Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 8

Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Environmental Pollution
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol

Quadratic discriminant analysis model for assessing the risk of


cadmium pollution for paddy fields in a county in China*
Xiumei Wang a, Xiujian Li b, Ruoyu Ma b, Yue Li b, Wei Wang b, Hanyu Huang a,
Chenzi Xu a, Yi An a, *
a
Agro-environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Tianjin 300071, China
b
Department of Computer and Control Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China

a r t i c l ein fo abstract

Article history: In China, the cadmium (Cd) levels in paddy fields have increased, which has led to the excessive uptake of
Received 15 September 2017 Cd into rice grains. In this study, we determined the physicochemical properties of soil samples, including
Received in revised form the pH, soil organic matter (SOM) content, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and total Cd content (Cd soil) in
21 January 2018
order to establish a quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) model for assessing the risk of Cd in rice and
Accepted 27 January 2018
to calculate its prior probability. Decision tree and logistic regression models were also estab - lished for
comparison. The results showed that the accuracy rate was 74% with QDA, which was significantly higher
than that obtained using the decision tree (67%) and logistic regression (68%) models. The correlation
Keywords:
coefficients between the soil pH and the other three factors (CEC, SOM, and Cd soil) were higher in the
Cadmium
Decision tree inaccurate set than the accurate set, whereas the correlation coefficients were smaller in the inaccurate
Logistic regression set than the accurate set.
Paddy field © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Quadratic discriminant analysis model

1. Introduction complexes with humic substances (Halim et al., 2015; Xu et al.,


2010), but also supply organic chemicals, acting as chelates, to the
The pollution of arable soils with heavy metals is a great risk for soil solution and enhance Cd availability to rice (Halim et al., 2015;
agricultural production (Bermudez et al., 2012). In China, pollution Zhao et al., 2015). The models used previously for predict- ing risk
by cadmium (Cd) is particularly important among the different types are based on decision trees, linear or logistic regression, and neural
of heavy metal pollution because a large area is contaminated (about networks. Regression algorithm can state the relationships between
7.0% of arable soil) and there is great risk of it being trans- ferred soil inputs (soil properties) and soil output (heavy metal content)
from the soil into rice (Liu et al., 2014), which is the major crop (Ro€mkens et al., 2009; Elzinga et al., 1999), while these
produced in China. formulated relationships are not necessary for decision tree (Vega et
Many studies have attempted to predict the risk of Cd trans- al., 2009, 2010) and neural networks models (Hattab et al., 2013;
ferring from soil into rice based on the physicochemical properties Liu et al., 2011). However, few of these models obtained ac- curate
of soil, such as the pH, soil organic matter (SOM) contents and cation quantitative predictions of the Cd concentration in rice. This may be
exchange capacity (CEC). According to lots of literature, these because other factors affect the transfer process, such as different
properties can change the soil Cd species and then affect its phy- crop varieties, hydrological conditions, meteorological factors, and
toavailability. Among them, the accumulation of Cd in rice decreased farming methods (Song et al., 2015; Ye et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2014; Hu
with CEC (Sebastian and Prasad, 2014; Honma et al., 2016) and pH et al., 2015).
(Miller et al., 1976), while the effect of SOM to Cd phytoavailability is Excessive predicting indexes can lower the accuracy and in-
a little complicated. The SOM can reduce the Cd phytoavailability in crease the monitoring costs. Thus, Geisser (1964) suggested using
soil through adsorption or forming stable quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) to obtain posterior distri-
butions for estimating the classes of predictions in order to simplify
the predicted index as a prior probability (Khasnobish et al., 2011).
*
The discriminant function is given by
This paper has been recommended for acceptance by Dr. Chen Da.
* Corresponding author. Tel.:þ86 22 23610159; fax: þ86 22 23610159.
E-mail address: simon8601@126.com (Y. An).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.088
0269-7491/© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
X. Wang et al. / Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372 367

