Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Pamela Flores, Nancy Regina Gómez, Alana Farrah Roa & Risa Whitson
To cite this article: Pamela Flores, Nancy Regina Gómez, Alana Farrah Roa & Risa Whitson
(2018): Reviving feminism through social media: from the classroom to online and offline public
spaces, Gender and Education, DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2018.1513454
Introduction
One of the central debates of contemporary feminism is the need to expose young women
to feminist content and information. Fernandez and Wilding (2003) argue that the
exposure of young women to the feminist debate gives them important tools to work
against the discrimination they find in their own lives. The aim is to recognise sexism in
everyday experiences and to inspire an activism able to question the current patriarchal
system, which tends to avoid the diversity of voices and subjectivities (Ryan 2006;
Eudey 2012; Piepmeier, Cantrell, and Maggio 2014).
The search for strategies to engage young generations in feminist debates has shown
that social media is especially appropriate for communicating new feelings and promoting
the discussion on feminist ideals (Baker and Ryalls 2014; Guillard 2016). Wilding (1998) has
identified the Internet as one of the strategies that can make feminism more accessible to
a new audience formed by a diversity of women immersed in technology. The objective is
to use the Internet as an entrance door, so that new generations of women make a link
between their experiences of gender discrimination and feminist theories, providing
them a space where they question the discriminatory practices that have been normalised
in their own contexts (Guillard 2012; Wang et al. 2012; Baker and Ryalls 2014; Dougherty
and Andercheck 2014).
Considering these findings, we created an academic experience to promote in our
female students an interest in the debate on sexist discriminatory practices. Our aim
was to influence the lives of students beyond the classroom and to show the value of
fighting discriminatory practices in their immediate surroundings (Scanlon 1993;
McCabe 2013). To achieve this, we tackled a specific problem invisible in the public
agenda of our city: street sexual harassment.
In this article we examine, through a thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2006), how a
group of young female university students communicated, both in public spaces and on
Facebook, new social representations after being exposed to feminist content, specifically
street harassment; and how they developed new ways to deal with the situation.
We are aware that access to and use of the Internet is mediated by power relations
(Kendall 1996; O’Brien 1996; Braidotti 2002; Fernandez and Wilding 2003; Daniels 2009).
Neither have we ignored criticisms of overestimating the use of social networks to
achieve social change (Lim 2012). McLean, Maalsen and Grech even talk about the
more-than-real ‘to highlight the excesses of digital spaces’ (2016, 157); and they invite
us to rethink the binary real life/online relations, and to temper ‘naïve optimism with rea-
listic appreciation of the negative and positive potentialities of spaces such as social
media … ’ (2017, 47). In other words, if new social media constitute new resources of
‘citizen-generated information’ (Elwood 2008) which enable new forms of activism and
inclusive practices in civic life, we should remember that these dynamics are not fully
understood, and conclusions have to be carefully evaluated.
Nevertheless, our purpose is to show how the use of offline and online spaces to discuss
feminist content and share feelings about inequality might help to build new forms of
communication, and remake the space.
cases, result in collective actions in public spaces – offline spaces. Today, social networks
are innovative tools of feminist activism that amplify/extend women’s voices to
promote both local and global actions.
In the case of street harassment, the exchange of stories has enabled the definition of
the problem from the perspective of women. Dimond et al. (2013) have documented how
street harassment stories published by women on an organisation’s website like Hollaback!
have facilitated the identification of common definitions of the problem. Moreover, Leszc-
zynski and Elwood (2015) highlight the fact that the HarassMap ‘offers a continuously evol-
ving snapshot of gendered urban life’ (p. 15). The emergence of these narratives on a web
platform has led to questioning the masculine version of public space, and has validated
‘other’ forms of being in the world.
Even though the impact of social media is still being evaluated, the fact that social
media is widely used to express discontent and create communities about situations
that were invisible, shows that social media is contributing to new forms of political
manifestations.
