Crusade for Christ

COL. GORDON "Jack" MOHR, AUS. RET.

400 Harper Lane
North Little Rock, AR 72118
(501) 753-2.095

Special Report
From the Watchman's Corner

The Noahide Laws

A Read and Pressing Danger!
Very few people who go by the name of Christian, know very much about the Noahide Laws, which today
govern America, in place of the Laws of Almighty God, which made and has preserved America as a
great. nation. Very few Christians know of the disastrous effect this heathen law will have on our Israel
people.

The fact that the majority of White Christians, who are Israelites of the "seed of Abraham , and do riot know this is
their heritage, because of false teachings in most Christian churches, which has given this position to the
antichrist's of Judaism, as we have forgotten God's warning in 2 Chronicles 19:2 - "... Shouldest thou help the
ungodly (and the Jewish people our churches claim are God's Chosen, are the one's described in 1 John 2:22
as antichrists), and love them that hate the Lord (they call Him a bastard)? Therefore is wrath upon thee from before
the Lord." Is not part. of this discussion, but merely mentioned to put this message into proper perspective. Our
antichrist enemy, whom Jesus described as children of hell" (Matthew 23:25), and in other places, have
cleverly lead our people, through Jewish fables the Apostle Paul warned us about in Titus 1:10, 11, & 14, to
accept these heathen laws, which are hastening Zionist attempts to "destroy white Christian civilization. "

Paul said of them, "For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the.
circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert (Greek - anatrepo - meaning: "to overthrow or
overturn the truth"), whole houses, teaching things they ought not, for filthy lucre's (money) sake . . . Not
giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."

I realize that some of you may have been taught in your church, that Jesus did away with the Law, when He
died on Calvary, and He did do away with the ceremonial laws and the laws of sacrifice, when he made
His "once and for all tune sacrifice for our sins. " Both lie and the Apostle Paul said that God's Law; the
Law of the Fen Commandments was not abolished. Jesus said, "I am not come to destroy the Law, but to
fulfill it." (Matthew 5:17) The Apostle Paul tells us in Romans 3:31, "Do we make void the Law
through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." In I John 3:4, .sirs is described as transgression of
the Law.

So we must definitely deal with Law, either that of God, or of the enemy.

In the first Century church, a great disturbance was created in the Jerusalem church when men from
Judea"(evidently Jews), began to teach that a man "must be circumcised before die l- could be saved. "
This was brought to the attention of the Jerusalem Church Council, where the Apostle Peter addressed
it in Acts 15:10 when he said, "Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of
disciples, which neither our fathers or we were able to bear?" (Refer also to Matthew 23:4), where Jesus,
speaking to the Jewish leaders accused them of "laying heavy burdens, and grievous to be borne, on
men's shoulders, but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers."

The Apostle Paul warns us in Galatians 5:1, to "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has
made us free, and be riot entangled again with the yoke of bondage." In other words, don't allow yourself to
believe keeping the Law can save you. Paul says that. those who place their trust for salvation in merely
keeping the Law have "fallen from grace.

Unfortunately many in the modern church have gone "overboard" on this truth and in their newfound
freedom, have often "thrown the baby out with the bath water"; by believing the Law no longer applies
to Christians. Yet Jesus said in John 14:15 - "If ye love me, keep my Commandments." Then in Matthew
5:19 He reinforced this by saving, "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments,
and shall teach men so, shall be called the least in the Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and
teach them, the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of heaven."

So you can see that keeping God's Law the Ten Commandments is very important, although this does not
save you.

If these things are true, and God's Word says they are, then how did Christian America become entangled
in the heathen Noahide Laws that govern us? And what effect do they have on our Christian witness?

This information on the Noahide Laws, which were approved by U.S. Congress in 1991, comes from
Pastor Cohen A. Rechart, who is pastor in an Apostolic Messianic Fellowship. (I'm not sure if this is a
Jewish group or not.)

