in Nelson (which are often steep). Maximise opportunities for easy customisation
to accommodate individual appetites for affordability, finishing, and sustainable design features.
Entrants will be rewarded for designs that show promise of a high shelf life.
5. Eco‐Design: green materials are used where appropriate and maximum possible energy
efficiency is achieved (strive to achieve the highest‐possible step code level). Other sustainability
features (e.g. living roofs) will be rewarded, but weighted against affordability. Ideally, such
features would be including as ‘options’ for the client.
Contest Entrance,
Release & Assignment
I/we hereby irrevocably consent to and authorize The City of Nelson [the City], its agents or assigns, the irrevocable
and unrestricted right to use and publish images and video of the persons named below and of the design and
conceptual plans that I/we submit as part of the City’s 2019‐2020 laneway house design competition [“the Images”] for
editorial, trade, advertising, promotion or any other lawful purpose in any manner or medium, and to alter the same
without restriction without the payment of any compensation. Further, in favour of the City, I/we do hereby:
(1) waive any right to notice or approval of any use of the Images;
(2) release the City and its agents or assigns from all claims and liabilities relating to the Images of
myself/ourselves or by virtue of alteration, processing or use in composite form;
(3) publicise the names of all entrants, along with the right to use other background information about the
entrant(s) or winner(s);
(4) release all intellectual property rights, including copyright, which I/we have in or to the Images; and
(5) assign to the City all moral rights which I/we have in or to the Images.
I/we declare that:
(1) I/we are hereby applying to participate in the design competition and have complied with and accept the
rules, regulations and conditions which apply to this competition and acknowledge that the City reserves the
right to refuse any entry.
(2) I/we declare that the information submitted as part of this competition is, to the best of my/our knowledge,
true and correct.
(3) I/we agree to accept the decision of the design review panel as final, and by submitting an entry to this
competition, I/we agree the City has the unlimited right to display, publish, post and otherwise exhibit all
materials submitted in any medium. Credit will be given to the authors of the material after entrants’
anonymity has been lifted by the City.
(4) I/we accept full authorship of the submission and declare that the design and plans are my/our original work
and that the entirety of the submission has been prepared either by me or under my/our direct supervision.
(5) I/we acknowledge that I/we retain ownership and copyright of all entry materials submitted, but accord, as
per this waiver, accord limited reproduction rights to the City, and, as per section 12 of this waiver, may be
required to forfeit copyright if selected as a winning submission. I/we assume all responsibility for any breach
of intellectual property rights or copyright entitlements of others.
(6) I/we agree to bear the cost of any claims or outlay relating to intellectual property rights or copyright
entitlements of others that might arise from the City’s use or reproduction of any materials submitted.
(7) I/we agree to waive any and all claims against the City, the Organizers, and the Design Review Panel members
arising as a result of the competition. I/we release and indemnify the City of Nelson, its Council members,
officers, employees, and agents from and against all liability, claims and other expenses of any kind which I, or
any other person, may have in connection with anything said or done with respect to this project.
(8) The City shall bear no responsibility for any unauthorized use of submissions by any third party.
(9) The City has the right to use any ideas contained in any winning or non‐winning submission.
(10) I/we agree that I/we will not release any material submitted to this competition until the results of the
competition are announced by the City.
(11) I/we acknowledge that the City will not return any materials submitted.
(12) If I/we should be awarded a prize as part of this competition, I/we acknowledge that the award is contingent
on a full set of buildable plans being submitted and approved by the City’s Building Official, and I/we agree to
transfer all rights and ownership over the winning design and plans (this includes rights over any designs that
are substantially similar to the winning design) to the City, that the designer(s) will receive 100% of the sale
value of the plans, and that the City will determine when the plans may be sold to the public.
I hereby represent that I am over 18 years of age and the right to contract in my own name. I also state that I have read
this document prior to signing same and that I fully understand its contents.
Official Mailing Address of Entrant/Team:
______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Primary email address of team: ______________________________________________________
Primary phone number of team: ______________________________________________________
Affiliation (e.g. firm or university):___________________________________________________________
Primary Entrant Name: ____________________________________________ Title or Professional Designation:________________________
Team Member Name: ____________________________________________ Title or Professional Designation:________________________
Team Member Name: ____________________________________________ Title or Professional Designation:________________________
Team Member Name: ____________________________________________ Title or Professional Designation:________________________
Team Member Name: ____________________________________________ Title or Professional Designation:________________________
Signature of Primary Applicant (on behalf of all team members): ______________________________________________________________
DATE: PRINT NAME IN FULL:
ADDRESS:
Signed in the presence of: WITNESS SIGNATURE:
WITNESS NAME: