Green architecture, or green design, is an approach to building that minimizes

harmful effects on human health and the environment. The "green" architect or
designer attempts to safeguard air, water, and earth by choosing eco-
friendly building materials and construction practices.

Building a greener home is a choice — at least it is in most communities.

"Typically, buildings are designed to meet building code requirements,"
the American Institute of Architects (AIA) has reminded us, "whereas green
building design challenges designers to go beyond the codes to improve overall
building performance and minimize life-cycle environmental impact and cost."
Until local, state, and federal public officials are persuaded to legislate green
processes and standards — just like building and fire prevention practices have
been codified — much of what we call "green building practices" is up to the
individual property owner. When the property owner is the U.S. General Services
Administration, results can be as unexpected as the complex built in 2013 for the
U.S. Coast Guard.

Common Characteristics of a "Green" Building

The highest goal of green architecture is to be fully sustainable. Simply put,
people do "green" things in order to achieve sustainability. Some architecture,
like Glenn Murcutt's 1984 Magney House, has been an experiment in green
design for years. While most green buildings do not have all of the following
features, green architecture and design may include:

 Ventilation systems designed for efficient heating and cooling

 Energy-efficient lighting and appliances (e.g., ENERGY STAR® products)
 Water-saving plumbing fixtures
 Landscaping with native vegetation and planned to maximize passive solar
energy
 Minimal harm to the natural habitat
 Alternative renewable energy power sources such as solar power or wind
power
 Non-synthetic, non-toxic materials used inside and out
 Locally-obtained woods and stone, eliminating long-haul transportation
 Responsibly-harvested woods
 Adaptive reuse of older buildings
 Use of recycled architectural salvage
 Efficient use of space
 Optimal location on the land, maximizing sunlight, winds, and natural
sheltering
 Rainwater harvesting and greywater reuse
You don't need a green roof to be a green building, although Italian
architect Renzo Piano not only created a green roof, but also specified recycled
blue jeans as insulation in his design of the California Academy of Sciences in San
Francisco. You don't need a vertical garden or green wall to have a green
building, yet French architect Jean Nouvel has successfully experimented with
the concept in his design for One Central Park residential building in Sydney,
Australia.

Construction processes are a huge aspect of green building. Great Britain

transformed a brownfield into the site of the London 2012 summer Olympic
Games with a plan for how contractors would build the Olympic village
— dredging waterways, strict sourcing of building materials, recycling concrete,
and using rail and water to deliver materials were just some of their 12 green
Ideas. The processes were implemented by the host country and overseen by the
International Olympic Committee (IOC), the ultimate authority for requiring
Olympic-sized sustainable development.

LEED, the Green Verification

LEED is an acronym meaning Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.
Since 1993, the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has been promoting green
design. In 2000, they created a rating system that builders, developers, and
architects can adhere to and then apply for certification. "Projects pursuing LEED
certification earn points across several categories, including energy use and air
quality," explains USGBC. "Based on the number of points achieved, a project
then earns one of four LEED rating levels: Certified, Silver, Gold or Platinum."
The certification comes with a fee, but it can be adapted and applied to any
building, "from homes to corporate headquarters." LEED certification is a choice
and not a requirement by the government, although it may be a requirement in
any private contract.

Students who enter their projects in the Solar Decathlon are judged by a rating
system as well. Performance is part of being green.

Whole Building Design

The National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) argues that sustainability has
to be part of the whole design process, from the very start of the project. They
devote an entire website to WBDG — Whole Building Design
Guide at www.wbdg.org/. Design objectives are interrelated, where designing for
sustainability is just one aspect. "A truly successful project is one where project
goals are identified early on," they write, "and where the interdependencies of all
building systems are coordinated concurrently from the planning and
programming phase."

Green architectural design should not be an add-on. It should be the way of doing
the business of creating a built environment. NIBS suggests that the
interrelationships of these design objectives must be understood, evaluated, and
appropriately applied — accessibility; aesthetics; cost-effectiveness; functional
or operational ("the functional and physical requirements of a project"); historic
preservation; productivity (comfort and health of the occupants); security and
safety; and sustainability.

The Challenge
Climate change will not destroy the Earth. The planet will go on for millions of
years, long after human life has expired. Climate change, however, can destroy
the species of life on Earth that cannot adapt fast enough to new conditions.

The building trades have collectively recognized its role in contributing to the
greenhouse gases put into the atmosphere. For example, the manufacturing of
cement, the basic ingredient in concrete, is reportedly one of the largest global
contributors to carbon dioxide emissions. From poor designs to construction
materials, the industry is challenged to change its ways.