For me, it’s also a matter of not wanting to be afraid. Even if I sometimes feel uncertain, I try to
sweep the fear out of my mind, because restrictions like where you should walk and where
you should not limit your life so much. (Maria, 26 years old, as cited in Koskela 1997, 306)
Everyday action on an individual scale is evident as well in other geographic contexts. Gole
(2016), for example, interviewed women in Mumbai, India, who, while experiencing harass-
ment and violence in public spaces continued to resist their exclusion from these spaces.
4 P. FLORES ET AL.
As one respondent commented, ‘The only way to fight it is by one being sensitive but you
can’t stop doing things.’ (Gole 2016, 30). The result of this type of behaviour is that
women’s ‘everyday spatial practices can be seen as practices of resistance. By daring to
go out – by their very presence in urban sphere – women produce space that is more avail-
able for other women’ (Koskela 1997, 316).
In addition to everyday actions, women also challenge violence against them through
collective, grassroots organisation. In particular, a number of groups are working to pub-
licise ways in which women’s actions can challenge the masculinity of public spaces. One
example of this is HARASSmap, a grassroots organisation that developed in response to
the victimisation of women in the Tahrir Square protests in Cairo, Egypt during and follow-
ing the Arab Spring uprisings in 2012 and 2013 (Peuchaud 2014; Skalli 2014). HARASSmap
focuses on supporting women’s right to the city and their presence in public spaces by in-
person individual and group interventions designed to end gender violence in public
areas. In particular, the organisation blends online and physical activism by using crowd-
sourcing reports about incidences of harassment and violence against women in public
spaces to make an online, interactive map that demonstrates the extent of the problem
in Cairo. The group also works through community mobilisation to speak with neighbours
about street harassment, and runs the ‘Safe Places’ programme for businesses, schools,
and universities committed to making public spaces safer for women (see harassmap.org).
Besides working directly, women are also organising at the grassroots by engaging in
other traditionally male activities in public spaces. One example of this is the organisation
‘Why Loiter,’ based in Mumbai, India. Women involved in this local, grassroots movement,
largely organised on social media (#whyloiter), intentionally ‘loiter’ in order to be in public
spaces to push against the idea that women need a reason for being in the streets. In these
cases not only is there a change in behaviour among individual women, but social media is
also used to push toward a changed meaning of public spaces (such as bars and streets at
night) in order to de-naturalise their masculinisation (Phadke, Khan, and Ranade 2011).
Grassroots organising is also occurring around issues of mobility, with examples including
the #Right2Drive movement in Saudi Arabia, which finally succeeded in 2018; the #Girl-
sOnBikes movement in Karachi and Lahore, Pakistan; and the #IranianWomenLoveCycling
movement, which originated in Ishfahan, Iran. These movements challenge both the law
(in the cases of Iran and Saudi Arabia) and strong local customs regarding women’s mobi-
lity in public spaces. As one participant in the Girls on Bikes movement commented, ‘Every
time something bad happens, the immediate reaction is to stay indoors, stay safe. This is a
way to say that we (women) can and should be on the streets … ’ (Mir and Ghani 2016).
Another organiser echoed this idea by stating, ‘Fear is the biggest thing that stops us from
going out and doing anything like cycling or walking and I think when we actually start to
do these things is when we start to overcome that fear,’ (Mir and Ghani 2016). These cases
also highlight the importance of social media as a platform for organising protests. As an
example, the SlutWalk movement began in Toronto, Canada, spread throughout the
United States, and continued to develop in Australia, Great Britain, Germany, the Nether-
lands, India, and South Africa, among other countries. The organisers of the Toronto Slut-
walk used Facebook to articulate the most predominant concerns of young feminists,
which are those expressed through online media (Reger 2014).
Finally, transnational organisations are also working to address the issue of violence
against women in public spaces. UN Women has been particularly active in this regard
GENDER AND EDUCATION 5
through their Safe Cities Global Initiative, which builds on and further develops the ‘Safe
Cities Free of Violence against Women and Girls’ initiative. This programme seeks to bring
local, regional, and national governments, as well as civil society groups together to work
with international organisations (including UN Women, UN-Habitat, UNICEF, and other
global agencies) to create cities that are both sustainable and safe for women (UN
Women 2014). The result is innovative collaboration across a variety of actors to
address the issue of women’s safety in public spaces in a comprehensive manner.
