Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also called the
Earth Summit, took place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 1992. This largest-ever world
meeting brought Heads of State and government officials together with international
organizations and representatives of non-government organizations (NGOs) from around the
world. The “21”in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st century.
A 700 page global plan of action called Agenda 21 was produced as a result of the Earth
Summit: it represents the consensus reached by 178 States on how we can secure OUR future.
Agenda 21 is like a blueprint (or maybe we should call it a "greenprint"!) for global partnership
aiming at a high quality environment and a healthy economy for all peoples of the planet.
Agenda 21 addresses the critical issues we face as a global community: continuing damage to
ecosystems, the worsening of poverty, hunger and ill health, increasing world population and
illiteracy. Agenda 21 is composed of 40 chapters that identify each challenge and propose
simple realistic solutions towards sustainable development which is: meeting the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Around the world, governments, businesses, non-governmental and other organizations are
already putting the ideas from Agenda 21 to work. It is crucial to maintain the momentum of the
Rio process and implement the agreements that were reached. This task will require not only
the leadership and funding of governments and business, but also the vision, cooperation and
work of every citizen. Sustainable development cannot be achieved without all sectors of society
working together.
CONTENTS
I. PREAMBLE
II. Relevant Sections and Chapters:
Chapter 18. Protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources: application of
integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources
1.1. Humanity stands at a defining moment in history. We are confronted with a perpetuation of
disparities between and within nations, a worsening of poverty, hunger, ill health and illiteracy, and the
continuing deterioration of the ecosystems on which we depend for our well-being. However,
integration of environment and development concerns and greater attention to them will lead to the
fulfilment of basic needs, improved living standards for all, better protected and managed ecosystems
and a safer, more prosperous future. No nation can achieve this on its own; but together we can - in a
global partnership for sustainable development.
1.2. This global partnership must build on the premises of General Assembly resolution 44/228 of 22
December 1989, which was adopted when the nations of the world called for the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development, and on the acceptance of the need to take a balanced
and integrated approach to environment and development questions.
1.3. Agenda 21 addresses the pressing problems of today and also aims at preparing the world for the
challenges of the next century. It reflects a global consensus and political commitment at the highest
level on development and environment cooperation. Its successful implementation is first and foremost
the responsibility of Governments. National strategies, plans, policies and processes are crucial in
achieving this. International cooperation should support and supplement such national efforts. In this
context, the United Nations system has a key role to play. Other international, regional and subregional
organizations are also called upon to contribute to this effort. The broadest public participation and the
active involvement of the non-governmental organizations and other groups should also be encouraged.
1.4. The developmental and environmental objectives of Agenda 21 will require a substantial flow of
new and additional financial resources to developing countries, in order to cover the incremental costs
for the actions they have to undertake to deal with global environmental problems and to accelerate
sustainable development. Financial resources are also required for strengthening the capacity of
international institutions for the implementation of Agenda 21. An indicative order-of-magnitude
assessment of costs is included in each of the programme areas. This assessment will need to
beexamined and refined by the relevant implementing agencies and organizations.
1.5. In the implementation of the relevant programme areas identified in Agenda 21, special attention
should be given to the particular circumstances facing the economies in transition. It must also be
recognized that these countries are facing unprecedented challenges in transforming their economies,
in some cases in the midst of considerable social and political tension.
1.6. The programme areas that constitute Agenda 21 are described in terms of the basis for action,
objectives, activities and means of implementation. Agenda 21 is a dynamic programme. It will be
carried out by the various actors according to the different situations, capacities and priorities of
countries and regions in full respect of all the principles contained in the Rio Declaration on Environment
and Development. It could evolve over time in the light of changing needs and circumstances. This
process marks the beginning of a new global partnership for sustainable development.
*****
* When the term "Governments" is used, it will be deemed to include the European Economic
Community within its areas of competence. Throughout Agenda 21 the term "environmentally sound"
means "environmentally safe and sound", in particular when applied to the terms "energy sources",
"energy supplies", "energy systems" and "technology" or "technologies".
