Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
My TeachHUB.com
Sign Up or Log in
Follow Us
Create an Account
Already have an account? Log In
Home
Lessons & Teaching Tools
Hot Tips & Topics
Graduate Programs
Professional Development
Community
Real Teacher Blogs
News Home
Top 12 Lists
Quick Guides
To Do Today Tips
Hot Topics
Interviews
If you use the VARK model of Student Learning, you know why I'm excited about it.
VARK teaching strategies started as a questionnaire to help students and teachers
understand their best approach to learning but has since become more of a guideline for
teaching and learning. The questionnaire is deliberately short (13 to 16 questions, depending
upon which version you take) in order to prevent student survey fatigue. The acronym VARK
refers to four learning modalities -- Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic teaching
strategies. Though often classroom lessons focus on the Visual, with a bit of preparation,
these teaching strategies can be taught using all four modalities, thus accommodating students
who learn best in a different way. Why go through this extra effort? VARK's creator, Neil
Fleming, explains it this way:
Students’ preferred learning modes have a significant influence on their behavior and
learning.
Information that is accessed through students’ use of their modality preferences shows
an increase in their levels of comprehension, motivation, and metacognition.
For me, that extra time and effort is a no-brainer. Let me back up a moment and explain how I
got to that point. I realized after a few years of teaching that something was wrong with the
methodology I had been taught. Lots of clever, smart kids weren't getting what I was putting out. I
taught in a way that addressed how the majority learned (because that covered most kids, didn't
it?), but that turned out to be more like a plurality. Or less. In fact, where that plurality of kids
might be the biggest group in the class, those that weren't learning in this prescriptive manner
was an even bigger group. To say it another way: What the Bell Curve considers the "typical
student" was always far outnumbered by those who weren't.
Interestingly enough, Dr. Fleming reports that Kinesthetics (the K in VARK) is the most
common learning style, though not the most common teaching style.
Differentiated instruction, also called "Personalized learning," addresses the truism that every
student learns differently. How they absorb, process, comprehend, and retain information often
doesn't match how their neighbor does. For example, when I teach coding, some students jump
in and learn by doing, not getting frustrated by how many times they must debug, retry, and redo.
Others start by reading instructions, watching videos, and observing the work of their neighbor.
Still others follow a hybrid of both. Learning better when information is presented a certain
way has nothing to do with intelligence.
Just as someone who can't see would fail if all instruction were visual, many of us absorb
knowledge better when presented in a certain way.
VARK is a learning style inventory. The acronym refers to the four most-common learning styles -
- Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetics found within educational theorist Neil
Fleming’s model of student learning.
Visual: Information presented as maps, spider diagrams, charts, graphs, flow charts,
labeled diagrams, and all the symbolic arrows, circles, hierarchies, and other devices that
people use to represent what could have been presented in words.
Auditory/Aural: A preference for information that is heard or spoken such as lectures,
group discussion, radio, email, mobile phones, speaking, web-chat, and talking things
through.
Reading/Writing: Information displayed as words, text-based input and output. This
includes all forms but especially manuals, reports, essays, and assignments.
Kinesthetic: A preference for gathering information through experience and practice,
simulated or real, either through concrete personal experiences, examples, practice or
simulation. It also includes demonstrations, simulations, videos, and movies, as well as
case studies, practice, and applications.
The VARK model acknowledges that students process information differently, referred to as
“Preferred learning modes." This has a significant impact on the student's ability to collect and
disseminate information and should be matched with appropriate learning strategies. When that
is done properly, students show increased ability to comprehend it, use it, and relate it to other
knowledge.
Like students, teachers also have preferred teaching modalities. VARK offers a teacher
questionnaire to help teachers understand how they teach. Because often teachers don't
understand how to teach using these different modalities, train faculty to not only recognize these
learning preferences among their students but to be open-minded about accepting them and be
capable of teaching in all.
A note of caution: VARK is intended to start a conversation about options in learning styles that
might help students themselves become better learners by thinking more about circumstances
that aid or stifle learning. Neil Fleming says: “[VARK] ... is a beginning of a dialogue, not a
measure of personality. It should be used strictly for learning, not for recreation or leisure. Some
also confuse preferences with ability or strengths. You can like something, but be good at it or
not good at it or any point between. VARK tells you about how you like to communicate. It tells
you nothing about the quality of that communication.”
