Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN SIGNATURE
(Rater/Ratee)
quiz notebooks (in all the subjects) are track records of learners least learned competencies are
Ratee/ Rater:
October 8, 2017 observed with TOS, test items, score and performance identified and intervention _________________
item analysis and level of mastery needed is applied
The use of ICT as shown during classroom IMs used did not fully capture the less participation among Ratee/ Rater:
October 10, 2016 observation has to be enhanced interest of students learners _________________
logbook of daily incidence in her classroom logbook served as evidence for could easily address the Ratee/ Rater:
September 1, 2019 is regularly done with a "refelction' every anecdotal records and journals of learner's needs _________________
week best practices
Department of Education
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit Effectivity Date
Reports to Principal/School Heads Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education
Experience
Eligibility
Trainings
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education
Experience
Eligibility
Trainings
Department of Education
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit Effectivity Date
Reports to Principal/School Heads Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGH
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER Outstanding
Very
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET (5)
Satisfactory
(3) (2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(4)
Timeliness
2. Used a range of Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
teaching different different different different acceptable
teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
strategies that
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that was shown
enhance learner promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
achievement in Quality writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
numeracy skills. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
May 2018
to April 7.5% Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No
2019 least 4 learner- least 3 learner- least 2 learner- learner-centered acceptable
centered lessons centered lessons centered lessons lesson as evidence
as shown in as shown in as shown in evidently shown was shown
Efficiency MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
supported by supported by supported by given MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other MOV given other MOV given other MOV given
Timeliness
3. Applied a range Used different Used different Used different Used different No
of teaching teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies to
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
thinkling, as well Quality
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
as other higher- shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills.
May 2018
to April 7.5%
2019 Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the was shown
Efficiency supported by supported by supported by given MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given MOV other given MOV other given MOV
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
classroom management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMEN strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
structure to
T AND engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
engage learners, in in in in
DIVERSITY OF individually or in Quality
activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
LEARNERS groups, in as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
meaningful MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
explanation, May 2018 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
discovery and to April 7.5%
hands-on 2019 Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
activities within a least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson acceptable
range of physical supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence
Efficiency MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any any of the was shown
learning 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable MOV
environments. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: ESTHER B. RICAFORTE Name of Rater: CORAZON M. VIOS
Position: Teacher I Position: Assistant School Principal II
District/School: PEDRO 'OLOY' N. ROA, SR., HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGH
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER Outstanding
Very
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET (5)
Satisfactory
(3) (2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(4)
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 1 of 4
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMEN strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of evidence
constructively by
T AND learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior was shown
applying positive that promote that promote that promote that promote
DIVERSITY OF and non-violent positive and positive and positive and positive and
LEARNERS discipline to non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
Quality
ensure learning- discipline as discipline as discipline as discipline as
focused shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
environments. submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
May 2018
to April 7.5%
2019
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No
least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the of the given acceptable
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as evidence
as observed in as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only was shown
Efficiency
at least 4 lessons lessons 1 lesson
lessons
Timeliness
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
implemented
PLANNING sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced was shown
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced learning process learning process learning process learning process
teaching and Quality as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
processes to rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
May 2018 least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
to April 7.5% developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence
2019 sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown
teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1
Efficiency shown in MOV 1 and supported and supported of the given
and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
by any 1 of the other given MOV other given MOV
other given MOV
3. 7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning
INDIVIDUAL
processes to PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT
meet curriculum
AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
requirements and
Name of Employee: ESTHER B. RICAFORTE
varied teaching Name of Rater: CORAZON M. VIOS
contexts.
