Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 58

FEA PROJECT REPORT

OPTIMISATION OF NUMBER OF HOLES IN THE


DISC BRAKE BASED ON THERMAL AND
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

BY
ALLEN GEORGE (201603)
FEBIN JOSEPH THOMAS (201623)
STEVE MERICK GEORGE (201624)
ADITYA KALASKAR (201630)
ABSTRACT
Braking system represents one of the most fundamental safety critical components in
modern vehicles. Brake absorbs kinetic energy of the rotating parts (Wheels) and the energy
is dissipated in the form of heat energy to the surrounding atmosphere. It decelerates or
stops the vehicle. When brake is applied to the disc brake it is subjected to high stress, thus
it may suffer structural and wear issues. Hence for the better performance, structural, stress
and the thermal analysis is preferred to choose low stress material. Disc brake is the recent
trend in automobile vehicles which dissipates the heat faster than the conventional drum
brakes. but if hard braking is done, there is induction of thermal stresses in the brake disc
which leads to generation of excessive temperature .if this heat is not dissipated properly,
then distortion will be get produced in the disc which leads to thermal cracking of the disc
leading to disc failure. The brake disc has an inherent ability that there is no change of co-
efficient of friction on the disc so there is no problem of brake fading phenomenon. The
main advantage of disc brake is that only a small portion of the disc is in contact with the
friction material i.e. the calliper. Hence there is large surface area of the disc which can
dissipate the heat to the atmosphere. Specifically the heat dissipated to the atmosphere is
the forced convection mode. The aim of this research work is to choose best profile and
best material which can dissipate maximum amount of heat to the surrounding. The
objective of this paper is to model and analyse stress concentration, structural deformation
and thermal gradient of disc brake. Here the disc brake is designed by using Solidworks 16
and analysis is done by ANSYS workbench R 16.0.
Key words: Solidworks, ANSYS, Disc Brake, FEA (Finite Element Analysis), Thermal stress,
Temperature Gradient Distribution, Structural Error, Equivalent Stress, Total Heat Flux

INTRODUCTION
A brake is a device which uses frictional resistance to stop motion of machine or vehicle.
The brakes absorb kinetic energy and dissipate it as heat energy. Brake systems must
have following requirements:

 Vehicle must stop within a minimum distance in emergency.

 Braking properties must not fade with constant prolonged application.

 It must have anti wear properties.


[1] Figure 1 Source: Google.com, Disc Brake Assembly
Disc brake is an important component of vehicle retardation system. It is the type of
brake that uses callipers to squeeze pairs of pads against a disc to create friction. That
friction slows the rotation of a shaft (vehicle axle) to hold it stationary or slow its
rotational speed. Disc brake is usually made of cast iron or ceramic composite such as
carbon, aluminium, and silica. Friction material known as brake pad is made to engage
on both side of disc either mechanically or pneumatically. This friction material causes
disc to slowdown or stop. The disc brake is sandwiched between two pads activated by
a cylinder backed in a calliper mounted on the stud shaft. At the point where the brake
lever is pressed, pressurised hydraulic pressed fluid is constrained in the chamber
pushing the contradicting cylinders and brake parts. When the pad is pressed against
the disc, the brake absorbs kinetic energy of the vehicle and it is transferred into heat
which is mainly absorbed by rotor and brake pad. This heat is dissipated into the
surrounding atmosphere. Due to the generation of frictional heat on the interface of
the disc and pad, there is rise in temperature. When this temperature exceeds the
critical value of the given material, it leads to catastrophic events such as brake fail,
premature wear, and failure of bearing, thermal crack or vaporisation of brake fluid.
Furthermore, due to heat generation at the disc pad interface, global deformation
occurs in disc and pad. Some common deformations are coning and buckling
Mainly three types of mechanical stress are subjected on disc brake.
 Traction force, caused by centrifugal effect and it occurs when wheel is rotating and no
brake force is applied to the disc.

 Compressive force, when the brake is applied due to action of the force, exerted by
pressing the pad perpendicular onto the surface of the disc.

