As seen in the May 2015 issue
The case for nitrogen inerting of
flammable and combustible liquids
Protection against gas, oxygen and ignition coming together —
unexpectedly, explosively
By Nathan Bowser and Derek Miller
Even when required practices
such as bonding and grounding are
followed, flammable and combusti-
ble liquids can present the process
industries with complex, persistent
hazards.
NFPA Class II and Class III com-
bustible liquids heated above flash
point, nonconductive flammable
and combustible liquids and special
situations — such as switch loading
— present significant risks equal
to those presented by flammable
liquids such as NFPA Class IB and
IC and API Intermediate Vapor
Pressure products.
A review of several industrial fires
and explosions includes examples
of hazards that were either unmit-
igated or improperly controlled.
The examples demonstrate the role
proper inerting applications can
play in hazard protection.
It’s impossible to eliminate all
possible ignition sources in all
possible flammable environments,
Table 1: Common Static-
particularly given unexpected or Accumulating Flammable
off-spec operating conditions. Due Liquids That May Form
to an abundance of variables that Ignitable Vapor-Air Mixtures
may cause an ignition — e.g., static
electricity or other unforeseen spark VM&P Naptha
generators — a focus on minimizing
oxygen concentration by inerting is Cyclohexane
necessary in many cases.
The U.S. Chemical Safety Board n-Heptane
(USCSB) notes how complex, per-
sistently present and under-commu- Benzene
nicated flammable and combustible
material hazards can be. It points Toluene
out that standard protections such
as bonding and grounding might n-Hexane
not prevent accidents in cases
involving nonconductive flammable Xylene
liquids, which include many com-
mon materials (see Table 1). Ethyl Benzene
Inerting practices mitigate these
hazards, and are a benefit partic- Styrene
ularly where it is challenging or
impractical to eliminate all ignition Source: US CSB Case Study on Barton
sources. Solvents Explosion (No. 2007-06-I-KS)
Petrochemical Industry
Done properly, inerting prevents
fires and explosions above and
beyond that of normal bonding and
grounding and can even protect
product quality.
Heated above flash point
Contributing factors in an explo-
sion at a polyethylene wax-process-
ing facility included combustible
liquid heated above flash point,
improper nitrogen-inerting system
operation and improper pres-
sure-vessel alterations. The explo-
sion caused structural damage up
to one-quarter of a mile away from
the plant.
Processing polyethylene wax
includes removing impurities,
referred to as “rag,” where the rag
wax is heated to about 300 F using
holding-tank steam piping. Post-
accident testing by the CSB found
the rag wax to have a flash point
of 230 F, which classifies it as an
NFPA Class IIIB combustible liquid.
Heating the material above flash
point generated sufficient vapor to
produce an ignitable environment,
when mixed with a sufficient con-
centration of oxygen.
When failure of a weld on a pres-
surized holding tank led to spark
generation, it initiated a flame that
flashed back into the vessel, result-
ing in an internal deflagration and
vessel failure.
The accident’s several root caus-
es included improper rag-wax
holding-vessel inerting. The facility
generated nitrogen to prevent wax
oxidation, as well as pneumatically
transfer rag wax from the heated
holding tanks. This same nitrogen
system, properly used, could have
avoided explosion of the rag-wax
holding vessel.
Unfortunately, the facility nitrogen
generator pressure occasionally
dropped below that required to
transfer the rag wax. To maintain
sufficient pressure to sustain opera-
tions, a compressed-air connection
downstream of the nitrogen gener-
ator allowed mixing compressed air
with the nitrogen stream.
Investigation determination
Investigation determined that the
nitrogen system typically generated
92 - 96 percent nitrogen with 4 - 8
percent oxygen. Post-accident gas
samples taken downstream of the
generator and compressed-air con-
nection tested 82-percent nitrogen
with 18-percent oxygen.
USCSB found this oxygen concen-
tration, although lower than that of
air (21 percent), adequate to sup-
port combustion. Given this oxygen
concentration and the flammable
rag-wax vapors in the holding ves-
sels, two of the three elements nec-
essary for a fire were present.
When the third element—an igni-
tion source—manifested itself, the
inevitable result was the accident
described.
Many industrial accidents involve
root causes that are occasional-
ly unique, but often unforeseen
because no one is consistently
“overlooking.”
Done correctly, inerting can pre-
vent the escalations that lead to
further failures. Inerting the rag wax
holding vessels may have prevent-
ed the flash-back into a vessel and
the catastrophe that immediately
ensued.
Something safer than the com-
pressed air connection, such as
liquid nitrogen backup or a differ-
ent generator system, would have
Petrochemical Industry
precluded attaining oxygen levels
sufficient for combustion. Matching
an inert gas supply system to the
process utilization rates and flow
patterns is important and can be
accomplished either by an on-site
generator, liquid supply, or combi-
nation of both.
Non-conductive liquids
Another noteworthy incident
involving unexpected spark gen-
eration, ignition, and explosion
occurred in a storage tank contain-
ing Varnish Makers’ and Painters’
naphtha. The naphtha’s flash point
was found to be 58 F, and USCSB
determined that at the handling
temperature during the incident
(approximately 77 F), there was like-
ly an ignitable mixture in the tank-
head space. Many materials, such
as NFPA Class IB and IC flammable
liquids, and API Intermediate Vapor
Pressure Products, are capable of
evolving flammable vapor-air mix-
tures at ambient conditions.
According to Britton, the naph-
tha involved also had a low electri-
cal conductivity of 3 picosiemens
per meter (pS/m), which allowed
for a potentially hazardous accumu-
lation of static electricity. Materials
with conductivities below 100 pS/m
are generally considered to be
non-conductive. Many very com-
mon liquids fall within this category
(see Table 1).
Processing these liquid materials
through piping, tubing, or filters;
splash filling; or stirring with splash-
ing can cause them to accumulate
static electricity. Decay of that static
charge depends on the liquid’s con-
ductivity and dielectric constant, so
that even the liquid surface in con-
tact with a bonded and grounded
tank wall can have static potential.
The fire and explosion occurred
while a tanker-trailer was loading
naphtha into an above-ground stor-
age tank. Witnesses confirm the
tanker-trailer, pump, piping, and
storage tank were all bonded and
grounded at the time. The tank
included a level float with a loose
linkage that could interrupt ground-
ing by slightly separating near the
float.
What had transpired
USCSB determined that static
charge accumulation occurred on
the nonconductive liquid surface
inside the tank and that a spark,
likely generated by the loose
linkage and intermittent loss of
grounding, ignited the flammable
vapor-air mixture in the tank head
space. The result was a fire and
explosion that destroyed the tank
farm and sent eleven residents and
one firefighter for medical treat-
ment.
A key investigation finding was
that the tank had an ignitable
vapor-air mixture in its head space.
Proper inerting techniques could
have mitigated this hazard by
reducing oxygen concentration to
below ignition-support levels. As
previously mentioned, bonding and
grounding typically employed to
mitigate static- charge accumulation
hazard but, in many cases, it may
not be enough.
Although the USCSB determined
the loose linkage was the most
likely spark location, a spark from a
brush discharge could not be ruled
out. According to Britton, brush
discharges can occur even when
equipment is properly bonded
and grounded during loading and
unloading operations. In this case,
two legs of the fire triangle — fuel
and an ignition source — can be
present, and a focus on eliminating
the oxygen content is needed. The
USCSB specifically noted in this
incident investigation that extra
precautions should be taken by
companies that store, transfer, and
handle nonconductive flammable
liquids due to these risks.
For those companies, inerting
solutions exist to protect against
the unexpected. Storage tanks
can be blanketed using a form of
concentration or pressure control,
which can be more economical than
blanketing via continuous purging.
Based on the material’s limiting oxy-
gen concentration, process operat-
ing pattern and flow rate needs, an
inert-gas purity and supply mode
(or combination of supply modes)
can be recommended. Nitrogen is
the most commonly used inerting
gas, but carbon dioxide or argon
can be used where nitrogen is not
appropriate.
Those special cases
Several additional, special cases
present significant flammability haz-
Petrochemical Industry
ards. Examples include off-gassing
of abnormal volatile components
in a low-vapor pressure liquid; fine
droplets, mist, or foam on the liq-
uid surface; processing liquids at
non-standard temperatures or pres-
sures capable of creating ignitable
vapors; or practices such as switch
loading.
“Switch loading,” as defined by
API 2003, refers to the practice of
loading a low-vapor pressure liquid
into a container, e.g., trailer, tank or
vessel, which previously contained
a high or intermediate vapor pres-
sure product. The hazard exists
because the head space, which is
often above the upper-flammability
limit with the high or intermediate
vapor-pressure product, may drop
into the flammable range while load-
ing the low-vapor pressure product.
In the event of a spark or static
discharge from liquid loading, the
flammable mixture in the head space
could ignite, resulting in fire, explo-
sion or both. Switch loading of non-
conductive liquids increases this risk
since any static charge build-up will
not be bled off as easily via bonding
and grounding. This practice has
resulted in numerous fires in indus-
try. Sufficient vessel inerting prior
to loading the low-vapor pressure
liquid can protect against these haz-
ards by eliminating the oxygen con-
tent as well as the ignitable vapors
from the previous liquid.
Final words
Combustible liquids heated above
their flash point, nonconductive
flammable and combustible liquids,
and special situations such as switch
loading present significant risks
that warrant additional precautions.
Inerting is a powerful and flexible
solution that can mitigate fires and
explosions for these situations. Inert
gases can present the risk of asphyx-
iation if not used properly. Therefore
safe handling procedures must be
understood and followed. In addi-
tion, materials such as ethylene
oxide contain oxygen in the mole-
cule that can yield flammability, with-
out additional oxygen. Therefore,
proper design of an inerting system
and its supply mode are based on
the facility, processes, and hazards
at hand. Experts in applying inert
gas solutions are essential resourc-
es when designing an application
and can help facilities improve their
understanding as well as their pro-
cess safety.
Nathan Bowser is an Industrial
Gases Applications Engineer at Air
Products covering the chemical pro-
cessing, biotech, rubber, and plastics
industries.
Derek Miller is Process Safety
Technical Director  at Air Products.
He has responsibility for the meth-
ods and tools used to manage pro-
cess safety hazards associated with
the production and application  of
the company’s gas and chemical
products.

For more information, please contact us at:

Corporate Headquarters Asia Europe

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Air Products Asia, Inc. Air Products PLC
7201 Hamilton Boulevard Floor 4&5, Building 72 2 Millennium Gate
Allentown, PA 18195-1501 U.S.A. Lane 887, Zu Chong Zhi Road Westmere Drive
T 800-654-4567 or 610-706-4730 Zhangjiang Hi-tech Park Crewe CW16AP
T 514-353-4331 (Francais) Shanghai, China United Kingdom
F 800-272-4449 T +86-21-3896-2000 T +44(0)800 389 0202
gigmrktg@airproducts.com F +86-21-5080-5575 F +44-1932-258652
Merchant Gases Hotline: 400-888-7662 apbulkuk@airproducts.com

tell me more
airproducts.com/inert

©Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., 2015 312-15-020-US