Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Luis E. Garcia
Outline
Generalities
DESIGN OF
Structural wall systems
REINFORCED CONCRETE Behavior of wall systems
STRUCTURAL WALLS ACI 318-08 Requirements
by: Earthquake resistant design
Luis Enrique García
President American Concrete Institute – ACI – 2008-2009 Boundary elements
Partner Proyectos y Diseños Ltda., Consulting Engineers
Professor of Civil Engineering, Universidad de los Andes,
Bogotá, Colombia
Page1
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
In Spanish:
Muros
Muros de cortante
Muros cortina
Pantallas
Paredes estructurales
Tabiques estructurales
Page2
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Lateral load
direction
Page3
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
75
65
55
50
35
20
Page4
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Effective flange
General behavior of wall systems ⎧A 4
⎪
b ≤ min.of ⎨16 ⋅ h f + b w
b ⎪s + b
hf ⎩ w
Type of foundation hf b ⎧A 12 + b w
⎪
b ≤ min.of ⎨6 ⋅ h f + b w
⎪
⎩s 2 + b w
floor area bf
b ⎧4 ⋅ b w
b ≤ min.of ⎨
bw ⎩b f
bw
Moment frame vs. wall system Fixed base vs. flexible foundation
2m
3m
3m
Wall 3m
3m
3m
3m
Rocking
Stiffness
10 m 9m 9m
Page5
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
/ Vtotal
0.8
Infinitelly
rigid wall
0.7
wall
V
06
0.6
Flexible
fixed-base
wall 0.5
0 1 10 100 1 000 10 000 100 000
Wall ROCKING STIFFNESS / WALL STIFFNESS
Rocking
Stiffness Stiffness
1 0%
1.0%
FREE
FREE 1
0.8% 4 10
100
STORY
1000
0.6% 3 2000
5000
10000
50000
0.4% 2 100000
1000000
Top D
FIXED
0.2% 1
0.0% 0
0 1 10 100 1 000 10 000 100 000 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
ROCKING STIFFNESS / WALL STIFFNESS
Lateral Deflection (m)
Page6
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
5
FREE
1
Wall frame combination existing in all
Wall-frame
10
100
height of the building
4 1000
Wall-frame combination when one system
STORY
FIXED 2000
FREE
3
5000
10000 is suspended in height
50000
100000 Frame in one direction and wall in other
1000000
2
FIXED direction in plan
1 Combination of structural materials
0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% 0.20% 0.25%
STORY DRIFT (%h)
Reinforced concrete
Bearing wall system
Reinforced masonry
Gravity loads
VERTICALES Lateral forces
HORIZONTALES
Structural steel
= +
Wood
Structural materials
Page7
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Lateral forces
Gravity loads
=
+ Lateral force resistance:
75 % walls
25 % frame
Page8
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Inertial forces are transmitted to the vertical When vertical elements stiffness contribution to lateral
lateral force resisting element through the stiffness is not uniformly distributed in plan torsion of
the whole structure arises
diaphragm Story lateral forces are
Column shear force distributed by diaphragm to
llateral
t l lload
d resisting
i ti
from upper stories
elements in proportion to their
stiffness
= Fx = Fx
Fx
Mass
centroid
Page9
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Abrupt change
in stiffness
Page10
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page11
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page12
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Fachada Norte
Planta Piso Típico North facade
Typical floor plan
Page13
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page14
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
H
h
t
D
D
section area of walls acting in x direction
px =
floor area
Page15
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page16
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page17
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
06
0.6
Zona 4 - Lacustre B
0.5
Zona 5 - Terrazas y Conos
Sa
0.4
(g)
0.3
Zona 1 - Cerros
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
T (s)
Page18
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
4 buildings in Zona 2
5 office buildings the transition
2 educational buildings from Zone 1
to 2 Zona 3 Zona 1 - Cerros
in Zone 3
9 400 m2 in average 2 buildings in
Zone 4
Page19
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
erage)
25 0.8
= 1.55 (ave
20
Zona 1 0.6 Zona 1
# pisos/Ty
n drift
10
SEAOC
Mean
D
0.2
T=N/10
5
Mean = 14 Mean = 0.63%
0.0
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Deflexión Cubierta X (%hn)
# pisos/Tx
4.0 50
W)
Corrte Basal Resistente Y (%W
Área muros direcc. Y/Área del p
40
Zona 1 Zona 1
3.0
Trans 1-2 Trans 1-2
Zona 2 Zona 2
