Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 12

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/321462275

Case Study on Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan


International Private Limited

Article · February 2015

CITATION READS

1 969

2 authors, including:

Pradeep K Gupta
BLDEA's A. S. Patil College of commerce, Bijapur
8 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

A STUDY ON WOMEN EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SELF HELP GROUPS – WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BIJAPUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA View project

A Comparative Analysis of Returns of Mutual Fund Schemes Ranked 1 by CRISIL View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Pradeep K Gupta on 02 December 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Vol 5 Issue 1 Feb 2015 ISSN No : 2230-7850

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

International Multidisciplinary
Research Journal

Indian Streams
Research Journal

Executive Editor Editor-in-Chief


Ashok Yakkaldevi H.N.Jagtap
Welcome to ISRJ
RNI MAHMUL/2011/38595 ISSN No.2230-7850
Indian Streams Research Journal is a multidisciplinary research journal, published monthly in English,
Hindi & Marathi Language. All research papers submitted to the journal will be double - blind peer reviewed
referred by members of the editorial board.Readers will include investigator in universities, research institutes
government and industry with research interest in the general subjects.

International Advisory Board


Flávio de São Pedro Filho Mohammad Hailat Hasan Baktir
Federal University of Rondonia, Brazil Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, English Language and Literature
University of South Carolina Aiken Department, Kayseri
Kamani Perera
Regional Center For Strategic Studies, Sri Abdullah Sabbagh Ghayoor Abbas Chotana
Lanka Engineering Studies, Sydney Dept of Chemistry, Lahore University of
Management Sciences[PK]
Janaki Sinnasamy Ecaterina Patrascu
Librarian, University of Malaya Spiru Haret University, Bucharest Anna Maria Constantinovici
AL. I. Cuza University, Romania
Romona Mihaila Loredana Bosca
Spiru Haret University, Romania Spiru Haret University, Romania Ilie Pintea,
Spiru Haret University, Romania
Delia Serbescu Fabricio Moraes de Almeida
Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Federal University of Rondonia, Brazil Xiaohua Yang
Romania PhD, USA
George - Calin SERITAN
Anurag Misra Faculty of Philosophy and Socio-Political ......More
DBS College, Kanpur Sciences Al. I. Cuza University, Iasi

Titus PopPhD, Partium Christian


University, Oradea,Romania

Editorial Board
Pratap Vyamktrao Naikwade Iresh Swami Rajendra Shendge
ASP College Devrukh,Ratnagiri,MS India Ex - VC. Solapur University, Solapur Director, B.C.U.D. Solapur University,
Solapur
R. R. Patil N.S. Dhaygude
Head Geology Department Solapur Ex. Prin. Dayanand College, Solapur R. R. Yalikar
University,Solapur Director Managment Institute, Solapur
Narendra Kadu
Rama Bhosale Jt. Director Higher Education, Pune Umesh Rajderkar
Prin. and Jt. Director Higher Education, Head Humanities & Social Science
Panvel K. M. Bhandarkar YCMOU,Nashik
Praful Patel College of Education, Gondia
Salve R. N. S. R. Pandya
Department of Sociology, Shivaji Sonal Singh Head Education Dept. Mumbai University,
University,Kolhapur Vikram University, Ujjain Mumbai

Govind P. Shinde G. P. Patankar Alka Darshan Shrivastava


Bharati Vidyapeeth School of Distance S. D. M. Degree College, Honavar, Karnataka Shaskiya Snatkottar Mahavidyalaya, Dhar
Education Center, Navi Mumbai
Maj. S. Bakhtiar Choudhary Rahul Shriram Sudke
Chakane Sanjay Dnyaneshwar Director,Hyderabad AP India. Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Indore
Arts, Science & Commerce College,
Indapur, Pune S.Parvathi Devi S.KANNAN
Ph.D.-University of Allahabad Annamalai University,TN
Awadhesh Kumar Shirotriya
Secretary,Play India Play,Meerut(U.P.) Sonal Singh, Satish Kumar Kalhotra
Vikram University, Ujjain Maulana Azad National Urdu University

