Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BY
ALLEN GEORGE (201603)
FEBIN JOSEPH THOMAS (201623)
STEVE MERICK GEORGE (201624)
ADITYA KALASKAR (201630)
ABSTRACT
Braking system represents one of the most fundamental safety critical components in
modern vehicles. Brake absorbs kinetic energy of the rotating parts (Wheels) and the energy
is dissipated in the form of heat energy to the surrounding atmosphere. It decelerates or
stops the vehicle. When brake is applied to the disc brake it is subjected to high stress, thus
it may suffer structural and wear issues. Hence for the better performance, structural, stress
and the thermal analysis is preferred to choose low stress material. Disc brake is the recent
trend in automobile vehicles which dissipates the heat faster than the conventional drum
brakes. but if hard braking is done, there is induction of thermal stresses in the brake disc
which leads to generation of excessive temperature .if this heat is not dissipated properly,
then distortion will be get produced in the disc which leads to thermal cracking of the disc
leading to disc failure. The brake disc has an inherent ability that there is no change of co-
efficient of friction on the disc so there is no problem of brake fading phenomenon. The
main advantage of disc brake is that only a small portion of the disc is in contact with the
friction material i.e. the calliper. Hence there is large surface area of the disc which can
dissipate the heat to the atmosphere. Specifically the heat dissipated to the atmosphere is
the forced convection mode. The aim of this research work is to choose best profile and
best material which can dissipate maximum amount of heat to the surrounding. The
objective of this paper is to model and analyse stress concentration, structural deformation
and thermal gradient of disc brake. Here the disc brake is designed by using Solidworks 16
and analysis is done by ANSYS workbench R 16.0.
Key words: Solidworks, ANSYS, Disc Brake, FEA (Finite Element Analysis), Thermal stress,
Temperature Gradient Distribution, Structural Error, Equivalent Stress, Total Heat Flux
INTRODUCTION
A brake is a device which uses frictional resistance to stop motion of machine or vehicle.
The brakes absorb kinetic energy and dissipate it as heat energy. Brake systems must
have following requirements:
Compressive force, when the brake is applied due to action of the force, exerted by
pressing the pad perpendicular onto the surface of the disc.
Due to braking action caused by rubbing on the brake pad against the surface of the disc.
It acts in opposite direction of the disc rotation.
The effect of the pressure distribution plays a vital role. Uniform pressure distribution
between pad and the rotor leads to uniform pad wear and even friction coefficient. On the
other hand, non-uniform pressure distribution may lead to uneven wear and it’s called disc
brake squeal. Frictional heat generated between two sliding bodies is responsible for
thermo-elastic deformation which ultimately alters the contact pressure distribution. In
order to predict the temperature distribution, many investigations had been carried out on
heat generation phenomenon between contact surfaces in brake. Due to the characteristic
pressure sliding speed, coefficient of viscosity this process is very complex. Finite element
analysis is used to solve it. From experimental setup it has been found out that coefficient of
viscosity generally decreases with increasing sliding speed and applied load but increases
with increasing disc temperature of 230 degree and then decreases with above disc
temperature. Furthermore specific wear rate was found to increase with increase in sliding
speed and disc temperature.
TITANIUM ALLOY
TABLE 29
Titanium Alloy > Constants
Density 4.62e-006 kg mm^-3
TABLE 31
Titanium Alloy > Compressive Yield Strength
Compressive Yield Strength MPa
930
TABLE 32
Titanium Alloy > Tensile Yield Strength
Tensile Yield Strength MPa
930
TABLE 33
Titanium Alloy > Tensile Ultimate Strength
Tensile Ultimate Strength MPa
1070
TABLE 34
Titanium Alloy > Isotropic Secant Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
Reference Temperature C
22
TABLE 35
Titanium Alloy > Isotropic Elasticity
Temperature C Young's Modulus MPa Poisson's Ratio Bulk Modulus MPa Shear Modulus MPa
Definition
C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC
Source
BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS\DM\SYS.agdb
Type DesignModeler
Bounding Box
Length X 300. mm
Length Y 300. mm
Length Z 5. mm
Properties
Mass 1.109 kg
Statistics
Bodies 1
Active Bodies 1
Nodes 64941
Elements 39226
Parameters Yes
Parameter Key DS
Attributes No
Named Selections No
Material Properties No
Advanced Geometry Options
Coordinate Systems No
Decompose Disjoint
Yes
Geometry
TABLE 3
Model (A4, B4) > Geometry > Parts
Object Name Solid
State Meshed
Graphics Properties
Visible Yes
Transparency 1
Definition
Suppressed No
Material
Bounding Box
Length X 300. mm
Length Y 300. mm
Length Z 5. mm
Properties
Mass 1.109 kg
Centroid X -1.6096e-006 mm
Centroid Y 2.6401e-004 mm
Centroid Z 2.5 mm
Statistics
Nodes 64941
Elements 39226
MESH
TABLE 5
Model (A4, B4) > Mesh
Object Name Mesh
State Solved
Display
Defaults
Relevance 0
Sizing
Smoothing Medium
Transition Fast
Inflation
Maximum Layers 5
Topology Checking No
Advanced
Defeaturing
Nodes 64941
Elements 39226
TABLE 6
Model (A4, B4) > Mesh > Mesh Controls
Object Name Refinement
Scope
Geometry 23 Faces
Definition
Suppressed No
Refinement 3
STEADY-STATE THERMAL
TABLE 7
Model (A4, B4) > Analysis
Object Name Steady-State Thermal (A5)
State Solved
Definition
Options
TABLE 8
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Initial Condition
Object Name Initial Temperature
Definition
TABLE 9
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings
Step Controls
Number Of Steps 1.