30
Zona 3 Zona 3
2.0 Zona 4 Mean = 21% Zona 4
20
Mean = 1.23%
1.0 10
Mean = 20%
0
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Corte Basal Resistente X (%W)
Área muros direcc. X/Área del piso
Page20
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
8
Capacity/Demand Effect of the wall section
7
Compression ρt = 0.01
ment
Tension
ρt = 0.0025
Mom
6
Tension
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Curvature
Vnx/(SaxW)
Flexure
Steel fails in tension Based on 143 low wall tests
Concrete spalls in the compression zone All loaded statically
Lateral buckling in the compression zone All failed in shear
Shear Distributed horizontal and vertical
Diagonal tension reinforcement ((no boundary y elements))
Sliding Vertical steel ratio between 0.0007 and 0.0290
Web buckling
Horizontal steel ratio between 0.007 and 0.0190
General buckling
Page21
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page22
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
y
v4 v3
a a
u3
θ1 θ2 u4
4 3 b
x
b
M1 M 1 M2 M2 u1 1 2
u2
v1 v2
(c) (b)
(c) (d)
Page23
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Chapter
p 10 – Flexure and axial load
Chapter 14 - Walls
Page24
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
⎡ ⎛ kA ⎞ 2 ⎤
φPnw = 0.55φf ′A g ⎢1 − ⎜ c ⎟ ⎥ (14-1) 14.5.3.1 — Thickness of bearing walls shall not be
⎢⎣ ⎝ 32h ⎠ ⎥⎦ less than 1/25 the supported height or length,
whichever is shorter, nor less than 100 mm.
where φ shall correspond to compression-controlled
ti
sections andd the
th factor
f t foe
f effective
ff ti length
l th k is:
i 14.5.3.2 — Thickness of exterior basement walls and
(a) k = 0.8 restrained against rotation at one or both ends, foundation walls shall not be less than 190 mm.
(b) k = 1.0 unrestrained against rotation at both ends.
For walls not braced against lateral translation k = 2.0
Page25
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
102
Page26
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
unless A B C D
Scope otherwise noted (none) (21.1.1.4) (21.1.1.5) (21.1.1.6)
This section must be met for seismic design The distributed web reinforcement ratios, ρt
categories D, E, and F within the denomination
set by NEHRP and adopted by ASCE 7. and ρA, for structural walls shall not be less
than 0.0025, except that if Vu does not exceed
For seismic design categories A, B and C it is 0.083A cv fc′ (MPa) 0 2 A cv fc′ (kgf/cm
(MP ) = 0.27A (k f/ 2),
)
considered that the requirements of Chapter 14 of ρt and ρA, may be reduced to the values
ACI are appropriate.
Given in14.3.
Page27
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
21.9 - Special structural walls and 21.9 - Special structural walls and
coupling beams coupling beams
Unless a more detailed analysis is
At least
l t two
t curtains
t i off reinforcement
i f t
performed, effective flange widths of
must be used in a wall if Vu exceeds flanged sections ( I, L, C or T) may be
supposed to extend from the face of the
0.17λ A cv fc′ (MPa) = 0.53λ A cv fc′ web a distance equal to the smaller of:
( )
V
Vn = Acv αc λ fc′ + ρt f y (21-7) ∑ ( A w ⋅ bw ) ≥ 0.25iu f ′ (MPa)
bw
c
αc Slenderness
hw hw
0 25
0.25 ≤4
Aw
0.17
⎛ hw ⎞ this slenderness ratio will Aw
⎜ ⎟ lead to a maximum story Vu
1.5 2.0 ⎝ Aw ⎠ drift Δ ≤ 1% hp
Page28
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
⎧150 mm
⎪
b w ≥ ⎨hn 20
⎪ A 25
⎩ w
Page29
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
A
θp and the additional deflection caused by nonlinear
rotation (orange zone) is:
Ap Plastification Ap
length Total lateral deflection is then:
φ a
0 0
Wall Mu My Mcr φu φy φcr (φu− φy) φy
section Moment Curvature φu
Page30
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
hw
Ap θp
φy (φu − φy)
The total deflection is: Mcr
0 φ
We can solve for the ultimate curvature φcr φy φn φu
demand and obtain:
At level of With a plastic hinge length equal to half the wall horizontal
εc = 0.003 length:
nominal
εs > εy φn
strength c
φy εc < 0.003
At level of εs = εy
yield in
cy
Then the curvature at the wall base when the displacement
tension of
h demand occurs is:
extreme
reinforcement
Aw
Page31
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page32
Wall design
Luis E. Garcia
Page33
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
The Example
Wall section 3 m by 0.30 m subjected to
acto ed Pu = 1750
factored 50 kN,, Mu = 2000
000 kN-m,, and
a d
DESIGN EXAMPLE OF Vu = 600 kN, which include gravity and
seismic forces.