Address:-Ashok Yakkaldevi 258/34, Raviwar Peth, Solapur - 413 005 Maharashtra, India
Cell : 9595 359 435, Ph No: 02172372010 Email: ayisrj@yahoo.in Website: www.isrj.org
Indian Streams Research Journal
ISSN 2230-7850
Impact Factor : 3.1560(UIF)
Volume-5 | Issue-1 | Feb-2015
Available online at www.isrj.org

CASE STUDY ON CAPITAL BUDGETING


WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HOTEL
MADHUVAN INTERNAL PRIVATE LIMITED
1 2
Pooja K. Jahagirdar and Pradeep K. Gupta
1
Student, BLDEA's, A. S. Patil College of Commerce, (BBA Programme), Vijayapur, Karnataka .
2
Asst. Professor, BLDEA's, A. S. Patil College of Commerce, (MBA Programme), Vijayapur, Karnataka.

Abstract:-Capital investment refers to the investment in projects whose results would be


available after year for the maximization profit of the company, the company should take right
investment decision or accept right investment proposal which will help in achieving expected
flow of benefits at the right time. Secondary data was collected through various media like fact
sheets, internet, business magazines, newspapers, books of various authors etc.
This research paper is based on “Capital Budgeting with special reference to Hotel
Madhuvan International Private Limited, Vijayapur”. It’s a service firm with hotel and lodging
facilities. The firm has decided to modernize its lodging department investing 2.5 lakh on each
room; there are 36 rooms and require a investments of Rs.90,00,000. This research paper is an
attempt to analyze the viability of the new proposal by using different capital budgeting
techniques.

Keywords: Capital budgeting, investment proposal.

INTRODUCTION:

Capital Budgeting is the planning of long-term financial projects relating to investments funded through
long term sources of capital. Capital budgeting is a decision-making process that facilitates managers to evaluate
and identify projects that are beneficial to the company. It is the most important task for managers for the following
reasons.
Firstly, capital budgeting helps the company to take its strategic decisions and directs the company in
undertaking new product, new service, new technology. Second, capital budgeting decisions are less flexible and
have long lasting effect on the company. Third, serious consequences may arise from poor capital budgeting
decisions. For example, if a company devoted too much capital to one project, the company’s capital would be
unnecessarily spent on excess production capacity. On the other hand, investment of inadequate capital by the
company results in low productivity and would suffer by the simple fact that its equipment, computer hardware and
software might not be cutting-edge to improve production. These poor capital budgeting decisions may provide the
rival companies an opportunity to steal market share by taking advantage of a lower cost structure or production
capabilities matching demand.
The goal with capital budgeting is to select the projects that bring the most value to the firm. Ideally, one
would like to select all of the projects that add value, and avoid those that lose value. Making optimal capital
budgeting decisions requires recognizing and correctly accounting the flexibilities associated with the project.
The Capital Budget reflects the continuing need to replace existing infrastructure along with making
investments to achieve efficient, effective and sustainable utilization of available resources.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Chandra, P(1975): conducted a study on 20 companies and his observations were “payback period method

Pooja K. Jahagirdar1 and Pradeep K. Gupta2 , “CASE STUDY ON CAPITAL BUDGETING WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HOTEL MADHUVAN
INTERNAL PRIVATE LIMITED” Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015 | Online & Print