If it is Jewish, then it cannot be Christian, for there can be no such thing as a Jewish Christian or a
Christian Jew. 'They are opposites, who do not even worship the same God. I doubt this will come as
a shock to you in the Fundamental world, which has been taught that the Jews are God's Chosen
people. A little study in the Jewish holy book, the Babylonian Talmud will convince you that they are
heading in opposite directions. Unfortunately very few Christian's pastors have ever read, or studied from
the Talmud, soknow little about the Jewish religion, other than what the rabbis in their seminaries have
taught them.

When anyone Jewish or non-Jewish is "born horn above" (John 3:3), they become a new creature, who is
a Christian. It's impossible to be an antichrist of Judaism, and a believer in Jesus Christ at the same time, as a
roan cannot have two masters. "

If a Jew can be saved, when this happens they are no longer a Jew, but a Christian. Yet few of them are willing
to drop the Jewish ness out of their life.

The present issue of the Noahide Law was the work of the Jewish Senator Joseph Lieberman. He was the
man who instigated their approval and sped its way through Congress. Most Senators were against what
Lieberman was attempting to do, but were duped by this Jew, as many have been before. Many pastors in the
Christian world, who have been leading their sheep to destruction, aided him.
President G. W. Bush Sr. signed these Noahide Laws into approved Law, on March 20, 1991, as P.L.
102-14.

Christian people in particular, must know what took place in our Law system that placed us under
heathen law. This is why I am putting out this SPECIAL REPORT

yours for Christ and Country, Jack Mohr.

Noahide Law and the New World Order

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

By Charles A. Fuller, Jr. (July 1992)

REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION.

'We find few historians who have been diligent enough in their search for truth; it is their common method
to take on trust what they help distribute to the public; by which means a falsehood once received from a
famed writer becomes traditional to posterity."

John Dryden
English Poet, 1631-1700

Here's another issue that liberals and the media are so incredibly ignorant about, I can only shake my head.
Regardless of how you feel about this issue, let's work with some facts so that we can all better understand
the historical path that got America to its current state of sickening political correctness and how it relates
to "separation of church and state." The following piece is as factual representation of this subject matter as
I have found except for David Barton's superb film, America's Godly Heritage.

_Supreme Court Ignores Founding Fathers on Prayer Issue

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued another decision undermining the U.S. Constitution and moral
foundations of America. The recent court decision banning prayer at school graduation ceremonies ignores
the intent of the Founding Fathers who clearly believed that religion must not be separated from civil
government In its latest decision, the high court ruled against prayer by a rabbi at Providence, R.I., junior
high graduation. The 5-4 ruling continues the court's enforcement of an original doctrine created by the
court in a 1947 decision when it falsified the intent of the First Amendment by only quoting part of
Thomas Jefferson's views on the subject The phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear in the
Constitution, but originated in an 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury (Connecticut) Baptist
Association regarding their fears that the Congregationalists would use the power of government to gain a
favored position.

Jefferson Wanted Christian Government The part of Jefferson's statement quoted by the high court was
that "The First Amendment has erected a wall of separation between church aqd state However, the court
chose to ignore the remainder of Jefferson's comment which continues: "but that wall is a one-directional
wall. It keeps the government from running the church but makes sure that Christian principles will always
stay in government." [Editorial note: According to America's God and Country Encyclopedia of
Quotations, "Jefferson borrowed phraseology from the famous Baptist minister Roger Williams who said,
'...the hedge or wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world, God
hath broke down the wall"' Jefferson went on to say: 'Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies
solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for faith or his worship, that the
legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with solemn
reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law
respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of
separation between Church and State.'

This personal letter reassured the Baptists that the government'shands were tied from interfering with, or in
any way controlling, the affairs and decisions of the churches in America. Thomas Jefferson did not sign
the Constitution, nor was he present at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Neither was he present
when the First Amendment and religious freedom were debated in the first session of Congress in 1789, as
he was out of the country in France as a U.S. Minister. Due to his not being present to hear all the
comments of the Founding Fathers regarding the First Amendment, Thomas Jefferson had to rely on
second-hand information to learn what had transpired in that first session of Congress. This personal letter
to the Danbury Baptists was written 13 years after the First Amendment.

