Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PLASTIC INDUSTRY
CLASS - B.B.A - V
ROLL No - 14
SEAT No -
ACADEMIC YEAR – 2017-18
PROJECT GUIDE - PROF. R.
DANGAR
SUBMITTED TO:-
SAURASTRA UNIVERSITY, RAJKOT
DECLARATION
Date :-
Place : - Rajkot
Yours faithfully
(Rajal Dhingani)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This project comes to a successful completion only with the joint efforts of
all these people and their help.
In Indian business, industrial and management activities are base for the
development of the country. With a view to preparing excellent future managers,
Saurashtra University has added a special subject, where students are required to
prepare a product project report in B.B.A. Sem-5.
Ever since 1957, the plastics industry in India has made significant
achievements as it made a modest but promising beginning by commencing
production of polystyrene. The chronology of manufacture of Indian
polymers is summarized as under – 1957- polystyrene, 1959- LDPE, 1961-
PVC, and 1968- HDPE, 1978- polypropylene. Such potential Indian market
has motivated the entrepreneurs in the company to acquire technical
expertise, achieve high quality standards and build capacities in various
facets of the booming plastic industry. The phenomenal development in the
plastic machinery sector is coupled with the developments in the
petrochemical sector, both of which support the plastic processing sector.
This has facilitated the plastic processors to build capacities for the service
of both the domestic market and the markets overseas. Today Indian plastic
processing sector comprises of over 30,000 units involved in producing a
variety of items through injection moulding, blow moulding, extrusion and
calendaring. The capacity to build in most segments of this industry coupled
with inherent capabilities has made us capable of servicing the overseas
markets. The Indian plastic industry has taken great striders and in the past
few decades, the industry has grown to the status of a leading sector in the
country with a sizable base.
2) GROWTH OF PLASTIC INDUSTRY
The growth rate of the Indian plastics industry is one of the highest in the
world, with plastics consumption growing at 16% per annum (compared to 10%
p.a. in China and around 2.5% p.a. in the UK). With a growing middle class
(currently estimated at 50 million) and a low per capita consumption of plastics,
currently 8kg per head, this trend is likely to continue. The Plastindia Foundation
estimates that plastics consumption is likely to reach 16kg per head by 2015.
3) TYPES OF PLASTIC PRODUCT
1. Polyethylene (PE):-
The most common plastic on earth, the key to PE’s wide usage is its ability
to be manufactured in varying densities which give it different mechanical
properties. At the heavy end of the scale Ultra High Molecular Weight PE
(UHMWPE) is used in bulletproof vests. High Density PE (HDPE) is found
in almost anywhere cheap rigid plastic is needed, like food packaging, toys
and pipes. Low Density PE (LDPE) is the king of disposable packaging, and
almost every piece of thin plastic sheeting, from shopping bags to food
wrap, is made from it.
2. Polypropylene (PP):-
Commonly known in the plastics industry as “prop”. Polypropylene is a one
of the most adaptable thermoplastics around. It is tougher than PE but
remains flexible. Repeated stress will not crack it. It has a high melting
point; it is easy to injection mould, acid resistant, and best of all its cheap.
Good old propel is the second most manufactured plastic, and you can find it
in everything from a wheelie bin to your see through Tupperware.
4. Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS):-
ABS is often used in the automotive industry for consoles, panels, trims and
vents. It is strong and flexible, chemically resistant and has a relatively low
manufacturing cost. It is also often used for boxes, gauges, housings, asthma
inhalers and toys.
5. Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC):-
If the Chloride part of its name sounds nasty to you, you are on the money.
Once hugely popular due to its UV stability and ability to blend with other
materials to produce many mechanically different resins, its use is on the
decline because it is toxic throughout its whole life cycle. It can still be
found in products as varied as clothing, non-food packaging, piping and wire
insulation.