1
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

was used for evaluating the investments of small size and accounting rate of return method was used as primary
criterion and payback period method as supplementary criterion for evaluating the investments of large size.
Discounted cash flow technique though not commonly used, are gaining importance, particularly in the evaluation
of large investments.”
Porwal L.S. (1976): An empirical study was conducted by Porwal L.S. on the organizational, quantitative,
qualitative, behavioural and control aspects of capital budgeting. He had selected 118 companies out of which 52
companies (44%) provided usable responses. He states “ 44% of the respondents ranked first preference for DCF
techniques, however, most companies were using combination of traditional and ‘theoretically correct’ economic
evaluation techniques of capital expenditure proposals. New product line preferred IRR and existing product line
preferred ARR and PBP continues to be the next preferred technique. Competitive position is the main non-financial
factor that is given due consideration for the capital budgeting decision. Most companies in India are using one or
more methods for incorporating risk. The shorter payback period and higher cut-off rate are the popular techniques
used by companies in India.”
Wong, K. A., Farragher, E. J., and Leung, R. K. C. (1987) conducted a survey of large corporations in Hong
Kong, Malaysia and Singapore in 1985. They found that “in Malaysia, payback period was the most popular primary
technique for evaluating and ranking projects. In Hong Kong, payback period and accounting rate of return are
equally popular. They concluded that, in contrast to US companies where discounted cash flow techniques are
significantly more popular than non-discounted cash flow techniques as primary evaluation measures, companies in
Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore prefer to use several methods as primary measures in evaluating and ranking
proposed investment projects.”
Pandey, I. M. (1989):In his survey and found that “all companies, except one, used payback period method
and payback period method gained importance because of its simplicity to use and understand, its emphasis on the
early recovery of the investment, its focus on risk. DCF techniques in India plays secondary role because of its
difficulty in understanding and using these techniques, lack of qualified professionals and unwillingness of top
management to use DCF techniques.”
Ken, L. K., and Cherukuri, U. R.(1991): In their study on US companies observed "Internal rate of return is
the number one choice of 66%, while 33% selected net present value as their most preferred (Primary) method."
Pike Richard(1992): had conducted a longitudinal capital budgeting study based on surveys between 1975
and 1992 on 100 large United Kingdom’s companies and observed “firms size influenced the usage of DCF methods
but not the traditional methods of capital budgeting techniques ( PBP & ARR). Large organizations ranked Internal
Rate of Return (IRR) first, followed by Net Present Valueand Pay Back Period whereas smaller organizations ranked
PBP first, Accounting Rate of Returnsecond and adjusted PBP and IRR third.”
Dhankar R. S.(1995): examined methods of evaluating investments and uncertainty in Indian companies.
He selected a sample of 75 firms. His findings revealed that “non-discounted methods like PBP and ARR were used
by 33% of firms whereas 16% of firms used modern DCF techniques. Moreover, almost 50% of the companies
incorporated risk by ‘Adjusting the Discount Rate’ and ‘Capital Asset Pricing Model’
Gupta, S., Batra, R.,and Sharma, M.(2007): they made an attempt to explore which capital budgeting
techniques is used by industries in Punjab and they found “non-discounted cash flow techniques like PBP and ARR
were used by majority of the sample companies. Only a few companies used DCF, and among them very negligible
number use NPV technique to evaluate a new project”

OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

To study & understand the capital budgeting process.


s
To study and understand on what basis investment decision are taken.
s
To analyse the investment proposal of Hotel Madhuvan International
s Private Limited using capital budgeting
techniques.

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This research paper is based on “Capital Budgeting with special reference to Hotel Madhuvan International
Private Limited, Vijayapur”. It’s a service firm with hotel and lodging facilities. Madhuvan hotel has decided to
modernize its lodging department investing 2.5 lakh on each room; there are 36 rooms i.e., Rs. 90,00,000
investments. This research paper will analyze the viability of the new proposal by using different capital budgeting
techniques and suggest the Hotel Madhuvan International Private Limited to undertake the project or not.

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


2
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

For the purpose of the study secondary data was collected from the books of Hotel Madhuvanand capital
budgeting techniques have been used to achieve the objective. The capital budgeting can be categorised as given
below:

Traditional techniques
l
v Payback period
v Accounting rate of return

l
Modern techniques
Discounted payback period
v
Net present value
v
Profitability index
v
Internal rate of return
v

Formula used

Payback period= No. of years + Amount to recover/ total cash inflow of next year
w
ARR = Average Profits After Tax/ Net investment x 100
w
NPV= Present value of cash inflows – Initial investment
w
Profitability index = Present value of cash inflows/ Initial investment
w

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Existing project

TYPE OF ROOM TARIFF TOTAL NO. OF TOTAL TOTAL


ROOMS INCOME INCOME
(PER DAY) (PER YEAR)
1 Executive deluxe A/C 1,200 10 12,000 43,80,000
2 Deluxe A/C 1,000 9 9,000 32,85,000
3 Deluxe non A/C 800 9 7,200 26,28,000
4 Standard 600 8 4,800 17,52,000
Total 36 33,000 1,20,45,000

