Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Project Information .......................................................................................................... 3
1.2.1 Salient Features ......................................................................................................... 3
1.2.2 Site Condition ........................................................................................................... 3
2. Analysis Technology and Methodology ................................................................................. 4
2.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 4
2.2 Codes and Standard used.................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Software Used ....................................................................................................................... 5
3. Analysis................................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Material properties .......................................................................................................... 6
3.1.1 Concrete ......................................................................................................................... 6
3.1.2 Reinforcement Steel .................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Section Properties ............................................................................................................. 6
3.3 Loadings ........................................................................................................................... 6
3.3.1 Load Cases ................................................................................................................ 7
3.3.2 Load Combination .................................................................................................... 7
3.4 Estimation of Load ................................................................................................................ 7
3.4.1 Unit Weight (Dead Load) ......................................................................................... 8
3.4.2 Live Load .................................................................................................................. 9
3.4.3 Seismic Load ........................................................................................................... 10
3.4.4 Response spectrum....................................................................................................... 11
4. Analysis and Design ............................................................................................................. 11
4.1 Time period and Base shear coefficient .............................................................................. 12
4.2 Drift and mass participation ratios ...................................................................................... 12
4.3 Check of Analysis ............................................................................................................... 12
4.4 Reinforcement requirement in beams and columns ............................................................ 13
4.5 Reinforcement requirement in foundation .......................................................................... 17
4.6 Reinforcement requirement in slab ..................................................................................... 20
4.7 Summary of Adopted Sections and reinforcement ............................................................. 21
References ..................................................................................................................................... 22
1
List of Figures
List of Tables
2
1. Introduction
1.1 General
This report presents the structure analysis and design of RC Gumbas. The building is Special
Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) type of building. It is designed to
meet both strength and serviceability requirements when subjected to gravity and earthquake
loads.
The analysis and design has been based on IS codes that are in practice in Nepal. This report
consists of the design assumptions, design methodology, design inputs and outputs, and
sample design of structural members.
1.2 Project Information
Twelve different RC Gumbas as listed below are modeled with following features
S.No Plan area No. of storeys ID of building
1 600 sq ft 1 600_1 gumba
2 600 sq ft 2 600_2 gumba
3 800 sq ft 1 800_1 gumba
4 800 sq ft 2 800_2 gumba
5 1000 sq ft 1 1000_1 gumba
6 1000 sq ft 2 1000_2 gumba
7 1200 sq ft 1 1200_1 gumba
8 1200 sq ft 2 1200_2 gumba
9 1400 sq ft 1 1400_1 gumba
10 1400 sq ft 2 1400_2 gumba
11 1800 sq ft 1 1800_1 gumba
12 1800 sq ft 2 1800_2 gumba
3
2. Analysis Technology and Methodology
2.1 General
After completion of Architectural design, the layout of columns and beams are done without
affecting the Architectural functions of building so far. Structure is modeled using finite
element method. A three-dimensional beam element having 12 DOF with 6 DOFs at each
node were used for modeling beams and columns in the building, while 24 DOFs shell
element with 6 DOFs at each node were used to model slab wall.
The structure is analyzed by the linear elastic theory to calculate internal actions produced by
anticipated design loads. The analysis is carried out using state of art three-dimensional
structural analysis programs like ETABS 2013. The design loads considered as per the
relevant codes of practice comprise dead load due to permanent structures, live load due to
occupancy of the structure and seismic load due to anticipated earthquake possible at the
proposed location. Several load combinations are considered to obtain the maximum values
of design stresses.
Following considerations is made during modeling, analysis and design.
The structures are Special Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) type.
Beams and columns are considered as the structural load resisting elements. Although
non-structural components like wall plaster, infill walls, floor finishing etc has comes
effects on structural performance, they are considered only as loading.
For all structural elements, M20 grade concrete are used.
Centre-line dimensions are followed for modeling, analysis and design.
Floor slabs are assumed to be rigid in their own plane. The slab action has been modeled
by rigid floor diaphragms. Slabs are also considered in modeling. Slab is modeled as shell
element.
Beam and columns are modeled as frame elements.
The main beams rest centrally on columns to avoid local eccentricity. Foundation is
assumed to be fully rigid at the plinth level.
