Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Description
In this grammar & vocabulary lesson, students generate a list of descriptive adjectives for two cities, and then attempt to use these adjectives to compare the two cities. From this activity,
students will be learn how to form the comparative form of adjectives and inductively deduce rules for categories of comparatives (regular short words: ending in 'e' to 'er'; ending in
consonant, double consonant and add '-er'; ending in 'y' change to 'i' and add '-er'; regular long words: introduce adj. with 'more').
Main Aims
To provide clarification of comparative adjectives in the context of travel.
Sub Aims
To provide review of descriptive adjectives in the context of city life.
Background
Class Profile
15 students, mostly aged 17-20, some older, even split m/f. Wide range of languages known and spoken by these students including varieties of French, several varieties Arabic, Haitian
creole, etc., perhaps other varieties of English, etc. This wide range of communicative competencies is an asset to the students' ability to absorb more language. Students are motivated
to succeed in their program of study, and so are generally willing to cooperate with the instructor. Students are also extremely busy and need in-class activities and homework that they
know will be useful and relevant.
Assumptions
I assume that students, having a high-beginner/low-intermediate level, will have little difficulty working together to come up with a list of descriptive adjectives. I assume that they will have
retained some information from the previous lesson ("should" modal).
Personal Aims
- to give clear instructions
Timetable Fit
In the previous lesson, students learned about the modal "should" and practiced giving advice. This lesson will expand on this knowledge by enabling them to give reasons to support
their opinions. Example: Yasmine should go to Toronto because it is more multicultural than Mont Tremblant. Superlative adjectives would be introduced later in this class (if it is a 3 or 4
hour class). Knowledge of comparative and superlative adjectives will help students with the written production for this unit (a persuasive essay or an informative essay).
Interaction
Stage Procedure Materials Time Comment
Pattern
Warmer/Lead-in Show image of my friend Yasmine, explain that she wants to go on vacation, but can't
To set lesson context and decide which city to go to (Mont Tremblant vs. Toronto). Read aloud and project her story, T-S 2-3
engage students or give as handout.
Highlighting
T: "Which city do you think is better?" Elicit student responses. Write the sentence frame
To draw students'
on the board: "Toronto is ____ than Mont Tremblant; Mont Tremblant is _____ than T-S 2-4
attention to the target
Toronto"
language
Clarification Write
To clarify the meaning, - safe
form and pronunciation of - big
the target language - noisy
- beautiful T-WB, T-
8 - 10
on the board. Ask students to help transform these into adjectives, show the formations S
(add r, double consonant, remove y ad -ier, add more)
Present incorrect forms and spellings:
"Can I say "Mont Tremblant is more safe than Toronto"? Can I say "Toronto is beautifuller
than Mont Tremblant? "
Free Practice Individually, students will write a short e-mail to Yasmin, advising her about which city they
To provide students with think she should go to. S-
free practice of the target Students will write for 8-10 minutes, then swap their writing with a peer for feedback. Peer individual; 10 - 20
language feedback will last about 10 minutes, and then these short pieces of writing will be collected PW
as formative assessment.