See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/283259774

Selecting Fluid Packages (Thermodynamic Model) for HYSYS/ Aspen

Plus/ ChemCAD Process Simulators

Research · October 2015

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3461.4487

CITATIONS READS

0 20,773

1 author:

Ali Al-Matar
University of Jordan
29 PUBLICATIONS   133 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Energy from Biomass View project

Solubility of CO2 in some solvents for electrochemical conversion View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Ali Al-Matar on 27 October 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 10/27/2015

Selecting Appropriate Fluid Packages in

HYSYS

Ali Kh. Al-matar

(aalmatar@kfupm.edu.sa)
Chemical Engineering Department
King Fahd University of Petroleum and
Minerals
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
(aalmatar@ju.edu.jo)
Chemical Engineering Department
University of Jordan
Amman 11942, Jordan

Outline
• Importance of Selecting the Appropriate Prediction Method
• Principal Steps in Selecting the Appropriate Thermodynamics
Package
• Sources of Information
• Issues in Selection of the Appropriate Thermodynamics
Package
• Recommendations for the Selection of the Appropriate
Thermodynamics Package
– Eric Carlson’s Recommendations
– Professor Seader Recommendations
– Hyprotech Recommendations
• Example: water and 1-propanol

1
 10/27/2015

Importance of Selecting the Appropriate Prediction Method

 Correct predictions of the physical properties of the

mixture as a function of temperature and pressure.
 Each method is suitable only for particular types of
components and limited to certain operating
conditions.
 Choosing the wrong method may lead to incorrect
simulation results.
 Particularly important for reliable computations
associated with separation operations (distillation, LL
extraction, etc.).

Principal Steps in Selecting the Appropriate

Thermodynamics Package

1. Choosing the most suitable model/thermo method.

2. Comparing the obtained predictions with data from
the literature.
3. Adding estimates for components that not available
in the chosen thermo package. Can they be
neglected?
4. Generation of lab data if necessary to check the
thermo model.

2
 10/27/2015

Sources of Information
1. Publications and professional literature that deal with the process in question or
with the components that participate in the process.
a) Journal of Chemical reference Data (NIST)
b) Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data
c) Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics
d) Journal of Fluid phase Equilibria
2. Simulator reference manual (HELP).
3. DATABANKS
a) DIPPR
b) DECHEMA (Dortmund)
4. Rules of thumb
1. Look for Walas’s design book
2. Your textbook
3. Brennan’s rules of thumb (latest edition)
4. Turton’s Process Design textbook.

Issues in Selection of the Appropriate

Thermodynamics Package
Hydrocarbon (HC)

Polar Compounds
(PC)
Nature of mixture

Electrolyte
Pressure and
temperature range
Issues to consider Associating
Possibility of
Phase Splitting

Availability of data
(Binary Interaction
Parameters)

3
 10/27/2015

Recommendations for the Selection of the Appropriate

Thermodynamics Package

1. Eric Carlson, “Don’t gamble with physical properties for

simulations,” Chemical Engineering Progress, October
1996, 35-46.
2. Prof J.D. (Bob) Seader, University of Utah
3. Hyprotech Recommendations

Eric Carlson’s Recommendations

Figure 1: Global Perspective
Elect. NRTL
Electrolyte
Pitzer
Polar?

Nonelectrolyte Figure 2
Mixture

PR

Real? EOS SRK

Lee-Kesler-Plocker

All nonpolar Chao-Seader

Pressurized Grayson-Streed

Pseudo and real P? Braun K-10

Vacuum Braun K-10

4
 10/27/2015

Eric Carlson’s Recommendations

Figure 2: Case of Polar non-electrolytes
NRTL
Yes
UNIQUAC

Yes LL?
Wilson

No NRTL
< 10 bar (Figure 3) Ij?
UNIQUAC
Polar non-electrolytes

Yes UNIFAC LLE

No LL?
UNIFAC and
NO
P? Schwatentruber- extensions
Renon

Yes PR or SRK with Ws

PR or SRK with
> 10 bar Ij? MHV2

PSRK
No
PR or SRK with
MHV2

Eric Carlson’s Recommendations

Figure 3: Case of Vapor Phase Association

Wilson with special EOS for

hexamers

NRTL with special EOS for

hexamers
Hexamers
UNIQUAC with special EOS
for hexamers

UNIFAC with special EOS for

Wilson, NRTL, UNIQUAC and

hexamers
Yes Degree of Polymerization
Wilson with Hayden
O’Connell or Northnagel EOS
UNIFAC