2013) has shown that the Cd in this region is mainly derived from
1 1 the metallurgical industry, chemical industry, and sewage
dk ðxÞ ¼ log pðkÞ — log.Sc . — ðx — mc ÞT S—c 1 ðx — mc Þ; (1)
2 2 irrigation.
In addition, severe Cd pollution in the soil means that there is a

where k is the predicted class, x is the set of measurements, mc is high risk of Cd absorption by paddy rice, which is the dominant
the mean vector, p(k) is the prior probability, and Sc is the crop (7.09×105 t/y of rice from 1.35 ×105 ha of land) in this region
covariance matrix. because of the suitable subtropical humid monsoon climate with an
In the present study, we developed a QDA model for assessing the average annual temperature of 17.4 ○ C and mean annual precipi-
risk of Cd in rice based on the total Cd content of the soil (Cdsoil), tation of 1300 mm.
physicochemical properties (pH, SOM, and cation exchange ca-
pacity (CEC)), and the calculated prior probability. We also estab-
lished decision tree and logistic regression models for comparison. 2.2. Locations of sampling plots

In total, 536 soilerice paired samples were collected during


2. Materials and methods 2012e2014 in Xiangtan County (126 pairs in 2012, 360 pairs in 2013,
and 50 pairs in 2014). The layout of the plots was fairly random (as
2.1. Survey of study area shown in Fig. 1) but the sampling density was higher in heavily
polluted towns (historically), including Yangjiaqao Town, Hekou
The study area (Fig. 1) was located in Xiangtan county, Hunan Town, Meilinqiao Town, Tanjiashan Town, and Yisuhe Town. Soil
Province, which is a typical area with paddy fields polluted by Cd samples were taken from the topsoil (0e25 cm) using a stainless steel
according to previous studies (Wang et al., 2015; Lei et al., 2015). auger at the harvest time when the paddy field was drained. Rice
Previous research (Williams et al., 2009; Wei et al., 2009; Du et al., samples were also collected from the sampling sites.

Fig. 1. Map of Xiangtan County showing the locations of the sampling plots.
368 X. Wang et al. / Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372

2.3. Sample pretreatment and analysis


K
X
○C, GiniðpÞ ¼ pkð1 — pkÞ; (3)
The soil samples were air-dried in the laboratory at 25e30
k¼1
before removing gravel, plant roots, and other foreign matter, and
they were divided into two subsamples. One subsample was ground Where K is the number of categories and pk is the probability when
in an agate mortar until it passed through a 2-mm mesh nylon sieve, the category is K.
before it was used for determining the pH and CEC. The second In addition, the formula used for fitting the logistic regression is
subsample was ground until it passed through a 100-mesh nylon given by Eq. (4), where the gradient descent method is used to obtain
sieve, before it was used for determining the SOM contents and the maximum likelihood value for the parameter q:
Cdsoil.
1
A grain huller was used to remove the outer shell of the rice h ðx ; (4)
Þ¼ T

samples and obtain brown rice grains. The rice grains were then q
1 þ e—q x
cleaned three times with deionized water, oven dried to constant

weight at 60 ○C, and passed through a 0.25-mm sieve. where q is the mean vector comprising the soil pH, SOM, Cd soil, and
The pH of each soil solution was measured potentiometrically CEC.
(water:soil slurry ratio ¼1:2.5) using a pH meter (PB-10, Sartorius,
Go€ttingen, Germany). The SOM contents were determined using
2.4.3. Model verification
the WalkleyeBlack method (Nelson et al., 1982). The CEC was
Finally, in order to calculate the accuracy of the data fitting by
measured using 1 M NH4OAc buffered at pH 7.0 (USDA, 1996),
the QDA, decision tree model, and logistic regression model, 30
where a soil sample weighing 2 g was digested with an acid
groups of data were randomly selected from the testing set and
mixture containing concentrated HNO3, HF, and HClO4 at a ratio of
repeated 50 times to compare the effectiveness of the model fitting
1:2:1, and then analyzed with a flame atomic absorption spectro-
procedure.
photometer (AA240, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). A brown rice grain
sample weighing 1 g was digested using an acid mixture containing
concentrated HNO3 and HClO4 at a ratio of 9:1, before analyzing 3. Results and discussion
with an atomic absorption spectrometer (AA800, PerkinElmer,
Norwalk, CT, USA) in a graphite furnace. 3.1. Regional monitoring results and classic assessment model

