Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1 Introduction
1.1 History
1.2 Series compensation
1.3 Shunt compensation
2 Theory
2.1 Series compensation
2.2 Shunt compensation
FACTS Controller:
A power electronic-based system and other static equipment that provide control of one or
more AC transmission system parameters.
As new technology for power transmission system, FACTS and FACTS controllers not
controlled switches in steady state but also improve the dynamic and transient
performance of the power system. The power electronics-based switches in the function
blocks of FACTS can usually be operated repeatedly and the switching time is a portion
of a periodic cycle, which is much shorter than the conventional mechanical switches.
ratings of the solid switches and facilitates the applications. For example, the switching
frequencies of Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) are from 3 kHz to 10 kHz
which is several hundred times the utility frequency of power system (50~60Hz). Gate
turn-off thyristors (GTOs) have a switching frequency lower than 1 kHz, but the voltage
FACTS controllers have many configurations. In general, they can be categorized into
Shunt compensation
In shunt compensation, power system is connected in shunt (parallel) with the FACTS. It works
as a controllable current source. Shunt compensation is of two types:
power angle
Theory
In the case of a no-loss line, voltage magnitude at the receiving end is the same as
voltage magnitude at the sending end: Vs = Vr=V. Transmission results in a phase lag
that depends on line reactance X.
As it is a no-loss line, active power P is the same at any point of the line:
Reactive power at sending end is the opposite of reactive power at receiving end:
As is very small, active power mainly depends on whereas reactive power mainly
depends on voltage magnitude.
Series compensation
FACTS for series compensation modify line impedance: X is decreased so as to
increase the transmittable active power. However, more reactive power must be
provided.
Shunt compensation
Reactive current is injected into the line to maintain voltage magnitude. Transmittable
active power is increased but more reactive power is to be provided.
FACTS controllers can be impedance type, based on thyristors without gate turn-off
capability, which are called Static Var Compensator (SVC) for shunt-connected
specific parameters of the electrical power system (typically bus voltage)” [5].
SVC is based on thyristors without gate turn-off capability. The operating principal and
characteristics of thyristors realize SVC variable reactive impedance. SVC includes two
main components and their combination: (1) Thyristor-controlled and Thyristor-switched
Reactor (TCR and TSR); and (2) Thyristor-switched capacitor (TSC). In Figure 1.4
reverse-connected thyristors. TCR is controlled with proper firing angle input to operate
in a continuous manner, while TSR is controlled without firing angle control which
TSC shares similar composition and same operational mode as TSR, but the reactor is
replaced by a capacitor. The reactance can only be either fully connected or fully
TCR/TSR, TSC and fixed capacitors, a SVC can meet various requirements to
Compensators which are usually based on the voltage source inverter (VSI) or current
source inverter (CSI), as shown in Figure 1.5(a). Unlike SVC, STATCOM controls the
output current independently of the AC system voltage, while the DC side voltage is
Figure 1. 5 STATCOM topologies: (a) STATCOM based on VSI and CSI (b)
Compared with SVC, the topology of a STATCOM is more complicated. The switching
device of a VSI is usually a gate turn-off device paralleled by a reverse diode; this
function endows the VSI advanced controllability. Various combinations of the switching
10
devices and appropriate topology make it possible for a STATCOM to vary the AC
output voltage in both magnitude and phase. Also, the combination of STATCOM with a
different storage device or power source (as shown in Figure 1.5(b)) endows the
STATCOM has much better dynamic performance than conventional reactive power
compensators like SVC. The gate turn-off ability shortens the dynamic response time
from several utility period cycles to a portion of a period cycle. STATCOM is also much
faster in improving the transient response than a SVC. This advantage also brings higher
reliability and larger operating range. Figure 1.6 shows the V-I characteristics of
Figure 1. 6 V-I characteristics of SVC and STATCOM: (a) SVC; (b) STATCOM [24]
into either impedance type or converter type. The former includes Thyristor-Switched
Switched Series Reactor, and Thyristor-Controlled Series Reactor. The latter, based on
11
VSI, is usually in the form of a Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC). The
composition and operation of different types are similar to the operation of the shunt-
connected peers.