6. Polyamide (PA):-
Almost universally known as Nylon. Like PE it is available in many
variants with different properties. It is strong, hardy and ranges in colour
from milky-white to almost clear. It is significantly more expensive than
plastics such as PP, and is usually reserved for when toughness is needed. It
is often reinforced with short glass fibers and used in situations requiring
excellent impact and resistance and some flexibility, such as seatbelt buckles
and hinges.
7. Polycarbonate (PC):-
It is tough, stable and transparent. Originally heavily used for food storage
requiring strength, like baby bottles, PC’s tendency to leach harmful
chemicals has seen it repurposed almost exclusively as an engineering
plastic. It now corners the market in applications requiring clear or vividly
colored plastics with high gloss finishes, scratch resistance and high
strength. Commonly, this involves products such as handheld devices or
light switches.
8. Polystyrene (PS):-
Polystyrene can refer to three different types. General Purpose (GPPS)
Polystyrene is the brittle, cheap material that is often used for packing
products into boxes. High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) is hardy, has impact
resistance and is translucent. It is used for electrical components, food
containers and construction aids. Expanded Polystyrene is PS fluffed up with
air inside a mould, and is commonly seen as the padding inside bicycle and
motorcycle helmets.
9. Polyoxymethylene (POM):-
Commonly known as Acetyl. POM is another high strength engineering
plastic, which often competes with PC. Unlike PC it is not clear, and so is
hard to cooler. However it has a higher resistance to heat, is stiffer, has low
friction and keeps its shape better. It is often used for moving mechanical
parts such as bindings, gears, wheels, sides and locking parts.
10.Polyurethane (PU):-
One of the most chemically flexible plastics on this list, PU can be either
thermoforming or thermosetting. When injection molded softer, highly
flexible forms of PU are often used. These form features like internal seals,
bump protection and even the “soft touch” skin molded over many handheld
devices to increase comfort and grip.
There is an incredible range of plastics available. Coupled with the low part
cost and amazing shapes that injection molding can offer, it is no wonder plastic
injection molding is one of the most powerful and widely used production
processes used today.
4) TOP 5 UNIT OF PLASTIC INDUSTRY
1) Blow molding
Hot air is blown into a pre-formed tube, a parson, of semi-molten plastic
which expands to fill a cavity formed by a two part, usually metal, mould. The tube
can be injection molded allowing a thread for a lid or some other detail to be
formed. It can also be extruded as a tube, pinched at one end, and again expanded
to fill the cavity of a two part metal mould. Textures can be formed on the mould
walls.
2) Casting
Plastic in liquid form is poured into an open mould itself often moulded
from plastic.
3) Compression molding
A measured amount of material is added to a two part mould and subjected
to heat and pressure.
4) Extrusion
Plastic pellets are fed into a heated cylinder and driven forward by a turning
screw which compacts and melts them and forces the melt through a die at the end,
creating continuous lengths of shapes with the desired profile. It is a system much
like that of a mincing machine except for the addition of heat. Once the plastic
5) Fabrication
There are a number of different processes but they share the release of
air/gas into the plastic so that it fills with bubbles and foams within a two
part metal mould of the desired shape.
7) Injection molding
Similar to extrusion except that the plastic is injected into a metal
mould often with branching for multi-impression tools.
8) Rotational molding
A measured amount of material is placed in a mould which is rotated
on two axes at low speed within an oven. The molten plastic then covers and
adheres to the inner surface of the mould. The mould is then cooled while
still rotating and the product is released.
9) Thermoforming
Uses preformed sheets which are warmed and sucked (vacuum
forming) or pushed into a mould. Neither high heat nor pressure is
required so moulds can be made from cheap materials such as MDF or cast
aluminum. Also used to shape rod and tube.
6) PLASTIC PRODUCTION IN THE WORLD
This represents around 4% increase from 2010, when 270 million tons of
plastic were produced. It also confirms the return of long term growth after
the economic crisis.
The five largest plastics types (polyolefin, PVC, EPS and PET) account for
about 70%of the total global demand, i.e. 200 million tons.