2.4. Model description In general, a higher value for Cd soil can lead to a greater value for
Cdrice. However, a clear relationship between Cd soil and Cdrice has not
In this study, all of the models were constructed using Matlab been reported previously (Li et al., 2003). To verify this rela-
2012a, and statistical analyses were performed with Origin 9.0 and tionship, Cdsoil is plotted versus Cdrice in our study region in Fig. 2.
IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 software. For the data shown in Fig. 2, Pearson's correlation coefficient was
only 0.168, thereby indicating the lack of a linear correlation
between Cdsoil and Cdrice in this study. We also used the Cd con-
2.4.1. QDA model
centrations comprising the limitation II level standard of the Chi-
We used the data set obtained in 2012 to calculate the prior
nese Soil Environmental Quality Standard (SQS) and the Chinese
probability for the QDA model, and the data sets from 2013 to 2014
Food Safety Standard (FQS) as cut-off rules to obtain four quad-
were employed as the training set and testing set, respectively. It
rants: N1 where Cdsoil > SQS and Cdrice > FQS; N2 where Cdsoil ≤ SQS
should be noted that the number of data used in the training set was
and Cdrice > FQS; N3 where Cdsoil ≤ SQS and Cdrice ≤ FQS; and N4
actually 330 after eliminating noise and outliers.
where Cdsoil > SQS and Cdrice ≤ FQS.
The QDA model is given by Eq. (2):
1
h i
p j2pS j— 2 exp — 1ðx — m ÞT S—1ðx — m Þ 10
i i 2 i 0 i
Critical line y = 0.724+0.663x
i¼0 ij Sij 2
— 2ð — iÞ Si ð — iÞ R2 = 0.168

pðy ¼ ijx;qÞ¼ P n h io ;
—1 1x
Cd concentration in brown rice / FQS

i¼1
p 2p exp m T —1 x m
(2) 8

(2) 8
N2=12 N1=309

where the value of i is 0 when the Cd concentration in rice


(Cdrice) ≤0.2 mg kg—1 and 1 when Cdrice > 0.2 mg kg—1; p is the 6
prior probability; m is the mean vector comprising the soil pH, SOM,
Cdsoil, and CEC; and S is the covariance matrix for the soil pH, SOM,
Cdsoil, and CEC. 4
Critical line

The cycle was repeated until the complete decision tree was generated
N =11 N =204
2.4.2. Comparison of models and it was then clipped to obtain an optimal deci- sion tree:
3 4

Decision tree and logistic regression models were also estab-


lished to compare with the QDA. It was not necessary to consider the
prior probability, so data from 2012 were not used in these two types
of models.
For the decision tree model, the Gini coefficient (Eq. (3)) of the
probability was calculated for each variable and the variable with the
smallest Gini coefficient was selected as the classification condition.
2

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Cd concentration in soil / SQS

Fig. 2. Distributions of Cd in soil (Cdsoil) and Cd in rice grains (Cdrice). The vertical
line is a critical line showing whether Cdsoil exceeded the Chinese Soil
Environmental Quality Standard (SQS). The horizontal line is a critical line
indicating whether Cdrice exceeded the Chinese Food Safety Standard (FQS).
X. Wang et al. / Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372 369

We found that NN1 þN3


¼ 1.48, which suggests that the concen- the value of p was calculated with the following equation using the
2þN4

trations of Cd in both the soil and rice relative to the safety stan- data from 2012:
dards differed in nearly 40% of the paired samples.
Ni
Previous studies have suggested that Cd rice is correlated well p ¼ ; (6)