 Due to braking action caused by rubbing on the brake pad against the surface of the disc.
It acts in opposite direction of the disc rotation.
The effect of the pressure distribution plays a vital role. Uniform pressure distribution
between pad and the rotor leads to uniform pad wear and even friction coefficient. On the
other hand, non-uniform pressure distribution may lead to uneven wear and it’s called disc
brake squeal. Frictional heat generated between two sliding bodies is responsible for
thermo-elastic deformation which ultimately alters the contact pressure distribution. In
order to predict the temperature distribution, many investigations had been carried out on
heat generation phenomenon between contact surfaces in brake. Due to the characteristic
pressure sliding speed, coefficient of viscosity this process is very complex. Finite element
analysis is used to solve it. From experimental setup it has been found out that coefficient of
viscosity generally decreases with increasing sliding speed and applied load but increases
with increasing disc temperature of 230 degree and then decreases with above disc
temperature. Furthermore specific wear rate was found to increase with increase in sliding
speed and disc temperature.

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)


It is a numerical technique for finding the approximate solutions to boundary value
problems for partial differential equations. It uses subdivision of a whole problem
domain into simpler part, called finite elements and solve the problem by minimizing
an associated error function. The subdivision of the whole domain has several
advantages:-
I. Accurate representation of the complex geometry.
II. Inclusion of dissimilar material property.
III. Easy representation of the solution.
IV. Capture of the local effects. It divides the domain into a group of sub domain; every
sub domain is represented by a set of element equations of the original domain.
1) INPUT PARAMETERS
MATERIAL DATA

 TITANIUM ALLOY
TABLE 29
Titanium Alloy > Constants
Density 4.62e-006 kg mm^-3

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 9.4e-006 C^-1

Specific Heat 5.22e+005 mJ kg^-1 C^-1

Thermal Conductivity 2.19e-002 W mm^-1 C^-1

Resistivity 1.7e-003 ohm mm

TABLE 31
Titanium Alloy > Compressive Yield Strength
Compressive Yield Strength MPa

930

TABLE 32
Titanium Alloy > Tensile Yield Strength
Tensile Yield Strength MPa

930

TABLE 33
Titanium Alloy > Tensile Ultimate Strength
Tensile Ultimate Strength MPa

1070

TABLE 34
Titanium Alloy > Isotropic Secant Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
Reference Temperature C

22

TABLE 35
Titanium Alloy > Isotropic Elasticity
Temperature C Young's Modulus MPa Poisson's Ratio Bulk Modulus MPa Shear Modulus MPa

96000 0.36 1.1429e+005 35294


TABLE 36
Titanium Alloy > Isotropic Relative Permeability
Relative Permeability

a) BRAKE DISC 1 (WITHOUT HOLES)


GEOMETRY
TABLE 2
Model (A4, B4) > Geometry
Object Name Geometry

State Fully Defined

Definition

C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC
Source
BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS\DM\SYS.agdb

Type DesignModeler

Length Unit Meters

Element Control Program Controlled

Display Style Body Color

Bounding Box

Length X 300. mm

Length Y 300. mm

Length Z 5. mm

Properties

Volume 2.4004e+005 mm³

Mass 1.109 kg

Scale Factor Value 1.