Architect Edward Mazria has taken the lead to transform the building industry
from a major polluter to an agent of change. He has suspended his own
architectural practice (mazria.com) to concentrate on the nonprofit organization
he established in 2002. The goal set for Architecture 2030 is simply this: "All
new buildings, developments, and major renovations shall
be carbon-neutral by 2030."

One architect who has taken the challenge is Richard Hawkes and Hawkes
Architecture in Kent, United Kingdom. Hawkes' experimental home, Crossway
Zero Carbon Home, is one of the first zero carbon houses built in the UK. The
house uses a timbrel vault design and generates it's own electricity through solar
energy.

Green design has many related names and concepts associated with it,
besides sustainable development. Some people emphasize the ecology and have
adopted names like eco-design, eco-friendly architecture, and even arcology. Eco-
tourism is a 21st century trend, even if eco house designs might appear to be a bit
non-traditional.

Others take their cue from the environmental movement, arguably begun
by Rachel Carson's 1962 book Silent Spring — earth-friendly architecture,
environmental architecture, natural architecture, and even organic
architecture have aspects of green architecture. Biomimicry is a term used by
architects who use nature as a guide to green design. For example, the Expo 2000
Venezuelan Pavilion has petal-like awnings that can be adjusted to control
internal environment — just as a flower may do. Mimetic architecture has long
been an imitator of its surroundings.

A building can look beautiful and even be constructed from very expensive
materials, but not be "green." Likewise, a building can be very "green" but
visually unappealing. How do we get good architecture? How do we move toward
what Roman architect Vitruvius suggested to be the three rules of architecture —
to be well-built, useful by serving a purpose, and beautiful to look at?

Sources
 How Can I Determine If a Building Is Green? by AIA at
http://www.aia.org/practicing/groups/kc/AIAS078386 [accessed April 1,
2015]
 About USGBC, http://www.usgbc.org/about, and About LEED,
http://www.usgbc.org/leed, Whole Building Design Guide [accessed April
18, 2016]
 Design Objectives, Whole Building Design Guide, http://www.wbdg.org/design-o
ectives [accessed December 3, 2017]
 How LEED Works, https://new.usgbc.org/leed#how-leed-works [accessed December
3, 2017]
 Cropped photo credits: Crossway Zero Carbon Home by James
Brittain/Getty Images; Expo 2000 Venezuelan Pavilion by Morley von
Sternberg/ArcaidImages/Getty Images; Eco House Exterior by Ray
Main/Mainstreamimages/Getty Images

Heating, ventilation and cooling system efficiency[edit]

Numerous passive architectural strategies have been developed over time. Examples of such
strategies include the arrangement of rooms or the sizing and orientation of windows in a
building,[3] and the orientation of facades and streets or the ratio between building heights and street
widths for urban planning.[4]
An important and cost-effective element of an efficient heating, ventilating, and air conditioning
(HVAC) system is a well-insulated building. A more efficient building requires less heat generating or
dissipating power, but may require more ventilation capacity to expel polluted indoor air.
Significant amounts of energy are flushed out of buildings in the water, air and compost streams. Off
the shelf, on-site energy recycling technologies can effectively recapture energy from waste hot
water and stale air and transfer that energy into incoming fresh cold water or fresh air. Recapture of
energy for uses other than gardening from compost leaving buildings requires centralized anaerobic
digesters.
HVAC systems are powered by motors. Copper, versus other metal conductors, helps to improve
the electrical energy efficiencies of motors, thereby enhancing the sustainability of electrical building
components.
Site and building orientation have some major effects on a building's HVAC efficiency.
Passive solar building design allows buildings to harness the energy of the sun efficiently without the
use of any active solar mechanisms such as photovoltaic cells or solar hot water panels.
Typically passive solar building designs incorporate materials with high thermal mass that retain heat
effectively and strong insulation that works to prevent heat escape. Low energy designs also
requires the use of solar shading, by means of awnings, blinds or shutters, to relieve the solar heat
gain in summer and to reduce the need for artificial cooling. In addition, low energy
buildings typically have a very low surface area to volume ratio to minimize heat loss. This means
that sprawling multi-winged building designs (often thought to look more "organic") are often avoided
in favor of more centralized structures. Traditional cold climate buildings such
as American colonial saltbox designs provide a good historical model for centralized heat efficiency
in a small-scale building.
Windows are placed to maximize the input of heat-creating light while minimizing the loss of heat
through glass, a poor insulator. In the northern hemisphere this usually involves installing a large
number of south-facing windows to collect direct sun and severely restricting the number of north-
facing windows. Certain window types, such as double or triple glazed insulated windows with gas
filled spaces and low emissivity (low-E) coatings, provide much better insulation than single-pane
glass windows. Preventing excess solar gain by means of solar shading devices in the summer
months is important to reduce cooling needs. Deciduous trees are often planted in front of windows
to block excessive sun in summer with their leaves but allow light through in winter when their leaves
fall off. Louvers or light shelves are installed to allow the sunlight in during the winter (when the sun
is lower in the sky) and keep it out in the summer (when the sun is high in the
sky). Coniferous or evergreen plants are often planted to the north of buildings to shield against cold
north winds.
In colder climates, heating systems are a primary focus for sustainable architecture because they
are typically one of the largest single energy drains in buildings.
In warmer climates where cooling is a primary concern, passive solar designs can also be very
effective. Masonry building materials with high thermal mass are very valuable for retaining the cool
temperatures of night throughout the day. In addition builders often opt for sprawling single story
structures in order to maximize surface area and heat loss.[citation needed] Buildings are often designed to
capture and channel existing winds, particularly the especially cool winds coming from
nearby bodies of water. Many of these valuable strategies are employed in some way by
the traditional architecture of warm regions, such as south-western mission buildings.
In climates with four seasons, an integrated energy system will increase in efficiency: when the
building is well insulated, when it is sited to work with the forces of nature, when heat is recaptured
(to be used immediately or stored), when the heat plant relying on fossil fuels or electricity is greater
than 100% efficient, and when renewable energy is used.