Back to Mr. Fuller's article: The First Amendment simply reads: "Congress hall make no law respecting
the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The amendment came about because
Congress did not want one Christian denomination dictating to the country as had occurred in England and
in Europe. It was never intended as a weapon for the Supreme Court to sweep religion out of government
and education. The decision in 1947 embracing "separation of church and state" was made by court justices
influenced by the doctrines of William James, the father of modern psychology. James strongly opposed
religious principles in both government and education and sought a complete separation.

Repeating Lies

James, like Adolph Hitler,_ recognized tide power of repetition in getting people to believe lies. He said,
"There's nothing so absurd that if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it." Similarly, the
Supreme Court and the mass media have used that technique so successfully that they have indoctrinated
the bulk of the American people into believing the Constitution and the Founding Fathers favored removal
of religion from both government and education. Nothing could be farther from the truth, and in fact, one
dissenting Supreme Court justice wrote in 1958 that "if this court doesn't stop talking about separation of
church and state, someone's going to think it's part of the Constitution."

[Editorial note: Again, let me quote Thomas Jefferson, six years after his letter to the Danbury Baptists.
Letter to Samuel Miller, January 23, 1808: "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted
by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises.
This results not only from the provision of law that shall he made respecting the establishment or free
exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the states the powers not delegated to the U S
government [10th Amendment]. Certainly no power to prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume
authority in religious discipline, has been delegated to the general government. It must then rest with the
states as far as it can be in any human authority."

Remember, the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States were ratified on December
15, 1791. The above letter was written seventeen years after the ratification of the first amendment - which
Jefferson was not a part of - a letter which only defines Jefferson's personal opinion. End of comment]
Back to Mr. Fuller's article : James Madison, the Founding Father most responsible for the Constitution,
said the whole future of America's civilization is not taken on the power of government but rather "upon
the capacity of each and every one of us to govern ourselves according to the 10 Commandments of
God."_ John Quincy Adams said, "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: That it
connected in one dissoluble bond the principles of Christianity with the principles of civil government."

John Jay, the First Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, and a major framer of the Constitution said,
"Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the privilege and
interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer

Textbook are Censored

George Washington's farewell address, considered the most important political speech ever given in
America, has been purged from most of today's school textbooks. Why? Probably because Washington
advocated a course of action considered by today's liberals as "isolationism" in warning that America
should stay out of Europe's intrigues. But there is undoubtedly another reason why Washington's speech
has vanished from the textbooks. America's first President said, "Don't let anyone claim to be a true
American. Don't let them claim the tribute of American patriotism if they ever attempt to remove religion
from politics."

Benjamin Franklin wrote that "Whoever will introduce into public affairs the principles of Christianity will
change the face of the world." Patrick Henry said, "It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that
this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians. Not all religions, but on the gospel of
Jesus Christ."

Founded on Christianity

America is the only nation in history that was founded upon Christianity, which the colonies established
by Christian sects who used biblical principles to establish self-government. indeed, if it hadn't been for the
intellectual and spiritual leadership of the churches, the American Revolution never would have been
fought. Cornwallis, during his surrender at Yorktown, acknowledged the overriding importance of
America's churches in the Revolution, when he threatened that England would ultimately take back the
colonies through subversion of the American churches. The authors of The Christian History of the
Constitution of the United States of America, wrote that "In proportion as Americans let go of faith in the
absolute power of God, they have accepted the belief in an all powerful State. This is true of peoples or
nations, for their ideal of God determines the form of their civil, political, religious and social institutions.
Communism and socialism are anti-God and anti-Christian; the battle against Communism and socialism
never was, and is not now, just economic and political; it is religious. "Consequently, in order to destroy
America and turn it into a socialist paradise, it is first necessary to destroy Christianity by eliminating the
people's faith in God and replacing it with faith in government_. What better way to do this than to banish
all references to God and Christianity in the public schools as the Supreme Court has done repeatedly? In
1962, our anti-American Supreme Court banned school prayer; in 1963 it outlawed Bible reading, and in
1980, itoutlawed the posting of the Ten Commandments in schools where children could see them. The
extreme danger which the absence of moral and religious instruction poses to a nation was well recognized
by John Adams who wrote: "We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human
passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious
people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." [Editorial note: On June 21, 1776, Adams
also said, "Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone,
which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. Only foundation of a free
Constitution is pure and virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People in a greater Measure than they
have it now, they may change their rulers and the forms of government, but they will not obtain a lasting
liberty."
 Test Scores Crash