It is both, in organised responses to women’s fear, as well as in their everyday actions,
that women are remaking their cities and themselves. In this purpose, social media has
proved to be an important tool for communicating between diverse communities with
similar problems, creating awareness of the right to the city from a gender perspective
and, borrowing Harvey’s words, building a huge ‘collective power to reshape the processes
of urbanisation’ (2008, 23).
Method
Participants
The whole process took place during two semesters in the framework of a 48-hour under-
graduate course called Communication and Culture at Universidad del Norte (Barranquilla,
Colombia). During each semester, 60 girls, between 20 and 22 years old, participated in the
course to develop the project. Our students belong to all social classes and practice
different religions, but the university does not establish any distinctions in relation to
these variables. Concerning ethnicity, Colombia is mainly a mestizo country, where
most people share a mixed ethnic identity. According to official statistics, we have Afro-
Colombians (10%) and indigenous (3.4%) population (www.dane.gov.co), but in the Uni-
versity, we do not have quotas. Since 2010, the University has a programme for the
inclusion of sexual minorities and disabled population. Any of these categories were
part of the study.
with the creation of a symbol, the blue footprint, meaning that our footprints will stay in
public spaces after we go home. Then we launched the Facebook page, followed by public
interventions designed by the students. These interventions included entertaining activi-
ties in parks and squares to attract people’s participation.
Third step: The production of a documentary. This activity served to recreate the
process and review the experience with the participants or showing it to different commu-
nities. This allowed to enhance the discussion, and gave the students a sense of pride for
what they were doing.
Fourth step: The forums. We organised two Forums on ‘Security for Women in Public
Spaces’. We invited experts to discuss issues as online feminism and its impact on street
harassment; the right to the city from a gender perspective; and emotional aspects
related to the use of public spaces. We recorded the interventions of the students in
the forums.
Fifth step: Writing essays. After the second forum, students were asked to write essays
discussing what they had learned throughout the process and how they had recreated
their views with the experiences they had lived.
The interest that the students had in the project and all the work they did seemed to
indicate that the process had had impact on them. However, we needed to create a
method in order to assess the process and establish valid conclusions. Throughout the
process, we had gathered an enormous amount of data that had to be organised and ana-
lysed. We made transcriptions of the interventions on the Facebook webpage, in the docu-
mentary and in the discussions after the forums. We also organised the 60 essays written
after the second forum and the videos of the interventions in public spaces. Following the
phases of thematic analysis, our purpose was to find, from the girls’ point of view, based on
the communication strategies they had built, which were the main themes that had
evolved around the subject, and which were their views after the process.
feelings began to arise. ‘I didn’t know that most girls felt the same,’ explained one of the
students in the classroom. ‘I thought I was giving [street harassment] more importance
than it had, but now I know I was not because this is violence.’ After the first testimonies,
the website and the classroom discussions became more active. ‘It was embarrassing
before, but now I feel men should be embarrassed, not us,’ said another student.
The next step was to create performances either on campus or in public spaces, and
publishing them on the project’s Facebook page. One of the students commented next
to a photograph of her activity:
It was so common to listen how men talked to women walking in the streets, highlighting
some attribute of their bodies or making any indecent proposal, that, in an absurd way, I con-
sidered it a joke. However, today I can safely say that it is not. It is not a joke, and it is not a
compliment. Street sexual harassment is a social problem, and it is so unreal and palpable
that women and men alike have accepted this. It involves unfairness, abuse of power, psycho-
logical abuse … In this very moment, millions of women are moving to the other sidewalk to
avoid a comment. (Facebook page Mi Huella Azul 12/04/2016).