Renewable energy generation[edit]

BedZED (Beddington Zero Energy Development), the UK's largest and first carbon-neutral eco-community: the
distinctive roofscape with solar panels and passive ventilation chimneys

Solar panels[edit]
Main article: Solar PV
Active solar devices such as photovoltaic solar panels help to provide sustainable electricity for any
use. Electrical output of a solar panel is dependent on orientation, efficiency, latitude, and climate—
solar gain varies even at the same latitude. Typical efficiencies for commercially available PV panels
range from 4% to 28%. The low efficiency of certain photovoltaic panels can significantly affect the
payback period of their installation.[5] This low efficiency does not mean that solar panels are not a
viable energy alternative. In Germany for example, Solar Panels are commonly installed in
residential home construction.
Roofs are often angled toward the sun to allow photovoltaic panels to collect at maximum efficiency.
In the northern hemisphere, a true-south facing orientation maximizes yield for solar panels. If true-
south is not possible, solar panels can produce adequate energy if aligned within 30° of south.
However, at higher latitudes, winter energy yield will be significantly reduced for non-south
orientation.
To maximize efficiency in winter, the collector can be angled above horizontal Latitude +15°. To
maximize efficiency in summer, the angle should be Latitude -15°. However, for an annual maximum
production, the angle of the panel above horizontal should be equal to its latitude.[6]
Wind turbines[edit]
Main article: Wind power
The use of undersized wind turbines in energy production in sustainable structures requires the
consideration of many factors. In considering costs, small wind systems are generally more
expensive than larger wind turbines relative to the amount of energy they produce. For small wind
turbines, maintenance costs can be a deciding factor at sites with marginal wind-harnessing
capabilities. At low-wind sites, maintenance can consume much of a small wind turbine's
revenue.[7] Wind turbines begin operating when winds reach 8 mph, achieve energy production
capacity at speeds of 32-37 mph, and shut off to avoid damage at speeds exceeding 55 mph.[7] The
energy potential of a wind turbine is proportional to the square of the length of its blades and to the
cube of the speed at which its blades spin. Though wind turbines are available that can supplement
power for a single building, because of these factors, the efficiency of the wind turbine depends
much upon the wind conditions at the building site. For these reasons, for wind turbines to be at all
efficient, they must be installed at locations that are known to receive a constant amount of wind
(with average wind speeds of more than 15 mph), rather than locations that receive wind
sporadically.[8] A small wind turbine can be installed on a roof. Installation issues then include the
strength of the roof, vibration, and the turbulence caused by the roof ledge. Small-scale rooftop wind
turbines have been known to be able to generate power from 10% to up to 25% of the electricity
required of a regular domestic household dwelling.[9] Turbines for residential scale use are usually
between 7 feet (2 m) to 25 feet (8 m) in diameter and produce electricity at a rate of 900 watts to
10,000 watts at their tested wind speed.[10] Building integrated wind turbine performance can be
enhanced with the addition of an aerofoil wing on top of a roof mounted turbine.[11]
See also: Design feasibilIty of Wind turbine systems