STRUCTURAL WALL The wall has 10 stories with each floor having
BOUNDARY ELEMENTS a 3 m height from finish to finish for a 30 m
total.
by:
Expected lateral displacement under seismic
Luis Enrique García
President American Concrete Institute – ACI – 2008-2009
design forces at the roof is δu = 0.20 m.
Partner Proyectos y Diseños Ltda., Consulting Engineers Structure is being designed as a Special Wall
Professor of Civil Engineering, Universidad de los Andes,
Bogotá, Colombia
under ACI 318-08.
Page1
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
Then
Page2
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
Interaction diagram
Diagrama de– 18 φ -12.5
Interacción (1/2”)
Muro Tarea 5 - 2006 diameter bars Flexural design of wall
20000
For axial force of 1 750 kN, moment φMn = 3 130
Pn-Mn kN > 2 000 kN, which meet the design objective.
15000
φPn-φMn
Moment strength is Mn = 3 638 kN and neutral
10000 axis depth when reaching the moment strength
Axial (kN)
Page3
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
Pu = 1 750 kN
Therefore, the wall requires boundary
Mu = 2 000 kN·m
kN m
elements!
l t !
Ag = 3 000 x 300 = 900 000 mm2
Aw = 3 000 mm The former pre-ACI 318-99 procedure
Ig = (1/12) x bw x Aw3 = 675 x 109 mm4 required the boundary elements alone to
be able to resist all forces derived from
flexural response including factored
gravity loads and factored seismic forces
forces.
The factored axial force Pu includes
gravity loads and factored wall moment Mu
includes seismic forces.
Mu
Pu Mu
Pu Mu Pcu = +
Ptu = − ≤0 2 ( A w − hbe )
2 ( A w − hbe )
φ ⋅ P0 n = φ ⋅ [0.85 ⋅ fc′ ⋅ ( Ag − Ast ) + Ast ⋅ fy ]
Ptu ≤ φ ⋅ Ptn = φ ⋅ Ast ⋅ fy
Pcu ≤ φ ⋅ Pn (max) ≤ 0.80 ⋅ φ ⋅ P0 n
It is in compression!
Page4
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
Page5
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
The layout of the hoop follows the same φ 12 mm (1/2”) spaced 340 .mm vertically.
This reinforcement must be anchored in
rules that for column ties in Section 77.10.5
10 5 10 φ 16 mm (5/8
(5/8”)) the boundary element
element.
of ACI 318-08: all vertical bars must be at
the corner of a tie or crosstie, unless the Confinement
hoops φ 12 φ12 mm (1/2”) spaced 300 mm
clear distance to next bar which is at a tie or mm (1/2”) 340 mm horizontally
crosstie corner is less than 150 mm.
On the other hand, Section 21.6.4.2 requires
. vertically.
φ 12 mm (1/2”) spaced 340 mm
that the horizontal spacing of crossties or 300 mm
This reinforcement must be anchored in
legs of rectilinear hoops, hx, within a cross the boundary element.
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
Now in order to obtain the vertical spacing In order to apply this equation it must be
of the confining hoops we must use Eq. t k iinto
taken t accountt th
thatt Ash is
i the
th area off
(21-5). We solve it for the vertical spacing all hoop legs including crossties that are
because we know all the other variables. perpendicular to the direction under
study.