In fact, since the 1962 and 1963 decisions banning school prayer and Bible reading, SAT scores declined
in schools nationwide for 18 consecutive years, an unprecedented catastrophe. The damage doesn't end
with poor SAT scores. Since the early 1960's America soared to first pace in the western world in
illiteracy, abortions, divorce, violent crime and drug use. What was the rabbi's prayer in Rhode Island that
our illustrious Supreme Court felt compelled to strike down as a mortal threat to the nation? "We give
thanks to you, Lord, for keeping us alive, sustaining us and allowing us to reach this happy occasion."
What will the Supreme Court outlaw next? How about the Declaration of Independence? It mentions God
four times." End of article.

Here's another issue that liberals and the media are so incredibly ignorant about, I can only shake my head.
Regardless of how you feel about this issue, let's work with some facts so that we can all better understand
the historical path that got America to its current state of sickening political correctness and how it relates
to "separation of church and state." The following piece is as factual representation of this subject matter as
I have found except for David Barton's superb film, America's Godly Heritage.

_Supreme Court Ignores Founding Fathers on Prayer Issue

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued another decision undermining the U.S. Constitution and moral
foundations of America. The recent court decision banning prayer at school graduation ceremonies ignores
the intent of the Founding Fathers who clearly believed that religion must not be separated from civil
government In its latest decision, the high court ruled against prayer by a rabbi at Providence, R.I., junior
high graduation. The 5-4 ruling continues the court's enforcement of an original doctrine created by the
court in a 1947 decision when it falsified the intent of the First Amendment by only quoting part of
Thomas Jefferson's views on the subject The phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear in the
Constitution, but originated in an 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury (Connecticut) Baptist
Association regarding their fears that the Congregationalists would use the power of government to gain a
favored position.

Jefferson Wanted Christian Government

The part of Jefferson's statement quoted by the high court was that "The First Amendment has erected a
wall of separation between church and state However, the court chose to ignore the remainder of
Jefferson's comment which continues: "but that wall is a one-directional wall. It keeps the government
from running the church but makes sure that Christian principles will always stay in government."_
[Editorial note: According to America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations, "Jefferson
borrowed phraseology from the famous Baptist minister Roger Williams who said, '...the hedge or wall of
separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world, God hath broke down the
wall...."'

Jefferson went on to say: 'Believing with you that religion is a mattbr which lies solely between man and
his God, that he owes account to none other for faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of
government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of the
whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation
between Church and State.'

This personal letter_ reassured the Baptists that the government's hands were tied from interfering with, or
in any way controlling, the affairs and decisions of the churches in America. Thomas Jefferson did not sign
the Constitution, nor was he present at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Neither was he present
when the First Amendment and religious freedom were debated in the first session of Congress in 1789, as
he was out of the country in France as a U.S. Minister. Due to his not being present to hear all the
comments of the Founding Fathers regarding the First Amendment, Thomas Jefferson had to rely on
second-hand information to learn what had transpired in that first session of Congress. This personal letter
to the Danbury Baptists was written 13 years after the First Amendment. End of editorial note.]

Back to Mr. Fuller's article: The First Amendment simply reads: "Congress hall make no law respecting
the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The amendment came about because
Congress did not want one Christian denomination dictating to the country as had occurred in England and
in Europe. It was never intended as a weapon for the Supreme Court to sweep religion out of government
and education. The decision in 1947 embracing "separation of church and state" was made by court justices
influenced by the doctrines of William James, the father of modern psychology. James strongly opposed
religious principles in both government and education and sought a complete separation.

