Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Facts:
Issue:
Whether or not Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over the case, considering the
petitioner’s contention that the Tanodbayan has no power to conduct preliminary
investigations, file informations and prosecute criminal cases against judges and their
appurtenant judicial staff.
Ruling:
PD No. 1607 (Tanodbayan decree), provides that “the Tanodbayan functions not
only as an ombudsman, but as prosecutor as well.”
In this case, the Tanodbayan as ombudsman, his investigatory powers are limited
to complaints initiated against officers and personnel of administrative agencies, as
defined in Section 9(a) of the law. Insofar as administrative complaints are concerned,
the courts, judges and their appurtenant judicial staff are outside the Tanodbayan's
investigatory power. However, a Tanodbayan may also act as prosecutor in criminal
cases. As petitioner is charged here with criminal cases (violations of the Anti-Graft and
Corrupt Practices Act), which are within the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan as defined
under Section 4 of P.D. 1606, the said court validly acquired jurisdiction over the
informations in question.
Note: procedural due process requirements in judicial, criminal, and civil proceedings: