Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Yasser Shahzad1,*,§, Sidra Saeed1, §, Muhammad Usman Ghori2, Tariq Mahmood1, Abid
Mehmood Yousaf1, Muhammad Jamshaid1, Muhammad Rizwan3 and Syed A. A. Rizvi4
Pakistan
4Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University,
*Correspondence:
Dr. Yasser Shahzad
Assistant Professor of Pharmaceutics
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Central Punjab
Lahore, Pakistan
Email: dr.yasser@ucp.edu.pk
y.shahzad@live.com
Abstract
Microsponge refers to a highly cross-linked particle system with a capacity to adsorb (like a
dry sponge) pharmaceutical materials. There are various methods available to prepare
microsponge formulations, in this study we used quasi emulsion-solvent diffusion method
with a combination of hydrophobic (ethyl cellulose) and hydrophilic polymers
(hydroxypropyl methylcellulose) mediated via Tween 80 and polyvinyl alcohol. Various
ratios and amounts of the polymers and surfactants were used to prepare microsponge
formulations using ketoprofen as a model drug and extensively characterised. Our results,
for the first time, indicate successful and optimised formulation with desired pharmaceutical
characteristics using a combination of hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymers.
Where MMicro is the weight of formulated microsponges and MRM is the initial weight of the
raw materials (polymers and drug). Production yield was calculated in triplicate and the
mean ± standard deviation values are reported.
The fact that we achieved lower yield of microsponges with higher HPMC contents, could
stem from the fact that HPMC is a hydrophilic polymer, and by the time dichloromethane
diffused out, some of the HPMC could have been dissolved in the aqueous phase, thereby
decreasing an overall content. A low drug loading capacity in case of Tween 80 as emulsifier
indicates a possibility of drug being leached out from the porous microsponges during
solidification process because of larger pore size (see section 3.2.1). However, increasing
amount of PVA might have increased the viscosity of internal phase by arranging themselves
in layers around the emulsion droplets. This conformation may have restricted the escape of
ketoprofen until the droplets converted into microsponges. With this conformation, one can
easily judge that the diffusion of dichloromethane would also be slow, thus leaving more
precise and smaller pores in microsponges, as confirmed by the mercury porosimetry and
SEM images (see sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2).
Table 3. Total intrusion volume, average pore diameter, bulk and apparent densities, total
pore area and porosity of microsponge formulations (n=3).
Formulation Total Average Bulk Apparent Total pore Porosity
Intrusion Pore density density area (%)
volume diameter (g/mL) (g/mL) (m2/g)
(mL/g) (µm)
Blank microsponge 1.33 ± 0.11 0.48 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.04 1.18 ± 0.10 29.33 ± 0.55 66.11 ± 3.87
(PVA)
Ketoprofen-loaded 1.19 ± 0.09 0.33 ± 0.08 0.48 ± 0.03 1.25 ± 0.09 24.88 ± 0.61 61.60 ± 2.56
microsponge (PVA)
Blank microsponge 1.99 ± 0.15 0.65 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.01 1.31 ± 0.15 77.88 ± 0.50 77.10 ± 1.40
(Tween 80)
Ketoprofen-loaded 1.66 ± 0.18 0.51 ± 0.03 0.39 ± 0.04 1.32 ± 0.07 49.22 ± 0.25 70.45 ± 2.11
microsponge
(Tween 80)
2500
2000
Intensity (a.u.)
1500
Ketoprofen
1000 Drug-loaded microsponge (Tween80)
Drug-loaded microsponge (PVA)
500
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2(degree)
80
60
F1
40 F3
F5
F7
F9
20
F11
F13
F15
0 F17
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time/h
Fig. 6. Dissolution profile of ketoprofen-loaded microsponges prepared using Tween 80 as
surfactant.
100
Percentage drug release (%)
80
60
F2
F4
40
F6
F8
F10
20 F12
F14
F16
0 F18
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time/h