with Cdsoil when certain soil physicochemical properties (e.g., pH, i


N
CEC, and SOM) are considered together (Ro€mkens et al., 2009; Brus
et al., 2005; Japenga et al., 2007; Kirkham, 2006). Thus, we also where the value of i is 0 when Cdrice 0.2≤mg kg—1 and 1 when Cdrice
determined the values of the soil pH, CEC and SOM to build models, > 0.2 mg kg—1, and N is the number of samples in 2012.
as shown in Table 1. In order to assess the risk of Cd in rice, a QDA model was
According to the results, the soil pH ranged from 4.6 to 7.8 with established by analyzing whether the probability of Cdrice exceeding
an average of 5.6. The average values for CEC and SOM were FQS was larger than 50%. After repeated training, the parameters
45.07 ± 5.13 and 12.70 ± 1.32, respectively. The results of the cor- obtained for the QDA model are shown in Table 2.
relation analysis showed that Cdrice was significantly correlated with The different QDA parameters for the groups where Cdrice
the pH, SOM, CEC, and Cdsoil at p < 0.01. 0.2 mg≤kg—1 and Cdrice > 0.2 mg kg—1 can be explained by the different
Two classic models were employed in this study to investigate the pathways comprising the links among the influential factors. Thus,
relationship between Cdsoil (with pH, CEC, and SOM) and Cdrice. The path analysis was performed, as shown in Fig. 4. For the group where
first was a logistic regression model where after repeated training, Cdrice exceeded the limit, pH and Cdsoil directly
the equation was obtained as follows. affected Cdrice, while pH, SOM, and CEC indirectly affected Cd rice via
Cdsoil. For the group where Cdrice did not exceed the limit, pH, SOM,
and CEC directly affected Cdrice, while pH and SOM indirectly
affected Cdrice via CEC. However, Cdsoil had no direct effect on Cdrice,

1
h ðx (5)
Þ¼
q
1 þ EXPð8:0529 — 1:5615pH þ 0:1404SOM þ 0:2804Cdsoil — 0:4127CECÞ

The second was a decision tree model, which is a classifier and and it indirectly affected Cdrice via pH, SOM, and CEC.
not a mathematical model. Thus, there was no equation for the According to the results obtained by the QDA model, the accu-
decision tree model and its classification process is shown in Fig. 3 racy rate was 74% (Fig. 5), which was higher than that for the de-
instead. cision tree or logistic regression models. Similar conclusion could be
According to tests of 50 groups, the accuracy rate for the deci- drawn by comparing to the researches of Xu et al. (2016), Adams et
sion tree model was 67% and that for the logistic regression model al. (2004) and Guo et al. (2007). Also, the accuracy rate of QDA
was 68% (Fig. 4). Both of these percentages were larger than 60%, model was almost the same with some neural network models (Liu
which was the proportion represented by (N1þN3) in the whole et al., 2011).
samples. In terms of the model's stability, the standard deviation of the
accuracy rate was 0.032 with QDA, and the results were 0.035 and
0.025 for the decision tree and logistic regression models, respec-
3.2. QDA model for Cd risk assessment tively. Thus, there were no significant differences among the three
models according to the 95% confidence intervals.
Many other factors could be introduced to further improve the We also analyzed the characteristics of the error data for the QDA
accuracy of the assessment models, where some region-specific model. Fig. 6 shows the sites where the QDA model obtained the
factors might affect the transfer of Cd from the soil to food crops, opposite results compared with the actual results.
including the crop species or breed, meteorological conditions, soil According to the results obtained by analysis of variance, there
physicochemical properties (excluding the pH, SOM, and CEC, such were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in the pH, CEC, SOM, or
as Fe, Mn, Si, Ca, and Se), agricultural management practices, and Cdsoil in the accurate set and inaccurate set for the QDA model. In
geographical differences (Zhao et al., 2015; Song et al., 2015; Ye et addition, the correlation analysis results (Table 3) showed that the
al., 2012; Kheir et al., 2010; Sarwar et al., 2010). Xu et al. (2016). correlation coefficients between the soil pH and the other three
suggested that certain prior conditions can be used to enhance the factors (CEC, SOM, and Cdsoil) were higher in the inaccurate set than
reliability of a model for assessing the risk of Cd accumulation in the accurate set, whereas the correlation coefficients were smaller in
rice. the inaccurate set than the accurate set. This indicates that the QDA
In this study, we used the historical rate in this region of Cd rice model might make an incorrect prediction if the relationship
exceeding the specified standard as the prior probability. Therefore,

Table 1
pH, soil organic matter (SOM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), Cd in soil (Cd soil), and Cd in rice grains (Cd rice) in each year. Minimum, maximum, and average (in brackets)
values are presented.