Solar water heating[edit]

Main article: Solar thermal power
Solar water heaters, also called solar domestic hot water systems, can be a cost-effective way to
generate hot water for a home. They can be used in any climate, and the fuel they use—sunshine—
is free.[12]
There are two types of solar water systems- active and passive. An active solar collector system can
produce about 80 to 100 gallons of hot water per day. A passive system will have a lower capacity.[13]
There are also two types of circulation, direct circulation systems and indirect circulation systems.
Direct circulation systems loop the domestic water through the panels. They should not be used in
climates with temperatures below freezing. Indirect circulation loops glycol or some other fluid
through the solar panels and uses a heat exchanger to heat up the domestic water.
The two most common types of collector panels are Flat-Plate and Evacuated-tube. The two work
similarly except that evacuated tubes do not convectively lose heat, which greatly improves their
efficiency (5%-25% more efficient). With these higher efficiencies, Evacuated-tube solar collectors
can also produce higher-temperature space heating, and even higher temperatures for absorption
cooling systems.[14]
Electric-resistance water heaters that are common in homes today have an electrical demand
around 4500 kW·h/year. With the use of solar collectors, the energy use is cut in half. The up-front
cost of installing solar collectors is high, but with the annual energy savings, payback periods are
relatively short.[14]
Heat pumps[edit]
Air-source heat pumps (ASHP) can be thought of as reversible air conditioners. Like an air
conditioner, an ASHP can take heat from a relatively cool space (e.g. a house at 70 °F) and dump it
into a hot place (e.g. outside at 85 °F). However, unlike an air conditioner, the condenser and
evaporator of an ASHP can switch roles and absorb heat from the cool outside air and dump it into a
warm house.
Air-source heat pumps are inexpensive relative to other heat pump systems. However, the efficiency
of air-source heat pumps decline when the outdoor temperature is very cold or very hot; therefore,
they are only really applicable in temperate climates.[14]
For areas not located in temperate climates, ground-source (or geothermal) heat pumps provide an
efficient alternative. The difference between the two heat pumps is that the ground-source has one
of its heat exchangers placed underground—usually in a horizontal or vertical arrangement. Ground-
source takes advantage of the relatively constant, mild temperatures underground, which means
their efficiencies can be much greater than that of an air-source heat pump. The in-ground heat
exchanger generally needs a considerable amount of area. Designers have placed them in an open
area next to the building or underneath a parking lot.
Energy Star ground-source heat pumps can be 40% to 60% more efficient than their air-source
counterparts. They are also quieter and can also be applied to other functions like domestic hot
water heating.[14]
In terms of initial cost, the ground-source heat pump system costs about twice as much as a
standard air-source heat pump to be installed. However, the up-front costs can be more than offset
by the decrease in energy costs. The reduction in energy costs is especially apparent in areas with
typically hot summers and cold winters.[14]
Other types of heat pumps are water-source and air-earth. If the building is located near a body of
water, the pond or lake could be used as a heat source or sink. Air-earth heat pumps circulate the
building's air through underground ducts. With higher fan power requirements and inefficient heat
transfer, Air-earth heat pumps are generally not practical for major construction.

Sustainable building materials[edit]

See also: Green building
Some examples of sustainable building materials include recycled denim or blown-in fiber glass
insulation, sustainably harvested wood, Trass, Linoleum,[15] sheep wool, concrete (high and ultra high
performance[16] roman self-healing concrete[17]), panels made from paper flakes, baked earth,
rammed earth, clay, vermiculite, flax linnen, sisal, seegrass, expanded clay grains, coconut, wood
fiber plates, calcium sand stone, locally obtained stone and rock, and bamboo, which is one of the
strongest and fastest growing woody plants, and non-toxic low-VOC glues and paints. Vegetative
cover or shield over building envelopes also helps in the same. Paper which is fabricated or
manufactured out of forest wood is supposedly hundred percent recyclable .thus it regenerates and
saves almost all the forest wood that it takes during its manufacturing process.