Note:

It is assumed that 70% of capacity is utilized. Hence 70% of Rs. 1,20,45,000 is Rs. 84,31,500.
v
Expenses incurred are assumed to be around 25% of computed receipts i.e., 25% of 84,31,500 are 21,07,875
v

Proposed project

TYPE OF ROOM TARIFF TOTAL NO. TOTAL INCOME TOTAL


OF ROOMS (PER DAY) INCOME
(PER YEAR)
1 Executive deluxe A/C 2,160 10 21,600 78,84,000
2 Deluxe A/C 1,800 9 16,200 59,13,000
3 Deluxe non A/C 1,440 9 12,960 47,30,400
4 Standard 1,080 8 8,640 31,53,600
Total 36 59,400 2,16,81,000

Note:

Booking of the rooms in a year is approximately 70%. Hence 70% of 2, 16, 81,000 are1, 51, 76,700.
v
Expenses incurred are assumed to be increased to 40% of total income i.e.,40% of 1,51,76,700 are 60,70,680
v
Net income
v

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


3
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

=Total income - total expenses


=1, 51, 76,700 - 60, 70,680
=91, 06,020

Hence, incremental cash flow is RS.27, 82,395.


(Net cash flow of proposed project – Net cash flow of existing project)
(91, 06,020-63, 23,625)

Other Details of the Proposed Project

The project is about Hotel Madhuvan International Private Limited who has undertaken modernization and
the details are as follows:

2.5 lakh is invested on each room for its modernization.


v
Total investment RS. 90,00,000
v
Own investment RS.40,00,000
v
Loan from bank RS.50,00,000
v
Interest on loan 14 %
v

Calculations: Depreciation
ASSET DEPRECIATION RATE(WDV)
Building 10%
Plant and machinery 13.91%
Furniture and fixture 18.10%
Computer and peripherals 40%
Office equipment 13.91%
Electrical installation 13.91%

ASSET SHARE IN TOTAL AMOUNT


INVESTMENT
Building 36% 32,40,000
Plant and machinery 13% 11,70,000
Furniture and fixture 32% 28,80,000
Computer and peripherals 2% 1,80,000
Office equipment 9% 8,10,000
Electrical installation 8% 7,20,000
Total 100% 90,00,000

Building (10% depreciation)

YEAR AMOUNT DEPRECIATION BALANCE


1 32,40,000 3,24,000 29,16,000
2 29,16,000 2,91,600 26,24,400
3 26,24,400 2,62,440 23,61,960
4 23,61,960 2,36,196 21,25,764
5 21,25,764 2,12,576.4 19,13,187.6

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


4
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

Plant and machinery (13.91% depreciation)

AMOUNT DEPRECIATION BALANCE


YEAR
1 11,70,000 1,62,747 10,07,253
2 10,07,253 1,40,108.89 8,67,144.11
3 8,67,144.11 1,20,619.75 7,46,524.36
4 7,46,524.36 1,03,841.54 6,42,682.82
5 6,42,682.82 89,397.18 5,53,285.64

Furniture and fixture (18.10% depreciation)

YEAR AMOUNT DEPRECIATION BALANCE


1 28,80,000 52,128 28,27,872
2 28,27,872 51,184.48 27,76,687.52
3 27,76,687.52 50,258.04 27,26,429.47
4 27,26,429.47 49,348.37 26,77,081.1
5 26,77,081.1 48,455.17 26,28,625.93
Computer and peripherals (40% depreciation)

YEAR AMOUNT DEPRECIATION BALANCE


1 1,80,000 72,000 1,08,000
2 1,08,000 43,200 64,800
3 64,800 25,920 38,880
4 38,880 15,552 23,328
5 23,328 9,331.2 13,996.8
Office equipment (13.91% depreciation)
YEAR AMOUNT DEPRECIATION BALANCE
1 8,10,000 1,12,671 6,97,329
2 6,97,329 96,998.46 6,00,330.54
3 6,00,330.54 83,505.98 5,16,824.56
4 5,16,824.56 71,890.3 4,44,934.26
5 4,44,934.26 61,890.36 3,83,043.91

