Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
nonneurologic procedures. The results of this chart review administration, antiepileptic medications, medications ad-
will allow a more accurate estimate of the risk for periopera- ministered at the time of the seizure, and recent antiepileptic
tive seizure in patients with a history of seizure disorder. drug blood levels. Information pertaining to the seizure
Additionally, this study may identify factors that affect the activity was derived from anesthetic records, postanesthesia
likelihood of perioperative seizures in these patients. care unit notes, and daily progress notes of the primary
service, medical consultation team(s), and the anesthesia pain
METHODS service. The cause of the seizure was determined based on the
After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective query of frequency of preoperative seizures, antiepileptic drug levels,
the Mayo Clinic Life Science System database from January electroencephalographic results, radiographic imaging ob-
1, 2002 through December 31, 2007 to identify all patients tained, results from neurology consultation, and documenta-
who met the following inclusion criteria: age ⱖ2 years, tion detailing seizure activity.
hospital admission ⬎24 hours’ duration, received any Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were
anesthetic (general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, or summarized using mean ⫾ SD for continuous variables
monitored anesthesia care) during their hospital admission, and frequency percentages for categorical variables. The
and seizure disorder documented in the medical record frequency of postoperative seizures was summarized using
before hospital admission. Patients with a seizure disorder a point estimate and exact 95% confidence interval. Base-
were identified by searching for ICD-9 codes 345.0 to 345.91 line characteristics were compared between those who did
and 780.3 to 780.39. From the 115,120 patients identified, and did not experience seizures using the rank sum test for
the database was limited to those patients with one or more continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categori-
routine hospital admissions during the study period with a cal variables. In all cases, a 2-tailed P value ⬍0.05 was
length of stay ⬎2 days with an anesthetic administered considered statistically significant.
during the hospitalization. A manual chart review was
performed for these 1778 patients.
Patients were excluded if they had 1 of the following RESULTS
conditions: no confirmed seizure disorder (e.g., single During the 6-year study period, 641 patients older than 2
febrile seizure in childhood, acute symptomatic seizure years with a documented seizure disorder were admitted
attributed to trauma, electrolyte disturbance, infection, or for at least 24 hours and had anesthesia for a nonneurologic
alcohol withdrawal), had anesthesia for an outpatient or surgical procedure. The mean age ⫾ SD of patients was
intracranial procedure, were younger than 2 years of age, 52.8 ⫾ 22.7 years. Other patient and procedural character-
ASA V classification, or pregnant women who received a istics at the time of anesthesia and surgery are provided in
labor epidural as their sole anesthetic. For the 641 patients Table 1. For these patients, the median (25th, 75th percen-
meeting inclusion criteria, the first hospital admission tile) length of hospital stay was 4 (2, 7) days. There were 22
during which an anesthetic was provided for a nonneurol- patients (3.4%; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%–5.2%) who
gic surgical procedure was manually reviewed for each experienced a seizure during the defined perioperative
patient. We defined the perioperative period as the time period. Using univariate analysis, patients with clinically
from the start of the surgical procedure until the third apparent seizure activity postoperatively were found to be
hospital day or hospital dismissal, whichever time period significantly younger than those who did not experience a
was shorter. Patient demographics including age, gender, seizure (40.3 ⫾ 22.2 vs 53.3 ⫾ 22.6 years; P ⫽ 0.011).
ASA physical status, and urgency (elective or emergent) of Preoperative use of multiple antiepileptic medications (P ⬍
the surgery were recorded. We recorded the characteristics 0.001), shorter length of time between last seizure episode
and clinical course of the seizure disorder, including type of and hospital admission (P ⬍ 0.001), and more frequent
seizure disorder (simple partial, complex partial, general- seizures at baseline (P ⬍ 0.001) were all found to be
ized nonconvulsive, or generalized convulsive), seizure associated with an increased risk for perioperative seizure
frequency, most recent seizure before surgery, previous (Table 2).
surgical management for the seizure disorder, antiepileptic Of the 22 patients who experienced perioperative seizure
medications, other medications the patient was taking at activity, 19 patients had a seizure that was consistent with
the time of surgery, and blood levels of antiepileptic drugs their usual seizure type. There was no association between
within 2 weeks of the surgical procedure. If the patient had anesthetic technique, induction drug, or type of maintenance
multiple seizure types at baseline, the most frequently and perioperative seizure occurrence. In addition, no relation-
occurring seizure type was recorded. ship was found regarding surgical procedure type and peri-
Details of the surgical procedure and the anesthetic were operative seizure occurrence. Six patients had a documented
also documented, including type of surgical procedure, subtherapeutic antiepileptic drug level. An additional 2 pa-
duration of inpatient stay (days), type of anesthetic (re- tients did not receive their antiepileptic medications per their
gional, general, monitored anesthesia care), primary induc- usual schedule, 1 because of vomiting and 1 because of
tion drug, type of anesthetic maintenance, type of regional intestinal surgery. Antiepileptic drug levels were not assessed
block, and use of any benzodiazepine during the anesthetic. in these 2 patients (Table 3).