Most plastic scraps from the united states, Europe, and other countries that
have established collection systems flow to china, which receives 56% (by
weight) of waste plastic imports worldwide.
Indirect evidence suggests that most of this imported plastic is reprocessed at
low- tech, family- run facilities with no environmental protection controls,
such as proper disposal of contaminants or waste water.
There are also concerns that low- quality plastics are not reused but are
disposed of or incinerated for energy in plants that lack air pollution control
systems. Through its 2010 green fence operation, the Chinese government
has started to work to reduce the number unregulated facilities.
2005 2015
4.7 million tone 18.9 million tone
@ 15% CARG, consumption
of plastic polymers
Overview
of
SAMPLE
UNIT
SUPREME INDUSTRY
The company owns largest plastics in India. SIL operates 18 plants that are
located at Derabassi, Gadegaon, Guwahati, Halol, Hosur, Jalgaon, Kanhe, Kanpur,
Khopoli, Khushukheda, Malanpur, Nandesari, Noida, Pondicheri and Silvassa.
The company operates a subsidiary namely the Supreme Industries Overseas
Operating in UAE. This subsidiary has supported company to create product
presence in 21 Countries.
2018-19 will see the Supreme Group turnover cross a projected Rs. 125
billion.
MISSION
NILKAMAL INDUSTRY
Industry Furniture
Genre Plastics
Founded 1981
Website www.nilkamal.com
MISSION
- Growing the business by improving and optimizing human skills, effective use of
technology and manpower skills within the Nilkamal Group resulting in 15000 jobs.
VIP INDUSTRY
HISTORY OF VIP INDUSTRY:-
The very first VIP Suitcase was manufactured in the year 1971. Since
then, VIP Industries has sold over 60 million pieces of luggage to people around
the world and have subsequently become the foremost manufacturer of hard and
soft luggage in Asia, with a goal to make travelling simple
Founded 1971
Website vipindustries.co.in
VISION
Plastibends India Limited, promoted by the 'Kolsite Group' is located in the union
territory of Daman, to manufacture various types of Master Batches, Compounds,
Blends, Alloys, etc. for the Plastics Industry. Plastibends India Limited is the first
master batch manufacturing company in India who has been awarded ISO 9001
Quality Assurance Certification by TUV Bayern, Germany.
The company has made a large investments in innovative technology and R&D
and is having a total manufacturing capacity of over 40000 Tons per annum.
The company’s products are highly compatible with a wide range of polymers like
polyolefin, polystyrenes, polyamides, PBT, PET and a diverse range of
engineering plastics.
PBI has got the coveted ‘Export House’ status by Government of India. They have
been making a major export thrust in keeping with their global aspirations. Their
products match international quality standards making them globally acceptable.
They have been exporting to more than 30 countries worldwide in Asian, African,
European, South American Markets and New Zealand. They are poised to
extend their footprint to the advanced North American Markets.
COMPANY PROFILE OF PLASTIBENDS INDUSTRY
MISSION
- The way they do their business, work culture, quality perspectives, obsession
with innovative, technology and their human resource are all singularly
focused on enhancing and adding value.
VISION
Since inception Cosmo has maintained market leadership in both the domestic and
export market. Cosmo Films believe in constant growth and innovation and hence
had taken strategic decision of expanding its current capacities to compete
successfully in the global market. This strategy will help in increasing its global
presence while contributing to overall margins and benefiting its shareholders &
stakeholders. This is reflected through its association with leading FMCG Brands
worldwide for providing them with cost–effective innovative packaging solutions
to enhance their value. Its current capacity is 56,000 MT per annum, and 22,000
MT of Thermal lamination film.