Page6
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
The concrete cover to the hoop is 40 mm First we check in the direction parallel to
(Section 77.7.1(c)
7 1(c) of ACI 318-08)
318 08). g Aw .
wall length
Using this value, the distance from the Variable values are as follows:
wall edge to the center of the outer hoop Ash = 3 x 129 = 387 mm2
bar is: 40 + 12.5/2 = 46 mm. fyt = 420 MPa
Therefore, in this case hc for both hc = 208 mm
directions is: 300 – 46 x 2 = 208 mm.
mm = 28 MP
MPa
Ab for φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) diameter bars is
129 mm2.
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
Now we apply the other rules for spacing of Now we need to check shear for the situation
p
hoops: g We have
where the wall is at flexural strength.
From Eq. (21-5) Æ 310 mm two alternatives, either to design for the shear
1/3 of the minimum section dimension 300/3 -> 100 mm force that corresponds to flexural strength or to
and 100 mm. use Section 9.3.4(a) where a reduced φ factor of
Therefore, for this direction the maximum hoops 0.6 is required when not designing for the shear
vertical spacing corresponds to the lesser of corresponding to flexural strength.
these values = 100 mm
The intent is to prevent a premature shear failure
For the other direction the variables have the when the wall is responding in the nonlinear
same values thus the vertical spacing is the range.
same.
Page7
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
b
boundary
d elements.
l t It mustt be
b computedt d for
f a
value of φ = 1.0. ACI 318-08 does not require the 4000.0
Momento (kN x m)
use of the strain-hardening stress for walls now
but used to require it in the pre-ACI 318-99 3000.0
versions.
The moment-curvature diagram for an axial load 2000.0
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
The value of the shear reached when The horizontal reinforcement steel ratio is
p
responding g in the nonlinear range
g at obtained by solving the equation for shear
moment strength is obtained proportional strength for variable ρt:
to the one from analysis as given in the
data for the example:
Page8
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
The steel ratio required for shear is:
From the construction point of view this to
spacing. Using φ 16 mm (5/8
close spacing (5/8”))
diameter bars the following vertical
spacing is obtained (this reinforcement
can be used in the zone critical for shear
and change to the other reinforcement in
Now we solve for the vertical spacing for 2 the upper floors):
φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) diameter bars :
(a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99 (a) Design using pre-ACI 318-99
φ 16 mm (5/8”) spaced 85 mm
. vertically.
This reinforcement must be anchored in
A horizontal reinforcement vertical 10 φ 16 mm (5/8”)
(5/8 ) the boundary element
element.
spacing of 85 mm will be used.
Confinement
hoops φ 12 φ12 mm (1/2”) spaced 300 mm
mm (1/2”) 340 mm horizontally
spaced at
This type of reinforcement must be used 100 mm
until the compressive
p stress at the wall vertically
φ 16 mm (5/8”) spaced 85 mm .vertically.
edge reaches a value of 300 mm
This reinforcement must be anchored in
the boundary element.
Page9
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(b) Using 21.9.6.2 of ACI 318-08 (b) Using 21.9.6.2 of ACI 318-08
According to this Section of ACI 318-08 zones in First we compute the quotient:
compression must be reinforced with special
b
boundary
d elements
l t when:
h
( 21-8)
Since it is less than 0.007, we take this last value
as the value for the quotient.
where c in Eq. (21-8) corresponds to the largest
neutral axis depth for the range of factored axial Dimension Aw = 3 000 mm and c was obtained
loads at moment strength consistent with the before as c = 396 mm.
design displacement. Quotient in Eq. (21-8)
must not be taken less than 0.007.
(b) Using 21.9.6.2 of ACI 318-08 (b) Using 21.9.6.2 of ACI 318-08
Applying Eq. (21-8) : The other condition required is that when no
boundary elements are needed, in Section
21
21.9.6.5
9 6 5 th
the steel
t l ratio
ti off vertical
ti l reinforcement
i f t att
the edge of wall is greater than confinement
reinforcement with a maximum spacing of 200
mm must be provided.
Page10
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(b) Using 21.9.6.2 of ACI 318-08 (b) Using 21.9.6.2 of ACI 318-08
The vertical distributed steel ratio at the edge is φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced at 340
. mm vertically.