Position: Teacher I May 2018 Position: Assistant School Principal II
District/School: PEDRO 'OLOY' N. ROA, 7.5% SCHOOL
to AprilSR., HIGH Date of Review: October 2018
2019
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGH
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER Outstanding
Very
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET (5)
Satisfactory
(3) (2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(4)
Timeliness
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 2 of 4
3. CURRICULUM 8. Participated in Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
AND LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence
discussions that
PLANNING meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to was shown
use teacher and discuss discuss discuss discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching Quality feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
practice. enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
May 2018
to April 7.5%
2019 Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 No
least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ acceptable
FGDs/meetings meetings as meetings as meeting as evidence
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
Efficiency shown in any 1 in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
of the given given MOV given MOV given MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Timeliness
May 2018
to April 7.5%
2019
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
4.Name of Employee: ESTHER
10. Designed,B. RICAFORTE Name of Rater: CORAZON M. VIOS
selected,
Position: Teacher
organizedI and Position: Assistant School Principal II
District/School: used diagnostic,
PEDRO 'OLOY' N. ROA, SR., HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
formative and
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with TO BE FILLED OUT
curriculum
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
requirements.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGH
May 2018 ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER Outstanding
Very
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory SCORE
to April 7.5%
KRA QET Satisfactory Poor (1) RESULTS Q E T AVE
2019 (5) (3) (2)
(4)
Timeliness
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 3 of 4
4. ASSESSMENT 11. Monitored and Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and acceptable
AND evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated evidence
progress and
REPORTING learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress was shown
achievement and and and and
using learner Quality achievement achievement achievement achievement
attainment data. using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
May 2018 MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
to April 7.5%
2019 Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV acceptable
Efficiency at least 4 of the of the of the evidence
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: ESTHER B. RICAFORTE Name of Rater: CORAZON M. VIOS
Position: Teacher I Position: Assistant School Principal II
District/School: PEDRO 'OLOY' N. ROA, SR., HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGH
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER Outstanding
Very
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET (5)
Satisfactory
(3) (2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(4)
Approving Authority:
JERSON B. HERRERO
School Principal
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
1 CONTENT 1. Applied knowledge of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No
content within and and/or inter-observer agreement form about of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its acceptable
. KNOWLEDGE integration within integration within integration within integration within evidence
across curricuoum knowledge of content within and across subject
AND and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject was shown
teaching areas. areas areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
PEDAGOGY Quality
MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
highlighting integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 No
content and its integration in other subject leassons using leassons using leassons using the given MOV acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence
areas
supported by any supported by any supported by any was shown
Efficiency
1of the other given 1of the other given 1of the other given
4. Performance tasks/test materials highlighting
MOV MOV MOV
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
3. Instructional materials highlighting learner- Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 No
centered strategies that promote literacy and/or learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered acceptable
lessons as shown in lessons as shown in lessons as shown in lesson as evidently evidence
numeracy skills
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown in any 1 of was shown
Efficiency supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 the given MOV
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
teaching given given given
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide
Timeliness
annotations)
3. Applied a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching strategies to and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable
that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence
develop critical and teaching strategies to develop critical and
and creative and creative and creative and creative was shown
creative thinkling, as creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
well as other higher- thinking skills other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
order thinking skills. Quality
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
highlighting learner-centered strategies that
develop critical and creative thinking, and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials highlighting different Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 lesson No
teaching strategies that develop critical and lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by acceptable
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any 1 of the given evidence
creative thinking, and/or other HOTS
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by MOV was shown
Efficiency any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
given MOV given MOV given MOV
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide
Timeliness
annotations)
2 LEARNING 4. Managed classroom 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
structure to engage and/or inter-observer agreement form about management management management management acceptable
. ENVIRONMENT strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
learners, individually managing classroom structure that engages
AND DIVERSITY engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in was shown
or in groups, in learners in various activities activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
OF LEARNERS meaningful Quality shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
explanation, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
discovery and hands- various classroom management strategies that
on activities within a engage learners in activities/tasks in different
range of physical physical learning environments
learning
environments. 3. Others (Please specify and provide Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No
annotations) lessons supported supported by MOV supported by MOV supported by any acceptable
by MOV 1 and any 1 and any 1 of the 1 and any 1 of the of the acceptable evidence
Efficiency
1 of the other other acceptable other acceptable MOV was shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
2 LEARNING 5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about management management management management acceptable
. ENVIRONMENT strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of evidence
constructively by teacher management of learner behavior using
AND DIVERSITY behavior that behavior that behavior that learner behavior was shown
applying positive and the following strategies: promote positive promote positive promote positive that promote
OF LEARNERS non-violent discipline
Quality and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent positive and non-
to ensure learning- 1. Providing motivation discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown violent discipline as
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted shown in MOV