Repeating Lies

James, like Adolph Hitler, recognized tide power of repetition in getting people to believe lies. He said,
"There's nothing so absurd that if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it." Similarly, the
Supreme Court and the mass media have used that technique so successfully that they have indoctrinated
the bulk of the American people into believing the Constitution and the Founding Fathers favored removal
of religion from both government and education. Nothing could be farther from the truth, and in fact, one
dissenting Supreme Court justice wrote in 1958 that "if this court doesn't stop talking about separation of
church and state, someone's going to think it's part of the Constitution."

[Editorial note: Again, let me quote Thomas Jefferson, six years after his letter to the Danbury Baptists.
Letter to Samuel Miller, January 23, 1808: "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted
by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises.
This results not only from the provision of law that shall he made respecting the establishment or free
exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the states the powers not delegated to the U S
government [10th Amendment]. Certainly no power to prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume
authority in religious discipline, has been delegated to the general government. It must then rest with the
states as far as it can be in any human authority."

Remember, the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States were ratified on December
15, 1791. The above letter was written seventeen years after the ratification of the first amendment - which
Jefferson was not a part of - a letter which only defines Jefferson's personal opinion. End of comment]
Back to Mr. Fuller's article : _James Madison, the Founding Father most responsible for the Constitution,
said the whole future of America's civilization is not
taken on the power of government but rather "upon the capacity of each and every one of us to govern
ourselves according to the 10 Commandments of God." John Quincy Adams said, "The highest glory of
the American Revolution was this: That it connected in one dissoluble bond the principles of Christianity
with the principles of civil government."

John Jay, the First Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, and a major framer of the Constitution
said, "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the
privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christian for their rulers”.

Textbook are Censored

George Washington's farewell address, considered the most important political speech ever given in
America, has been purged from most of today's school textbooks. Why? Probably because Washington
advocated a course of action considered by today's liberals as "isolationism" in warning that America
should stay out of Europe's intrigues. But there is undoubtedly another reason why Washington's speech
has vanished from the textbooks. America's first President said, "Don't let anyone claim to be a true
American. Don't let them claim the tribute of American patriotism if they ever attempt to remove religion
from politics."

Benjamin Franklin wrote that "Whoever will introduce into public affairs the principles of Christianity will
change the face of the world." Patrick Henry said, _"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that
this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians. Not all religions, but on the gospel of
Jesus Christ."

Founded on Christianity

America is the only nation in history that was founded upon Christianity, which the colonies established
by Christian sects who used biblical principles to establish self-government. indeed, if it hadn't been for the
intellectual and spiritual leadership of the churches, the American Revolution never would have been
fought. Cornwallis, during his surrender at Yorktown, acknowledged the overriding importance of
America's churches in the Revolution, when he threatened that England would ultimately take back the
colonies through subversion of the American churches.

The authors of _The Christian History of the Constitution of the United States of America_, wrote that "In
proportion as Americans let go of faith in the absolute power of God, they have accepted the belief in an all
powerful State. This is true of peoples or nations, for their ideal of God determines the form of their civil,
political, religious and social institutions. Communism and socialism are anti-God and anti-Christian; the
battle against Communism and socialism never was, and is not now, just economic and political; it is
religious."

Consequently, in order to destroy America and turn it into a socialist paradise, it is first necessary to
destroy Christianity by eliminating the people's faith in God and replacing it with faith in government_.
What better way to do this than to banish all references to God and Christianity in the public schools as the
Supreme Court has done repeatedly? In 1962, our anti-American Supreme Court banned school prayer; in
1963 it outlawed Bible reading, and in 1980, it outlawed the posting of the Ten Commandments in schools
where children could see them. The extreme danger which the absence of moral and religious instruction
poses to a nation was well recognized by John Adams who wrote:

"We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by
morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly
inadequate for the government of any other." [Editorial note: On June 21, 1776, Adams also said,
"Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone, which can
establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. Only foundation of a free Constitution is
pure and virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People in a greater Measure than they have it now,
they may change their rulers and the forms of government, but they will not obtain a lasting liberty."]

