Episode 11

00:07:15,300 --> 00:07:16,460

Text: You told me you'll forget it.
Fallacy: Argumentatum ad Misericordiam
Explanation: The husband is trying to convince his wife by evoking feelings of compassion

00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:05,060

Text: It was because I knew...you'd be more confused had I told you.
Fallacy: Argumentatum Ad Hominem
Explanation: The husband is ignores the issue by focusing on the personal characteristics of his
wife.

00:11:45,900 --> 00:12:00,000

Text: If we can help people while getting more famous, it's perfect. We're on a roll after winning
Lee Tae Joon's case. If we win this case on top of it, our law firm's name will be engraved in the
public's mind. That way, we won't have to fire people again.
Fallacy: Hasty generalization
Explanation: The speaker is trying to conclude based on a single circumstance that happened.

00:13:02,730 --> 00:13:06,720

Text: Lawyers who are talented at speaking... will be at an advantage than those with talents in
writing.
Fallacy: Hasty generalization
Explanation: The speaker is trying to conclude based on limited circumstances that were not
proven by any studies.

00:18:08,530 --> 00:18:36,930

Text: We're here today because a family was ruined because of Elvatil. Many died from the side
effects of antidepressant Elvatil. However, the pharmaceutical company MRG... denies this fact
and is continuing to sell the drug... which will lead to more victims.

00:21:59,130 --> 00:22:10,130

Text: I have what's called tardive dyskinesias. I can't control all of my muscles, so I keep moving
like this. Sometimes when I'm happy, I do this.
Fallacy: Argumentatum ad Misericordiam
Explanation: The counsel is convincing the judges and the people by evoking sympathy that are
not logical to the case.

00:22:19,030 --> 00:22:53,400

Text: I take this medicine once every few hours every day. This medicine doesn't get rid of my
symptoms completely, but it reduces them greatly. My condition is rare, so selling this medicine
won't bring enough revenue.
Fallacy: Hasty Generalization
Explanation: The speaker creates a conclusion based on insufficient and isolated facts.

00:25:47,690 --> 00:25:51,890

Text: Why do you think I did that?
Are you seeing another man?
Fallacy: begging the question(leading)
Explanation: The speaker makes the other accept a conclusion based on the premise that is
assumed by the question.
00:35:08,660 --> 00:35:27,870
Text: What was that substance called?
Sel... Serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, right?
Anyway, that substance has an influence on people's... sexual behaviours and emotions, doesn't
it?
Yes. It does, but...
But it would only amplify one's feelings. It cannot create feelings one never had, am I right?
Fallacy: Begging the Question(Leading)
Explanation: The counsel is leading the witness to answer questions favorable to their side.

575
00:36:44,560 --> 00:36:47,530
Text: Please help us so that there won't
be any more victims like us.
Fallacy: Argumentatum ad Misericordiam
Explanation: The counsel is trying to convince the jury to give them a favorable decision based on
emotional appeal.

00:37:16,060 --> 00:38:12,260

Text: Did your father work in an interior design company?
Yes. He designed wallpapers and lights.
Were all of his colleagues females?
I'm not sure about that.
Then I'll tell you. He worked with 11 women. He used to work late a lot, right?
He was late time to time, but...
I'd like to submit this as evidence. The police found this bag when they arrived at the site.
Is it your father's?
Yes.
This is a list of items inside the bag. Please read out loud the third item. I'll read it out loud instead.
"A woman's black underwear". "Small size".
Fallacy: Argumentatum Ad Hominem
Explanation: The counsel is trying to expose the unchaste practices of the accused to give focus
to the personal characteristics of the accused which are irrelevant to the issue.

00:40:08,430 --> 00:40:12,730

Text: Do you really believe in what you say... or are you doing this for the money?
Fallacy: False Dilemma
Explanation: The speaker is giving two alternatives that are not exhaustive but are so given to let
the listener preclude what the speaker wanted to hear.

00:46:17,130 --> 00:46:19,730

Text: Skills are more important than conscience, right?
Fallacy: Appeal to Ages
Explanation: The speaker is trying to convince the listener that the skills are more important than
conscience based on prior experiences.

00:53:20,290 --> 00:53:37,650

Text: If you step into politics, you lose interest in women. Politics is so much more fun. It excites
you and you get addicted to it. Gosh, it's incomparable to women. You'll be able to have a better
relationship with your wife.
Fallacy: Hasty generalization
Explanation: The notion that entering into politics is taken as general rule when there can be other
circumstances which may \change such cionclusion.
01:01:23,890 --> 01:01:26,020
Text: Are you the good one and the only one who's hurt?
Fallacy: False Dilemma
Explanation: The speaker is giving two seemingly exhaustive alternatives though in fact it is not.

01:01:26,190 --> 01:01:33,250

Text: Is it all my fault? You've lived with me for 15 years. Don't pretend that you're the victim and
the only good person.
Fallacy: Argumentatum ad Misericordiam
Explanation: The speaker is trying to convince the other by evoking feelings of compassion

01:01:45,650 --> 01:01:57,620

Text: You said you loved me so tell me what you've done for me. Have you ever... asked what I
really wanted?
Fallacy: Argumentatum Ad Hominem
Explanation: The husband ignores the issue by focusing on the personal characteristics of his
wife.

01:03:09,120 --> 01:03:13,449

Text: Between you and me, whose the worse one?
Fallacy: False Dilemma
Explanation: The speaker presents two alternatives and assumes that they are exhaustive when
in fact they are not.

01:03:17,890 --> 01:03:24,810

Text: Were you wondering why I was taking so long to forgive you?
My apologies were sincere.
You were the one who didn't believe me.
Fallacy: Argumentatum Ad Hominem
Explanation: The husband ignores the issue by focusing on the personal characteristics of his
wife.