Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Jean A. O’Connor
known as the preparation practice gap. This gap has been identified as a serious challenge
facing graduate nurses since 1974 (Marlene Kramer, 1974). Preparation-practice gaps are
from academia to the clinical environment (Hickerson et al., 2016; Institute of Medicine,
assist nursing students to improve clinical competencies needed to practice safely in the
clinical environment (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010). One initiative to assist
utilization of simulation in nursing education (Berkow et al., 2008; Wall, Andrus &
Morrison, 2014; Hope, Garsied, & Prescott, 2010; Powers et al., 2018; Rossler, 2019;
and clinical reasoning. Nursing simulation dates back as far as 1847 where it was noted in
The Handbook for Hospital Sisters requirements for “every nursing school to have a
mechanical dummy, models of legs and arms to learn bandaging, a jointed skeleton, a
black drawing board, and drawings, books, and models (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander,
Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries, 2014). The first simulation mannequin was built in 1911,
named Mrs. Chase, and was used to train nurses in basic skills (Aebersold, 2018). Nurses
THE EFFICACY OF SIMULATION IN NURSING EDUCATION
3
were trained in learning environments known then as demonstration rooms, the skills
laboratory, or the nursing laboratory (Aebersold, 2018). By the early 1990s simulation
had dramatically evolved with the development of high fidelity simulators. Nursing
students today are provided with a high fidelity simulation experience in a state of the art
simulation lab that incorporates high fidelity mannequins as well as simulated patients
experience (Kolb, 1984, p. 38). This experience is formed on a learning cycle that
theory that one can see the process of simulation evolve through the learners experience
the facilitation of knowledge gleaned from the experience, and active experimentation
occurs when the learner is able to transfer that knowledge into practice (Aebersold,
2018).
preparing future nursing students. Content laden curricula are being replaced by concept-
THE EFFICACY OF SIMULATION IN NURSING EDUCATION
4
based curricula that focus on moving from critical thinking, to clinical reasoning (Benner
et al., 2010). Simulation in nursing education is at the forefront of this shift, and is
imperative to fill the gap as available nursing faculty and available clinical sites decline
(Aebersold, 2018; Nehring & Lashley, 2009). Simulation in nursing education is seen as a
bridge that links theoretical learning with practical application, and provides a safe
objectives. In the clinical environment, students may not have the chance for hands on
facilitates the development of clinical skills in a safe and structured environment (Wall,
and affective skills at the higher levels of taxonomy to ensure graduate readiness to
practice.
Simulation provides the opportunity to develop objectives that align with hospital
workforce expectations. For example, when one university’s graduates faced barriers
getting entry-level positions because they lacked ACLS certification required for hire at
their partner facility, the university revised their curriculum to provide ACLS training
through simulation. Senior nurses were eligible to sit for ACLS certification prior to
graduating, and hiring facilities were impressed with their qualifications (Powers et al.,
2019). Simulation is relevant to bridging the preparation practice gap when student-
the use of simulation is increasing. Nehring and Lashley (2009) published a 40-year
review of nursing simulation. From mannequins, to task trainers, role playing, games, and
CAI, to simulated patients, and high-fidelity mannequins, these tools have been part of
Patricia Benner’s novice to expert, Kolb’s experiential learning, Jeffries and Rogers
nursing education simulation framework, and Nehring and Lashley critical incident
nursing management (Nehring & Lashley, 2009). Simulation has a role in both nursing
education, and nursing practice, and the future of simulation in nursing has boundless
potential (Nehring & Lashley, 2009). Guimaraes dos Santos Almeida et al.’s (2018)
literature review also concluded that scientific evidence supports the use of simulation in
nursing education as they sought to determine how researchers had been using nursing
objectives, fidelity, problem solving student support, and debriefing (Guimaraes dos
Santos Almeida et al., 2018). The use of simulation in nursing education is imperative as
nursing shortages increase, and available faculty decrease. Abersold (2018) highlights the
need to incorporate simulation, not merely as an add on, but integrated into the
curriculum. Due to the relatively new research published in the area of simulation, there
have been questions as to whether or not simulation can or should replace nursing
practice. This research helps to affirm the use of simulation in nursing education as a
teaching pedagogy, but more importantly allows for changes to policy guided by boards
of nursing.
Understanding that clinical experiences may not provide students with the
Preparing students readiness to practice can be achieved through the effective use of
simulation in nursing education (Hope, Garside, & Prescott, 2010; Powers et al., 2018;
Nwafor, & Tsaras, 2018; Forcina Hill, Woodley, & Goodwin, 2018).
In 2003 the Institute of Medicine (IOM) put out a report titled Health Professions
Education: A Bridge to Quality, which emphasized the need to improve patient safety
through reforming health professional education. Ensuring nursing students are prepared
to transition into practice safely is just one area of focus in the IOM report (Greiner, &
safe practitioners, that are not only able to critically think, but reason clinically. Evidence
has shown that simulation can be substituted for 50% of clinical time without changes to
THE EFFICACY OF SIMULATION IN NURSING EDUCATION
7
measureable outcomes such as NCLEX pass rates, clinical competence, and readiness to
nursing education allows for learning opportunities in a safe, and controlled environment
(Labrague et al., 2019). All stakeholders including: nursing students, faculty, institutions,
patients, and the community, benefit from simulation when nurses training is safe,
Ultimately it is the nursing student, upon graduation, who has to face the
challenges during the transition from graduate nurse, to practicing nurse. It is during this
transition period that increased mistakes are often made. New nurses are responsible for
75% of medication errors, and 40% of patient falls (Hickerson, Taylor, & Terbaar, 2016).