Statistics

Bodies 1

Active Bodies 1

Nodes 64941

Elements 39226

Mesh Metric None

Basic Geometry Options

Parameters Yes

Parameter Key DS

Attributes No

Named Selections No

Material Properties No
Advanced Geometry Options

Use Associativity Yes

Coordinate Systems No

Reader Mode Saves


No
Updated File

Use Instances Yes

Smart CAD Update No

Compare Parts On Update No

Attach File Via Temp File Yes

Temporary Directory C:\Users\R\AppData\Local\Temp

Analysis Type 3-D

Decompose Disjoint
Yes
Geometry

Enclosure and Symmetry


Yes
Processing

TABLE 3
Model (A4, B4) > Geometry > Parts
Object Name Solid

State Meshed

Graphics Properties

Visible Yes

Transparency 1

Definition

Suppressed No

Stiffness Behavior Flexible

Coordinate System Default Coordinate System

Reference Temperature By Environment

Material

Assignment Titanium Alloy

Nonlinear Effects Yes

Thermal Strain Effects Yes

Bounding Box

Length X 300. mm
Length Y 300. mm

Length Z 5. mm

Properties

Volume 2.4004e+005 mm³

Mass 1.109 kg

Centroid X -1.6096e-006 mm

Centroid Y 2.6401e-004 mm

Centroid Z 2.5 mm

Moment of Inertia Ip1 7619.6 kg·mm²

Moment of Inertia Ip2 7619.6 kg·mm²

Moment of Inertia Ip3 15235 kg·mm²

Statistics

Nodes 64941

Elements 39226

Mesh Metric None

MESH
TABLE 5
Model (A4, B4) > Mesh
Object Name Mesh

State Solved

Display

Display Style Body Color

Defaults

Physics Preference Mechanical

Relevance 0

Sizing

Use Advanced Size Function Off

Relevance Center Coarse

Element Size Default


Initial Size Seed Active Assembly

Smoothing Medium

Transition Fast

Span Angle Center Coarse

Minimum Edge Length 0.542410 mm

Inflation

Use Automatic Inflation None

Inflation Option Smooth Transition

Transition Ratio 0.272

Maximum Layers 5

Growth Rate 1.2

Inflation Algorithm Pre

View Advanced Options No

Patch Conforming Options

Triangle Surface Mesher Program Controlled

Patch Independent Options

Topology Checking No

Advanced

Number of CPUs for Parallel Part Meshing Program Controlled

Shape Checking Standard Mechanical

Element Midside Nodes Program Controlled

Straight Sided Elements No

Number of Retries Default (4)

Extra Retries For Assembly Yes

Rigid Body Behavior Dimensionally Reduced

Mesh Morphing Disabled

Defeaturing

Pinch Tolerance Please Define

Generate Pinch on Refresh No

Automatic Mesh Based Defeaturing On

Defeaturing Tolerance Default


Statistics

Nodes 64941

Elements 39226

Mesh Metric None

TABLE 6
Model (A4, B4) > Mesh > Mesh Controls
Object Name Refinement

State Fully Defined

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry 23 Faces

Definition

Suppressed No

Refinement 3

STEADY-STATE THERMAL
TABLE 7
Model (A4, B4) > Analysis
Object Name Steady-State Thermal (A5)

State Solved

Definition

Physics Type Thermal

Analysis Type Steady-State

Solver Target Mechanical APDL

Options

Generate Input Only No

TABLE 8
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Initial Condition
Object Name Initial Temperature

State Fully Defined

Definition

Initial Temperature Uniform Temperature


Initial Temperature Value 30. °C

TABLE 9
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings

State Fully Defined

Step Controls

Number Of Steps 1.

Current Step Number 1.

Step End Time 1. s

Auto Time Stepping Off

Define By Substeps

Number Of Substeps 5.

Solver Controls

Solver Type Program Controlled

Solver Pivot Checking Program Controlled

Radiosity Controls

Radiosity Solver Program Controlled

Flux Convergence 1.e-004

Maximum Iteration 1000.

Solver Tolerance 1.e-007 W/mm²

Over Relaxation 0.1

Hemicube Resolution 10.

Nonlinear Controls

Heat Convergence Program Controlled

Temperature Convergence Program Controlled

Line Search Program Controlled

Output Controls

Calculate Thermal Flux Yes

General Miscellaneous No

Store Results At All Time Points

Analysis Data Management


C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC
Solver Files Directory
BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS\MECH\

Future Analysis None

Scratch Solver Files


Directory

Save MAPDL db No

Delete Unneeded Files Yes

Nonlinear Solution Yes

Solver Units Active System

Solver Unit System nmm

TABLE 10
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Loads
Object Name Temperature Convection Radiation

State Fully Defined

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry 2 Faces 86 Faces 87 Faces

Definition

Type Temperature Convection Radiation

Magnitude 450. °C (ramped)

Suppressed No

Film Coefficient 6.e-005 W/mm²·°C (ramped)

Ambient Temperature 30. °C (ramped)

Convection Matrix Program Controlled

Correlation To Ambient

Emissivity 0.8 (step applied)


FIGURE 1
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Temperature

FIGURE 2
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Convection

TABLE 11
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Convection
Steps Time [s] Convection Coefficient [W/mm²·°C] Temperature [°C]

0. 0.
1 30.
1. 6.e-005

FIGURE 3
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Radiation

STATIC STRUCTURAL
TABLE 18
Model (A4, B4) > Analysis
Object Name Static Structural (B5)

State Solved

Definition

Physics Type Structural

Analysis Type Static Structural

Solver Target Mechanical APDL

Options

Environment Temperature 22. °C

Generate Input Only No


TABLE 19
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings

State Fully Defined

Step Controls

Number Of Steps 1.