These words reveal an acquired knowledge that allows her to stop normalising a situation
that she finds uncomfortable. She characterises street harassment as gender violence and
she recognises that her experience is not only hers, but the experience of ‘millions of
women.’ In the section of the Facebook page called visitors posts, one of the visitors
stated that normally she ignores catcalling, but that she experienced another kind of har-
assment which left her paralysed:
When an unknown man talks to you, crosses your path, prevents you from moving, and tells
you a lot of things that you don’t know how to react to; and the fear of being hurt leaves you
paralysed, unable to scream, even if you are in a place full of people who could help you, still,
this is truly a terrible feeling. (Facebook page Mi Huella Azul, 11-04-2016)
She explained that her intention in sharing her case was to warn about this situation, so that
we tackle the root of the problem. This publication received the empathy of another student,
who thanked her for sharing her experience and highlights the relevance of using the
hashtag #NoMás and ‘raising our voices’ (Facebook page Mi Huella Azul, 11/05/2016).
As we said, students also wrote essays to narrate their experiences of street harassment.
In the essay Blame it on Beauty, a student narrated an episode that occurred when record-
ing the reactions of potential harassers while two young girls were crossing a street under
construction. She said that they experienced feelings of anger and repugnance: ‘I wanted
to finish quickly, even I felt the aggression when I saw what they were doing to my friends,’
(Essay Blame it on Beauty, 27/10/2016).
Once the students were capable of sharing their experiences and feelings, we proposed
an exercise in the classroom to identify the emotions generated by street harassment.
Fear, anger, and frustration were the most common responses. These results served to
strengthen the feeling of a common sentiment around a common problem. To address
these results outside the space of the classroom, the students took their cameras and
looked for other young women who wanted to share their stories. Some of these
videos are part of the documentary, and clearly show that ‘giving a name to the
problem’, as one student stated, helped them to recognise it and to build a common
feeling. This stage of the process was crucial since it made visible underlying ideas and
assumptions that characterise the phenomenon, and led to the second theme.
10 P. FLORES ET AL.
Theoretically, they were inspired by Lynch’s basic public rights and by the ‘Charter on
Women’s Rights to the City’ (Barcelona 2004). In the case of Lynch’s rights, we worked
in class on a reinterpretation of these rights from a gender perspective. In the case of
the Charter, we specifically analysed the aspects related to violence in public spaces. In
practice, the self-awareness that female students felt more insecure when wearing
certain types of clothing led to associate safety and the way they were dressed. Therefore,
the ideas of safety and wearing what they wanted became a theme. Messages like: ‘My
cleavage is not an invitation to harass me,’ ‘I dress for myself, not for you,’ ‘To use
public space does not mean that my body is a public place,’ ‘I decide what to do with
my body,’ ‘It wasn’t the skirt, it wasn’t the place, it wasn’t the time’, confront the precon-
ceptions that justify sexual harassment based on how women are dressed, where they are,
or how their bodies occupy public spaces. With sentences like ‘We want to live. Nothing
justifies sexual assault!’ they expressed their new attitude: blame is on the offender, not
on the victim. Women have to leave fear behind and show that they have the right to
use public spaces on their own terms.
Even though they know that safety is an ignored right, they decided to continue using
public spaces. One student commented, ‘I used to go out with someone, my sister or a
friend. Now, I go out alone because I have to show that I’m not afraid, or even if I am, I
have to overcome my fear.’ This connects to what Koskela (1997) terms ‘boldness’ and indi-
cates that participants took steps offline to challenge norms surrounding gender and
public space.
On October 19, students published an illustration by the artist Debi Hasky, which shows
a woman with arms crossed and a caption that states, ‘I don’t want your compliment, I
want your respect.’ A man commented: ‘You have to earn it.’ This comment generated
a debate on the role of clothing in street harassment. Several students argued that any
person deserves respect just for being a human being; and that humiliation and harass-
ment are not acceptable for any reason. The man suggested that certain clothes might
cause harassment since they do not show decency. It is important to state that three
male participants also supported the idea that all humans deserve respect and added
that it would be important to educate young men so that they would respect women
no matter what they are wearing.