The company has acquired a PVDC and Acrylic coating plant from France and has
started making inroads in the high barrier packaging material as well as coated
Label segments. the R & D of Cosmo is committed to adapt, modify and develop
the product to fulfill customer's requirements and needs in time. The R & D center
is thoroughly equipped with MVTR, OTR, FTIR machines apart from various
other testing equipments
During a survey conducted by 'FORBES' in 2003 Cosmo was recognized as one of
the best 200 companies out of 19000 listed companies with revenue of less than 1
Billion US$ outside US
Type Public
Founded 1976
MISSION
- "To be the most preferred global brand offering value added BOPP films for
packaging, labels, lamination and industrial applications."
1. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Plastic waste is silent threat to the environment and their disposal is a serious
issue for waste managers. Now a day society does not have any alternative to
plastic products like plastic bags, plastic bottles, and plastic sheets etc. In spite of
all efforts made to limit its use but unfortunately its utility is increasing day by day.
To circumvent this issue many efforts were made in the past to reuse the plastic
waste but no significant results were achieved. On contrary concrete being the
widely used construction material is facing problem due to unavailability of
construction material (Cement, sand and coarse aggregate). Various attempts were
made through experimentation to check the feasibility of plastic waste to be use
partially in concrete with respect to various properties of strength, workability,
durability and ductility of concrete. This paper includes review of various studies
conducted on utility of waste plastic material used in the concrete. Moreover this
paper will draw our focus toward the impingement on the various properties of
concrete when partially replacing with waste plastic.
Literature review on plastics recycling and waste
management in the US by Subramanian, P.M., in 2009
1 Introduction
2 Definitions
3 Importance of Ratio Analysis
INTRODUCTION
2. Judging Efficiency
Accounting ratios are important for judging the company's efficiency in terms of
its operations and management. They help judge how well the company has been
able to utilize its assets and earn profits.
3. Locating Weakness
Although accounting ratios are used to analyze the company's past financial
performance, they can also be used to establish future trends of its financial
performance. As a result, they help formulate the company's future plans.
5. Comparing Performance
It is essential for a company to know how well it is performing over the years and
as compared to the other firms of the similar nature. Besides, it is also important to
know how well its different divisions are performing among themselves in
different years. Ratio analysis facilitates such comparison. Ratio analysis is an
important and useful technique to check upon the efficiency of an organization.
The management can arrive at important decisions by using ration analysis. The
ratio is used for expressing the mutual relation to different accounts consisting in
the financial statement.
INDEX
1 Introduction
2 Meaning
3 Research Design
4 Research Process
13 Research type
INTRODUCTION
According • "Research is a
systematic study of
to Remand generationg new
and Mary knowledge."
Definition:-
“Research is a systematic activity directed towards the discovery and
development of an organized body of knowledge.”
- JOHANWEST
RESEARCH DESIGN
Analysis of information
The collection is done in two ways that is primary data collection and secondary
data collection. But here primary data collection is not require in finance
secondary data which is useful for making decision in balance sheet and profit
& loss account government finance journal etc.
Analysis of the information:-
The next stage of research method is to extract the findings from the collection
data. The researcher tabulates the data and analysis it.
The last stage the researcher presents the findings in front of top management.
So, top management can approve these findings.
1. SUPREME INDUSTRY
2. NILKAMAL
3. VIP
4. PLASTIBLENDS
5. Cosmo FILMS
PERIOD OF THE STUDY
The present study has been made covering the period of last 5
years that are 2012-13 to 2016-17. There are not special reasons to choose this time
period for purpose of study.
UNIVERSE OF THE STUDY
The universe of the study is all leading units & all are private limited units
which are working in tea industry. They are as follows:-
1. SUPREME INDUSTRY
2. NILKAMAL
3. VIP
4. PLASTIBLENDS
5. Cosmo FILMS
SOURCES OF THE DATA
The task of data collection after a research problem has been defined and research
design/plan checked out. While deciding about the method of data collection to be
used for the study, the researcher should keep in mind two types of data.
1) Primary data: -The primary data are those which are collected afresh and
for the first time and thus happen to be original in character. There are
following methods of obtaining primary data.