For all patients identified as experiencing a clinically ap- Two patients received regional anesthesia, but their
parent seizure documented in the daily nursing and seizures were not related to the regional block. One of these
progress notes within 3 days after surgery, the circum- patients received a single-injection fascia iliaca block for
stances surrounding the event were documented, including postoperative pain control for a muscle biopsy. She expe-
the time of seizure, type of seizure, recent local anesthetic rienced hundreds of complex partial seizures daily at
Male/78 III Cardiac catheterization/ Generalized convulsive Not documented Not documented
echocardiography
PACU ⫽ postanesthesia care unit; IR ⫽ interventional radiology; ENT ⫽ ear-nose-throat; ASA ⫽ American Society of Anesthesiology.
experience an isolated seizure during their lifetime (e.g., a number of antiepileptics do not have a parenteral formu-
febrile seizure in children, acute symptomatic seizures lation and the interpretation of blood levels may be difficult
caused by trauma, electrolyte disturbances, infection, and for practitioners unfamiliar with these medications. Pa-
alcohol withdrawal) but are not regarded as having a tients requiring multiple medications for seizure control
seizure disorder. In Rochester, MN, the cumulative inci- present a particular challenge, because these patients are at
dence of epilepsy through age 74 years is 3.0%, with an a greater risk of seizure recurrence when medications are
incidence of any seizure incident near 10%.9 Given this withdrawn or their dosage is reduced.13 Consultation with
large segment of the population with a seizure disorder, it a neurologist may be necessary to formulate the most
is not uncommon for these patients to present for surgery effective plan for these patients in the perioperative period.
and anesthesia. The patients who experienced seizure activity periop-
Recent data suggest that the occurrence of postoperative eratively were significantly younger than patients who did
seizures in patients with a seizure disorder undergoing not. In addition, the incidence of epilepsy is higher in the
regional anesthesia is infrequent, and that regional anes- intellectually and developmentally disabled population,
thesia in such patients is not contraindicated.8 A multi- and there is increased morbidity and mortality in children
center prospective cohort study in Thailand reported an with seizures and neurodeficits.14,15 This group of patients
incidence of postoperative seizure of 3.1 per 10,000 for all tends to have more frequent seizures and often requires
patients undergoing all surgical (including neurosurgical anesthesia for routine procedures (e.g., radiologic examina-
procedures) and anesthesia types, but the incidence of tions and dental examinations and treatment) or proce-
postoperative seizure in patients with an underlying sei- dures related to trauma incurred during a seizure that a
zure disorder was not reported.10 Recently, a much smaller healthy patient otherwise would not require.16
retrospective study examined the incidence of seizures in In a recent study at our institution, 24 of 411 patients
patients with epilepsy undergoing general anesthesia.11 (5.8%) with a seizure disorder undergoing regional anes-
Seizures were observed in 2% of patients and they reported thesia experienced postoperative seizure activity, and none
no adverse effect after receiving general anesthesia. of these seizures were conclusively linked to the regional
technique.8 The overall occurrence of postoperative sei-
There are many factors that can increase the likelihood
zures is slightly lower in our current investigation; how-
of seizure activity in patients with a seizure disorder,
ever, it is unclear what factors may have contributed to this
including changes in antiepileptic drug levels, fatigue,
difference, because the anesthetic technique did not seem to
stress, sleep deprivation, menstruation, electrolyte distur-
significantly affect the rate of seizure activity. This study
bances, and excessive alcohol intake.3,6,12 Many situations
similarly found that patients whose last seizure occurred
arise in the perioperative period that can affect antiepileptic
close to the time of admission were more likely to experi-
drug levels, including preoperative medication noncompli-
ence a seizure in the perioperative period. In addition,
ance, changes in dosing schedule, perioperative medica-
patients with more frequent seizure activity at baseline
tions, anesthetic exposure, and changes in gastrointestinal
were more likely to have seizure activity during the peri-
motility leading to delayed absorption and reduced bio-
operative period.
availability.3,5 In particular, when patients are advised to
The retrospective nature of this study creates some
take nothing by mouth preoperatively, they may omit their limitations with regard to the recommendations that can be
scheduled doses of antiepileptic medications. This is exac- made based on the results. It is virtually impossible to
erbated postoperatively in patients who are not allowed to retrospectively identify seizure activity in patients under-
take oral medications because of their surgical procedure or going outpatient procedures, thus they were excluded from
are unable to tolerate oral intake because of nausea and our study. However, the risk factors for perioperative
vomiting. Decreased antiepileptic drug serum levels may seizures in outpatients are likely to be similar to those
contribute to perioperative seizure activity.4 found for hospitalized patients in the perioperative period.
Nine patients in our study experienced perioperative Additionally, the retrospective nature of the study prevents
seizure activity that was likely influenced by fluctuations in us from making any specific recommendations regarding
antiepileptic levels. Six of these patients had documented the perioperative management of patients with a seizure
subtherapeutic antiepileptic levels, 2 had interruptions in disorder. Both of these issues would require further pro-
their usual dosing schedule because of vomiting and spective investigation. The lack of continuous electroen-
nothing-by-mouth status, and 1 had antiepileptic medica- cephalographic monitoring in our study may have caused
tions intentionally withdrawn because of Stevens-Johnson an underestimation of the overall seizure frequency. In
syndrome. The therapeutic level for antiepileptic medica- addition, there may have been patients with nonconvulsive
tions is a complex measurement that depends on the seizures resulting in prolonged emergence or nocturnal
individual patient and the timing of the blood draw, and it nonconvulsive seizures that were not identified.
frequently lies outside of the laboratory standard therapeu- In summary, patients with an underlying seizure disor-
tic range. However, the neurologists consulting on these der infrequently experience a perioperative seizure. Pa-
cases thought that the levels obtained were below the tients with frequent seizures at baseline and with recent
therapeutic range for these particular patients, which con- seizures before surgical admission are at increased risk for
tributed to their perioperative seizure activity. This under- perioperative seizure activity. The anesthetic technique
scores the importance of maintaining an inpatient dosing does not seem to have a role in the occurrence of periop-
regimen as close as possible to what the patient is accus- erative seizures, and most patients who do have a seizure
tomed to as an outpatient. This can be challenging because experience their typical seizure type. The patient’s usual