Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The word, covenant, typically derives from the Hebrew word, berit, referring to a “contract, pact or treaty”. The word, berit, applied in
both a divine and secular context results in the same meaning. The Akkadian word, biritu, (belonging to a language existing outside of
the bible) indicates the meaning of “mutuality” or “binding” by an agreement or obligation.
Suzerainty Treaties:
Covenants in the Ancient Near East Suzerainty Treaties were binding All Ancient Near Eastern
acted as legal binding documents covenants that defined and outlined covenants had a specific time
between parties, individuals or entire loyalty between two parties. The at which the covenant began
nations. These covenants were held obligation and responsibility largely to function legally. This was
at the utmost importance and fell upon the inferior party. The inferior often referred to as “cutting a
created under extremely serious parties would be obliged to adhere bond”, meaning the covenant
terms. Ancient Near Eastern to particular laws and specifications
Covenants were traditionally used
was enacted and official.
determined by the superior party Ceremonies were often held to
as a personal or political agreement who would in return provide
with the overall aim to create mark the moment the
protection, security, resources and
recognised and formal relationships. power.
covenant was “cut”, and
Once the involved parties, usually involved the
individuals or nations taking part in presentation of a sacrifice,
the covenant were identified, the token or physical act. Even
obligations and benefits were then Royal Grants: more interestingly, Ancient
established. Here, the specific terms Royal Grants were binding covenants Near Eastern covenants were
of the covenant are identified and that offered a reward or benefit
primarily designed to last
obligations and responsibilities of mainly to the minority of those
eternally and still continued to
each party, individual or nation are involved. Therefore, the obligation
recognised. Ancient Near Eastern largely (but not entirely) relied on the function even if the terms were
Covenants generally consisted of superior party. The inferior party broken. Generally, it was only
two major categories: Suzerainty would be required to prove their the consequence of the
Treaties and Royal Grants. loyalty to then receive an awarded covenant that changed, not
favour or increased privilege, for the continuation.
example, clothing, housing and food.
A Royal Grant covenant existed
around a list of benefits and generally
only involved the superior party
honouring their pledge.
Covenants in the Pentateuch
The Pentateuch consists of several covenants being made between God and the Israelite nation. Similarly, to Ancient Near Eastern
covenants, the biblical understanding of covenants refers to a binding commitment between two parties, usually between God and the
Israelite people. The presence of Ancient Near Eastern covenants in the Pentateuch can be seen through several examples such as the
covenants between God and Abraham, Moses and David. Both Suzerainty Treaties and Royal Grants are also seen within these covenants.
Beacham, Dr. Roy. "Ancient Near Eastern Covenants." Journal of Ministry and Theology, 2011: 1-5.
Bill T. Arnold, Rochard S. Hess. Ancient Israel's History. Baker Academy , 2014.