The issue of what to wear is always present in the discussions about harassment. The
expression tienes que darte tu lugar (literally ‘you have to give yourself your place’)
means that women have to create the conditions to gain respect. Since ‘the place does
GENDER AND EDUCATION 11
not exist, it has to be created,’ as one student stated. In the documentary, one student
expressed:
If I dress in a certain way, if I use makeup, it is because I feel good doing it. It is for me, because I
want to look in a certain way. It is not to satisfy someone, it is not to be watched by other
people, but I think that many people believe that we dress for others. When I see a group
of men in a corner, I believe they are thinking that she wears certain clothing or fixes her
hair in a certain way because she likes to be told things in the street.
Students have also stated that being forced to modify their clothing or to change the
street they take to get somewhere violates their right to feel free and safe in the
streets. They are aware that this disrespect for the woman’s body is a matter of gender,
but they stressed that it affects them in their rights as human beings and as citizens. As
one student wrote:
Human rights do not depend on the context, or the day, age, time, or clothing. Violating
human rights should not be excused. Street harassment is a problem; it is a reality that
must be taken into account instead of ignoring it as a problem that does not concern to
us. (Essay 27/10/2016)
On May 11, students asked followers of the page to write things they would tell street
harassers if they could. This activity was similar to one of the interventions in a public
space, but this time they expected to have more comments since social media promotes
wider participation, as Wilding discovered 20 years ago. People made statements such as
‘That makes you no better person, I deserve respect,’ ‘Treat others as you want to be
treated,’ ‘You can express yourself, but you should respect me.’ Although there were sen-
tences like ‘Would you like these comments if they were directed to your daughter?’ the
general discourse was based on the idea of respecting rights, not on the fact that the
victim could be your mother or your daughter. It is also important to note that the
language used was friendly, avoiding insults or recriminations.
expressing their feelings about it, their response shifted to the creation of a ‘chain of soli-
darity’ sharing their stories and finally, to motivating people to change their views. They
said that they had always been harassed, but they had never realised that this was not
a normal situation, because the silence around the subject prevented them from thinking
about it as a problem:
I remember that one of the questions of the survey we did on street harassment asked if
women exaggerated when they said that catcalling was sexual harassment. I was very sur-
prised because from our perspective as women, it is a lack of respect, but there were many
men and even women, who said that women should feel flattered because they were
being told something nice (Testimony, Documentary Mi Huella Azul, 2016).
We also observe this attitude in the videos posted to the Facebook page after the
interventions:
We are here, in the streets of our historical downtown, to tell passers-by our message. Citizens
became aware of the problem, they signed our blue wall, and made a commitment with all
women in our city: they agreed to respect every woman walking in the streets, and to transmit
this message to their peers, (Facebook page Mi Huella Asul, 13/04/2016)
A serious issue
In one of the dramatised videos, a blow on the body of a woman follows every word of
harassment. Then, it presents statistics of violence against women, including sexual
aggression. This publication received the comment: ‘Beautifully powerful, and it puts
light on such a serious issue. I love it,’ (Facebook page Mi Huella Azul, 21/01/2017). The
student who shared the video answered with this comment:
Thank you so much! This is a serious issue, but some people don’t understand how big the
problem is. They say that this is “normal” and that this is part of “our culture” but they’re
very wrong. This is so wrong. (Facebook page Mi Huella Azul, 21/01/2017)
In the comments to Facebook posts, expressions such as ‘we must raise awareness,’ ‘you
need to take action soon’ or ‘street harassment is not a game’ became common. A normal-
ised situation, an accepted aggression, an unrecognised fear, all became a serious issue,
showing the potential of social media to promote social change. As Guilliard says,
‘Social media is not a panacea and its potential as an activist outlet has not been fully
realised,’ (2016, 623), but as she also demonstrates, the responses of students are enthu-
siastic, and it serves to strengthen the interactions among students and with course
content (2016, 621–622).
As many other groups that have used social media to promote cooperation around an
idea, Mi Huella Azul community dissolved after the course finished. McLean, Maalsen and
Grech state, after evaluating DTJ followers in Australia, that ‘the reporting back of research
findings … did not garner significant interest’ (2016, 157). Nevertheless, what we have to
GENDER AND EDUCATION 13
value is not the permanence or durability of the community that, per se, is ephemeral. We
have to establish the affection in terms of what is new in what the participants know, feel,
and do; we may observe this through the different communications they produce.