Current Step Number 1.

Step End Time 1. s

Auto Time Stepping Off

Define By Substeps

Number Of Substeps 5.

Solver Controls

Solver Type Program Controlled

Weak Springs Program Controlled

Solver Pivot Checking Program Controlled

Large Deflection Off

Inertia Relief Off

Restart Controls

Generate Restart Points Program Controlled

Retain Files After Full


No
Solve

Nonlinear Controls

Newton-Raphson Option Program Controlled

Force Convergence Program Controlled

Moment Convergence Program Controlled

Displacement
Program Controlled
Convergence

Rotation Convergence Program Controlled

Line Search Program Controlled

Stabilization Off

Output Controls

Stress Yes

Strain Yes
Nodal Forces No

Contact Miscellaneous No

General Miscellaneous No

Store Results At All Time Points

Analysis Data Management

C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Solver Files Directory
1\MECH\

Future Analysis None

Scratch Solver Files


Directory

Save MAPDL db No

Delete Unneeded Files Yes

Nonlinear Solution No

Solver Units Active System

Solver Unit System nmm

TABLE 20
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Loads
Object Name Fixed Support Pressure Pressure 2

State Fully Defined

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry 12 Faces 1 Face

Definition

Type Fixed Support Pressure

Suppressed No

Define By Vector

Magnitude 1. MPa (ramped)

Direction Defined
FIGURE 7
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Pressure

FIGURE 8
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Pressure 2
b) BRAKE DISC 2 (WITH HOLES)

GEOMETRY
TABLE 2
Model (C4, D4) > Geometry
Object Name Geometry

State Fully Defined

Definition

C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Source
2\DM\SYS-2.agdb

Type DesignModeler

Length Unit Meters

Element Control Program Controlled

Display Style Body Color


Bounding Box

Length X 300. mm

Length Y 300. mm

Length Z 5. mm

Properties

Volume 1.9095e+005 mm³

Mass 0.88221 kg

Scale Factor Value 1.

Statistics

Bodies 1

Active Bodies 1

Nodes 463189

Elements 282690

Mesh Metric None

Basic Geometry Options

Parameters Yes

Parameter Key DS

Attributes No

Named Selections No

Material Properties No

Advanced Geometry Options

Use Associativity Yes

Coordinate Systems No

Reader Mode Saves


No
Updated File

Use Instances Yes

Smart CAD Update No

Compare Parts On Update No

Attach File Via Temp File Yes

Temporary Directory C:\Users\R\AppData\Local\Temp

Analysis Type 3-D


Decompose Disjoint
Yes
Geometry

Enclosure and Symmetry


Yes
Processing

TABLE 3
Model (C4, D4) > Geometry > Parts
Object Name Solid

State Meshed

Graphics Properties

Visible Yes

Transparency 1

Definition

Suppressed No

Stiffness Behavior Flexible

Coordinate System Default Coordinate System

Reference Temperature By Environment

Material

Assignment Titanium Alloy

Nonlinear Effects Yes

Thermal Strain Effects Yes

Bounding Box

Length X 300. mm

Length Y 300. mm

Length Z 5. mm

Properties

Volume 1.9095e+005 mm³

Mass 0.88221 kg

Centroid X 3.35e-003 mm

Centroid Y -5.9924e-004 mm

Centroid Z 2.5 mm

Moment of Inertia Ip1 5579.8 kg·mm²

Moment of Inertia Ip2 5579.5 kg·mm²


Moment of Inertia Ip3 11156 kg·mm²

Statistics

Nodes 463189

Elements 282690

Mesh Metric None

MESH
TABLE 5
Model (C4, D4) > Mesh
Object Name Mesh

State Solved

Display

Display Style Body Color

Defaults

Physics Preference Mechanical

Relevance 100

Sizing

Use Advanced Size Function Off

Relevance Center Fine

Element Size Default

Initial Size Seed Active Assembly

Smoothing Medium

Transition Fast

Span Angle Center Fine

Minimum Edge Length 3.99420 mm

Inflation

Use Automatic Inflation None

Inflation Option Smooth Transition

Transition Ratio 0.272

Maximum Layers 5

Growth Rate 1.2

Inflation Algorithm Pre


View Advanced Options No

Patch Conforming Options

Triangle Surface Mesher Program Controlled

Patch Independent Options

Topology Checking No

Advanced

Number of CPUs for Parallel Part Meshing Program Controlled

Shape Checking Standard Mechanical

Element Midside Nodes Program Controlled

Straight Sided Elements No

Number of Retries Default (4)