Year pH SOM CEC Cdsoil Cdrice grains


(g kg—1) (cmol[þ] kg— 1) (mg kg—1 ) (mg kg—1 )

2012 4.6e7.8 (5.5) 28.3e71.1 (44.3) 7.49e20.29 (12.76) 0.13e7.70 (0.64) ND*e3.20 (0.38)
2013 4.8e7.7 (5.7) 36.6e55.1 (45.2) 10.94e14.19 (12.69) 0.17e2.80 (0.60) NDe3.31 (0.40)
2014 4.8e6.3 (5.4) 38.4e52.1 (45.9) 10.97e14.16 (12.62) 0.30e1.70 (0.71) 0.04e3.31 (0.61)

* ND: Indicates lower than the detection limit (0.0284 mg kg —1).


370 X. Wang et al. / Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372

Fig. 3. Decision-tree for predicting Cd in rice grains (Cdrice) based on soil properties (where Cds is Cd in soil and Cdr is Cdrice).

Fig. 4. Path analysis for soil properties with different limits on Cd in rice grains.

Table 2
Parameters in the quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) model. Cd soil: Cd in soil and Cdrice: Cd in rice grains.

Parameter Cdrice ≤ 0.2 mg kg— 1 Cdrice > 0.2 mg kg— 1


p 0.365 0.635
2 3 2 3
S 0:384 0:386 0:0469 0:0127 0:126 —0:0120 0:00690 0:0293
0:386 10:9 0:0820 0:468 —0:0120 12:2 0:403 0:383 7
6 7 6
4 0:0469 0:0820 0:0172 —0:0125 5 4 0:00690 0:403 0:0424 —0:0408 5
0:0127 0:468 —0:0125 0:289 0:0293 0:383 —0:0408 0:263

m ð5:83; 47:2; 0:494; 12:9Þ ð5:49; 45:9; 0:591; 12:7Þ


X. Wang et al. / Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372 371

Table 3
Analysis of correlations between soil properties in the accurate set and inaccurate
set. SOM: soil organic matter; Cd soil: total Cd content in soil; CEC: cation exchange
capacity.

Category Variable pH SOM Cdsoil CEC

Accurate set pH 1 0.170 0.234 0.094


SOM 1 0.324 0.179
Cdsoil 1 —0.042
CEC 1
Inaccurate set pH 1 0.337 0.498 0.335
SOM 1 0.258 0.021
Cdsoil 1 —0.223
CEC 1

Fig. 5. Accuracy rates for the quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), decision tree
(DTA), and logistic regression (LRA) models after testing 50 times.

Fig. 6. Assessment of the results obtained by the quadratic discriminant analysis model using data from 2014.
372 X. Wang et al. / Environmental Pollution 236 (2018) 366e372

