MAPÚA UNIVERSITY

School of Civil, Environmental, and Geological Engineering

Intramuros, Manila, Philippines

DESIGN LAY-OUT OF A TWO-

STOREY WITH ROOF DECK
RESIDENTIAL HOUSE

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements in Structural Design 1: Reinforced

Concrete/ CE133P

Submitted By: Joaquin Lorenzo C. San Pedro

Submitted To: Engr. Jonas Christian Quero

Submitted On: October 19, 2018

Perspective View
Week 3

SUMMARY OF LAY-OUT REVISION

Specifications: Rev 0 Rev 1 Reason of Revision

1. Architectural
a. Lay-out • Wall height • Make the • The normal
dimensions per floor is height of the height of a
(e.g. column- about 3m. walls 4 floor in a
column • Bathroom meters. residential
distances, in the 2nd • Make the house is 3m
offsets) floor is bathroom in (12 ft) but it
positioned the 2nd floor would be
far away parallel or at better if the
from the least near height will be
T&B in the the the adjusted to
first floor location of 4m so that
the there is an
bathroom I allowance.
the 1st floor. • There is no
problem if the
bathrooms
from each
floor are far
from another.
The
advantage of
bathrooms
being parallel
is that the pipe
networks will
be easily
connected
from top to
bottom. It will
also reduce
the cost of the
project.
 b. Others (e.g. • Doors are • Position the • In feng shui,
feng shui) located door in having your
directly in which it will bed directed
front of the not face the to the door
bed. door. brings bad
• Firewall is • Align the luck.
not aligned firewall to • Aligning the
or shaped the roof. firewall to the
with the roof will
roof. lessen the cost
but still can
function well.
2. Structural
a. Member sizes & • Columns • Columns • Reducing the
reinforcements uses 300 x can be cross
300 cross replaced sectional area
sectional with 250 x will reduce
areas. 250 cross the cost of the
• Beams use sectional materials.
250 x 300 areas. Smaller area
cross • Beams can doesn’t mean
sectional also use 250 that the
area. x 250 cross structure will
sectional be unsafe.
area. Although it
has smaller
area it can still
perform since
it is just a
residential
house.
b. Member to • Utilized • Girders can • Removing the
member girders for be removed girders will be
connections the from the fine for a two-
structure building storey
residential
house.
c. Supports • Utilizing • Change the • It will be more
hinge supports to convenient to
supports or fixed use fixed
simply support. support since
supported it only
beams requires
welding.
Construction
of residential
houses
usually lack
construction
materials.
Using fixed
support or
welding will
be convenient
for the
workers .
Week 4

SUMMARY OF LAY-OUT REVISION

Specifications: Rev 0 Rev 1 Reason of Revision

3. Architectural
c. Lay-out dimensions Not detailed floor plan. Detailed To identify the sizes
(e.g. column- No dimensions and dimensions of the doors and
column distances, symbols for doors and of floor and windows.
offsets) windows windows
Bathroom in the 2nd The It would be ideal to
floor is positioned far bathroom of position the T&B of
away from the T&B in the 2nd floor each floor near each
the first floor must be close other to make the
to the installation of pipes
allocated area easier and cheaper.
of the first
floor for
T&B.
No back door and lack of Add back To make the house
windows in the dining door and more accessible.
and kitchen part windows
d. Others (e.g. feng Doors are located Changing the According to Feng
shui) directly in front of the position of Shui, sleeping
bed. the bed that facing the door
would not brings bad luck.
break the rule.
Firewall is not aligned or Firewall To make the
shaped with the roof. should be structure pleasing to
aligned to the the eye.
roof.
4. Structural
d. Member sizes & Columns uses 300 x 300 Structure can All of the revisions
reinforcements cross sectional areas. use 300 x 250 made are to reduce
cross the amount or cost
sectional of the structure to
column be created

Beams use 250 x 300 Structure can

cross sectional area. use 250 x 250
cross
sectional
beam
 e. Member to member Utilized girders for the Girders can All of the revisions
connections structure be removed made are to reduce
from the the amount or cost
building of the structure to
be created
f. Supports Hinge supports or simply Use fixed All of the revisions
supported beams were support for made are to reduce
used beams. the amount or cost
of the structure to
be created

Revision 2 Layout
Summary of Applied Loads

Tributary, Live, and Dead Loads

Seismic Loads
Summary of Most Critical Beam and Column

Column Max Mx Max Mz Max My Max Max Px Max Py

No. Axial

26 643.81 2.686 39.899

Beam
No.