The beam-column joint is not modeled in detail.
Preliminary sizes of structural components are assumed by experience.
Seismic loads were considered acting in the horizontal direction (along either of the two
orthogonal directions of building) and not along the vertical direction, since it is not
considered to be significant for design of structural members suitable load combinations
as suggested by IS 1893– 2002 are used.
4
2.2 Codes and Standard used
For the structural analysis and design, the following codes and standard are followed:
IS 456- 2000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete.
IS 875-1987 Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and
structures.
IS 1893-2002 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.
IS 13920-1993 Code of practice for ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures
subjected to seismic forces.
5
3. Analysis
3.1 Material properties
3.1.1 Concrete
All components of plain and reinforced concrete unless specified in design are M20 grade.
The structural design strength is derived from the characteristic strength multiplied by a
coefficient 0.67 and divided by the material partial safety factor. The partial factor for concrete
in flexure and axial load is 1.5.
3.1.2 Reinforcement Steel
Characteristic strength of high yield steel is taken as 500 MPa for main rebar and shear rebar and
material partial safety factor is to be 1.15.
Modulus of Elasticity = 2*105 Mpa
During the analysis, beam and column are modeled as frame elements whereas slabs are
modeled as area element.
3.3 Loadings
The following considerations are made during the loading on the structural model:
The loads distributed over the area are imposed on the area element and the loads
distributed over the length are imposed on the frame elements whenever possible.
For lateral load, necessary calculations are performed to comply with the requirements of
IS 1893-2000.
6
3.3.1 Load Cases
The following load cases are used for the loading during analysis.
7
The weight of infill walls are calculated and applied on beams as line weight in KN/m.
Parapet wall load are assigned as uniformly distributed area load in beam
Floor finishing load are assigned as area load in slab with magnitude of 1.5 KN/m2.
3.4.1 Unit Weight (Dead Load)
Dead loads for analysis are calculated as per Indian Standard, IS 875 - 1987(part1). Unit weights
of different material used are given below.
Table 2: Unit Weight of Materials
SN Type Value
1 Reinforced Concrete 25 KN/m3
2 Brick Masonry 19 KN/m3
8
Figure 3: Floor Finish intensity on slab (KN/m2)
9
Figure 4: Live load intensity on slab (KN/m2)
3.4.3 Seismic Load
The seismic load is applied to the building with auto lateral load pattern in ETABS 2013 as per
IS 1893-2000. This load case is assumed static linear and all the necessary data are given as per
the following conditions.
To determine the seismic load, it is considered that the country lies in the seismic zone V
according to IS 1893:2000. The soil type is considered as soft with 5% damping to determine
average response acceleration. The building is analyzed as moment resisting frame without
consideration of infill wall. Therefore the fundamental time period Ta is obtained by using the
following formula:
Ta = 0.09*h/√(d) [Cl.7.6.2, IS 1893 -2002]
10
1 Dead load 1
2 Live load<=3 0.25
3 Live load>3 0.5
3 Roof live load 0
Figure 5: Response Spectra for rock and soil sites for 5 percent damping
The spectrum ordinates defined within IS:1893, are normalized values in which spectral
accelerations are divided by gravity acceleration. The spectrum must be converted to the specific
set of units used throughout the model by applying a scale factor given as the value of gravity
acceleration in the current units of your model.
The design spectrum of IS: 1893 is actually the MCE-level spectrum which must be reduced by
dividing this value by a factor of 2R, in which R is the response reduction factor. In the first run,
the value of the scale factor should be SF = I*g/(2R), in which I is the importance factor. After
the first run, the base shear is checked which develops in the model, and if this value is less than
the code-prescribed minimum, then increased by the scale factor of the first run such that the
resultant base shear matches the code specification. The scale factor to match the base shear with
static method is shown below in table
Scale Factor
Gumba
X-Dir Y-Dir
800 _2 gumba 1.644 1.693
11
The analysis results are discussed in this chapter. Both seismic coefficient method and response
spectrum method is used for analysis. The major discussions are focused on the time period, base
shear, storey drift and reinforcement requirement along two orthogonal directions.
Ta = 0.09*h/√(d)
Where,
h is height of building in m
d is base dimension of the building at the plinth level, in m, along the considered direction of the
lateral force.