Recycled materials[edit]

Recycling items for building

Sustainable architecture often incorporates the use of recycled or second hand materials, such
as reclaimed lumber and recycled copper. The reduction in use of new materials creates a
corresponding reduction in embodied energy (energy used in the production of materials). Often
sustainable architects attempt to retrofit old structures to serve new needs in order to avoid
unnecessary development. Architectural salvage and reclaimed materials are used when
appropriate. When older buildings are demolished, frequently any good wood is reclaimed, renewed,
and sold as flooring. Any good dimension stone is similarly reclaimed. Many other parts are reused
as well, such as doors, windows, mantels, and hardware, thus reducing the consumption of new
goods. When new materials are employed, green designers look for materials that are rapidly
replenished, such as bamboo, which can be harvested for commercial use after only 6 years of
growth, sorghum or wheat straw, both of which are waste material that can be pressed into panels,
or cork oak, in which only the outer bark is removed for use, thus preserving the tree. When
possible, building materials may be gleaned from the site itself; for example, if a new structure is
being constructed in a wooded area, wood from the trees which were cut to make room for the
building would be re-used as part of the building itself.

Lower volatile organic compounds[edit]

Low-impact building materials are used wherever feasible: for example, insulation may be made
from low VOC (volatile organic compound)-emitting materials such as recycled denim or cellulose
insulation, rather than the building insulation materials that may contain carcinogenic or toxic
materials such as formaldehyde. To discourage insect damage, these alternate insulation materials
may be treated with boric acid. Organic or milk-based paints may be used.[18] However, a common
fallacy is that "green" materials are always better for the health of occupants or the environment.
Many harmful substances (including formaldehyde, arsenic, and asbestos) are naturally occurring
and are not without their histories of use with the best of intentions. A study of emissions from
materials by the State of California has shown that there are some green materials that have
substantial emissions whereas some more "traditional" materials actually were lower emitters. Thus,
the subject of emissions must be carefully investigated before concluding that natural materials are
always the healthiest alternatives for occupants and for the Earth.[19]
Volatile organic compounds (VOC) can be found in any indoor environment coming from a variety of
different sources. VOCs have a high vapor pressure and low water solubility, and are suspected of
causing sick building syndrometype symptoms. This is because many VOCs have been known to
cause sensory irritation and central nervous system symptoms characteristic to sick building
syndrome, indoor concentrations of VOCs are higher than in the outdoor atmosphere, and when
there are many VOCs present, they can cause additive and multiplicative effects.
Green products are usually considered to contain fewer VOCs and be better for human and
environmental health. A case study conducted by the Department of Civil, Architectural, and
Environmental Engineering at the University of Miami that compared three green products and their
non-green counterparts found that even though both the green products and the non-green
counterparts both emitted levels of VOCs, the amount and intensity of the VOCs emitted from the
green products were much safer and comfortable for human exposure.[20]

Materials sustainability standards[edit]

Despite the importance of materials to overall building sustainability, quantifying and evaluating the
sustainability of building materials has proven difficult. There is little coherence in the measurement
and assessment of materials sustainability attributes, resulting in a landscape today that is littered
with hundreds of competing, inconsistent and often imprecise eco-
labels, standards and certifications. This discord has led both to confusion among consumers and
commercial purchasers and to the incorporation of inconsistent sustainability criteria in larger
building certification programs such as LEED. Various proposals have been made regarding
rationalization of the standardization landscape for sustainable building materials.[21]

Waste management[edit]
Waste takes the form of spent or useless materials generated from households and businesses,
construction and demolition processes, and manufacturing and agricultural industries. These
materials are loosely categorized as municipal solid waste, construction and demolition (C&D)
debris, and industrial or agricultural by-products.[22] Sustainable architecture focuses on the on-site
use of waste management, incorporating things such as grey water systems for use on garden beds,
and composting toilets to reduce sewage. These methods, when combined with on-site food waste
composting and off-site recycling, can reduce a house's waste to a small amount of packaging
waste.
Building placement[edit]
This section does not cite any sources. Please
help improve this section by adding citations to reliable
sources. Unsourced material may be challenged
and removed. (March 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this
template message)

One central and often ignored aspect of sustainable architecture is building placement. Although the
ideal environmental home or office structure is often envisioned as an isolated place, this kind of
placement is usually detrimental to the environment. First, such structures often serve as the
unknowing frontlines of suburban sprawl. Second, they usually increase the energy
consumption required for transportation and lead to unnecessary auto emissions. Ideally, most
building should avoid suburban sprawl in favor of the kind of light urban development articulated by
the New Urbanist movement. Careful mixed use zoning can make commercial, residential, and light
industrial areas more accessible for those traveling by foot, bicycle, or public transit, as proposed in
the Principles of Intelligent Urbanism. The study of Permaculture, in its holistic application, can also
greatly help in proper building placement that minimizes energy consumption and works with the
surroundings rather than against them, especially in rural and forested zones.