Questionnaire or survey method
Observation method
Panel research
Experimental research
2) Secondary data: - The secondary data are those which have already been
passed through the statistical process. There are internal & external sources
of obtaining secondary data. Like sales force reports, miscellaneous reports,
internal expert, government publication, non- government publication,
research agencies, publication of internal organization.
The present research work is mainly based on secondary data
obtained from the annual reports of the sample units. To supplement the data,
different publication, various books, journal and different websites related
Automobile industry etc. have been used for better reliability.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The collected data are duly edited classified & analyzed using all types
of relevant accounting ratios & statistical techniques. The data are presented
through simple classification & with the help of percentage, average & hypothesis
are tested at 5% level of significance of employing ‘F’-test.
There are many techniques which may be used for analyzing the
financial performance. These techniques have been classified as follows:
A. Accounting techniques
B. Statistical techniques
Accounting Techniques:-
Ratio Analysis:-
A ratio analysis is a figure showing the logical relationship between any two items
taken from financial statements. A number of ratios are used by financial analysis.
They can be classified as profitability ratios, activity ratios, liquidity ratios and
solvency ratios. The use of ratios for the purpose of arriving at some conclusion
regarding some aspect of performance of financial position of business is known as
ratio analysis.
Statistical Techniques:-
F-Test:-
An F- test is any statistical test in which the test statistical has an F distribution
under the null hypothesis. It is not often used when comparing statistical models
that have been fitted to a data set, in order to identify the model that fits the
population from which the data were samples. Exact F- test mainly arises when the
models have been fitted to the data using least squares.
ANOVA Analysis:-
ANOVA table also shows the statistics used to test hypotheses about the
population means. An ANOVA is a statistical test that evaluates data sets from
statistical experiments to see if there are statistically significant differences in the
different experimental conditions. For an ANOVA, the data sets are organized by
the different independent variables in your experiment, with each factor being
tested at given levels.
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
There are some pros and cons for each and every study. I have
studied the project report on financial statement analysis of development.
This study is based on secondary data taken from published annual reports &
accounts of selected companies and such as its findings depends entirely on
the accuracy of such data.
There are different methods to measure the liquidity of an industry in this
connection views of experts differ from one another.
The present study is largely based on ration analysis has its own limitations
which also applies to the study.
The different views have been applied in the calculation of the elements of
costs by the unit.
Research Type
Gross profit margin is the ratio of gross profit to sales revenue. It is the
percentage by which gross profit exceed production cost. Gross margins
reveal how much a company earns taking into consideration the costs that it
incurs for producing its products or services. A company that boasts gross
margin than its competitors and industry is more efficient.
Sales
14
12
10 SUPREME
PLASTIBENDS
8
NILKAMAL
6 VIP
COSMO
4
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Supreme which is 13.33 and the lower ratio
of Cosmo which is 4.25.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of supreme is 12.29 and the lower ratio of
Cosmo which is 5.03.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of supreme is 12.38 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 4.82.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of supreme is 11.98 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 7.47.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of supreme is 13.61 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 8.48.
F – Test:
Ho = There is no significant difference in gross profit ratio within the
samples & between the samples.
H1 = There is significant difference in gross profit ratio within the
samples & between the samples.
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS Df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 37.36414 4 9.341036 5.18725 0.007123 3.006917
Columns 129.4489 4 32.36223 17.97134 9.1E-06 3.006917
Error 28.8123 16 1.800768
Total 195.6253 24
H0: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (5.18> 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (17.97 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 5.18 and 17.97.
5.18 And 17.97 both are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of
significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is also
rejected.
(2) Net Profit Ratio
The net profit margin ratio is the overall measure of a firm’s ability to turn
each rupee of income into profit. It indicates the efficiency with which a
business managed. A bank with a high net profit ratio is in an advantageous.
Where net profit ratio is low the firm will find it difficult to survive on this
adverse situation.