Significant changes to the way nurses are educated and transitioned into practice should
be a priority in the academic community in order to reduce new graduate stress, reduce
medical errors that grossly affect patient safety, reduce overall costs to hospitals related to
turnover and poor patient outcomes, and improve new graduate readiness to practice
safely and effectively. Simulation provides the opportunity for nursing students to
Recommendations
such as Patricia Benner’s theory describing the stages of novice to expert, or Kolb’s
Simulation Framework. Simulation ought to focus on both nursing education and nursing
practice (Nehring & Lashley, 2009). Nursing schools that have limited access to clinical
THE EFFICACY OF SIMULATION IN NURSING EDUCATION
8
sites, or insufficient adjunct faculty should consider increasing hours associated with
simulation learning to meet clinical objectives as evidence supports the safety and
2014). Nurse educators should familiarize themselves with graduate readiness to practice
producing graduate nurses that are safe, confident, and prepared practitioners. In order to
create a vision for the future of nursing, there must be a comprehensive understanding of
nursing’s past, and present. The state of nursing is at a crossroads. Nurses are faced with
an increasing shortage of nursing staff, nursing faculty, and clinical site availability
(Hayden et al., 2014; Nehring & Lashley, 2009). Nursing curricula have been heavily
traditional clinical experiences with partnering health care facilities. Past evidence
collected through the Nursing Executive Center surveyed nurse educators and senior
nurse administrators using the New Graduate Nurse Performance Survey which found
that nearly 90% of academic leaders believed their nursing students were fully prepared
to practice safely and effectively, compared to 10% of hospital nurse executives (Berkow,
Virkstis, Stewary, & Conway, 2008). This dichotomy is something nurse educators should
reflect on.
The 2010 Carnegie Foundation report “Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical
Transformation” Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day (2010) called for improving the
THE EFFICACY OF SIMULATION IN NURSING EDUCATION
9
nursing education competencies by replacing abstract knowledge with concrete,
deliberate thought processes that allow for students to think contextually where patients
needs are concerned, integrate classroom education with clinical experience, and shift
from critical thinking to clinical reasoning (Hansen, 2014). The IOM called for a major
overhaul in education for health professions (Greiner, & Knebel, 2003). As past research
beckons changes to future education, nurse educators will undoubtedly feel the burden,
simulation as a learning pedagogy into the curriculum is one way nurse educators can
improve student learning outcomes, provide high quality clinical related experiences, and
improve student confidence, safety, and clinical reasoning skills, in order to improve
Conclusion
The state of nursing education is facing challenges due to faculty shortages, limited
clinical site availability, or limited opportunity for students to practice within their
clinical sites due to restrictive hospital policies. As undergraduate nursing programs grow,
opportunities for clinical placement shrink (Hayden et al., 2014). Simulation in nursing
education is an effective pedagogical strategy that provides nursing students with quality
2014). Simulation education prepares nursing students to transition from graduate nurse
to practicing nurse, and increases confidence, safety, and marketability when skills
obtained in simulation education align with hospital workforce expectations (Robinson &
Benner P., Sutphen M., Leonard V., Day L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical
Teaching.
Berkow, S., Conway, L., Stewart, J., & Virkstis, K. (2008). Assessing new graduate nurse
Forcina Hill, J.M., Woodley, L., & Goodwin, M. (2018). Simulation to prepare graduate
nursing students for clinical faculty role. Nursing Education Perspectives 39(5),
319-321.
Guimaraes dos Santos Almeida, R., Jorge, B.M., Souza-Junior, M.J., Mazzo, A., Martins,
E7-E10.
https://www.nap.edu/read/10681/chapter/1
Hansen, J. (2014). Nurse Residency Programs: Why now? Journal for Nurses in
https://www.nursingcenter.com/journalarticle?
Article_ID=1655516&Journal_ID=54029&Issue_ID=1655091
THE EFFICACY OF SIMULATION IN NURSING EDUCATION
11
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Dardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014).
https://www.ncsbn.org/JNR_Simulation_Supplement.pdf
Hickerson, K.A., Taylor, L.A., & Terhaar, M.F. (2016). The preparation-practice gap: an
47(1), 17-23.
Hope, A., Garside, J., Prescott, S. (2010). Rethinking theory and practice: pre-
31(2011), 711-715.
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing leading change, advancing health.
Kramer, M. (1974). Reality shock; why nurses leave nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby
Co.
Labrague, L.J., McEnroe-Petitte, D.M., Bowling, A.M., Nwafor, C.E., Tsaras, K. (2019).
McLeod, S. (2017). Kolb’s learning styles and experiential learning cycle. Retrieved from
https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
Nehring, W.M., & Lashley, F.R. (2009). Nursing simulation: a review of the past 40
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2014). Nearly one in five new nurses leaves first job
from https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2014/09/nearly-one-in-
five-new-nurses-leave-first-job-within-a-year--acc.html
203-209.
Rossler, K.L. (2019). Peer-assisted learning with simulation for examination and
Wall, P., Andrus, P.M., Morrison, P. (2014). Bridging the theory practice gap through
135.