Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
232
Th SERIES RADIONUCLIDES*
In this paper a new method for preparation of any shape radioactive sources with a
desired activity is described, by using ThO2 in secular equilibrium for calibration in
efficiency of a HPGe detector. By knowing the absolute specific activity of ThO2 and
the disintegration probability of the γ- emitters from the 232Th series, the efficiency
curve of the spectrometer was well determined for different shape of samples. We also
used this method for preparation of calibration samples in Marinelli backers, by mixing
a determined quantity of ThO2 with artificial soil for environmental radioactivity
measurements in different types of soils from the forest and uranium mines zones, in
which radionuclides from the uranium family were identified and the total activity of
the samples was determined.
232
Key words: Th series, gamma spectrometry, calibration, efficiency curve, Marinelli
beaker, soil gamma activity.
1. INTRODUCTION
*
Paper presented at the First East European Radon Symposium – FERAS 2012, September 2–5,
2012, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
For natural samples with a very low activity it is difficult to separate the
recorded signal from the background radiation, especially in a laboratory
environment. In these conditions, measurements can be performed only using a Pb
shielding (Figure 1).
3 Efficiency calibration in gamma spectrometry by using 232Th series radionuclides S101
Table 1
Detector efficiency calculation using a source of 226Ra
Energy Peak Scheme factor
(keV) area (p) Detector efficiency (%)
243.7 171868 0.074 19.5
296.8 364903 0.19 16.2
353.4 589516 0.37 13.4
609.8 363348 0.46 6.6
769 21707 0.049 3.7
934.7 12566 0.03 3.5
1120.9 62058 0.15 3.5
1239.6 17966 0.057 2.6
1378.4 14570 0.04 3.1
S102 L. Daraban, D. Iancu, D. Nita, Laura Daraban 4
In Figure 3 it can be noticed that the shape of the efficiency curve is similar
with those from the literature for this type of detector.
In order to measure the radioactivity of the soil (and other samples with low
activity) it is important to use samples in high volumes. In our laboratory we
conceived and manufactured some Marinelli beakers adapted to the shape of the
shielding in the laboratory. In order to measure the radioactivity of the soil (and
other samples with low activity), it is important to use samples in high volumes. In
our laboratory we conceived and executed some Marinelli beakers adapted to the
shape of the shielding in the laboratory. Further, a sample containing oxide of Th
older than 30 years [7-10] was used as thorium progeny implantation for alpha
spectrometry and also as a calibration source in efficiency as in [11-14], where the
absolute activity per gram of ThO2 was of 3565 ± 15 Bq/g. In this procedure the
geometrical factor was included in equation by using a beaker with the same
geometry as the sample. The main gamma lines of 232Th at secular equilibrium with
its daughter radionuclides are presented in Table 2, it can be seen that 212Bi decays
by both emitting an alpha particle (36 %) and beta particle (64 %).
Table 2
232
The Th series parameters
Energy (keV) Radionuclide Intensity (%)
228
209.4 Ac 4.55
228
270.3 Ac 3.77
228
328 Ac 3.36
228
338.4 Ac 12.01
228
463.0 Ac 4.64
228
911.1 Ac 29.0
228
968.9 Ac 17.46
228
1459.2 Ac 0.92
228
1587.9 Ac 3.71
208
510.7 Tl 22.5
208
583.1 Tl 86.0
208
860.5 Tl 12.0
208
2614.5 Tl 100
212
727.17 Bi 11.8
212
238.6 Pb 43.1
In order to measure the radioactivity of the soil (and other samples with low
activity), it is important to use samples in high volume. In our laboratory we
manufactured some Marinelli beakers adapted to the shape of the shielding in the
laboratory.
S104 L. Daraban, D. Iancu, D. Nita, Laura Daraban 6
Fig. 4 – Characteristic gamma spectrum for the artificial ( SiO2 · Al2O3 ·CaSO4) soil,
impurified with 0.32 g of ThO2 with an absolute activity of Λ =1239 Bq.
7 Efficiency calibration in gamma spectrometry by using 232Th series radionuclides S105
Table 3
Data from the calibration spectrum using ThO2 in Marinelli beaker
Statistic error εi
Ni pi (Scheme
Energy for peak area (detector Radionuclide
(peak area) factor)
calculation efficiency)
keV Counts/hour (%) (%) (%) -
237.4 47718 0.6 43.1 89 Pb-212
336.5 7388 2 12 50 Ac-228
581.8 12407 1 86 20 Tl-208
725 2732 5 11 19 Bi-212
910 8420 2 29 23 Ac-228
966.4 6057 2 17.5 28 Ac-228
100
90
Detector effciency (%)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Energy (keV)
Fig. 5 – The detector efficiency for large sample in Marinelli beacker determined with ThO2.
Fig. 6 – Characteristic gamma spectrum of a sample of mosses (Sphagnum sp.) with soil from Baita
river, with a total activity of 544 Bq (without the contribution of 40K and the presence of 137Cs),
measured for 1 hour.
If the annual average of the γ-global activity for the samples of uncultivated
soil was about 311.5 Bq/kg and the maxium value was of 390.9 Bq/kg recorded on,
the values are situated in the range of variation of the natural background in the
area [13-14]. The activities of the radionuclides from natural samples show values
in this range.
4. CONCLUSIONS
by knowing the scheme factors and the descendent radionuclides. The calibration
in efficiency was also made for samples of artificial soil containg ThO2.
This method was then applied to a sample of soil from the area of mines with
uranium, obtaining a spectrum in which it was possible to identify radionuclides
from the uranium series. The total gamma activity of a contaminated sample of
390.9 Bq/kg was determined, measured for natural radionuclides. The obtained
results were placed under the level of warning, fiting into the limits of variation of
the natural background in the area, measured also on natural soil samples from the
Faget forest.
REFERENCES
1. E.L. Grigorescu, A.C. Razdolescu, M. Sahagia, A. Luca, C. Ivan, G. Tanase, Appl Radiat Isot, 56,
435–439 (2002).
2. I. Vucanac, M. Djurasevic, A. Kandic, L. Nadjerdj, Z. Milosevic, Appl Radiat Isot, 66, 792–795
(2008).
3. C. A. Adesanmi, F. A. Balogun, M. K. Fasasi, I. A. Tubosun, A. A. Oladipo, J. Rad. Nucl. Chem.,
249, No. 3, 607–611 (2001).
4. M.I. Abbas, Appl Radiat Isot, 64, 1661–1664 (2006).
5. D. Arnold, O. Sima, Appl Radiat Isot, 61, 117–121 (2004).
6. D. Sardari, T. D. MacMahon, J. Rad. Nucl. Chem., 244, 2, 463–469 (2000).
7. Z.B. Alfazi, J. Rad. Nucl. Chem., 245, 561–565 (2000).
8. C. Cosma, Nucl. Instr. and Methods B, 179, 255–261 (2001).
9. O. Rusu, S. Dreve, R. Begy, D. Nita, L. Bobos, J. Radioanal Nucl. Chem., 290, 2, 241-245, 2011.
10. N. Lavi, Z.B. Alfassi, Appl Radiat Isot, 61, 1437–1441 (2004).
11. N. Lavi, Z.B. Alfassi, Rad. Meas., 39, 15–19 (2005).
12. J. Saegusaa, K. Kawasakia, A. Miharaa, M. Itob, M. Yoshida, Appl Radiat Isot., 61, 1383–1390
(2004).
13. N. Antovic, N. Svrkota, J Environ Radioactiv 100, 823–830 (2009).
14. G. Jia, G. Torri, Appl Radiat Isot., 65, 849–857 (2007).