6
SUPREME
5 PLASTIBENDS
NILKAMAL
4
VIP
3
COSMO
2
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Supreme which is 8.00 and the lower ratio
of Cosmo which is 1.35.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of supreme is 7.10 and the lower ratio of cosmo
which is 0.64.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of supreme is 7.42 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 2.37.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of cosmo is 7.51 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 5.21.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of supreme is 8.50 and the lower ratio of
Plastibends which is 5.77.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 37.25248 4 9.31312 4.165341 0.016851 3.006917
Columns 50.52996 4 12.63249 5.649947 0.004954 3.006917
Error 35.77376 16 2.23586
Total 123.5562 24
H0: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (4.16> 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (5.64 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 4.16 and 5.64.
4.16 And 5.64 both are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of
significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is also
rejected.
(3) Current Ratio
This ratio used to perform the short term financial analysis. It is also known
as working capital ratio. This ratio matches the current assets to the current
liability of the firm.
A ratio greater than one means that firms has more current
assets against current liability. The ratio is obtained by dividing current
assets by current liabilities.
Current liabilities
SUPREME
1.5
PLASTIBENDS
NILKAMAL
1 VIP
COSMO
0.5
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of VIP which is 2.11 and the lower ratio of
Cosmo which is 0.51.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of VIP is 2.16 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 0.60.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of VIP is 1.93 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 0.61.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of VIP is 1.96 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 0.68.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of VIP is 2.27 and the lower ratio of cosmo
which is 0.74.
F – test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 0.248016 4 0.062004 1.507733 0.24688 3.006917
1.15E-
Columns 5.645736 4 1.411434 34.32142 07 3.006917
Error 0.657984 16 0.041124
Total 6.551736 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (1.50 < 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (17.97 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 1.50 and 34.32.
34.32 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
(4) Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
4
SUPREME
PLASTIBENDS
3
NILKAMAL
VIP
2
COSMO
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Plastibends which is 4.24 and the lower ratio
of Cosmo which is 1.23.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of Plastibends is 4.67 and the lower ratio of
Cosmo which is 1.49.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of VIP is 4.31 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.67.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of VIP is 4.99 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.38.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of Nilkamal is 5.59 and the lower ratio of
Cosmo which is 1.56.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 1.87772 4 0.46943 0.565964 0.690919 3.006917
Columns 26.53972 4 6.63493 7.999337 0.000966 3.006917
Error 13.27096 16 0.829435
Total 41.6884 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (0.56< 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (7.99 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 0.56 and 7.99.
7.99 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
(5) Total asset turnover Ratio
The ratio indicates the number of times total asset are being
turned over with relationship to value of sales in a year. This ratio is used to
indicate the efficiency with which asset and resources of firm are being
utilized. A high ratio shows efficient utilization. A low ratio shows that the
firm has an extensive investment in total assets.
Total asset
3.5
2.5 SUPREME
PLASTIBENDS
2
NILKAMAL
1.5 VIP
COSMO
1
0.5
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of VIP which is 2.94 and the lower ratio of
Cosmo which is 1.32.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.21 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.43.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.11 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.85.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.49 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.75.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.21 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.29.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 0.508304 4 0.127076 1.313637 0.307068 3.006917
Columns 7.376064 4 1.844016 19.06236 6.23E-06 3.006917
Error 1.547776 16 0.096736
Total 9.432144 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (1.31< 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (19.06 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
1.31 and 19.06
19.06 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
(6) Debtor Turnover Ratio
The ratio shows the number of days taken to collect the dues of credit sales. The
ratio is computed by dividing debtors and bills receivable by the average daily
sales. The average daily sales are obtained by dividing the total annual sales by
365. The debtor’s turnover suggests the number of times the amount of credit sale
is collected during the year.