Test Scores Crash

In fact, since the 1962 and 1963 decisions banning school prayer and Bible reading, SAT scores
declined in schools nationwide for 18 consecutive years, an unprecedented catastrophe. The
damage doesn't end with poor SAT scores. Since the early 1960's America soared to first pace in
the western world in illiteracy, abortions, divorce, violent crime and drug use. What was the rabbi's
prayer in Rhode Island that our illustrious Supreme Court felt compelled to strike down as a mortal
threat to the nation? "We give thanks to you, Lord, for keeping us alive, sustaining us and allowing
us to reach this
happy occasion." What will the Supreme Court outlaw next? How about the Declaration of
Independence? It mentions God four times." End of article.

I did not bring this subject up to force anyone to embrace Christianity. But I believe that the architects of
the New World Order have deliberately embarked upon a course of destroying the moral and religious
fiber of this nation - and the attack upon Christianity will be rapidly stepped up in the immediate future.
Why? As a famous Communist by the name of Lenin, said: "Destroy the family, you destroy the country"
and religion from the earliest records of the history of this nation, has been the spiritual bond between
families. Only a fool can't see that since the '60's, the moral fabric of this country has been torn asunder.
What is the one common denominator behind many of our social ills? Lack of belief in God and the Ten
Commandments - remember, Thou shall not kill? Over the past 30 years, life has become very cheap in
America. Why not have an abortion, throw a newborn in a garbage dumpster, 12-year olds blow each other
away in the inner-cities, why not, my sister had an abortion, what's the difference? Remember Thou shall
not steal? Heck, why not, man, the government steals from us and besides. I want that stereo in my
neighbor's house and I ain't got no money man, so what the hell? Remember Thou shall not covet thy
neighbor’s wife? Shoot, infidelity is a national pastime, I mean look at the President of the United States,
while not inhaling his marijuana, he inhales another woman's perfume in the sack while Hillary is off on
another feminist crusade. Remember thou shall not lie? Well, the President of the United States is the most
prolific liar in history, my old man tells some good ones, what's the harm anyway? I mean, character
doesn't matter, that's what the voters of America say. And people keep scratching their heads and
wondering why America's moral foundation looks like the Murrah Building after the bombing in OKC?

America is a Christian nation and it was founded on Christiandoctrine. To attempt to say otherwise is to
deny the very existence of our Republic and history._ Let me ask liberals and politicians a question: What
if 100,000 Catholics went to Israel and demanded that Israel become a Christian country? What if 100,000
Baptists went to Iran and demanded that Iran become a Christian nation? What would happen if 100,000
Presbyterians or Methodists went to Communist China and demanded that China become a Christian
nation? The answer to these questions is without a doubt,_ NO, NO, and NO. So, why then are the liberals,
the Muslims, the Buddhists, the Jews and atheists demanding in the loudest of voices that America can no
longer be a Christian nation, that we should be forced to deny our very history and heritage just to suit
those who come to America to seek religious and personal freedom?

Does this mean that Americans who wish to worship as Muslims, Jews, Mormons or Buddhists can't do
so? Of course not. This is one of the most important aspects of the First Amendment - that you can worship
the religion of your choice. _But I am sick and tired and fed up with all the special interest non-Christian
religious organizations, Congress, the White House and the U.S. Supreme Court doing their absolute
darndest to wipe out Christianity in the United States and deny us our Christian heritage.

There can be no mistake if anyone takes the time to study the hard-core effect at eradication of Christianity
and the Ten Commandments from America, you can see the moral rot and how its spread through all layers
of our society. For those who would like to research this in more depth, I fully recommend David Barton's
outstanding video titled, America's Godly Heritage_ from Wall Builders, P.O. Box 397, Aledo, TX 76008
and the book,_ America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations by William J. Federer, your local
bookseller can order it, just give them the ISBN # 1-880563-09-6.