between the soil pH and other physicochemical properties is fold Classification for Composite Decision about Localized Arm Movement from
EEG by SVM and QDA Techniques, International Joint Conference on Neural
stronger.
Networks. IEEE, pp. 1344e1351.
Kheir, R.B., Greve, M.H., Abdallah, C., Dalgaard, T., 2010. Spatial soil zinc content
4. Conclusions distribution from terrain parameters: a GIS-based decision-tree model in Lebanon.
Environ. Pollut. 158, 520e528.
Kirkham, M.B., 2006. Cadmium in plants on polluted soils: effects of soil factors,
In this study, was established a QDA model for assessing the risk hyperaccumulation, and amendments. Geoderma 137, 19e32.
of paddy fields being polluted by Cd. We can make the following Lei, M., Tie, B.Q., Song, Z.G., Liao, B.H., Lepo, J.E., Huang, Y.Z., 2015. Heavy metal
conclusions based on the results obtained. pollution and potential health risk assessment of white rice around mine areas in
Hunan Province, China. Food. Secur. 7, 45e54.
Li, F., Okazaki, M., Zhou, Q., 2003. Evaluation of Cd uptake by plants estimated from
(1) According to tests based on 50 groups, the accuracy rate was total soil Cd, pH, and organic matter. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. Environ.
74% using QDA, but only 67% and 68% with the decision tree Contam. Tox 71, 0714e0721.
Liu, M., Liu, X., Wu, M., Li, L., Xiu, L., 2011. Integrating spectral indices with envi-
and logistic regression models, respectively. There were no ronmental parameters for estimating heavy metal concentrations in rice using a
significant differences in the stability of the three models. dynamic fuzzy neural-network model. Comput. Geosci. 37, 1642e1652.
(2) The correlation coefficients between the soil pH and the other Liu, J.G., Qu, P., Zhang, W., Dong, Y., Li, L., Wang, M.X., 2014. Variations among rice
cultivars in subcellular distribution of cd: the relationship between trans- location
three factors (CEC, SOM, and Cdsoil) were higher in the and grain accumulation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 107, 25e31.
inaccurate set than the accurate set, whereas the correlation Miller, J.E., Hassett, J.J., Koeppe, D.E., 1976. Uptake of cadmium by soybeans as
coefficients were smaller in the inaccurate set than the ac- influenced by soil cation exchange capacity, pH, and available phosphorus.
J. Environ. Qual. 52, 157e160.
curate set. Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H.,
1982. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. Methods of Soil Analysis
Acknowledgement Partdchemical Methods, pp. 961e1010.
€ mkens, P.F., Guo, H.Y., Chu, C.L., Liu, T.S., Chiang, C.F., Koopmans, G.F., 2009.
Ro
Prediction of cadmium uptake by brown rice and derivation of soil-plant
This work was funded by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific transfer models to improve soil protection guidelines. Environ. Pollut. 157,
Research in the Public Interest (No. 201403014) and Agricultural 2435e2444.
Sarwar, N., Saifullah, M., Malhi, Z.S.S., Zia, M.H., Naeem, A., Bibi, S., 2010. Role of
science and technology innovation project (No. CAAS-ASTIP-2017-
mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants. J. Sci. Food Agr.
AEPI-lyj). 90, 925e937.
Sebastian, A., Prasad, M.N.V., 2014. Cadmium minimization in rice. A review. Agron.
References Sustain. Dev. 34, 155e173.
Song, W.E., Chen, S.B., Liu, J.F., Li, C., Song, N.N., Ning, L.I., 2015. Variation of Cd
concentration in various rice cultivars and derivation of cadmium toxicity
Adams, M.L., Zhao, F.J., McGrath, S.P., Nicholson, F.A., Chambers, B.J., 2004. Pre-
thresholds for paddy soil by species-sensitivity distribution. Integr. Agric 14 (9),
dicting cadmium concentrations in wheat and barley grain using soil proper- ties.
1845e1854.
J. Environ. Qual. 33, 532e541.
USDA, Soil, 1996. Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations,
Bermudez, G.M., Jasan, R., Plá, R., Pignata, M.L., 2012. Heavy metals and trace ele-
Washington, DC.
ments in atmospheric fall-out: their relationship with topsoil and wheat
Vega, F.A., Matías, J.M., Andrade, M.L., Reigosa, M.J., Covelo, E.F., 2009. Classification
element composition. J. Hazard Mater. 214, 447e456.
