Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
| MARCH 2019
CASE 1
CASE 2
CONTACTS
CASE 1
2
CASE 2
The case examined by the Court concerned the The company contested the falsification of the
dismissal of an employee who carried out his reports, having ascertained that the visits indi-
job mainly outside the company. cated therein did not correspond to the real
ones. This verification was effectuated by inve-
He was under no obligation to certify his pre- stigators - appointed by the company to moni-
sence through clocking in and out, instead cer- tor the employee's movements during working
tified his professional service through reports hours. They ascertained that during work time
he compiled. he also carried out activities of a private nature.
3
CONTACTS
MILANO ROMA
TORINO TRENTO
PARMA BERGAMO
Online Contacts
Web: www.trifiro.info
Email: trifiro.partners@trifiro.it
LinkedIn: Trifirò & Partners Avvocati
Twitter: @TrifiroPartners