When students realize that everyone learns in different ways, Dr. Fleming reports their common
reaction is: "At last I know I'm different not dumb."
Educational Applications
The idea of individual learning styles is so popular because it makes sense. We see it in action.
We notice it in ourselves. Learning-styles theory is endorsed by 93 percent of the public and
76 percent of educators.
Wait -- what? Twenty-four percent of educators don't think it exists? Here's how implementing the
results of the VARK questionnaire would look in an education ecosystem:
Teachers understand why students don't always understand their well-constructed lesson
plans.
Teachers begin to present materials in multiple ways, accepting that students learn in
different ways.
Teachers allow students to complete their work in ways that work for them, as long as
what they do satisfies lesson goals.
When teaching, Gardner recommends two steps: 1) Individualize teaching for
students, and 2) pluralize teaching to include as many of the intelligences as possible.
When teaching keyboarding, teachers play music so students can pace themselves with
the beat.
Instead of checklists, teachers use brainstorming and mindmaps to help students
organize their ideas.
Once modalities have been identified, there are a variety of approaches available for
implementing multisensory teaching. The most common and one often used to teach writing
is sand trays. Often these are integrated into a teaching strategy like:
In 1983, Howard Gardner published what would become a seminal discussion on what he called
a learner’s multiple intelligences and became one of the best-known of the discussions on
learning styles. Since then, it has grown to an approach to teaching based on the most common
multiple intelligences:
Whole-Brain Teaching
Whole-Brain Teaching (WBT) is a multisensory approach to teaching that includes vocal
directions mixed with hand gestures, inflections, full body movement, head motions, and chants.
It uses "Model and repeat" in a fast-paced class that at first blush, visitors would probably call
chaotic. Students call it fun. Parents call it effective. Click for more detail.
Orton-Gillingham
***
Now, after more than a decade of teaching in a manner that addresses student personal learning
styles, I can see that the time invested up front quickly paid off in student success. And once I
learned to structure lessons that meet students where they learn, it actually saved time in not
having to re-explain, provide after-school tutoring, and discuss with them and their parents why
they didn't do well when we all knew they were smart enough.
Have you had a similar experience? Or a different one? I'd love to hear from you.
More on VARK:
Jacqui Murray has been teaching K-8 technology for 20 years. She is the editor/author of more
than 100 ed-tech resources, including a K-8 technology curriculum, K-8 keyboard
curriculum, K-8 Digital Citizenship curriculum. She is an adjunct professor in ed-tech, CSG
Master Teacher, webmaster for four blogs, an Amazon Vine Voice reviewer, CAEP reviewer,
CSTA presentation reviewer, freelance journalist on ed-tech topics, and a weekly contributor
to TeachHUB. You can find her resources at Structured Learning. Read Jacqui’s tech thriller
series, To Hunt a Sub and Twenty-four Days.
prevnext
Read Other K12 Education News
Classroom Holiday Party Ideas
Subscribe to TeachHUB
Receive the latest in education news, free lesson plans and more via email.
Submit
Click Here to View the Newsletter Archives
Free Lesson Plans
Grade
Subject
Popular
Most Commented
Create an Account
To Join TeachHUB
or
Login to Your Account
Education News
Top 12 Lists
Quick Guides
To Do Today Tips
Hot Topics
Interviews
Graduate Programs
Masters in Your Area
Online Masters Programs
PhD & EdD Programs
Professional Development
Common Core Standards
Singapore Math
Differentiated Instruction
RTI
Classroom Management
Motivation
Co-Teaching
Guided Reading
Mission Statement
At TeachHUB it is our mission to improve the quality of education by making available the most current, complete and
affordable resources for all K-12 Educators.
Built by Teachers, for Teachers, we offer free lesson plans, the latest in education news, professional development and
real teacher blogs plus the tools and applications modern Educators need to maintain a level of excellence in their
classrooms.
JOURNAL ARTICLE