It is quite amazing how the U S. Supreme Court has evolved over the years, legislating from the bench,
hallucinating their decisions based on a Constitution I've never seen. But then again, look at the people
who make up the court, three of them today are CFR and that spells anti-American. A few words from the
bench back when America as a whole still believed in morals, integrity and character: _"Our laws and our
institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the Redeemer of mankind. It is
impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent, our civilization and our
institutions are emphatically Christian." _The U.S. Supreme Court, 1892, Church of Holy Trinity v. United
States. If there is this big separation of church and state and the liberalsgo ballistic over Christianity, why
then did Congress make the Jewish religion the officially recognized religion of the United States?_ No,
you say? Below is Public Law 102-14 [Hi Res. 104] March 20, 1991:

Education Day, U.S.A Proclamation, Joint Resolution designating

March 26, 1991 as Education Day USA , and it states:

WHEREAS Congress recognizes the historical tradit ion of

ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized
society and upon which our great nation was founded;

WHEREAS these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock
of society from the dawn of civilization, when they are known as the
Seven Noahide Laws;

WHEREAS_ without these ethical values and principle the edifice

of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

_WHEREAS_ society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening

of these principles that have resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten
the fabric of civilized society;

WHEREAS_ the justified preoccupation with these crises must not

let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to
transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished part tot
he generations of the future;

_WHEREAS the Lubavitch movement_ has fostered and promoted

these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

WHEREAS Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement

is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on
March 26, 1991;

WHEREAS in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the

rebbe," this, his ninetieth year, will be seen as one of
"education and giving," the year in which we turn to education
and charity. To return the world to the moral and ethical
values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

WHEREAS this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor

signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state.
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress
 assembled that March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi
Schneerson, leader of _the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is
designated as "Education Day, USA..." The President is requested to
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the U.S. to observe
such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. This resolution
was adopted, ratified and signed into law by George Bush.

The following commentary on this resolution was written by Don Bell, Box 2223, Palm Beach, Fl 33480,
March 1992:

"The Seven Noahide Laws are mentioned twice in Public Law 102-14, but are not spelled out. They seem
difficult to find in English translation. We were not able to find them. A Christian pastor and subscriber
informs us that they appear in a book written by one Rabbi Marvin Antelman, but we haven't been able to
locate the book. However, they can be seen in the Institute of Judaic -Christian Researcher, January, 1990,
in the following form:

(1) Thou shalt not engage in idol worship; (2) Thou shalt not blaspheme God; (3) Thou shalt not shed
innocent blood of a human or fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live; (4) Thou shalt not
engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous or homosexual relations nor commit the act of rape; (5) Thou shalt
not steal; (6) Thou shalt establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws, including the death
penalty for those who kill, administered only if there is one testifying witness; (7) Thou shalt not be cruel
to animals.

Further information concerning the Noahide Laws are found on Page 737 of Encyclopedia Americana: "A
Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws_ given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to
Moses on Mt Sinai and consequently binding all mankind. Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian
Talmud listed the first six commandments ... After the flood a seventh commandment, given-to Noah,
forbade the eating of flesh from living animals (Genesis 9:4). Throughout the ages scholars have viewed
the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a
basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all."_

Now Facts With Comment. In the Bible there is a reference to the Noahic Covenant and the rainbow and
its symbol and promise, _but there is no mention of any Seven Noahide Laws. These come not from the
Bible, but from the Babylonian Talmud._ (The Torah is defined by Webster as "the whole body of Jewish
religious literature including the Scriptures, the Talmud, etc.) Since these laws apply to all mankind, it is
said in Noahidic literature that "The Seven Noahide Laws may now receive recognition as a source of
international law. By stating that the 'ethical principles' which have been 'the bedrock of society from the
dawn of civilization' are the Seven Noahide Laws," Public Law 102-14, provides national recognition to
both a theoretical foundation and the justification for general principles of law

This theoretical foundation anticipates further international recognition by its incorporation in an

'international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state,' and
essaying to 'return to the world' the Seven Noahide Laws for' international law.' Here we see the real reason
for passage of Public Law 102- 14. It is a step towards establishment of a law code for a one world
government " End of comment

Referring to the Seven Noahide Laws, Gordon Ginn, Phd., comments: "A superficial reading of these 'laws'
may elicit a favorable response from those who have not done their homework. But the crux of the matter
is how they are interpreted. For example, if Orthodox Jews interpret them, every Christian would be guilty
of violating number one (Thou shalt not engage in idol worship) because no cross, crucifix, image,
photograph, or anything that could be construed as an icon would be allowed. Christians would be guilty of
violatin g number two (Thou shalt not blaspheme God) because they believe that Jesus Christ was God in
the flesh, and that is blasphemy to the Jews. The Jews believe that Jesus was not the son of God but only a
prophet. Technically, every Christian on the face of the earth could be executed under these laws.
[Editorial note: How about number 7: That it is a violation of the Seven Noahide Laws to eat the flesh of
animals? Shall all Christians then be executed because one witness saw them at Black Angus restaurant
eating a steak? Think about it.]