and regression trees (carts) for modelling the sorption and retention of heavy metals
€ mkens, P.F., 2005. Probabilistic quality standards for
Brus, D.J., Gruijter, J.J.D., Ro by soil. J. Hazard Mater. 167, 615e624.
heavy metals in soil derived from quality standards in crops. Geoderma 128,
Vega, F.A., Andrade, M.L., Covelo, E.F., 2010. Influence of soil properties on the
301e311.
sorption and retention of cadmium, copper and lead, separately and together,
Du, Y., Hu, X.F., Wu, X.H., Shu, Y., Jiang, Y., Yan, X.J., 2013. Affects of mining activities
by 20 soil horizons: comparison of linear regression and tree regression ana-
on Cd pollution to the paddy soils and rice grain in Hunan province, Central South
lyses. J. Hazard Mater. 174, 522e533.
China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 185, 9843e9856. Wang, M., Chen, W., Peng, C., 2015. Risk assessment of Cd polluted paddy soils in the
Elzinga, E.J., Van Grinsven, J.J.M., Swartjes, F.A., 1999. General purpose Freundlich industrial and township areas in Hunan, Southern China. Chemosphere 144,
isotherms for cadmium, copper and zinc in soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50, 139e149.
346e351.
Geisser, S., 1964. Posterior odds for multivariate normal distributions. J. Royal Soc.
Wei, C., Cheng, W., Yang, L., 2009. Characterizing spatial distribution and sources of
Series B Methodol. 26, 69e76.
heavy metals in the soils from mining-smelting activities in Shuikoushan, Hunan
Guo, H.Y., Liu, T.S., Chu, C.L., Chiang, C.F., Ro€ mkens, P.F., 2007. Prediction of Heavy
Province, China. J. Environ. Sci. 21, 1230e1236.
Metal Uptake by Different Rice Species in Paddy Soils Near Contaminated Sites of
Williams, P.N., Ming, L., Sun, G.X., Huang, Q., Lu, Y., Deacon, C., 2009. Occurrence and
Taiwan.
partitioning of cadmium, arsenic and lead in mine impacted paddy rice: Hunan,
Halim, M.A., Majumder, R.K., Zaman, M.N., 2015. Paddy soil heavy metal contami-
China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 637e642.
nation and uptake in rice plants from the adjacent area of Barapukuria coal mine,
Xu, W.H., Li, Y.R., He, J.P., Ma, Q.F., Zhang, X.J., Chen, G.Q., Wang, H.X., Zhang, H.B.,
northwest Bangladesh. Arab. J. Geosci. 8, 3391e3401.
2010. Cd uptake in rice cultivars treated with organic acids and EDTA. J. Environ.
Hattab, N., Hambli, R., Motelica-Heino, M., Bourrat, X., Mench, M., 2013. Application
Sci. 22, 441e447.
of neural network model for the prediction of chromium concentration in
Xu, J.J., Wu, B., Zhang, L.Y., Guo, S.H., Li, G., Li, F.M., 2016. Risk assessment of cad-
phytoremediated contaminated soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 128, 25e34.
mium in rice in Xiangtan, Hunan, China based on Bayesian method. Chin. J. Appl.
Honma, T., Ohba, H., Kanekokadokura, A., Makino, T., Nakamura, K., Katou, H., 2016.
Ecol. 27, 3221e3227 (in Chinese).
Optimal soil eh, ph, and water management for simultaneously minimizing arsenic
Ye, X., Ma, Y., Sun, B., 2012. Influence of soil type and genotype on Cd bioavailability
and cadmium concentrations in rice grains. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4178.
and uptake by rice and implications for food safety. J. Environ Sci. 24, 1647e1654.
Hu, P., Ouyang, Y., Wu, L., Shen, L., Luo, Y., Christie, P., 2015. Effects of water man-
Yu, L., Zhu, J., Huang, Q., Su, D., Jiang, R., Li, H., 2014. Application of a rotation system
agement on arsenic and cadmium speciation and accumulation in an upland rice
to oilseed rape and rice fields in Cd-contaminated agricultural land to ensure food
cultivar. J. Environ. Sci. 27, 225e231.
safety. Ecotox. Environ Safe 108, 287e293.
€ mkens, P.F., 2007. A feasibility test to estimate
Japenga, J., Koopmans, G.F., Song, J., Ro
Zhao, K., Fu, W., Ye, Z., Zhang, C., 2015. Contamination and spatial variation of heavy
the duration of phytoextraction of heavy metals from polluted soils. Int. J.
metals in the soil-rice system in nanxun county, southeastern China. Inter. J.
Phytoremediat 9, 115e132.
Environ. Res. Pub. Heal 12, 1577e1594.
Khasnobish, A., Bhattacharyya, S., Konar, A., Tibarewala, D.N., Nagar, A.K., 2011. Two-

Вам также может понравиться