II. Relevant Sections and Chapters:
In order to meet the challenges of environment and development, States have decided to
establish a new global partnership. This partnership commits all States to engage in a
continuous and constructive dialogue, inspired by the need to achieve a more efficient and
equitable world economy, keeping in view the increasing interdependence of the community of
nations and that sustainable development should become a priority item on the agenda of the
international community. It is recognized that, for the success of this new partnership, it is
important to overcome confrontation and to foster a climate of genuine cooperation and
solidarity. It is equally important to strengthen national and international policies and
multinational cooperation to adapt to the new realities.
Environment and trade policies should be mutually supportive. An open, multilateral trading
system makes possible a more efficient allocation and use of resources and thereby contributes
to an increase in production and incomes and to lessening demands on the environment. It thus
provides additional resources needed for economic growth and development and improved
environmental protection. A sound environment, on the other hand, provides the ecological and
other resources needed to sustain growth and underpin a continuing expansion of trade. An
open, multilateral trading system, supported by the adoption of sound environmental policies,
would have a positive impact on the environment and contribute to sustainable development.
International cooperation in the environmental field is growing, and in a number of cases trade
provisions in multilateral environment agreements have played a role in tackling global
environmental challenges. Trade measures have thus been used in certain specific instances,
where considered necessary, to enhance the effectiveness of environmental regulations for the
protection of the environment. Such regulations should address the root causes of
environmental degradation so as not to result in unjustified restrictions on trade. The challenge
is to ensure that trade and environment policies are consistent and reinforce the process of
sustainable development. However, account should be taken of the fact that environmental
standards valid for developed countries may have unwarranted social and economic costs in
developing countries.
Action items under Agenda 21 must address the primary health needs of the world's population,
since they are integral to the achievement of the goals of sustainable development and primary
environmental care. The linkage of health, environmental and socio-economic improvements
requires intersectoral efforts. Such efforts, involving education, housing, public works and
community groups, including businesses, schools and universities and religious, civic and
cultural organizations, are aimed at enabling people in their communities to ensure sustainable
development.
In many locations around the world the general environment (air, water and land), workplaces
and even individual dwellings are so badly polluted that the health of hundreds of millions of
people is adversely affected. This is, inter alia, due to past and present developments in
consumption and production patterns and lifestyles, in energy production and use, in industry, in
transportation etc., with little or no regard for environmental protection. There have been notable
improvements in some countries, but deterioration of the environment continues. The ability of
countries to tackle pollution and health problems is greatly restrained because of lack of
resources. Pollution control and health protection measures have often not kept pace with
economic development. Considerable developmentrelated environmental health hazards exist
in the newly industrializing countries. Furthermore, the recent analysis of WHO has clearly
established the interdependence among the factors of health, environment and development
and has revealed that most countries are lacking such integration as would lead to an effective
pollution control mechanism. 2/ Without prejudice to such criteria as may be agreed upon by the
international community, or to standards which will have to be determined nationally, it will be
essential in all cases to consider the systems of values prevailing in each country and the extent
of the applicability of standards that are valid for the most advanced countries but may be
inappropriate and of unwarranted social cost for the developing countries.
Integrating environment and development at the policy, planning and management levels
Prevailing systems for decision-making in many countries tend to separate economic, social and
environmental factors at the policy, planning and management levels. This influences the
actions of all groups in society, including Governments, industry and individuals, and has
important implications for the efficiency and sustainability of development. An adjustment or
even a fundamental reshaping of decision-making, in the light of country-specific conditions,
may be necessary if environment and development is to be put at the centre of economic and
political decision-making, in effect achieving a full integration of these factors
The responsibility for bringing about changes lies with Governments in partnership with the
private sector and local authorities, and in collaboration with national, regional and international
organizations, including in particular UNEP, UNDP and the World Bank. Exchange of
experience between countries can also be significant. National plans, goals and objectives,
national rules, regulations and law, and the specific situation in which different countries are
placed are the overall framework in which such integration takes place. In this context, it must
be borne in mind that environmental standards may pose severe economic and social costs if
they are uniformly applied in developing countries.