environments. 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 submitted with a
rating of 4
3. Setting house rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learner's active participation Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies acceptable
5. Allowing learners to express their strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only evidence
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson was shown
ideas/opinions Efficiency
4 lessons lessons lessons
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
3 CURRICULUM 7. Planned, managed 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
and implemented and/or inter-observer agreement form about implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
. AND PLANNING developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
developmentally using developmentally sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced was shown
sequenced teaching and learning process and learning and learning and learning teaching and
and learning Quality process as shown process as shown process as shown learning process as
processes to meet 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1
curriculumrequireme highlighting developmetally sequenced rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
nts and varied instruction that meet curriculum goals and
teaching contents. varied teaching contexts
Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Timeliness
3 CURRICULUM 9. Selected, developed, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Developed and 6Developed and 6Developed and 6Developed and No
organized, and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about used varied used varied used varied used varied acceptable
. AND PLANNING teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence
appropriate teaching using appropriate teaching and learning
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources was shown
and learning resources, including ICT including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
resources, including Quality address learning address learning address learning address learning
ICT, to address Examples: Activity sheets/tasks sheets/work goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
learning goals. sheets, powerpoint presentations, video clips, MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a
module, SIMs-Strategic Intervention Matertials, of 7 of 8 of 5 rating of 4
Other
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with apprropriate Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No
instructional materials appended varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource evidence
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as was shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
3. Others (Please specify and provide
Efficiency MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
annotations) supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
4 ASSESMENT 10. Designed, selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, No
organized and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about organized and used organized and used organized and used selected, organized acceptable
. AND diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, and used evidence
diagnostic, formative using diagnostic, formative and summative
REPORTING formative and formative and formative and diagnostic, was shown
and summative assessment startegies summative summative summative formative and
assessment assessment assessment assessment summative
strategies consistent 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs strategies strategies strategies assessment
Quality
with curriculum highlighting appropriate use of formative consistent with consistent with consistent with strategies
requirements. assessment strategies curriculum curriculum curriculum consistent with
requirements as requirements as requirements as curriculum
3. Develop diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 requirements as
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1
accomplished questionaire/answer sheets with a rating of 4
4. Develop summative tests: (a) with TOS Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as acceptable
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in evidence
accomplished questionaire/answer sheets
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the was shown
Efficiency
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
5. Develop performance tasks: (a) with rubrics
MOV
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics
12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No
promptly and clearly the same 3 learners innthe same learning area showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear acceptable
clear communication of clear communication of evidence
the learner's needs, with parents' or guardians' signature and date
communication of the learner's needs, communication of the learner's was shown
progress and of receipt the learner's needs, progress and the learner's needs, needs, progress
achievement to key 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher
progress and achievement to key progress and and achievement
stakeholders, conferences in all quarters with proof of Quality achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key to key
including parents/ parents'/guardians' attendance stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, stakeholders,
guardians including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ including parents/
3. Report cards with parent's or guardian's guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown guardians as
signature in all quarters supported by minutes in the MOV submitted in the MOV shown in the MOV
of meeting submitted submitted submitted
6. Other documents showing learner needs, Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
progress and achievement submitted to other were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in acceptable
Timeliness across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter evidence
stakeholders
was shown
5 PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No
related performed various performed various performed various various related acceptable
. 2. Certificate of Training related related related works/activities evidence
works/activities that
works/activities that works/activities that works/activities that that contribute to was shown
contribute to the 3. Certificate of Speakership contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the the teaching-
teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning learning process as
4. Committee involvement Quality
process process as shown process as shown process as shown shown in the MOV
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities submitted submitted submitted
6. Book or Journal Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable acceptable
8. Coaching and mentoring learners in Efficiency acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV evidence
competitions was shown
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
. related
works/activities that
contribute to the
teaching-learning
process
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY
RATINGS
Competence, Dedication, Optimism//ponrshs@2018 JAY VON ERICK L. RICAFORTE, SST-I
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A. Functional Competencies
Feedback:
MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV TARGET
PER KRA RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV TARGET
PER KRA RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN SIGNATURE
(Rater/Ratee)
__________ / _________
__________ / _________
__________ / _________
__________ / _________
__________ / _________
Competence, Dedication, Optimism//ponrshs@2018 Teacher's Name: ___________________________________ PONRSHS '2018-2019
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation.
Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas
Note: For schools with only one observer (i.e., Principal), this form serve as the final rating sheet.
Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation.
Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
OBSERVER 2:
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
OBSERVER 2:
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
OBSERVER: DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:
OBSERVER: DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:
Competence, Dedication, Optimism//ponrshs@2018
ANNOTATION