ETHICS 1: Second LE Reviewer o Mixed Motives Altruism
Little for self-interest
EGOISM Self-interest is parallel with Selfishness – never mind other’s sentiments altruistic motives Self-interest – ought to do things that matters Two types: *Teleological – goal or end o Descriptive/Psychological Egoism Own good Utilitarianism Hypotheses/Explanation Teleological o Normative/Ethical Egoism Utility – satisfaction Ought to do actions that lead to own good Two aspects: Types of Ethical Egoism: o Consequentialist/Teleological Aspect The right or wrongness of an act Individual depends on the result of the Personal action Universal o Hedonic/Utility Principle 1. Individual Ethical Egoism An act is good if it leads to All other people ought to do something pleasure, wrong if it leads to that will benefit for my own good pain 2. Personal Ethical Egoism The only thing that is good in You do the action that will benefit for itself is the state your own good, never minding other’s Two types: 3. Universal Ethical Egoism Instrumental Good Everyone ought to do actions that will Intrinsic Good benefit themselves Proponents of Utilitarianism: o Reciprocal Egoism 1. Jeremy Bentham Enlightened egoism Quantitative Utilitarianism Actions done for own benefit by Hedonic or Felicific Calculus helping others (“hedons”) o Rational Egoism o Intensity Ayn Rand – “The Virtue of o Duration Selfishness” o Certainty Self-interest is used o Hearness interchangeably with selfishness o Fruitfulness o Purity o Extent 2. John Stuart Mill ALTRUISM Bentham’s student Ought to do actions which maximize good of Qualitative Utilitarianism others Two types of pleasure: Altruist – for others, automatically good o Lower order pleasures – Self-negation or deprivation bodily pleasures Types of Altruism based on motives: o Higher order pleasures – o Pure Altruism intellect, spirit, artistic, non- Purely for altruistic reason bodily pleasures Two Types: “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig High Altruism satisfied, it is better to be Socrates satisfied than a fool o Based on dissatisfied” beneficiary of actions Low Altruism Types of Utilitarianism: Two types: o Act Utilitarianism o Act Intuitionism An act determines if the result is You’ll know an act is good or bad good or not based on “What act will maximize the your intuitions good?” Joseph Butler Disadvantage: Different people, o Rule Intuitionism different acts of good Two types: o Rule Utilitarianism a. Absolutist “What rules, if followed, will b. Objectivist maximize the good?” *WD Ross (objectivist) – our intuition discovers the correct moral principles and applies them correctly *Reason-based Intuitionism Immanuel Kant – “categorical imperative” *The special quality of humans is the capacity to reason *Categorical vs. Hypothetical Imperative Categorical – perfect duties; Do A Hypothetical – if you want A, do B *Chi Nielsen – negative responsibility to utilitarianism Major Formulations of Categorical Imperative *Three kinds of Consequences: 1. Formula of Universality a. Act only according to that maxim at 1. Actual which you can 2. Expected *Maxim – rule of action depending on an 3. Intended individual (Maxim universalised = law) *Objections against Utilitarianism 2. Formula of Humanity a. Treat people as end in themselves and 1. No Rest not as means 2. Absurd Implications 3. Formula of Autonomy 3. Integrity a. “So act that your will can regard itself at 4. Justice the same time as making universal law 5. Publicity through its maxims” *William Frankena *Deontological – duty; rule-based act; we look at the Mixed Deontology (utilitarianism + deontology) rightness or wrongness of the act itself Two principles: Deontological Theories: o Principle of Justice o Principle of Beneficence 1. Divine Command Theory “if it is willed by God, it is correct” Morality originates from God, therefore VIRTUE ETHICS without God, there is no morality Moral rightness = willed by God Aretaic Ethics (“Arete” = excellence) 2. Intuitionism “What type of person should I be?” Intuition Focuses in the character of an individual An act is right based on your intuition Three types: o Pure Aretaic Ethics Virtues are seen as intrinsic good Virtues > Principles Moral principles are only derived from virtues o Standard Deonic View Virtue is instrumental, duty is intrinsic There is always a need for principles in order to guide virtues o Pluralistic/Complemetarily Ethics Both virtues and principles are equally important *Aristotle – virtues = golden mean = aretaic
CARE ETHICS *Carol Giligan – one of the first liberal feminists *Heinz dilemma
PARTICULARITY ETHICS/MORAL PARTICULARISM
Context can’t be disregarded We miscontrue the subject and arrive at the wrong decisions if context is disregarded