The thematic analysis of the statements made by the students show that it is possible to
affect the knowledge, the attitudes, and the expressions of young people in a relatively short
period of time, when we reinforce the theoretical content with personal experiences, and
when we use social media as a tool to express feelings and ideas.
Conclusions
Street harassment is a form of gender violence that remains invisible and normalised. During
the project Mi Huella Azul, developed during two semesters in an undergraduate course
called Communication and Culture, female students discussed feminist content specifically
related to the right to the city, and they created communication strategies to raise aware-
ness and foster discussion on street harassment both in online and in offline spaces.
While speaking about the problem was embarrassing at the beginning, the use of social
media created a sense of community inside and outside the classroom that helped to
appreciate feminist content and develop the project. As students got involved in the dis-
cussions, they realised that street harassment is a social problem, that most women have
suffered these situations, and that expressing their feelings about it is an important step to
face this issue. Later on, as they developed and published the strategies, they understood
that feeling safe is a right; and that they must be free to use public spaces on their own
terms. Finally, they got to the conclusion that they can be active about the problem,
that they are not powerless, and that, even though the situation has been accepted for
centuries, it is not normal and it is not acceptable.
Despite the multiplicity of scholars’ perspectives that question the possibilities of new
media technologies to empower women, participants’ experiences suggest social media
was important for the development of the project. Sharing their stories and ideas on
the subject gave the young girls a sense of community that promoted active behaviours
and creative strategies. Even though this specific community dissolved after the course
was finished, we may assume that some transformations occurred if we are going to
give credit to their testimonies in the essays, the videos, and the documentary. In fact,
the products created by them showed that they had a new knowledge, that they had
new feelings, and that they reacted differently.
In contrast with other projects on Street Harassment, our focus was never on the stalker,
but on women, promoting the appropriation of public spaces and making them feel that
feeling safe is a right. We do not intend to draw definite conclusions. On the contrary, we
are just opening a conversation on a subject that was not considered a social issue; and
evaluating strategies to promote discussions on feminist issues combining online and
offline spaces.
The project was a qualitative study. Our goal was not to generalise, but rather to
provide a contextualised understanding of the ways young undergrad women in Barran-
quilla, Colombia recreate their meanings about public spaces and the right to the city. We
embrace the fact these women’s realities are unique, diverse and local phenomena. From
this approach, the goal of the project was not measure changes of behaviour among par-
ticipants regarding street harassment, but it privileges women’s symbolic practices of
14 P. FLORES ET AL.
Disclosure statements
No potential conflict of interests was reported by the authors.
Funding
This work was supported by Open Society Foundations under Grant # OR2015-25050.
Notes on contributors
Pamela Flores holds a PhD in Cultural Studies from Universidad de Sevilla, Spain. She is an Associate
Professor and Coordinator of the Masters of Communication at Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla,
Colombia. Her research interests focus on the relations between public spaces and citizenship, urban
cultures, and the coexistence of differences in contemporary world.
Nancy Regina Gómez has a PhD in Communication Studies from Ohio University. She is a Professor,
and Director of PBX, Research Group in Communication, Culture, and Social change at Universidad
del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia. Her research interests focus on the recognition of diversity, the
evolution of feminism and feminist theory, and narratives of peace.
Alana Farrah Roa is a doctoral student at Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia. Her research
interests have to do with the communication of equality in public and private spaces, and with the
recognition of the rights of Women and LBGT Communities.
Risa Whitson is an Associate Professor and Curriculum Chair at the Geography Department and at
the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department of Ohio University. Her interests are situ-
ated at the intersection of geographies of development, social geography, and feminist geography.
ORCID
Pamela Flores http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2812-9212
References
Baker, Ashley, and Emily Ryalls. 2014. “Technologizing Feminist Pedagogy: Using Blog Activism in the
Gender Studies Classroom.” Feminist Teacher 25 (1): 23–38.