Define By Substeps
Number Of Substeps 5.
Solver Controls
Radiosity Controls
Nonlinear Controls
Output Controls
General Miscellaneous No
Save MAPDL db No
TABLE 10
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Loads
Object Name Temperature Convection Radiation
Scope
Definition
Suppressed No
Correlation To Ambient
FIGURE 2
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Convection
TABLE 11
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Convection
Steps Time [s] Convection Coefficient [W/mm²·°C] Temperature [°C]
0. 0.
1 30.
1. 6.e-005
FIGURE 3
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Radiation
STATIC STRUCTURAL
TABLE 18
Model (A4, B4) > Analysis
Object Name Static Structural (B5)
State Solved
Definition
Options
Step Controls
Number Of Steps 1.
Define By Substeps
Number Of Substeps 5.
Solver Controls
Restart Controls
Nonlinear Controls
Displacement
Program Controlled
Convergence
Stabilization Off
Output Controls
Stress Yes
Strain Yes
Nodal Forces No
Contact Miscellaneous No
General Miscellaneous No
C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Solver Files Directory
1\MECH\
Save MAPDL db No
Nonlinear Solution No
TABLE 20
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Loads
Object Name Fixed Support Pressure Pressure 2
Scope
Definition
Suppressed No
Define By Vector
Direction Defined
FIGURE 7
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Pressure
FIGURE 8
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Pressure 2
b) BRAKE DISC 2 (WITH HOLES)
GEOMETRY
TABLE 2
Model (C4, D4) > Geometry
Object Name Geometry
Definition
C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Source
2\DM\SYS-2.agdb
Type DesignModeler
Length X 300. mm
Length Y 300. mm
Length Z 5. mm
Properties
Mass 0.88221 kg
Statistics
Bodies 1
Active Bodies 1
Nodes 463189
Elements 282690
Parameters Yes
Parameter Key DS
Attributes No
Named Selections No
Material Properties No
Coordinate Systems No
TABLE 3
Model (C4, D4) > Geometry > Parts
Object Name Solid
State Meshed
Graphics Properties
Visible Yes
Transparency 1
Definition
Suppressed No
Material
Bounding Box
Length X 300. mm
Length Y 300. mm
Length Z 5. mm
Properties
Mass 0.88221 kg
Centroid X 3.35e-003 mm
Centroid Y -5.9924e-004 mm
Centroid Z 2.5 mm
Statistics
Nodes 463189
Elements 282690
MESH
TABLE 5
Model (C4, D4) > Mesh
Object Name Mesh
State Solved
Display
Defaults
Relevance 100
Sizing
Smoothing Medium
Transition Fast
Inflation
Maximum Layers 5
Topology Checking No
Advanced
Defeaturing
Statistics
Nodes 463189
Elements 282690
TABLE 6
Model (C4, D4) > Mesh > Mesh Controls
Object Name Refinement
Scope
Geometry 23 Faces
Definition
Suppressed No
Refinement 3
STEADY-STATE THERMAL
TABLE 7
Model (C4, D4) > Analysis
Object Name Steady-State Thermal (C5)
State Solved
Definition
Options
TABLE 8
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Initial Condition
Object Name Initial Temperature
Definition
TABLE 9
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings
Step Controls
Number Of Steps 1.
Define By Substeps
Number Of Substeps 5.
Solver Controls
Radiosity Controls
Nonlinear Controls
Output Controls
General Miscellaneous No
C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Solver Files Directory
2\MECH\
Save MAPDL db No
Scope
Definition
Suppressed No
Correlation To Ambient
FIGURE 1
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Temperature
FIGURE 2
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Convection
TABLE 11
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Convection
Steps Time [s] Convection Coefficient [W/mm²·°C] Temperature [°C]
0. 0.
1 30.
1. 6.e-005
FIGURE 3
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Radiation
STATIC STRUCTURAL
TABLE 18
Model (C4, D4) > Analysis
Object Name Static Structural (D5)
State Solved
Definition
Options
TABLE 19
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings
State Fully Defined
Step Controls
Number Of Steps 1.
Define By Substeps
Number Of Substeps 5.
Solver Controls
Restart Controls
Nonlinear Controls
Displacement
Program Controlled
Convergence
Stabilization Off
Output Controls
Stress Yes
Strain Yes
Nodal Forces No
Contact Miscellaneous No
General Miscellaneous No
C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Solver Files Directory
3\MECH\
Save MAPDL db No
Nonlinear Solution No
TABLE 20
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Loads
Object Name Fixed Support Pressure Pressure 2
Scope
Definition
Suppressed No
Define By Vector
Direction Defined
FIGURE 7
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Pressure
FIGURE 8
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Pressure 2
2) RESULT AND ANALYSIS
State Solved
Refinement Depth 2.