0.0025, and this steel ratio is less than: This reinforcement must end in a standard
hook at the wall edge.
edge
(c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08 (c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08
The size of the boundary element section
Section 21.9.6.3 del ACI 318-08 prescribes is defined by geometric rather than
the need to use boundary elements in an strength
t th requirements.
i t
similar way than the old pre-ACI 318-99
The depth c of the neutral axis is needed
procedure.
here also. It was established before to be
396 mm.
The main difference is that under ACI 318- The horizontal extension of the boundary
08 there is no need to resist all flexural l
element t iis th
the llarger of:
f
effect with just the boundary elements and
the rest of the wall can contribute to
strength for flexure.
Page11
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08 (c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08
A dimension of 200 mm complies with
minimum 198 mm. There is no special φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced .
requirement for the vertical reinforcement
reinforcement, 6 φ 12.5 mm (1/2”)
340 mm vertically
so the same bars φ 12.5 mm (1/2”)
diameter may be used.
φ 12.5 mm
(1/2”) hoops φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced 300 mm
350 mm horizontally
The boundary element must comply with
the requirement
q for transverse
φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced .
reinforcement in special frame columns. 200 mm 340 mm vertically
(c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08 (c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08
Minimum hoop spacing in ACI 318-08:
Page12
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
(c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08 (c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08
Now we obtain the vertical spacing of
hoops in the boundary elements. First in
th di
the direction
ti off the
th hoop
h legs
l parallel
ll l to
t
wall length Aw
Now in the direction of the hoop legs
perpendicular to the wall length:
Ash = 3 x 129 = 387 mm2 Ash = 2 x 129 = 258 mm2
fyt = 420 MPa
fyt
y = 420 MPa
bc = 108 mm
bc = 208 mm
= 28 MPa
= 28 MPa
(c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08 (c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08
The smaller of the two is 310 mm. This spacing is controlled by the minimum
Now we check the limits of ACI 318-08: dimension of the boundary element (200
mm).) A llarger di
dimension
i may have
h been
b
1/3 of the smallest dimention of the
used, say 300 mm, and the spacing would
element = 200/3 = 66 mm
be larger and equivalent to the one
6db of longitudinal reinforcement = 6 x obtained for the pre-ACI 318-99 part of the
12.5 = 75 mm example (100 mm).
so according g to Eq.
q (21-2).
( ) This Eq.
q
increases over a minimum of 100 mm, it
The vertical reinforcement may have been
is not relevant in this case.
kept using φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) bars.
The smallest value is 66 mm.
Page13
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
M n = 4240 kN x m
4500
3000
Momento (kN x m)
The flexural strength of the wall is 2500
0
0 0.000002 0.000004 0.000006 0.000008 0.00001 0.000012
Curvatura (1/mm)
(c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08 (c) Using 21.9.6.3 of ACI 318-08
The shear at flexural strength is obtained
proportional to the one for the loads N° 4 a 340 mm verticalmente.
given:
i 6 N° 4
E refuerzo
Este f d b quedar
debe
del elemento de borde
d anclado
l d en ell núcleo
ú l
Estribos de
confinamiento N° 4 a 350 mm 300 mm
de barra N° 4 horizontalmente
espaciados a 50
This value is less than the shear strength mm
verticalmente
obtained
bt i d initially
i iti ll for
f the
th minimum
i i 200 mm
N° 4 a 340 mm verticalmente.
Este refuerzo debe quedar anclado en el núcleo
reinforcement (1 272 kN < 1 478 kN) del elemento de borde
therefore no change in reinforcement is
needed.
Page14
Wall boundary element design example
Luis E. Garcia
Confinement
hoops φ 12 φ12 mm (1/2”) spaced
340 mm horizontally
300 mm Pre-ACI 318-99
mm (1/2”)
spaced at
φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced. 100 mm
vertically
340 mm vertically φ 16 mm (5/8”) spaced 85 mm .vertically.
6 φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) 300 mm
This reinforcement must be anchored in
φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced at 340
. mm vertically.
This reinforcement must end in a standard
the boundary element. hook at the wall edge.
φ 12.5 mm
(1/2”) hoops φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced 300 mm ACI 318-08 - Displacement φ 12.5 mm (1/2”) spaced at
350 mm horizontally
300 mm
The End
Page15