Storage
Figure 1. 7 Series-connected FACTS controllers: (a) TCSR and TSSR; (b) TSSC; (c)
SSSC [5]
application effective in transmission system voltage control. Since 1980 when the first
STATCOM (rated at 20 Mvar) using force-commutated thyristor inverters was put into
operation in Japan [10], many examples have been installed and the ratings have been
12
increased considerably. In 1991, KEPCO and Mitsubish Motors installed a ±80MVar
STATCOM at Inuyama Switching Station [11]. In 1996, TVA, EPRI and Westinghouse
installed a ±100MVar STATCOM at Sullivan 500 kV Substation [12]. In 2001, EPRI and
that more STATCOMs will be installed due to the advances in technology and commercial
success.
STATCOM could have many topologies, but in most practical applications it employs the DC
to AC converter, which can also be called a Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) in 3-phase
configuration as the primary block. The basic theory of VSI is to produce a set of controllable
bus voltage from a DC input voltage source such as a charged capacitor or a DC energy
supply device. By varying the magnitude and phase angle of the output voltage and current,
the system can exchange active/reactive power between the DC and AC buses, and regulate
13
Table I: Shunt Connected FACTS Controllers
Name Classification Main Function Subsidiary Functions
BESS 1P-FC-HF-BES- Load Levelling Voltage stabiliser,
Battery energy storage DC active filter, UPS
system
SSC 1P-FC-HF-CES- Voltage control VAR compensation,
Static synchronous DC damp- ing of
compensator
oscillation, transient
SSG 1P-FC-MF-EES- Exchanging stability
Static synchronous DC independently
generator
controllable real and
reactive power with
power system.
SVC 1P-NC-LF-ZES- Voltage control VAR compensation,
Static VAR compensator NDC steady state and
dynamic stability
SVG 1P-NC-LF-ZES- Generating or Steady state and
Static VAR generator NDC absorbing reactive dynamic stability
power (TCR and TSC in
parallel)
SVS 1P-NC-LF-ZES- Stability limit Voltage control
Static VAR systems NDC extender at the
midpoint of a long
transmis- sion line.
15
Table III: Two-Port FACTS Controllers
Name Classification Main Function Subsidiary Functions
IPC 2-NC-LF-ZES- Independent active
Interphase power NDC and reactive power
controller
controller
TCPST 2-NC-LF-ZES- Controlling power
Thyristor controlled DC flow distri- bution and
phase shift
providing high speed
Transformer
variable phase angle to
control power system
UPFC 2-FC-HF-CES- transient
Terminal and dynamic VAR compensation
voltage
Unified power flow DC stability phase angle
control,
controller
regulation, series line
compensation
16
REFERENCES
[1] Zhang, B.M.; Ding, Q.F “The development of FACTS and its control”, Advances in
Power System Control, Operation and Management, APSCOM-97. Fourth International
Conference, Vol.1, Nov. 1997, pp: 48 – 53
[2] Paserba, J.J.; “How FACTS controllers benefit AC transmission systems”, Power
Engineering Society General Meeting, IEEE, Vol.2, June 2004, pp:1257 - 1262
[6] N.G. Hingorani, “High power electronics and flexible AC transmission system”,
IEEE Power Engineering Review, Vol.8, No.7, pp.3-4, July 1988.
[7] IEEE FACTS Terms & Definitions Task Force of the FACTS Working Group of the
DC and FACTS subcommittee, “Proposed terms and definitions for Flexible AC
Transmission System (FACTS)”, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp.
1848-1853, Oct. 1997.
[8] A.D. Rajapakse, A.M. Gole, and P.L. Wilson, “Electromagnetic transient’s simulation
models for accurate representation of switching losses and thermal performance in power
electronic systems”, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 319 – 327, Jan
2005.
[9] A.D. Rajapakse, A.M. Gole, and P.L. Wilson, “Electromagnetic transient’s simulation
models for accurate representation of switching losses and thermal performance in power
electronic systems”, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 319 – 327, Jan
2005.
[10] Sumi Yoshihiko, Harumoto Yoshinobu, Hasegawa T, et al, “New Static Var Control
Using Force-Commutated Inverters”, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems,
1981, PAS-100(9); 4216-4224
[11] Matsuno, K., Iyoda, I., Oue, Y., “An experience of FACTS developed 1980s and
1990s”, Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition 2002: Asia Pacific,
IEEE/PES, Volume: 2, 6-10 Oct. 2002, 1378-1381 vol.2
17
18
19
20