"Whoever is behind the 'Seven Noahide Laws' is not wasting any time nailing down their dastardly plans
On the day (March 20th) that George Bush signed the resolution into law, the Wall Street Journal carried a
front page story about the Noahides_. And now that we are saddled with this "law," the Noahides are
exploring the feasibility of taking it worldwide through the United Nations._ It seems to me that this fits
right in with Bush's New World Order." End of Ginn quote.

There is more material but due to space constraint, I'll have to leave it up to readers to research this for
themselves. The bottom line is this: It's unconstitutional to display the 10 Commandments anywhere in
public now. Crosses placed at the side of the roa d by people who have lost a loved one are now under
attack because some people are offended by seeing a cross. _But Congress can vote into law the
requirement that Americans adopt the Jewish religion and that these Seven Noahide Laws will now
somehow constitute international law? Isn't this unconstitutional?

Give me a break. Only a fool can't see what's going on here. And why would Congress even consider such
action in favor of one religion over another, say a resolution to support Muslims'? Perhaps this might shed
some light on that question: In an essay reprinted in the May 27, 1996 issue of _The New York Times_,
Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist, reflected somewhat_ sorrowfully on the wanton Israeli killing of more
than 100 Lebanese civilians in April. "We killed them out of a certain
naive nubris. Believing with absolute certitude _THAT NOW WITH THE WHITE HOUSE, THE SENATE AND
MUCH OF THE AMERICAN MEDIA IN OUR HANDS, THE LIVES OF OTHERS DO NOT COUNT SO
MUCH AS OUR OWN."

This is a shocking statement in more ways than one. First of all, what does Mr. Shavit means when he says
the Jews have the White House, the Senate and much of the American media "in our hands?"_ And second,
what does that have anything to do with the "wanton killing of more than 100 Lebanese civilians?" What
does the wanton killing of more than 100 human beings have to do with .Jews having the White House, the
Senate and much of the American media "in our hands?" How does this equate to other people's lives not
being as important as Jewish lives?_ These statements are very serious and should make all Americans,
including those of the Jewish faith, ponder the implications of such words. If you are an American citizen,
your first allegiance should be to America, not Israel or Germany or Canada.

Getting back to a Public Law passed by Congress that America should adopt Jewish laws as the bedrock of
our society; our great nation was not founded on the Seven Noahide Laws or the Jewish religion. It was not
founded on the Catholic Church or the Baptist faith or Buddhism. It was founded on Christianity and the
teachings of Jesus Christ, not a specific religion or church. I am one of the most religiously tolerant people
I know I have read the religious doctrines of more than 30 world religions. I disagree with many of the
precepts of these religions, i.e. that I am the spawn of the Devil as preached in the Islamic religion because
I was born "white." But, as long as someone doesn't try to force their religion on me, as I would not do
unto them, let us live in peace and harmony together. And, let us hope that Public Law 102-14 gets
challenged in court and is struck down because it is grossly unconstitutional to establish any religion as the
religion of the United Stats, never mind the rest of the world.
 Unfortunately, the media and some of these religious "leaders" don't want us to live in peace and
harmony. If we don't agree with their religion, we automatically must be anti-Semitic or anti-something,
just as long as it inflames the passions of the people. Just say no and refuse to be drawn into this race and
religion baiting. If we refuse to play their game, they won't have a battleground and we will win. Divided
we will fall.

"Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern, which have

come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of
Jesus."_ --Thomas Jefferson

Commentary by Joe Farah of World Net Daily April,

1999 Congress and the Ten Commandments