18
16
14
SUPRME
12
PLASTIBENDS
10
NILKAMAL
8 VIP
6 COSMO
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Supreme which is 18.12 and the lower ratio
of Plastibends which is 5.50.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of supreme is 18.05 and the lower ratio of
Plastibends which is 5.36.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of supreme is 18.01 and the lower ratio of
Plastibends which is 5.47.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of Supreme is 12.56 and the lower ratio of
Plastibends which is 5.17.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of supreme is 17.44 and the lower ratio of
Plastibends which is 5.17.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 5.007936 4 1.251984 0.874378 0.500767 3.006917
Columns 374.0862 4 93.52155 65.31489 1.05E-09 3.006917
Error 22.9097 16 1.431857
Total 402.0039 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (0.87< 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (65.31 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 0.87 and 65.31
65.31 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
(7) Inventory Turnover Ratio
16
14
12
SUPREME
10 PLASTIBENDS
NILKAMAL
8
VIP
6
COSMO
4
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Cosmo which is 8.12 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 5.28.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 14.40 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 5.50.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 15.98 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 4.78.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of Plastibends is 9.83 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 4.44.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 13.76 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 4.78.
F – test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 23.13988 4 5.78497 2.572524 0.077751 3.006917
Columns 178.9805 4 44.74512 19.89775 4.72E-06 3.006917
Error 35.98004 16 2.248753
Total 238.1004 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (2.57< 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (19.89 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 2.57 and 19.89.
19.89 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
(8) Debt Equity Ratio
The Debt equity ratio a financial ratio indicating the relative proportion
of shareholders' equity and debt used to finance a company's assets. Closely
related to leveraging, the ratio is also known as risk, gearing or leverage.
The two components are often taken from the firm's balance sheet or
statement of financial position (so-called book value), but the ratio may also
be calculated using market values for both, if the company's debt and equity
are publicly traded, or using a combination of book value for debt and
market value for equity financially.
1.4
1.2
1 SUPREME
PLASTIBENDS
0.8
NILKAMAL
0.6 VIP
COSMO
0.4
0.2
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Cosmo which is 1.15 and the lower ratio of
VIP which is 0.16.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 1.36 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 0.06.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 0.96 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 0.10.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 0.66 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 0.04.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 0.86 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 0.
F – test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 0.422704 4 0.105676 3.912332 0.021142 3.006917
Columns 2.361544 4 0.590386 21.85724 2.55E-06 3.006917
Error 0.432176 16 0.027011
Total 3.216424 24
H0: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (3.91> 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (21.85 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 3.91 and 21.85.
3.91 and 21.85 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance
is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is also
rejected.
(9) Long term debt equity Ratio
The ratio is calculated by taking the company's long-term debt and dividing it by
the book value of common equity. The greater a company's leverage, the higher
the ratio. Generally, companies with higher ratios are thought to be more risky.
A high ratio usually indicates a higher degree of business risk because the
company must meet principal and interest on its obligations. Potential creditors are
reluctant to give financing to a company with a high debt position. However, the
magnitude of debt depends on the type of business. For example, a bank may have
a high debt ratio but its assets are generally liquid. A utility can afford a higher
ratio than a manufacturer because its earnings are more stable.
Long term debt equity ratio = Long-term debt ÷ (Common stock + Preferred stock)
1.4
1.2
1 SUPREME
PLASTIBENDS
0.8
NILKAMAL
0.6 VIP
COSMO
0.4
0.2
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Cosmo which is 1.15 and the lower ratio of
Plastibends which is 0.12.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 1.36 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 0.12.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 0.96 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 0.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 0.66 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 0.02.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of cosmos is 0.86 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 0.
.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 0.180456 4 0.045114 3.122833 0.044585 3.006917
Columns 3.021816 4 0.755454 52.29322 5.48E-09 3.006917
Error 0.231144 16 0.014447
Total 3.433416 24
H0: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (3.12> 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (52.29 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 3.12 and 52.29.
3.12 And 52.29.are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance
is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is also
rejected.
(10) Operating Profit Margin Ratio:-
The operating profit margin ratio indicates how much profit a company makes
after paying for variable costs of production such as wages, raw materials, etc. It is
also expressed as a percentage of sales and then shows the efficiency of a company
controlling the costs and expenses associated with business operations.