Information
Status Done
Post Processing
TABLE 13
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information
State Solved
Solution Information
FE Connection Visibility
Visible on Results No
TABLE 14
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Results
Object Name Temperature Total Heat Flux Thermal Error
State Solved
Scope
Definition
By Time
Identifier
Suppressed No
Results
Information
Time 1. s
Load Step 1
Substep 5
Iteration Number 10
FIGURE 4
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Temperature
TABLE 15
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Temperature
Time [s] Minimum [°C] Maximum [°C]
1. 38.47 451.04
FIGURE 5
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Total Heat Flux
TABLE 16
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Total Heat Flux
Time [s] Minimum [W/mm²] Maximum [W/mm²]
1. 2.3476e-005 0.34085
FIGURE 6
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Thermal Error
TABLE 17
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Thermal Error
Time [s] Minimum Maximum
1. 3.5471e-007 88012
State Solved
Refinement Depth 2.
Information
Status Done
Post Processing
TABLE 24
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information
State Solved
Solution Information
Newton-Raphson Residuals 0
FE Connection Visibility
Visible on Results No
TABLE 25
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Results
Object Name Total Deformation Equivalent Stress Structural Error
State Solved
Scope
Definition
By Time
Identifier
Suppressed No
Results
Information
Time 1. s
Load Step 1
Substep 5
Iteration Number 5
0.2 0.10427
0.4 0.20853
0.6 0. 0.3128
0.8 0.41706
1. 0.52133
FIGURE 10
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Equivalent Stress
TABLE 27
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Equivalent Stress
Time [s] Minimum [MPa] Maximum [MPa]
1. 0.72542 900.88
FIGURE 11
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Structural Error
TABLE 28
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Structural Error
Time [s] Minimum [mJ] Maximum [mJ]
1. 7.0826e-008 24.857
State Solved
Refinement Depth 2.
Information
Status Done
Post Processing
TABLE 13
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information
State Solved
Solution Information
FE Connection Visibility
Activate Visibility Yes
Visible on Results No
TABLE 14
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Results
Object Name Temperature Total Heat Flux Thermal Error
State Solved
Scope
Definition
Set Number 1.
Identifier
Suppressed No
Results
Time 0.2 s 1. s
Load Step 1
Substep 1 5
Iteration Number 2 8
FIGURE 4
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Temperature
TABLE 15
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Temperature
Time [s] Minimum [°C] Maximum [°C]
1. 38.277 450.
FIGURE 5
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Total Heat Flux
TABLE 16
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Total Heat Flux
Time [s] Minimum [W/mm²] Maximum [W/mm²]
1. 8.0813e-005 0.32751
FIGURE 6
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Thermal Error
TABLE 17
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Thermal Error
Time [s] Minimum Maximum
1. 1.7059e-009 10764
State Solved
Refinement Depth 2.
Information
Status Done
Post Processing
TABLE 24
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information
State Solved
Solution Information
Newton-Raphson Residuals 0
FE Connection Visibility
Visible on Results No
TABLE 25
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Results
Object Name Total Deformation Equivalent Stress Structural Error
State Solved
Scope
Definition
By Time
Identifier
Suppressed No
Results
Information
Time 1. s
Load Step 1
Substep 5
Iteration Number 5
0.2 9.4997e-002
0.4 0.18999
0.6 0. 0.28499
0.8 0.37999
1. 0.47498
FIGURE 10
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Equivalent Stress
TABLE 27
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Equivalent Stress
Time [s] Minimum [MPa] Maximum [MPa]
1. 0.50541 806.95
FIGURE 11
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Structural Error
TABLE 28
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Structural Error
Time [s] Minimum [mJ] Maximum [mJ]
1. 3.9973e-010 0.22354
CONCLUSION
On comparing a disc brake with holes and without holes, the
final temperatures after heat dissipation with an initial
condition of 450°C are found to be 38.277°C and 38.47°C
respectively and that for equivalent stresses are 806.95 MPa
and 900.88 MPa respectively which is below the ultimate
tensile limit (i.e. 930MPa). The following observations clearly
states that the design for disc brakes with holes are much
better than that without holes and that both of them won’t
fail in any of the above conditions.
REFERENCES
[1] V. Chengal Reddy, M. Gunasekhar Reddy, Dr. G. Harinath
Gowd, Modeling and Analysis of FSAE Car Disc Brake Using FEM,
ISSN 2250-2459, 3(9), September 2013.
[2] Praveena S, Lava Kumar M, Sreekanth Reddy S, Modeling and
Structural Analysis of Disc Brake, ISSN: 2319-8753, 3(10) October
2014.
[3] V. Chengal Reddy, M. Gunasekhar Reddy, Dr. G. Harinath
Gowd, Modeling and Analysis of FSAE Car Disc Brake Using FEM,
ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2013.