The objectives and activities in this chapter of Agenda 21 are intended to improve the
conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of biological resources, as well as to
support the Convention on Biological Diversity. 15.2. Our planet's essential goods and services
depend on the variety and variability of genes, species, populations and ecosystems. The
current decline in biodiversity is largely the result of human activity and represents a serious
threat to human development.
Despite mounting efforts over the past 20 years, the loss of the world's biological diversity,
mainly from habitat destruction, over-harvesting, pollution and the inappropriate introduction of
foreign plants and animals, has continued. Biological resources constitute a capital asset with
great potential for yielding sustainable benefits. Urgent and decisive action is needed to
conserve and maintain genes, species and ecosystems, with a view to the sustainable
management and use of biological resources. Capacities for the assessment, study and
systematic observation and evaluation of biodiversity need to be reinforced at national and
international levels. Effective national action and international cooperation is required for the in
situ protection of ecosystems, for the ex situ conservation of biological and genetic resources
and for the enhancement of ecosystem functions. The participation and support of local
communities are elements essential to the success of such an approach. Recent advances in
biotechnology have pointed up the likely potential for agriculture, health and welfare and for the
environmental purposes of the genetic material contained in plants, animals and micro-
organisms. At the same time, it is particularly important in this context to stress that States have
the sovereign right to exploit their own biological resources pursuant to their environmental
policies, as well as the responsibility to conserve their biodiversity and use their biological
resources sustainably, and to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not
cause damage to the biological diversity of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national
jurisdiction.
Water is needed in all aspects of life. The general objective is to make certain that adequate
supplies of water of good quality are maintained for the entire population of this planet, while
preserving the hydrological, biological and chemical functions of ecosystems, adapting human
activities within the capacity limits of nature and combating vectors of water-related diseases.
Innovative technologies, including the improvement of indigenous technologies, are needed to
fully utilize limited water resources and to safeguard those resources against pollution.
The widespread scarcity, gradual destruction and aggravated pollution of freshwater resources
in many world regions, along with the progressive encroachment of incompatible activities,
demand integrated water resources planning and management. Such integration must cover all
types of interrelated freshwater bodies, including both surface water and groundwater, and duly
consider water quantity and quality aspects. The multisectoral nature of water resources
development in the context of socio-economic development must be recognized, as well as the
multi-interest utilization of water resources for water supply and sanitation, agriculture, industry,
urban development, hydropower generation, inland fisheries, transportation, recreation, low and
flat lands management and other activities. Rational water utilization schemes for the
development of surface and underground water-supply sources and other potential sources
have to be supported by concurrent water conservation and wastage minimization measures.
Priority, however, must be accorded to flood prevention and control measures, as well as
sedimentation control, where required.
The following programme areas are proposed for the freshwater sector:
a. Integrated water resources development and management;
b. Water resources assessment;
c. Protection of water resources, water quality and aquatic ecosystems;
d. Drinking-water supply and sanitation;
e. Water and sustainable urban development;
f. Water for sustainable food production and rural development;
g. Impacts of climate change on water resources.
Integrated water resources development and management;
The overall objective is to satisfy the freshwater needs of all countries for their sustainable
development.
Integrated water resources management is based on the perception of water as an integral part
of the ecosystem, a natural resource and a social and economic good, whose quantity and
quality determine the nature of its utilization. To this end, water resources have to be protected,
taking into account the functioning of aquatic ecosystems and the perenniality of the resource,
in order to satisfy and reconcile needs for water in human activities. In developing and using
water resources, priority has to be given to the satisfaction of basic needs and the safeguarding
of ecosystems. Beyond these requirements, however, water users should be charged
appropriately.