Electrical installation (13.91% depreciation)

YEAR AMOUNT DEPRECIATION BALANCE


1 7,20,000 1,00,152 6,19,848
2 6,19,848 86,220.86 5,33,627.14
3 5,33,627.14 74,227.54 4,59,399.61
4 4,59,399.61 63,902.49 3,95,497.12
5 3,95,497.12 55,013.65 3,40,483.47

DEPRECIATION
Year Building Plant Furniture Computer & Office Electric Total
&machinery & fixture peripherals equipment installation
1 3,24,000 1,62,747 52,128 72,000 1,12,671 1,00,152 8,23,698
2 2,91,600 1,40,108.89 51,184.48 43,200 96,998.46 86,220.86 7,09,312.7
3 2,62,440 1,20,619.75 50,258.04 25,920 83,505.98 74,227.54 66,16,971.3
4 2,36,196 1,03,841.54 49,348.37 15,552 71,890.3 63,902.49 5,40,730.69
5 21,2,576.4 89,397.18 48,455.17 9,331.2 61,890.36 55,013.65 4,76,663.95

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


5
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

NET PRESENT VALUE

INCREMENTAL
YEAR DEPRECIATION PADBT TAX PADAT PATNBD
CASH FLOW
1 27,82,395 8,23,698 19,58,697 98,745.79 18,59,951.21 26,83,649.21
2 27,82,395 7,09,312.7 20,73,082.3 1,10,527.48 19,62,554.83 26,71,867.52
3 27,82,395 6,16,971.3 21,65,423.7 1,20,038.64 20,45,385.06 26,62,356.36
4 27,82,395 5,40,730.69 22,41,664.31 1,27,891.42 21,13,772.88 26,54,503.58
5 27,82,395 4,76,663.95 23,05,731.05 1,34,490.3 21,71,240.75 26,47,904.7

NPV= Present value of cash inflows – Initial investment

26,83,649.21 26,71,867.52 26,62,356.36 26,54,503.58 26,47,904.7


NPV = + + + + -
90,00,000
1.14 1.14^ 2 1.14^3 1.14^ 4 1.14^5
NPV =
91,53,926.21 -
90,00,000
NPV =
1,53,926.2

PROFITABILITY INDEX

Profitability index = Present value of cash inflows/ Initial investment

91,53,926.21
PI =
90,00,000
PI =
1.02

ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN

ARR = Average Profits After Tax/ Net investment x 100

18,59,951.21 +
19,62,554.83 +
20,45,385.06 +
21,13,772.88 +
21,71,240.75
APAT =
5
1,01,52,904.72
APAT =
5

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


6
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

APAT =
20,30,580.94
20,30,580.94
ARR = *100
90,00,000

ARR =
22.5%

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

Calculate the NPV of two closest rate of return.

NPV @ 14% =
1,53,926.2
NPV @ 15% =
-
61,336.11
Find the absolute sum of the NPV obtained in step1.

1,53,926.2 +
61,336.11 =
2,51,262.31
Calculate the ratio of NPV of smallest rate and sum obtained in step 2

1,53,926.2
=
.71
2,15,262.31
Add the number obtained in step 3 to smallest NPV

14 +
.71 =
14.71%

Hence, IRR is 14.71 %

PAY BACK PERIOD


YEAR CASH FLOW CUMULATIVE CASH FLOW
1 26,83,649.21 26,83,649.21
2 26,71,867.52 53,55,516.73
3 26,62,356.36 80,17,873.09
4 26,54,503.58

Payback period= No. of years + Amount to recover/ total cash of next year’s

9,82,106.91
=
3+
26,54,503.58

=
3.37 years

DISCOUNTED PAY BACK PERIOD

CUMULATIVE
DISCOUNTED CASH
YEAR CASH FLOW DISCOUNTED CASH
FLOW
FLOW
1 2683649.21 2354078.25 2354078.25
2 2671867.52 2055915.3 4409993.55
3 2662356.36 1797014.71 6207008.26
4 2654503.58 1571679.21 7778687.47
5 3717567.59 1930788.11

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


7
.Case Study On Capital Budgeting With Special Reference To Hotel Madhuvan Internal Private Limited