Braidotti, Rosy. 2002. “Cyberfeminism with a Difference.” http://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/
rqtr/biblioteca/ciberespacio%20gltb/Cyberfeminism%20with%20a%20difference.pdf.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative
Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
“Carta por el Derecho de las Mujeres a la Ciudad”. 2004. Barcelona. http://www.barcelona2004.org/
www.barcelona2004.org/esp/banco_del_conocimiento/docs/OT_4_ES.pdf.
GENDER AND EDUCATION 15
Carter Olson, Candi. 2016. “#BringBackOurGirls: Digital Communities Supporting Real-World Change
and Influencing Mainstream Media Agendas.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (5): 772–787. doi:10.1080/
14680777.2016.1154887.
Dane. “Información Estratégica”. www,dane,gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-
poblacion/grupos-etnicos.
Daniels, Jessie. 2009. Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights.
New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Danitz, Tiffany, and Warren P. Strobel. 1999. “The Internet’s Impact on Activism: The Case of Burma.”
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 22 (3): 257–269.
Dimond, Jill, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne La Rose, and Amy Bruckman. 2013. “Hollaback! The Role of
Collective Storytelling Online in a Social Movement Organization.” Computer Supported
Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13: 477–490. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441831.
Dougherty, Kevin D., and Brita Andercheck. 2014. “Using Facebook to Engage Learners in a Large
Introductory Course.” Teaching Sociology 42 (2): 95–104.
Elwood, Sarah. 2008. “Volunteered Geographic Information: Future Research Directions Motivated by
Critical, Participatory, and Feminist GIS.” GeoJournal 72 (3): 173–183. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-
9186-0.
Eudey, Betsy. 2012. “Civic Engagement, Cyberfeminism, and Online Learning: Activism and Service
Learning in Women’s and Gender Studies Courses.” Feminist Teacher 22 (3): 233–250.
Falú, Ana. 2014. “El derecho de las mujeres a la ciudad. Espacios públicos sin discriminaciones y vio-
lencias.” Revista Vivienda y Ciudad 1: 10–28. ISSN 2422-670X.
Fernandez, Maria, and Faith Wilding. 2003. “Situating Cyberfeminisms.” https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/242513097_Situating_Cyberfeminisms.
Gacoin, Andrée E. 2017. “Encountering Gender: Resisting a Neo-Liberal Political Rationality for
Sexuality Education as an HIV Prevention Strategy.” Gender and Education 29 (1): 66–83.
Gole, A. 2016. “Gender, Leisure and Public Spaces: Exploring Solitary Leisure Activities of Women in
Mumbai.” Unpublished Manuscript, Communication and Development Program, Center for
International Studies, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
Gómez, N., and R. Aden. 2017. “‘I Stared at Him in Defiance:’ Hollaback! Movement and the Enactment
of Reflexive, Resilient Countervisuality.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 45 (2): 1–18.
Guillard, Julianne. 2012. “Potentialities of Participatory Pedagogy in the Women’s Studies Classroom.”
Feminist Teacher 23 (1): 50–62.
Guillard, Julianne. 2016. “Is Feminism Trending? Pedagogical Approaches to Countering (Sl)activism.”
Gender and Education 28 (5): 609–626. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1123227.
Harvey, David. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review II (53): 23–40. https://newleftreview.org/
II/53/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city.
Keller, Jessalyn, Kaitlynn Mendes, and Jessica Rinngrose. 2016. “Speaking ‘Unspeakable Things:’
Documenting Digital Feminist Responses to Rape Culture.” Journal of Gender Studies, 1–15.
doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511.
Kendall, L. 1996. “MUDder? I Hardly Knew ‘Er!: Adventures of a Feminist MUDder.” In Wired Women:
Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace, edited by Lynn Cherny and Elizabeth R. Weise, 207–223.
Seattle: Seal Press.
Koskela, Hille. 1997. “Bold Walk and Breakings: Women’s Spatial Confidence Versus Fear of Violence.”
Gender, Place and Culture 4 (3): 301–320.
Leszczynski, Agnieszka, and Sarah Elwood. 2015. “Feminist Geographies of New Spatial Media.” The
Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 59 (1): 12–28. doi:10.1111/cag.12093.