Extra Retries For Assembly Yes

Rigid Body Behavior Dimensionally Reduced

Mesh Morphing Disabled

Defeaturing

Pinch Tolerance Please Define

Generate Pinch on Refresh No

Automatic Mesh Based Defeaturing On

Defeaturing Tolerance Default

Statistics

Nodes 463189

Elements 282690

Mesh Metric None

TABLE 6
Model (C4, D4) > Mesh > Mesh Controls
Object Name Refinement

State Fully Defined

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry 23 Faces
Definition

Suppressed No

Refinement 3

STEADY-STATE THERMAL
TABLE 7
Model (C4, D4) > Analysis
Object Name Steady-State Thermal (C5)

State Solved

Definition

Physics Type Thermal

Analysis Type Steady-State

Solver Target Mechanical APDL

Options

Generate Input Only No

TABLE 8
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Initial Condition
Object Name Initial Temperature

State Fully Defined

Definition

Initial Temperature Uniform Temperature

Initial Temperature Value 30. °C

TABLE 9
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings

State Fully Defined

Step Controls

Number Of Steps 1.

Current Step Number 1.

Step End Time 1. s

Auto Time Stepping Off

Define By Substeps
Number Of Substeps 5.

Solver Controls

Solver Type Program Controlled

Solver Pivot Checking Program Controlled

Radiosity Controls

Radiosity Solver Program Controlled

Flux Convergence 1.e-004

Maximum Iteration 1000.

Solver Tolerance 1.e-007 W/mm²

Over Relaxation 0.1

Hemicube Resolution 10.

Nonlinear Controls

Heat Convergence Program Controlled

Temperature Convergence Program Controlled

Line Search Program Controlled

Output Controls

Calculate Thermal Flux Yes

General Miscellaneous No

Store Results At All Time Points

Analysis Data Management

C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Solver Files Directory
2\MECH\

Future Analysis None

Scratch Solver Files


Directory

Save MAPDL db No

Delete Unneeded Files Yes

Nonlinear Solution Yes

Solver Units Active System

Solver Unit System nmm


TABLE 10
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Loads
Object Name Temperature Convection Radiation

State Fully Defined

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry 2 Faces 247 Faces

Definition

Type Temperature Convection Radiation

Magnitude 450. °C (ramped)

Suppressed No

Film Coefficient 6.e-005 W/mm²·°C (ramped)

Ambient Temperature 30. °C (ramped)

Convection Matrix Program Controlled

Correlation To Ambient

Emissivity 0.8 (step applied)

FIGURE 1
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Temperature
FIGURE 2
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Convection

TABLE 11
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Convection
Steps Time [s] Convection Coefficient [W/mm²·°C] Temperature [°C]

0. 0.
1 30.
1. 6.e-005
FIGURE 3
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Radiation

STATIC STRUCTURAL
TABLE 18
Model (C4, D4) > Analysis
Object Name Static Structural (D5)

State Solved

Definition

Physics Type Structural

Analysis Type Static Structural

Solver Target Mechanical APDL

Options

Environment Temperature 22. °C

Generate Input Only No

TABLE 19
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Analysis Settings
Object Name Analysis Settings
State Fully Defined

Step Controls

Number Of Steps 1.

Current Step Number 1.

Step End Time 1. s

Auto Time Stepping Off

Define By Substeps

Number Of Substeps 5.