Furthermore, it is the return achieved from standard operations and does not
include unique or one time transactions. Terms used to describe
operating profit margin ratios this include the following:
Where,
Operating Income = gross profit – operating expenses
year Supreme Plastibends Nilkamal VIP Cosmo Ri Avg.
18
16
14
12
SUPREME
10 PLASTIBENDS
NILKAMAL
8
VIP
6
COSMO
4
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Supreme which is 15.73 and the lower ratio
of Cosmo which is 7.44.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of supreme is 14.85 and the lower ratio of
Cosmo which is 8.24.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of supreme is 15.65 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 8.27.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of Supreme is 115.49 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 8.46.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of supreme is 17.06 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 11.88.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 34.15926 4 8.539816 6.755924 0.002204 3.006917
Columns 170.4486 4 42.61216 33.71086 1.31E-07 3.006917
Error 20.22478 16 1.264049
Total 224.8327 24
H0: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (6.75> 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (33.71 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 6.75 and 33.71.
6.75 and 33.71..are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance
is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is also
rejected.
(11) Asset Turnover Ratio :-
The asset turnover ratio is an efficiency ratio that measures a company’s ability to
generate sales from its assets by comparing net sales with average total assets. In
other words, this ratio shows how efficiently a company can use its assets to
generate sales.
The asset turnover ratio is calculated by dividing net sales by average total
assets.
3.5
2.5 SUPREME
PLASIBENDS
2
NILKAMAL
1.5 VIP
COSMO
1
0.5
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Supreme which is 3.23 and the lower ratio
of Cosmo which is 1.49.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.23 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.77.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.26 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.75.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of VIP is 3.54 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.50.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of VIP is 2.86 and the lower ratio of Cosmo
which is 1.43.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 0.2458 4 0.06145 0.529844 0.715584 3.006917
Columns 7.59256 4 1.89814 16.36645 1.64E-05 3.006917
Error 1.85564 16 0.115978
Total 9.694 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (0.52< 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (33.71 > 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 0.52 and 16.36.
16.36 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
18
16
14
12
SUPREME
10 PLASTIBENDS
NILKAMAL
8
VIP
6
COSMO
4
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-14
Interpretation:
In 2012 - 13, the higher ratio of Cosmo which is 10.21 and the lower ratio of
VIP which is 4.78.
In 2013-14, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 10.21 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 4.44.
In 2014-15, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 15.98 and the lower ratio of VIP
which is 4.78.
In 2015-16, the higher ratio of Plastibends is 9.83 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 5.50.
In 2016-17, the higher ratio of Cosmo is 13.76 and the lower ratio of
Nilkamal which is 5.28.
F – Test:
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 23.4214 4 5.85535 2.624355 0.073688 3.006917
Columns 178.9805 4 44.74512 20.05467 4.48E-06 3.006917
Error 35.69852 16 2.231158
Total 238.1004 24
H0: This is accepted, because (Fc < Ft) i.e. (2.62< 3.00).
H1: This is rejected, because (Fc > Ft) i.e. (20.05> 3.00).
Interpretation:
Above table indicates the calculated value of ‘F’. The calculated value of ‘F’
is 2.62 and 20.05.
20.05 are more than to table value of ‘F’ at 5% level of significance is 3.00.
It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected.
FINDING
S
FINDING
At last finding help to under the conclusion of project. In this showing that in how
5 companies work and what is conclusion from the ratio of and position the
company.
OPPORTUNITY
“Opportunities do not come itself.”-It is rightly said. So, one have to grab
opportunities or to recognize them in time.
Untapped rural market.
Rising income level.
Large domestic market.
High consumer goods spending.
Marketing department has to do good advertisement and build brand
awareness in the market.
Job rotation, job enlargement and job enrichment needs to be done
frequently which would motivate an employee to do better.
Recruitment and selection process should be more transparent.