34 359.68 0.11 19.35 19.35 0.11

Week 5

Lay-out Revision Matrix

Specifications: Rev 2 Rev 3 Reason of Revision

5. Architectural
e. Lay-out Dimension change to No changes
dimensions (e.g. 10 x 8
column-column
distances, offsets)
Remove firewall No changes

Add deck No changes

f. Others (e.g. feng

shui)

6. Structural
g. Member sizes & The designer used 350 No changes All of the revisions
reinforcements x 292 cross sectional made according to
column the rule of safety for
The designer used 292 The designer the occupants and
x 292 cross sectional used 350 x 350 for economical
beam cross sectional purposes as well.
beam

h. Member to The designer used 250 No changes

member x 250 cross sectional
connections girders

i. Supports Use fixed support for No changes

beams.
Beam Detailing Summary

Beam No. Location Max Mu Grouping Fs Beam Details

201 1-AB 25.48 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
202 1-BC 31.12 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
203 2-AB 54.37 G2 2.471 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
204 2-BC 55.54 G2 2.471 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
205 4-EF 18.45 G3 3.049 250 x 250
w/ 5-D16
206 3-FG 22.95 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
207 3-BC 41.67 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
251 A-12 37.01 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
252 B-12 58.16 G2 2.471 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
253 C-12 42.98 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
254 A-23 42.69 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
255 D-24 17.35 G3 3.049 250 x 250
w/ 5-D16
256 B-23 69.32 G2 2.471 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
257 C-23 62.05 G1 4.012 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
Structural of Beams Lay-out
Cross-section Details
Difficulties Encountered
Difficulties
1.) Lack of knowledge regarding
designing of beams
2.) No idea how to use STAAD
3.) Design did not comply with the
required factor of safety
Action
Researched on the internet on how to
design beams
Asked help from groupmates who
knows how to use STAAD
Increase the cross-section of the beams
Week 7

Lay-out Revision Matrix

Specifications: Rev 3 Rev 4 Reason of Revision

7. Architectural
g. Lay-out Dimension change to No changes
dimensions (e.g. 10 x 8
column-column
distances, offsets)
Remove firewall No changes

Add deck No changes

h. Others (e.g. feng

shui)

8. Structural
j. Member sizes & The designer used 350 No changes All of the revisions
reinforcements x 292 cross sectional made according to
column the rule of safety for
The designer used 350 No Changes the occupants and
x 350 cross sectional for economical
beam purposes as well.

k. Member to The designer used 250 No changes

member x 250 cross sectional
connections girders

l. Supports Use fixed support for No changes

beams.
Beam Detailing Summary

Beam No. Location Max Mu Grouping Fs Beam Details

201 1-AB 25.48 G1 2.44 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
202 1-BC 31.12 G1 1.99 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
203 2-AB 54.37 G2 1.28 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
204 2-BC 55.54 G2 1.25 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
205 4-EF 18.45 G3 1 250 x 250
w/ 5-D16
206 3-FG 22.95 G1 2.70 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
207 3-BC 41.67 G1 1.49 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
251 A-12 37.01 G1 1.68 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
252 B-12 58.16 G2 1.19 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
253 C-12 42.98 G1 1.44 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
254 A-23 42.69 G1 1.45 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
255 D-24 17.35 G3 1.06 250 x 250
w/ 5-D16
256 B-23 69.32 G2 1 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
257 C-23 62.05 G1 1 350 x 350 w/
10-D16

Beam No. Location Max Mu Grouping Fs Beam Details

208 1-AB 11.504 G1 5.40 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
209 1-BC 13.640 G1 4.55 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
210 2-AB 22.576 G2 3.07 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
211 2-BC 22.163 G2 3.13 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
212 4-EF 18.069 G3 1.02 250 x 250
w/ 5-D16
213 3-FG 22.859 G1 2.72 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
258 3-BC 11.504 G1 5.39 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
259 A-12 16.038 G1 4.32 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
260 B-12 11.001 G2 5.64 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
261 C-12 29.403 G1 0.628 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
262 A-23 10.086 G1 1.83 350 x 350 w/
10-D16
263 D-24 50.971 G3 1.01 250 x 250
w/ 5-D16
264 B-23 50.971 G2 1.6 350 x 350 w/
10-D16

Structural of Beams Lay-out

 Cross-section Details

Difficulties Encountered

Difficulties
4.) Lack of knowledge regarding
designing of beams
5.) No idea how to use STAAD
6.) Design did not comply with the
required factor of safety
Action
Researched on the internet on how to
design beams
Asked help from groupmates who
knows how to use STAAD
Analyzed and revised the project
Week 9

Slab Design
Final

Design of Column

Interaction Diagram
Design of Shear Reinforcement