Solver Controls

Solver Type Program Controlled

Weak Springs Program Controlled

Solver Pivot Checking Program Controlled

Large Deflection Off

Inertia Relief Off

Restart Controls

Generate Restart Points Program Controlled

Retain Files After Full


No
Solve

Nonlinear Controls

Newton-Raphson Option Program Controlled

Force Convergence Program Controlled

Moment Convergence Program Controlled

Displacement
Program Controlled
Convergence

Rotation Convergence Program Controlled

Line Search Program Controlled

Stabilization Off

Output Controls

Stress Yes

Strain Yes

Nodal Forces No

Contact Miscellaneous No
General Miscellaneous No

Store Results At All Time Points

Analysis Data Management

C:\Users\R\Desktop\DESIGN\PROJECT\DISC BRAKE_files\dp0\SYS-
Solver Files Directory
3\MECH\

Future Analysis None

Scratch Solver Files


Directory

Save MAPDL db No

Delete Unneeded Files Yes

Nonlinear Solution No

Solver Units Active System

Solver Unit System nmm

TABLE 20
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Loads
Object Name Fixed Support Pressure Pressure 2

State Fully Defined

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry 12 Faces 1 Face

Definition

Type Fixed Support Pressure

Suppressed No

Define By Vector

Magnitude 1. MPa (ramped)

Direction Defined
FIGURE 7
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Pressure

FIGURE 8
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Pressure 2
2) RESULT AND ANALYSIS

a) BRAKE DISC 1 (WITHOUT HOLES)

STEADY-STATE THERMAL SOLUTION


TABLE 12
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution
Object Name Solution (A6)

State Solved

Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Max Refinement Loops 1.

Refinement Depth 2.

Information

Status Done

Post Processing

Calculate Beam Section Results No

TABLE 13
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information

State Solved

Solution Information

Solution Output Solver Output

Update Interval 2.5 s

Display Points All

FE Connection Visibility

Activate Visibility Yes

Display All FE Connectors

Draw Connections Attached To All Nodes

Line Color Connection Type

Visible on Results No

Line Thickness Single


Display Type Lines

TABLE 14
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Results
Object Name Temperature Total Heat Flux Thermal Error

State Solved

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry All Bodies

Definition

Type Temperature Total Heat Flux Thermal Error

By Time

Display Time Last

Calculate Time History Yes

Identifier

Suppressed No

Results

Minimum 38.47 °C 2.3476e-005 W/mm² 3.5471e-007

Maximum 451.04 °C 0.34085 W/mm² 88012

Minimum Value Over Time

Minimum 38.47 °C 1.5422e-006 W/mm² 6.6121e-008

Maximum 44.711 °C 2.3476e-005 W/mm² 4.0101e-007

Maximum Value Over Time

Minimum 114.08 °C 5.3076e-002 W/mm² 681.02

Maximum 451.04 °C 0.34085 W/mm² 88012

Information

Time 1. s

Load Step 1

Substep 5

Iteration Number 10

Integration Point Results

Display Option Averaged


Average Across Bodies No

FIGURE 4
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Temperature
TABLE 15
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Temperature
Time [s] Minimum [°C] Maximum [°C]

0.2 44.711 114.08

0.4 44.545 198.23

0.6 42.466 282.44

0.8 40.322 366.71

1. 38.47 451.04
FIGURE 5
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Total Heat Flux
TABLE 16
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Total Heat Flux
Time [s] Minimum [W/mm²] Maximum [W/mm²]

0.2 1.5422e-006 5.3076e-002

0.4 5.1523e-006 0.12277

0.6 1.0413e-005 0.19602

0.8 1.6759e-005 0.26919

1. 2.3476e-005 0.34085

FIGURE 6
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Thermal Error
TABLE 17
Model (A4, B4) > Steady-State Thermal (A5) > Solution (A6) > Thermal Error
Time [s] Minimum Maximum

0.2 6.6121e-008 681.02

0.4 2.2237e-007 5185.4

0.6 3.3813e-007 17782

0.8 4.0101e-007 43494

1. 3.5471e-007 88012

STATIC STRUCTURAL SOLUTION


TABLE 23
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution
Object Name Solution (B6)

State Solved

Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Max Refinement Loops 1.

Refinement Depth 2.