Sustainable building consulting[edit]

A sustainable building consultant may be engaged early in the design process, to forecast the
sustainability implications of building materials, orientation, glazing and other physical factors, so as
to identify a sustainable approach that meets the specific requirements of a project.
Norms and standards have been formalized by performance-based rating systems
e.g. LEED[23] and Energy Star for homes.[24] They define benchmarks to be met and
provide metrics and testing to meet those benchmarks. It is up to the parties involved in the project
to determine the best approach to meet those standards.

Changing pedagogues[edit]
Critics of the reductionism of modernism often noted the abandonment of the teaching of
architectural history as a causal factor. The fact that a number of the major players in the shift away
from modernism were trained at Princeton University's School of Architecture, where recourse to
history continued to be a part of design training in the 1940s and 1950s, was significant. The
increasing rise of interest in history had a profound impact on architectural education. History
courses became more typical and regularized. With the demand for professors knowledgeable in the
history of architecture, several PhD programs in schools of architecture arose in order to differentiate
themselves from art history PhD programs, where architectural historians had previously trained. In
the US, MIT and Cornell were the first, created in the mid-1970s, followed by Columbia, Berkeley,
and Princeton. Among the founders of new architectural history programs were Bruno Zevi at the
Institute for the History of Architecture in Venice, Stanford Anderson and Henry Millon at MIT,
Alexander Tzonis at the Architectural Association, Anthony Vidler at Princeton, Manfredo Tafuri at
the University of Venice, Kenneth Frampton at Columbia University, and Werner Oechslin and Kurt
Forster at ETH Zürich.[25]
The term “sustainability” in relation to architecture has so far been mostly considered through the
lens of building technology and its transformations. Going beyond the technical sphere of “green”
design, invention and expertise, some scholars are starting to position architecture within a much
broader cultural framework of the human interrelationship with nature. Adopting this framework
allows tracing a rich history of cultural debates about our relationship to nature and the environment,
from the point of view of different historical and geographical contexts.[26]
Sustainable urbanism and architecture[edit]
Concurrently, the recent movements of New Urbanism and New Classical Architecture promote a
sustainable approach towards construction, that appreciates and develops smart
growth, architectural tradition and classical design.[27][28] This in contrast to modernist and globally
uniform architecture, as well as leaning against solitary housing estates and suburban sprawl.[29] Both
trends started in the 1980s. The Driehaus Architecture Prize is an award that recognizes efforts in
New Urbanism and New Classical Architecture, and is endowed with a prize money twice as high as
that of the modernist Pritzker Prize.[30]

Building Information Modelling BIM[edit]

Building Information Modelling BIM is used to help enable sustainable design by allowing architects
and engineers to integrate and analyze building performance.[5]. BIM services, including conceptual
and topographic modelling, offer a new channel to green building with successive and immediate
availability of internally coherent, and trustworthy project information. BIM enables designers to
quantify the environmental impacts of systems and materials to support the decisions needed to
design sustainable buildings.

Criticism[edit]
There are conflicting ethical, engineering, and political orientations depending on the viewpoints.[31]
There is no doubt Green Technology has made its headway into the architectural community, the
implementation of given technologies have changed the ways we see and perceive modern day
architecture. While green architecture has been proven to show great improvements of ways of living
both environmentally and technologically the question remains, is all this sustainable? Many building
codes have been demeaned to international standards. "LEED" (Leadership in Energy &
Environmental Design) has been criticized for exercising flexible codes for building to follow.
Contractors do this to save as much money as they possibly can. For example, a building may have
solar paneling but if the infrastructure of the building's core doesn't support that over a long period of
time improvements would have to be made on a constant basis and the building itself would be
vulnerable to disasters or enhancements. With companies cutting paths to make shortcuts with
sustainable architecture when building their structures it fuels to the irony that the "sustainable"
architecture isn't sustainable at all. Sustainability comes in reference to longevity and effectiveness.
Ethics and Politics also play into sustainable architecture and its ability to grow in urban
environment. Conflicting viewpoints between engineering techniques and environmental impacts still
are popular issues that resonate in the architectural community. With every revolutionary technology
or innovation there comes criticisms of legitimacy and effectiveness when and how it is being
utilized. Many of the criticisms of sustainable architecture do not reflect every aspect of it but rather a
broader spectrum across the international community.