Wilson with IG or RK
Vapor Phase Association
NRTL with Hayden O’Connell
or Northnagel EOS
NRTL with IG or RK Dimers
UNIQUAC with Hayden
No
O’Connell or Northnagel EOS
UNIQUAC with IG or RK
UNIFAC with Hayden
O’Connell or Northnagel EOS
UNIFAC (and extensions)
with IG or RK

5
 10/27/2015

Bob Seader’s Recommendations

Bob Seader’s Recommendations

Figure 4: Global Perspective

Organic Polar Yes PSRK

Yes Compounds
(PC) No Figure 5
Yes Light Gases (LG)
Hydrocarbon (HC)

Polar Yes Figure 6

No Compounds
(PC) No Figure 5

Yes Elect. NRTL

NO Electrolytes (E )
No Special

e.g., Sour Water (NH3, CO2,

H2S, H2O), Aqueous amine
solution with CO2 and H2S

6
 10/27/2015

Bob Seader’s Recommendations

Figure 5: HC and/or LG

Critical PR
Pressure
Cryogenic
range BWRS
Narrow to Temperature Noncritical
HC and/or LG

wide range PR PR
Boiling Point Noncryogenic
Range (BPR) SRK
Lee-Kesler-
Very wide
Plocker (LKP)

Bob Seader’s Recommendation

Figure 6: HC and Polar Compounds PC

NRTL
Yes
Possible Phase UNIQUAC
HC and PC

Available
Binary Interaction Splitting (PPS)
Parameters (BIP) No Wilson
Not available UNIFAC

7
 10/27/2015

Hyprotech Recommendations
Hyprotech is HYSYS’s original company

Example
• Find the best thermodynamic package
for 1-Propanol , H2O mixture.

Eric Carlson, “Don’t gamble with physical

properties for simulations,” Chem. Eng. Prog.
October 1996, 35-46

Prof J.D. (Bob) Seader,

University of Utah

8
 10/27/2015

Eric Carlson’s Recommendations

Figure 1: Global Perspective
Elect. NRTL
Electrolyte
Pitzer
Polar?

Nonelectrolyte Figure 2
Mixture

PR

Real? EOS SRK

Lee-Kesler-Plocker

All nonpolar Chao-Seader

Pressurized Grayson-Streed

Pseudo and real P? Braun K-10

Vacuum Braun K-10

Eric Carlson’s Recommendations

Figure 2: Case of Polar non-electrolytes
NRTL
Yes
UNIQUAC

Yes LL?
Wilson

No NRTL
< 10 bar (Figure 3) Ij?
UNIQUAC
Polar non-electrolytes

Yes UNIFAC LLE

No LL?
UNIFAC and
NO
P? Schwatentruber- extensions
Renon

Yes PR or SRK with Ws

PR or SRK with
> 10 bar Ij? MHV2

PSRK
No
PR or SRK with
MHV2

9
 10/27/2015

Bob Seader’s Recommendations

Figure 4: Global Perspective

Organic Polar Yes PSRK

Yes Compounds
(PC) No Figure 5
Yes Light Gases (LG)
Hydrocarbon (HC)

Polar Yes Figure 6

No Compounds
(PC) No Figure 5

Yes Elect. NRTL

NO Electrolytes (E )
No Special

e.g., Sour Water (NH3, CO2,

H2S, H2O), Aqueous amine
solution with CO2 and H2S

Bob Seader’s Recommendation

Figure 6: HC and Polar Compounds PC

NRTL
Yes
Possible Phase UNIQUAC
HC and PC

Available
Binary Interaction Splitting (PPS)
Parameters (BIP) No Wilson
Not available UNIFAC

10
 10/27/2015

100

98
PRSV NRTL
96
UNIQUAC Wilson
94
GCEOS Experimental
92
Temperature (°C)

90

88

86

84

82

80
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Al-Matar 21
x1, y1

Exercise
• Select an appropriate fluid package for the
following systems
– Benzene, toluene, and xylene at P = 8 bar.
– Water, NaCl.
– Hydrogen, methane, benzene and toluene.

22

11
 10/27/2015

23

View publication stats 12