Obtained time period is 0.208 sec in X- direction and 0.295 sec in Y-direction 0.371 ec. As time
period is below 0.5 sec, base shear coefficient of 0.135 is used as according to following
calculation
12
Case Displacement
(mm)
19.702 0.002374 OK
2 EQX X 13.7 0.002378 OK
1 EQX X 6.453 0.001745 OK
Base EQX X 0
16.451 0.002143 OK
2 EQY Y 10.629 0.002264 OK
1 EQY Y 3.904 0.001067 OK
Base EQY Y 0
Similarly, according to the clause 7.8.4.2 of IS 1893-2002, the number of modes to be used in the
analysis should be such that the sum of total modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90
percent of the total seismic mass.
Modal Mass Participating Ratios
IS 1893: 2002 clause 7.8.4.2 states that number of modes to be used in the analysis should be
such that the sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the total
seismic mass of the structure. Analysis was carried out for modes up to which the 90 percent
mass participation is there so that the mass participation satisfies this criterion in both orthogonal
directions. Table shows time period and mass participation ratio for all modes.
13
Figure 6: Reinforcement requirement in grid A-A
14
Figure 8: Reinforcement requirement in grid C-C
15
Figure 10: Reinforcement requirement in storey 1
16
4.5 Reinforcement requirement in foundation
Owing to the basis of their location, columns are classified as corner, side and middle columns.
Accordingly, the requirement of foundation size and reinforcement is calculated. Sample
calculation of isolated foundation carrying largest axial load is presented below.
Inputs
Axial Load 202 KN
Bearing capacity of footing 100 KN/m2
Column size a 0.3
b 0.3
Grade of concete 20 N/mm2
Grade of steel 500 N/mm2
Cover 50 mm
Dia of Bar 12 mm
Outputs
Area of Footing 2.02 m2
Provide L 1.6 m
B 1.6 m
Net earth pressure 118.36 KN/m2
Bending moment 40.005 KN-m
Effective depth 95.18 mm
Assume depth 250 mm
Overall depth 300 mm
Area of steel 377 mm2
Spacing 150 mm
Actual area of steel 1206.4 mm2
b B
17
Checking
Two way shear
Critical section at d/2 from face of
column
Shear force 267.2 KN
Nominal shear stress 0.668 N/mm2 0.597
Ks 1
Permissible Shear stress(Ѓ c) 1.118 N/mm2
safe
One way Shear
shear force at d from face of column
Ultimate Shear force 75.8 KN
Nominal shear stress 0.1894 0
percentage of steel 28.00%
Permissible Shear strength 0.36 N/mm2
safe
18
Reinforcement above the joint 1.40%
2 Sagging Capacity
Mu/(bd2) 2.4
Mu 2 53.7 KN-m
B Capacity of Column
Pu/(Fck bd) 0.08
1 For Below the joint
P/Fck 0.07
Mu/(Fckbd2) 0.14
Mu 75.6 KN-m
∑Mc/∑Mb 1.4 OK
19
4.6 Reinforcement requirement in slab
DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB
Design Data
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 20 N/mm 2
Length of short span, Lx = 3.1500 m fy = 500 N/mm 2
Length of long span, Ly = 3.800 m
Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm
Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 125 mm ; Effective depth, d = 101 mm
Effective span, lx = 3.15 m (or) 3.021 m whichever is less; d = 3.021 m
ly = 3.8 m (or) 3.671 m whichever is less; d = 3.671 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.22 < 2 ; Here, (ly / lx ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab
Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.125 x 25 = 3.13 KN/m 2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m 2
Finishes load on slab = 1.50 KN/m 2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m 2
2
Live Load on slab = 4.0 KN/m
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.63 KN/m 2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 4.0 KN/m 2
Factored Design Load w = 12.95 KN/m 2
Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x 2 & My = ay w l x 2
20
4.7 Summary of Adopted Sections and reinforcement
The summary of adopted sections and reinforcements for different element like beam, column,
and slab is given below:
12-
0.9x0.9 250 1.5*1.5 250 12-150 1X1 250 12-150 1.6x1.6 250 12-150
150
4-16+4-12
300x300 125 10-150 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 3-12
(all)
21
References
22