Lim, Merlyna. 2012. “Clicks, Cabs, and Coffee Houses: Social Media and Oppositional Movements in
Egypt, 2004–2011.” Journal of Communication 62 (2): 231–248.
McCabe, Janice. 2013. “Making Theory Relevant: The Gender Attitude and Beliefs Inventory.”
Teaching Sociology 41 (3): 282–293.
McLean, Jessica E., Sophia Maalsen, and Alana Grech. 2016. “Learning about Feminism in Digital
Spaces: Online Methodologies and Participatory Mapping.” Australian Geographer 47 (2):
157–177. doi:10.1080/00049182.2016.1138842.
16 P. FLORES ET AL.
McLean, J. E., Sophia Maalsen, and Alana Grech. 2017. “Beyond the Binaries. Geographies of Gender-
Technology Relations.” In Handbook on Geographies of Technology, edited by Barney Warf, 36–49.
Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mir, Ayesha, and Amel Ghani. 2016. “#GirlsOnBikes Sets Off on Road to Equality.” March 27. https://
tribune.com.pk/story/1073754/girlsonbikes-sets-off-on-road-to-equality/.
O’Brien, J. 1996. “Changing the Subject.” Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 9 (1).
Osorio, Roxana (producer), and Pamela Flores (director). 2016. Mi Huella Azul (documentary).
Colombia: Universidad del Norte. Open Society Foundations.
Peuchaud, Sheila. 2014. “Social Media Activism and Egyptians’ Use of Social Media to Combat Sexual
Violence: An HiAP Case Study.” Health Promotion International 29: i113–i120. doi:10.1093/heapro/
dau046.
Phadke, Shilpa, Sameera Khan, and Shilpa Ranade. 2011. Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai
Streets. New Delhi, India: Penguin Books.
Piepmeier, Alison, Amber Cantrell, and Ashley Maggio. 2014. “Disability Is a Feminist Issue: Bringing
Together Women’s and Gender Studies and Disability Studies.” Disability Studies Quarterly 34 (2).
http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4252/3592.
Plant, Sadie. 1997. Zeroes and Ones: Digital Women and the New Technoculture. London: Fourth Estate.
Reger, Jo. 2014. “Micro-Cohorts, Feminist Discourse, and the Emergence of the Toronto SlutWalk.”
Feminist Formations 26 (1): 49–69.
Ryan, Jennifer D. 2006. “Writing the World: The Role of Advocacy in Implementing a Feminist
Pedagogy.” Feminist Teacher 17 (1): 15–35.
Sassen, Saskia. 2002. “Towards a Sociology of Information Technology.” Current Sociology 50 (3):
365–388.
Scanlon, Jennifer. 1993. “Keeping Our Activist Selves Alive in the Classroom: Feminist Pedagogy and
Political Activism.” Feminist Teacher 7 (2): 8–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40023773.
Skalli, Loubna. 2014. “Young Women and Social Media against Sexual Harassment in North Africa.”
The Journal of North African Studies 19 (2): 244–258.
Sutton, Jo, and Scarlett Pollock. 2000. “Online Activism for Women’s Rights.” CyberPsychology and
Behavior 3 (5): 699–706.
UN (United Nations). 2014. “Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals.”
United Nations. http://undocs.org/A/68/970.
UN WOMEN (United Nations). 2014. “Safe Cities for Women.” United Nations. https://actionaid.ie/
wpcontent/uploads/2016/10/Safe-Cities-for-Women-From-Realities-to-Rights-1.pdf.
Walker, Shawn. 2017. The Complexity of Collecting Digital and Social Media Data in Ephemeral
Contexts. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/40612/Walker
_washington_0250E_17763.pdf?sequence=1.
Wang, Q., Huay Lit Woo, Choon Lang Quek, Yuqin Yang, and Mei Liu. 2012. “Using the Facebook
Group as a Learning Management System: An Exploratory Study.” British Journal of Educational
Technology 43 (3): 428–438.
Wilding, Faith. 1998. “Where is the Feminism in Cyberfeminism?” http://www.obn.org/reading_
room/writings/html/where.html.