Information

Status Done
Post Processing

Calculate Beam Section Results No

TABLE 24
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information

State Solved

Solution Information

Solution Output Solver Output

Newton-Raphson Residuals 0

Update Interval 2.5 s

Display Points All

FE Connection Visibility

Activate Visibility Yes

Display All FE Connectors

Draw Connections Attached To All Nodes

Line Color Connection Type

Visible on Results No

Line Thickness Single

Display Type Lines

TABLE 25
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Results
Object Name Total Deformation Equivalent Stress Structural Error

State Solved

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry All Bodies

Definition

Type Total Deformation Equivalent (von-Mises) Stress Structural Error

By Time

Display Time Last

Calculate Time History Yes

Identifier
Suppressed No

Results

Minimum 0. mm 0.72542 MPa 7.0826e-008 mJ

Maximum 0.52133 mm 900.88 MPa 24.857 mJ

Minimum Value Over Time

Minimum 0. mm 0.14508 MPa 2.8331e-009 mJ

Maximum 0. mm 0.72542 MPa 7.0826e-008 mJ

Maximum Value Over Time

Minimum 0.10427 mm 180.18 MPa 0.99427 mJ

Maximum 0.52133 mm 900.88 MPa 24.857 mJ

Information

Time 1. s

Load Step 1

Substep 5

Iteration Number 5

Integration Point Results

Display Option Averaged

Average Across Bodies No


FIGURE 9
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Total Deformation
TABLE 26
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Total Deformation
Time [s] Minimum [mm] Maximum [mm]

0.2 0.10427

0.4 0.20853

0.6 0. 0.3128

0.8 0.41706

1. 0.52133

FIGURE 10
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Equivalent Stress
TABLE 27
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Equivalent Stress
Time [s] Minimum [MPa] Maximum [MPa]

0.2 0.14508 180.18

0.4 0.29016 360.35

0.6 0.43525 540.53

0.8 0.58033 720.7

1. 0.72542 900.88

FIGURE 11
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Structural Error
TABLE 28
Model (A4, B4) > Static Structural (B5) > Solution (B6) > Structural Error
Time [s] Minimum [mJ] Maximum [mJ]

0.2 2.8331e-009 0.99427

0.4 1.1333e-008 3.9771

0.6 2.5498e-008 8.9484

0.8 4.5331e-008 15.908

1. 7.0826e-008 24.857

b) BRAKE DISC 2 (WITH HOLES)

STEADY-STATE THERMAL SOLUTION


TABLE 12
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution
Object Name Solution (C6)

State Solved

Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Max Refinement Loops 1.

Refinement Depth 2.

Information

Status Done

Post Processing

Calculate Beam Section Results No

TABLE 13
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information

State Solved

Solution Information

Solution Output Solver Output

Update Interval 2.5 s

Display Points All

FE Connection Visibility
Activate Visibility Yes

Display All FE Connectors

Draw Connections Attached To All Nodes

Line Color Connection Type

Visible on Results No

Line Thickness Single

Display Type Lines

TABLE 14
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Results
Object Name Temperature Total Heat Flux Thermal Error

State Solved

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry All Bodies

Definition

Type Temperature Total Heat Flux Thermal Error

By Result Set Time

Set Number 1.

Calculate Time History Yes

Identifier

Suppressed No

Display Time Last

Results

Minimum 44.527 °C 8.0813e-005 W/mm² 1.7059e-009

Maximum 114. °C 0.32751 W/mm² 10764

Minimum Value Over Time

Minimum 38.277 °C 8.0567e-006 W/mm² 2.7256e-010

Maximum 44.527 °C 8.0813e-005 W/mm² 1.7257e-009

Maximum Value Over Time

Minimum 114. °C 5.1338e-002 W/mm² 67.222

Maximum 450. °C 0.32751 W/mm² 10764


Information

Time 0.2 s 1. s

Load Step 1

Substep 1 5

Iteration Number 2 8

Integration Point Results

Display Option Averaged

Average Across Bodies No

FIGURE 4
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Temperature
TABLE 15
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Temperature
Time [s] Minimum [°C] Maximum [°C]

0.2 44.527 114.

0.4 44.304 198.

0.6 42.219 282.

0.8 40.118 366.