DPBP= No. of years + Amount to recover/ total cash of next year’s

12,21,312.53
=
4+
19,30,788.11
=
4.63 years
FINDINGS

The points observed from the capital budgeting process are as follows:

Net present value is Rs.1,53,926.2


v
Profitability index is 1.02
v
Accounting rate of return is 22.5%
v
Internal rate of return is 14.72%
v
Payback period is 3.37years
v
Discounted payback period is 4.63 years
v

CONCLUSION

The capital budgeting helps management to choose the most profitable alternative for long term
investment. The existing capital budgeting proposal is found to be clear and comprehensive.Capital budgeting
influences managerial action for long-term implications and it effects the growth and profitability of the firm.
Since, Net present value is greater than 0, Profitability index is greater than 1, Accounting rate of return is
higher than the target rate, Internal rate of return is greater than cost of capital, Payback period is less than target
period, the proposed project has to be considered for investment.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.www.studyfinance.com
2.www.wikipedia.org/wiki/capital_budgeting
3.http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/10603/7277/10/09_chapter%203.pdf
4.http://journal.asci.org.in/Vol.25(1996)/v25_1_pra.htm
5.http://www.ku.ac.ke/schools/business/images/stories/research/capital_budgeting_procedures.pdf
6.Chandra, P., (1975), “Capital Expenditure Analysis in Practice”, Indian Management, July, p 10-13.
7.Porwal, L. S., (1976), “Capital Budgeting in India”, Sultan Chand and Sons, New Delhi.
8.Wong, K. A., Farragher, E. J., and Leung, R. K. C.,(1987), “Capital Investment Practices: A Survey of Large
Corporations in Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, January, pp 112-123
9.Pandey, I. M.,(1989),“Capital Budgeting Practices of Indian Companies”,MDI Management Journal, January ,
Vol. 2, No.1
10.Ken, L. K., and Cherukuri, U. R., (1991), “CurrentPractices in Capital Budgeting, Cost of Capital and Risk
Adjustment”, ASCI Journal of Management, June, Vol. 2 1, (1).
11.Pike Richard,(1996),“A longitudinal survey on capital budgeting practices”, Journal of Business Finance &
Accounting, 23(1), January, 0306-686X, pp79-92
12.Dhankar, R. S., (1995), “An Appraisal of Capital Budgeting Decision Mechanism in Indian Corporates”,
Management Review, July-December, pp. 22-34
13.Gupta, S., Batra, R.,and Sharma, M.,( 2007 ),“Capital Budgeting Practices in Punjab-based Companies”, The
Icfai Journal of APPLIED FINANCE, February, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 57-70
Pooja K. Jahagirdar
Student, BLDEA's, A. S. Patil College of Commerce, (BBA Programme), Vijayapur, Karnataka .

Pradeep K. Gupta
2
Asst. Professor, BLDEA's, A. S. Patil College of Commerce, (MBA Programme), Vijayapur, Karnataka.

Indian Streams Research Journal | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Feb 2015


8
Publish Research Article
International Level Multidisciplinary Research Journal
For All Subjects

Dear Sir/Mam,
We invite unpublished Research Paper,Summary of Research
Project,Theses,Books and Book Review for publication,you will be pleased to
know that our journals are

Associated and Indexed,India


International Scientific Journal Consortium
¬
OPEN J-GATE
¬

Associated and Indexed,USA

Google Scholar
?
EBSCO
?
DOAJ
?
Index Copernicus
?
Publication Index
?
Academic Journal Database
?
Contemporary Research Index
?
Academic Paper Databse
?
Digital Journals Database
?
Current Index to Scholarly Journals
?
Elite Scientific Journal Archive
?
Directory Of Academic Resources
?
Scholar Journal Index
?
Recent Science Index
?
Scientific Resources Database
?
Directory Of Research Journal Indexing
?
Indian Streams Research Journal
258/34 Raviwar Peth Solapur-413005,Maharashtra
Contact-9595359435
E-Mail-ayisrj@yahoo.in/ayisrj2011@gmail.com
Website : www.isrj.org

View publication stats

Вам также может понравиться