Integrated water resources management, including the integration of land- and water-related
aspects, should be carried out at the level of the catchment basin or sub-basin. Four principal
objectives should be pursued, as follows:
b. To plan for the sustainable and rational utilization, protection, conservation and
management of water resources based on community needs and priorities within
the framework of national economic development policy;
c. To design, implement and evaluate projects and programmes that are both
economically efficient and socially appropriate within clearly defined strategies,
based on an approach of full public participation, including that of women, youth,
indigenous people and local communities in water management policy-making
and decision-making;
Three objectives will have to be pursued concurrently to integrate water-quality elements into
water resource management:
b. Public health protection, a task requiring not only the provision of safe drinking-water but also
the control of disease vectors in the aquatic environment;
All States, according to their capacity and available resources, through bilateral or multilateral
cooperation, including the United Nations and other relevant organizations as appropriate, could
set the following targets:
c. To put in place strategies for the environmentally sound management of freshwaters and
related coastal ecosystems, including consideration of fisheries, aquaculture, animal grazing,
agricultural activities and biodiversity.
Special attention needs to be given to the growing effects of urbanization on water demands
and usage and to the critical role played by local and municipal authorities in managing the
supply, use and overall treatment of water, particularly in developing countries for which special
support is needed. Scarcity of freshwater resources and the escalating costs of developing new
resources have a considerable impact on national industrial, agricultural and human settlement
development and economic growth. Better management of urban water resources, including the
elimination of unsustainable consumption patterns, can make a substantial contribution to the
alleviation of poverty and improvement of the health and quality of life of the urban and rural
poor. A high proportion of large urban agglomerations are located around estuaries and in
coastal zones. Such an arrangement leads to pollution from municipal and industrial discharges
combined with overexploitation of available water resources and threatens the marine
environment and the supply of freshwater resources.
A substantial use of chemicals is essential to meet the social and economic goals of the world
community and today's best practice demonstrates that they can be used widely in a cost-
effective manner and with a high degree of safety. However, a great deal remains to be done to
ensure the environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, within the principles of
sustainable development and improved quality of life for humankind. Two of the major problems,
particularly in developing countries, are (a) lack of sufficient scientific information for the
assessment of risks entailed by the use of a great number of chemicals, and (b) lack of
resources for assessment of chemicals for which data are at hand.
Collaboration on chemical safety between the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP),
the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) in the
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) should be the nucleus for international
cooperation on environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals. All efforts should be
made to strengthen this programme. Cooperation with other programmes, such as those of the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the European
Communities (EC) and other regional and governmental chemical programmes, should be
promoted.
Because so many of the problems and solutions being addressed by Agenda 21 have their
roots in local activities, the participation and cooperation of local authorities will be a determining
factor in fulfilling its objectives. Local authorities construct, operate and maintain economic,
social and environmental infrastructure, oversee planning processes, establish local
environmental policies and regulations, and assist in implementing national and subnational
environmental policies. As the level of governance closest to the people, they play a vital role in
educating, mobilizing and responding to the public to promote sustainable development.
Each local authority should enter into a dialogue with its citizens, local organizations and private
enterprises and adopt "a local Agenda 21". Through consultation and consensus-building, local
authorities would learn from citizens and from local, civic, community, business and industrial
organizations and acquire the information needed for formulating the best strategies. The
process of consultation would increase household awareness of sustainable development
issues. Local authority programmes, policies, laws and regulations to achieve Agenda 21
objectives would be assessed and modified, based on local programmes adopted.
Partnerships should be fostered among relevant organs and organizations such as UNDP, the
United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) and UNEP, the World Bank, regional
banks, the International Union of Local Authorities, the World Association of the Major
Metropolises, Summit of Great Cities of the World, the United Towns Organization and other
relevant partners, with a view to mobilizing increased international support for local authority
programmes. An important goal would be to support, extend and improve existing institutions
working in the field of local authority capacity-building and local environment management For
this purpose:
a. Habitat and other relevant organs and organizations of the United Nations system are called
upon to strengthen services in collecting information on strategies of local authorities, in
particular for those that need international support;
b. Periodic consultations involving both international partners and developing countries could
review strategies and consider how such international support could best be
mobilized. Such a sectoral consultation would complement concurrent country-focused
consultations, such as those taking place in consultative groups and round tables.