1. 38.277 450.
FIGURE 5
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Total Heat Flux
TABLE 16
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Total Heat Flux
Time [s] Minimum [W/mm²] Maximum [W/mm²]

0.2 8.0567e-006 5.1338e-002

0.4 8.2864e-006 0.11842

0.6 3.6213e-005 0.18868

0.8 3.1007e-005 0.2592

1. 8.0813e-005 0.32751

FIGURE 6
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Thermal Error
TABLE 17
Model (C4, D4) > Steady-State Thermal (C5) > Solution (C6) > Thermal Error
Time [s] Minimum Maximum

0.2 2.7256e-010 67.222

0.4 9.1157e-010 553.53

0.6 1.5658e-009 2016.5

0.8 1.7257e-009 5064.7

1. 1.7059e-009 10764

STATIC STRUCTURAL SOLUTION


TABLE 23
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution
Object Name Solution (D6)

State Solved

Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Max Refinement Loops 1.

Refinement Depth 2.

Information

Status Done
Post Processing

Calculate Beam Section Results No

TABLE 24
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Solution Information
Object Name Solution Information

State Solved

Solution Information

Solution Output Solver Output

Newton-Raphson Residuals 0

Update Interval 2.5 s

Display Points All

FE Connection Visibility

Activate Visibility Yes

Display All FE Connectors

Draw Connections Attached To All Nodes

Line Color Connection Type

Visible on Results No

Line Thickness Single

Display Type Lines

TABLE 25
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Results
Object Name Total Deformation Equivalent Stress Structural Error

State Solved

Scope

Scoping Method Geometry Selection

Geometry All Bodies

Definition

Type Total Deformation Equivalent (von-Mises) Stress Structural Error

By Time

Display Time Last 1. s

Calculate Time History Yes

Identifier
Suppressed No

Results

Minimum 0. mm 0.50541 MPa 3.9973e-010 mJ

Maximum 0.47498 mm 806.95 MPa 0.22354 mJ

Minimum Value Over Time

Minimum 0. mm 0.10108 MPa 1.5989e-011 mJ

Maximum 0. mm 0.50541 MPa 3.9973e-010 mJ

Maximum Value Over Time

Minimum 9.4997e-002 mm 161.39 MPa 8.9414e-003 mJ

Maximum 0.47498 mm 806.95 MPa 0.22354 mJ

Information

Time 1. s

Load Step 1

Substep 5

Iteration Number 5

Integration Point Results

Display Option Averaged

Average Across Bodies No


FIGURE 9
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Total Deformation
TABLE 26
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Total Deformation
Time [s] Minimum [mm] Maximum [mm]

0.2 9.4997e-002

0.4 0.18999

0.6 0. 0.28499

0.8 0.37999

1. 0.47498

FIGURE 10
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Equivalent Stress
TABLE 27
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Equivalent Stress
Time [s] Minimum [MPa] Maximum [MPa]

0.2 0.10108 161.39

0.4 0.20216 322.78

0.6 0.30324 484.17

0.8 0.40433 645.56

1. 0.50541 806.95
FIGURE 11
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Structural Error
TABLE 28
Model (C4, D4) > Static Structural (D5) > Solution (D6) > Structural Error
Time [s] Minimum [mJ] Maximum [mJ]

0.2 1.5989e-011 8.9414e-003

0.4 6.3956e-011 3.5766e-002

0.6 1.439e-010 8.0473e-002

0.8 2.5583e-010 0.14306

1. 3.9973e-010 0.22354

CONCLUSION
On comparing a disc brake with holes and without holes, the
final temperatures after heat dissipation with an initial
condition of 450°C are found to be 38.277°C and 38.47°C
respectively and that for equivalent stresses are 806.95 MPa
and 900.88 MPa respectively which is below the ultimate
tensile limit (i.e. 930MPa). The following observations clearly
states that the design for disc brakes with holes are much
better than that without holes and that both of them won’t
fail in any of the above conditions.
REFERENCES
[1] V. Chengal Reddy, M. Gunasekhar Reddy, Dr. G. Harinath
Gowd, Modeling and Analysis of FSAE Car Disc Brake Using FEM,
ISSN 2250-2459, 3(9), September 2013.
[2] Praveena S, Lava Kumar M, Sreekanth Reddy S, Modeling and
Structural Analysis of Disc Brake, ISSN: 2319-8753, 3(10) October
2014.
[3] V. Chengal Reddy, M. Gunasekhar Reddy, Dr. G. Harinath
Gowd, Modeling and Analysis of FSAE Car Disc Brake Using FEM,
ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2013.

Вам также может понравиться